Families sent wrong bodies after Air India disaster
The Daily Mail reports that at least two cases of mistaken identity had come to light, with one family having to abandon a funeral after being informed their coffin contained an unknown body.
In another case, a coffin contained 'co-mingled' remains of more than one person killed in the flight 171 crash at Ahmedabad in western India on June 12.
The scandal has sparked top-level inquiries in both the UK and India, the Mail reports, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to raise concerns with counterpart Narendra Modi this week.
There were 52 British citizens killed among the 261 people who died after the plane lost power and crashed into a residential area soon after it lifted off to fly to London.
All but one of the 242 people on board died as well as 19 people on the ground.
Aviation lawyer James Healy-Pratt has been engaged to represent UK-based people impacted by the tragedy, with the remains of 12 people repatriated so far.
'I've been sitting down in the homes of these lovely British families over the last month, and the first thing they want is their loved ones back,' he told the Mail.
'But some of them have got the wrong remains and they are clearly distraught over this.
'It has been going on for a couple of weeks (and) I think these families deserve an explanation.'
Mr Healy-Pratt said the family which had received the wrong body had been left 'in limbo' since the devastating discovery was made.
'(They) have no one to bury because it was the wrong person in their casket.
'And if isn't their relative, the question is, who is it in that coffin? Presumably it's another passenger and their relatives have been given the wrong remains.
'The coroner also has a problem because she has an unidentified person in her jurisdiction.'
Investigations continue into how the disaster unfolded, with mounting attention on the actions of lead pilot Captain Sumeet Sabharwal.
Some experts who have reviewed the initial report from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) believe a pilot on turned off two switches controlling fuel flow to the plane's engines.
The first was moved three seconds after lift off and the other one second later, the AAIB report found, before being turned back on a further 10 seconds later.
Fingers have been pointed at Captain Sabharwal because his younger co-pilot, Clive Kunder, would have had his 'hands full' while flying the plane.
Air India's inspection of the locking feature on the fuel control switches of its existing Boeing 787 aircraft found no issues, an internal communication circulated within the airline said on July 17.
India's aviation regulator ordered the country's airlines this week to investigate the locking feature on the switches of several Boeing models.
The order came after Boeing notified operators that the fuel switch locks on its jets were safe.
However, it was in line with a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 2018, which recommended inspection of the locks to ensure they could not be moved accidentally.
Air India's probe found no problems with the locking mechanism.
'Over the weekend, our Engineering team initiated precautionary inspections on the locking mechanism of Fuel Control Switch (FCS) on all our Boeing 787 aircraft,' the airline's flight operations department said in a communication to its pilots.
'The inspections have been completed and no issues were found.'
A spokesperson for the UK government told the Mail formal identification of the bodies was a 'matter for the Indian authorities'.
'We understand that this is an extremely distressing time for the families, and our thoughts remain with them,' they said.
– with AFP.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
3 hours ago
- The Australian
India defies Donald Trump on Russian oil despite tariff threats
India is digging in its heels and resisting pressure from the US to curb purchases of Russian oil, despite threats by President Trump to retaliate by imposing higher tariffs on India. Last week, Trump said he would place a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports to the US in retaliation for India's large-scale purchases of cheap Russian oil. Then, on Monday, the president said he would be 'substantially raising' tariffs on Indian goods — on top of the 25 per cent duty — because of the 'massive amounts' of Russian oil that India buys. India has nonetheless refused to back down and has suggested that it intends to continue to buy Russian oil. Political experts said that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is calculating that Trump will decide that ties between the two countries are ultimately too critical to jeopardise in a trade spat. Many Indian experts believe that Trump is spotlighting the issue to gain short-term leverage in ongoing trade negotiations with New Delhi — and that he will drop it once a deal is signed. In recent years, the US has grudgingly accepted India's close ties with Russia, despite occasional protests, because New Delhi is considered a crucial partner in countering China's growing power. 'The view is that this is not going to affect the overall relationship, and that we don't have to kowtow,' said Sreeram Chaulia, dean at O.P. Jindal Global University's School of International Affairs in Sonipat, India. India has taken advantage of discounted oil prices from Russia following Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. By late 2024, India accounted for over one-third of Russia's oil exports, second only to China at nearly 50 per cent, according to the Observer Research Foundation, an Indian think tank. Before the war, India bought most of its oil from Gulf countries. New Delhi has repeatedly defended its purchases of Russian oil as necessary to support its economy and keep energy prices steady for its huge population. In a Monday statement, India's Foreign Ministry said that its imports of Russian oil ramped up only after its traditional supplies were diverted to European countries during the Ukraine war. The ministry also accused the US and the EU of operating a double standard — continuing to trade with Russia while penalising others for doing the same. 'The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable,' it added. When facing pressure from bigger powers, India has also historically defended its autonomy in foreign policy, Chaulia said. That independent streak surprised many when New Delhi remained neutral on Russia's invasion of Ukraine despite a volley of criticism. Over the weekend, Modi vigorously defended India's right to prioritise its own economic wellbeing at a time of global uncertainty. 'Today, the world economy is going through many apprehensions, there is an atmosphere of instability,' Modi said in a speech during a Saturday rally in the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. 'In such a situation, the countries of the world are focusing on their respective interests.' He urged Indians to boost the economy by buying and selling only homegrown products 'made by the sweat of an Indian.' The White House has rapidly ratcheted up pressure on India as Trump looks for ways to push President Vladimir Putin toward ending the Ukraine war. Trump has vowed to impose tariffs on countries that do business with Moscow, and threatened India with a 'penalty' for continuing to buy Russian goods. Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House and a top aide to Trump, accused India on Sunday of taking advantage of the US on trade and financing the war by buying Russian oil. He also took aim at India's protectionist policies. 'India portrays itself as being one of our closest friends in the world, but they don't accept our products. They impose massive tariffs on us,' Miller said on Fox News. A sticking point in negotiations is the US's push to open India's agricultural and dairy markets to foreign products, a politically sensitive issue for Modi. But India could pacify Trump in other ways, experts said, such as agreeing to big investments in the US that will allow him to claim a win. Wall Street Journal The Wall Street Journal Congress could limit the mutually assured political destruction as partisans move to redistrict more than once a decade. The Wall Street Journal The White House is preparing to step up pressure against big banks over perceived discrimination against conservatives and crypto companies.
