Indoda Dialogue gives Alex men platform to speak freely
The event, organised by FAN Champions For Change, provided a safe platform for men to openly discuss pressing issues such as GBV, HIV, and societal challenges.
Read more: Alex CPF concerned about GBV victims reluctance to press charges
Charles Mphephu, the manager of FAN Champions For Change, emphasised the importance of men speaking out. 'It is significant for men to advocate against gender-based violence. We know that men are not talking, but here it is safe, we created a space for men to open up and talk about their issues.'
Participants tackled topics such as regular HIV testing, and protection, while also stressing the need for continued engagement in men's initiatives such as the Men's Parliament. Mphephu noted that these efforts underscored their commitment to help the Department of Health to reach 1.1 million HIV-positive individuals not yet on treatment.
Also read: Community safety stakeholders strategise for an effective GBV campaign
Stakeholders, including Man of Hope, Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, and Social Development, joined the dialogue to address men's familial and social responsibilities. 'They know that when they talk here, it remains here. The main aim is to go out and have a healthy family, no fighting, no violence, and to stand up against GBV.'
Attendee Khutjo Mabetwa highlighted the power of unity among men. 'When you are a man, one of the things that should be bothering you is, 'Am I playing my role?' No challenge is too big when men stand together.' He further encouraged men to assume their positions as leaders in society and to become actively involved in addressing some of the pressing issues people in the community were grappling with.
Mphephu said that attendees found the dialogue insightful. To mobilise more men to combat GBV and build stronger, healthier communities in Alexandra, he revealed plans to expand its reach to Marlboro Park on May 15.
Follow us on our Whatsapp channel, Facebook, X, Instagram, and TikTok for the latest updates and inspiration! Have a story idea? We'd love to hear from you – join our WhatsApp group and share your thoughts!
Related article: ENSafrica tackles GBV and patriarchy
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
14 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Here's what SA's teen girls want you to know about their state of mind
Think of a young woman's world like a series of circles, each one influencing the next. At the centre is the girl herself — her thoughts, feelings and personal struggles. Around her are her relationships with family and friends, and with school and the community. And then there's the bigger picture: a society fraught with inequality and impossible expectations. Our team of researchers used this framework to make sense of the ways those circles of influence affect the mental health of South Africa's teen girls and young women. The data is limited, but what we do know shows numbers that are staggering. A 2022 study of learners in the Western Cape found that one in three were experiencing symptoms of depression, while research in Mpumalanga showed that just over a quarter did — with girls far more likely to be depressed than boys of the same age. Our earlier work highlighted what we called a sexual and reproductive mental health syndemic — a messy mix of overlapping sexual and reproductive health risks and emotional struggles. When girls feel isolated, unsupported and under constant pressure, it often leads to taking bigger risks, such as having sex with the wrong people for the wrong reasons, or not using a condom, heightening their chances of contracting HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, falling pregnant without planning for it, and mental health problems. Several studies have looked at the social, economic, environmental, physiological and interpersonal factors that play a part in mental health struggles among young people in South Africa. But there has been scant focus on how young women themselves see the different issues influencing their mental health and wellbeing. We sat down with over 50 young women between the ages of 15 and 24 from two communities — one in KwaZulu-Natal and the other in North West — with high rates of HIV, early pregnancy and school drop-outs. What they shared with us showed how stress doesn't just come from one place — it strikes from every angle. But they also told us how despite the challenges they face, they somehow manage to keep it together.
IOL News
20 hours ago
- IOL News
Why South African women still lack access to reproductive health services
Despite South Africa's progressive Constitution guaranteeing sexual and reproductive health rights, women face significant barriers in accessing these services, says the writer. Image: AI Ron South Africa's Constitution articulates one of the world's most progressive visions for human rights. But after 30 years into democracy, the daily reality of women's sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR) boldly contradicts the spirit of that promise. Section 27(1)(a) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa guarantees access to health care services, including reproductive health, to everyone living in the country, regardless of their immigration status. South Africa's legal architecture around SRHR is extensive. Beyond Section 27, the Constitution affirms the right to bodily and psychological integrity under Section 12(2)(a), explicitly including reproductive decision-making. The Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996 translated these rights into policy, permitting abortion on request within the first 12 weeks of pregnancy and under specific conditions thereafter. No parental or spousal consent is required. This is a rare marker of autonomy on the African continent. In theory, SRHR includes far more than abortion. It spans contraception, antenatal and postnatal care, treatment for sexually transmitted infections, cancer screening, and comprehensive sex education. These are essential tools not just for health, but for women's autonomy. Services like antenatal care, family planning, HIV testing, and termination procedures are rights and not privileges in South Africa. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Although South African law guarantees access to SRHR services, several gaps persist, including: • Adolescents face judgment from health workers when requesting contraception, even though the Children's Act allows access from age 12. • Women with disabilities report being denied services due to a lack of trained providers and physical infrastructure. • Many rural clinics lack midwives, specialist doctors, and even running water, turning basic care into a logistical marathon.• Migrant and undocumented women are being denied health services in certain areas, due to their status in the country. The result? Women resort to unsafe abortions, suffer undiagnosed infections, and navigate pregnancies without professional support. Rights exist, but implementation remains uneven, inaccessible, and in some cases, non-existent. Seshni Moodley , admitted attorney , director of Seshni Moodley attorneys incorporated. Image: Supplied The statistics speak volumes. According to the research I conducted for my LLM dissertation—a comparative analysis of women's SRHR in South Africa and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, unsafe abortions account for approximately 52–58% of the 260,000 estimated abortions performed annually in South Africa. Maternal mortality remains disproportionately high in underserved areas. Women with HIV are often denied appropriate fertility treatment or cervical cancer screening, despite being at increased risk. This research also makes it clear that South African women do not lack rights. They lack access. Rights remain theoretical unless they are realised at the point of need, the clinic, the hospital, the mobile unit. Based on the findings in that research, the following recommendations offer a pathway forward: • Implement the National Health Insurance Act: This will equalise access to comprehensive SRHR across socioeconomic lines, including free services at private practitioners for those who need them most. • Deploy more mobile clinics to remote areas: Rural women should not be penalised for their geography. Mobile clinics offer a direct bridge to primary services such as contraception, antenatal care, and family planning. • Increase specialist staff and midwives at public facilities: More obstetricians and gynaecologists, not only in urban centres but rural hospitals, are essential to addressing maternal morbidity. Midwives, often the first contact for SRHR, are a critical resource and their numbers should be increased especially in rural health facilities. This will reduce maternal mortality and improve reproductive outcomes. • Strengthen youth-focused SRHR programming: The National Adolescent SRHR Strategy must be revitalised with consistent sexual education and confidential services in all provinces.• Prioritise reproductive justice for marginalised groups. This includes migrant and undocumented women, women with disabilities, and women living with HIV. All face compounded discrimination in accessing care. Targeted policy shifts and service adaptations are essential. These are not luxuries. They are constitutional obligations and moral imperatives. South Africa's National Human Rights Commission must also step up. Monitoring the implementation of SRHR across public hospitals, rural clinics, and community-based services is central to its mandate. Human rights are not realised in courtrooms alone. They are lived in the everyday spaces where women seek care, and where care is often not available. The bottom line is South African women do not lack rights. They lack access. Until the state commits to investing not only in legislation but in delivery as well as staffing, infrastructure, outreach, and education, then SRHR will remain a constitutional promise, not a public health reality. South African women are still waiting. *Seshni Moodley is an admitted attorney, director of Seshni Moodley attorneys incorporated , with expertise in digital, civil and criminal law. She holds a masters in human rights law and is currently pursuing her PhD in human rights law. Cape Argus
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Doctors Without Borders condemn denial of immigrant healthcare as activists intensify deportation push
Doctors Without Borders highlights healthcare crisis for immigrants in South Africa. Image: DOCTOR NGCOBO/Independent Newspapers Doctors Without Borders (MSF) has raised alarm over what it calls a 'distressing and unacceptable' crisis in South Africa's public healthcare system, where anti-illegal immigrant groups are blocking foreign nationals, many of them pregnant women or patients with chronic illnesses from receiving treatment. MSF says its teams have witnessed patients being turned away from more than half of the 15 healthcare facilities they visited in Gauteng. Groups of between two and 10 individuals, dressed in civilian clothing, have been stationed at clinic gates or inside facilities, demanding identification and refusing entry to those they deem non-South African. In some cases, security staff and healthcare workers were allegedly working in collusion with these anti-migrant groups. "This conduct is highly unacceptable," said MSF spokesperson Jane Rabothata, stressing that South Africa's Constitution guarantees everyone the right to access healthcare services and prohibits the refusal of emergency treatment. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The consequences of the campaign to block illegal immigrants from accessing health care have been dire according to MSF. Many pregnant women with high-risk conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, and HIV, have gone without essential monitoring and treatment, said the organisation. Some HIV patients have reportedly been without their medication for over two weeks, placing their health and public health more broadly at serious risk. One pregnant patient, 16 weeks into her term, told MSF she wished she could terminate her pregnancy because she could not access care, yet feared the consequences of doing so. "Defaulting HIV treatment can have serious complications for individuals and create a broader public health concern," Rabothata warned. However, not everyone agrees with MSF's position. Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma, leader of the March and March Movement, told IOL: "In light of what our Constitution says, illegal immigrants are not even supposed to be in the country. They're supposed to be taken and deported. "In the instance that they need emergency health care, they are welcome to access it but from there, they are meant to be deported. They are not supposed to be on a list for chronic medication, surgeries, getting medical treatment month after month and having multiple babies in the country. That is not what the Constitution says." Ngobese-Zuma claimed some illegal immigrants are stealing medication and taking it to their countries and starting businesses. "This is compromising the lives of South Africans who have no other country to go to and end up having to sleep on the floor without beds in hospitals, wait in queues or take their own money to buy medication from pharmacies." "We're not running a country on emotions, we are running for the wellbeing of the people," she said. South Africans can no longer survive having to share their medical resources with the whole of Africa." MSF emphasised that denying basic or emergency healthcare to migrants risks the spread of communicable diseases such as tuberculosis, HIV, and Covid-19 conditions that do not respect borders or legal status. Untreated illnesses, they warn, could spark outbreaks, increase treatment costs, and further burden the system. The government at the time condemned the protests and reaffirmed that the right to healthcare applies to all, regardless of nationality or documentation. MSF noted that South Africa's commitments to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights reinforce that healthcare is a universal right.