The Australian
13 hours ago
- The Australian
Imperial Trump shows how to get things done
While Sir Keir Starmer's Labour government toils ineffectually with a majority of 170 seats in the House of Commons in a parliamentary democracy once described as an elective dictatorship, Trump rules like a monarch in a federative political system specifically designed to limit the power of any one branch of government, where his party has majorities of just a handful in both houses of the legislature. Consider what, in less than six months, Trump has achieved so far in his second term. That slender Republican majority in Congress has passed one of the most consequential pieces of domestic legislation in the past 50 years. No chaotic and destructive backbench rebellions here: just a few squawks of protest from some isolated Republican critics. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) enshrines in permanent law deep corporate and personal tax cuts (take that, Kemi Badenoch), makes significant reductions in welfare programmes (eat your heart out, Rachel Reeves), while spending heavily on defence and border security (how do you like that, Nigel Farage?). Though the bill adds trillions of dollars to an already heaving pile of federal government debt, the yield on ten-year US government bonds is down from the day Trump took office (can anyone say 'Liz Truss"?). Small boats may continue to wash up on Britain's shores in great numbers but in just five months Trump has in effect stopped illegal immigration into the US. The latest data from Customs and Border Protection show that there were 6,000 illegal border crossings into the US in May, down from 80,000 in May of last year and a monthly peak of 250,000 in December 2023. Deportations of those here illegally are accelerating. Daily arrests of suspected illegal immigrants are running at around 750, up from 350 on average in the previous decade. The fanfare over his 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April gave way to a quiet climbdown as he paused or cut most of the duties, and just as quietly, elevated levels of tariffs have remained in place on most imports into the US, radically changing the economic system. The Budget Lab, a nonpartisan economic research unit at Yale University, estimates that the average tariff paid by American importers today stands at around 15 per cent, up from 3 per cent before Trump took office and the highest level since 1938. Despite this, and the panicked warnings of economic Armageddon that would follow such an embrace of protectionism, the US economy continues to grow at a fair clip. Yesterday (Thursday) the Labor Department reported another month of job gains in June - 147,000 - and the unemployment rate remained near its recent low of 4.1 per cent. While the president has suffered a slew of defeats in court over the scope of his volley of executive orders on immigration, government spending, universities and other matters, he has won the biggest cases, affirming his unprecedented bid for expanded executive authority. Last week the Supreme Court ruled that a lower court judge cannot issue a nationwide injunction against a presidential mandate but can only limit his powers within a relatively narrow geography confined to the actual litigants. His opponents had been using such injunctions in effect to stymie much of Trump's programme. Now that's off the table. His domestic political enemies are divided, confused and finding themselves increasingly tempted by a destructive extremism likely only to rally support behind Trump. To the alarm of more moderate Democrats, the most prominent figures in the party have been helping illegal immigrants violently defy immigration enforcement; denouncing presidential actions against the nation's enemies, and defending the 'free speech' of jihadi-supporting students and demonstrators. The party's current leading figures in the media are a pair of thirtysomething self-described 'democratic socialists": Zohran Mamdani, the party's candidate for mayor of New York City; and his fellow New Yorker, congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. On the world stage, Trump has shown he is an eager exponent of the imperial presidency. His territorial threats against Greenland and Canada have, mercifully and predictably, come to nought. But his activism in defence and foreign policy has yielded significant results. Last week Nato members agreed to do what every American president for the past 40 years has tried to get them to do: significantly raise their contribution to the alliance's total defence spending. By ordering an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities last month, he demonstrated his willingness to take the sort of military action against the country from which his predecessors have all shied away. There is no sign of the end to the Russia-Ukraine war he promised, but Israel and Hamas seem to be on the brink of a ceasefire he has spent a good deal of time trying to organise. There are plenty of caveats. While it's hard to dispute that Trump has got so much done, we don't yet know what exactly he has done. The effect of tariffs on the economy has still not been fully realised and may yet produce headwinds. The Big Beautiful Bill Act's fiscal costs could come to worry bond markets and its political effects could haunt Republicans. The strike on Iran may have only increased Tehran's determination to get the bomb. Ukraine could yet stain his presidential record. The authoritarian way he has wielded executive power may be badly damaging the foundations of America's constitutional republic. But for now, on this July 4, as the US enters the 250th year since its rejection of kingship, what better way to celebrate than by crowning an emperor? Read related topics: Donald Trump
SBS Australia
16 hours ago
- SBS Australia
SBS News in Filipino, Tuesday 5 August 2025
Honeylet Avanceña claims she's barred from visiting former President Duterte at the ICC detention centre. Chinese national faces court in Canberra over foreign interference charges. Philippines and India mark 75 years of diplomatic ties; leaders expected to discuss economic and trade cooperation. 📢 Where to Catch SBS Filipino
