
Canfor reports results for the first quarter of 2025.
Overview.
Q1 2025 operating loss of $29 million; shareholder net loss of $31 million, or $0.26 per share.
Increase in North American lumber prices through Q1 2025 driven largely by supply constraints amid rising global economic and trade uncertainty; improved results from Western Canada following rationalization in 2024, combined with another quarter of solid earnings from Europe.
Improved results for Canfor Pulp as global softwood pulp market fundamentals saw modest improvement early in the quarter.
Financial results.
The following table summarizes select financial information for the Company for the comparative periods:
(millions of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts)
Q1 2025
Q4 2024
Q1 2024
Sales
$
1,417.5
$
1,285.7
$
1,382.7
Reported operating income before amortization
$
72.6
$
52.7
$
19.8
Reported operating loss
$
(28.5)
$
(45.9)
$
(85.8)
Adjusted operating income (loss) before amortization 1
$
68.9
$
16.6
$
(10.4)
Adjusted operating loss 1
$
(32.2)
$
(82.0)
$
(116.0)
Net loss 2
$
(31.0)
$
(63.3)
$
(64.5)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted 2
$
(0.26)
$
(0.53)
$
(0.54)
Adjusted net loss 1, 2
$
(38.1)
$
(39.9)
$
(52.1)
Adjusted net loss per share, basic and diluted 1, 2
$
(0.32)
$
(0.33)
$
(0.44)
1. Adjusted results referenced throughout this news release are defined as non-IFRS financial measures. For further details, refer to the "Non-IFRS Financial Measures" section of this document.
2. Attributable to equity shareholders of the Company.
The Company reported an operating loss of $28.5 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to an operating loss of $45.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. After taking into consideration a $3.7 million reversal of a previously recognized inventory write-down, the Company's adjusted operating loss was $32.2 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to a similarly adjusted operating loss of $82.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2024. These results largely reflected improved lumber segment results and, to a lesser extent, the pulp and paper segment.
Commenting on the Company's first quarter of 2025 results, Canfor's President and Chief Executive Officer, Susan Yurkovich said, "While improved North American lumber benchmark prices provided some relief this quarter, rising global economic and trade uncertainty, in addition to the already punitive US softwood lumber duties, create a challenging backdrop and a period of significant uncertainty for our lumber business. Through our diversified operating platform in Canada, the US South and Europe, we are positioned to mitigate these challenges, while remaining focused on what we can control, including operating safely and efficiently, working with our customers, and continuing to be flexible and responsive.
"For our pulp business" Yurkovich added, "this was another solid quarter with improved results and a strong operational performance. However, global economic uncertainty is also putting pressure on global softwood pulp markets in the near term."
First quarter lumber segment highlights.
For the lumber segment, the operating loss was $25.5 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to the previous quarter's operating loss of $36.6 million. After taking into consideration the aforementioned inventory adjustment, the Company's lumber segment adjusted operating loss was $29.2 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to a similarly adjusted operating loss of $72.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2024.
These results principally reflected improved results from the Company's North American operations, most notably in Western Canada, combined with another quarter of solid earnings from its European operations. For the quarter overall, results reflected generally improved North American lumber benchmark pricing through most of the period, an uplift in European market pricing, and a 2 cent, or 3%, weaker Canadian dollar versus the US-dollar combined with a 4% weaker Canadian dollar versus the Swedish Krona ("SEK"). These factors were combined with an increase in production and shipments, predominantly in the US South, largely driven by the ongoing ramp-up of the Company's Urbana sawmill in Arkansas following its modernization and expansion project, as well as its greenfield sawmill in Axis, Alabama. These positive drivers were tempered, to a degree, by a decrease in Western Spruce/Pine/Fire ("SPF") production and shipments following the closures in the previous period, as well as an ongoing escalation in European log costs.
Overall, North American lumber markets experienced a modest improvement in the first quarter of 2025. Despite solid underlying long-term fundamentals, affordability challenges and economic and political instability, driven primarily by concerns over potential US tariffs, continued to weigh on demand in the current period. Reduced supply from mill closures and market-related curtailments in Western Canada, coupled with weather-related disruptions in the US South, however, led to an increase in most North American lumber benchmark prices quarter-over-quarter.
In Japan, improved demand in the multi-family rental and non-residential segments through the first quarter of 2025 was combined with fewer imports into the region, which led to an uptick in pricing in the current period. In contrast, demand in China remained muted throughout the current quarter, as the real estate market continued to face difficulties despite the government's ongoing efforts to stimulate the economy. These demand factors were met with lower supply and resulted in relatively flat and subdued pricing in the region quarter-over-quarter.
European lumber pricing experienced a moderate improvement through the first quarter of 2025, principally reflecting ongoing log supply constraints and high log prices, which lowered lumber inventories in the region and gave rise to pricing pressure in the current period.
Lumber segment outlook.
Looking ahead, North American lumber markets are anticipated to experience continued volatility and uncertainty throughout the second quarter of 2025. Ongoing affordability challenges and tariff-related disruptions to traditional trade flows are projected to result in tepid demand in the near term.
In addition to the pre-existing countervailing and anti-dumping duty impacts on the Company, Canfor continues to monitor the trade situation between Canada and the US. With a diversified global operating platform, the Company is positioned to mitigate some of these costs. However, potential tariffs do present challenges for the Company's Canadian operations. As a result, the Company is continuing to focus on domestic markets, as well as strengthening its presence in non-US markets.
In Japan, lumber demand and pricing are anticipated to continue to improve through the second quarter of 2025 as a result of ongoing strength in the multi-family rental and non-residential sectors, coupled with relatively lean inventory levels in the region. In China, the subdued market conditions experienced in the first quarter of 2025 are forecast to continue through the second quarter.
In Europe, lumber supply is projected to remain under pressure in the second quarter of 2025 as a result of ongoing log supply constraints and persistently high log prices in the region. This constrained lumber supply, when combined with an anticipated slight improvement in affordability, is forecast to result in an uplift in European lumber prices in the second quarter.
First quarter pulp and paper segment highlights.
For the pulp and paper segment, operating income was $10.8 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to $4.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2024. These results were largely driven by a modest uplift in Canfor Pulp Product Inc.'s ("CPPI") average Northern Bleached Softwood Kraft ("NBSK") pulp unit sales realizations in the current quarter combined with a 6% increase in pulp production compared to the fourth quarter of 2024.
Global softwood pulp market fundamentals experienced some positive improvement during the first quarter of 2025, with modest strength observed early in the quarter, particularly in China, as global pulp producer inventory levels began to stabilize. As the quarter progressed, however, this momentum diminished as global economic and trade uncertainty rose. As a result, US-dollar NBSK list prices to China, the world's largest pulp consumer, started the year at US$770 per tonne and saw a modest increase through the current period, ending March at US$798 per tonne. For the current quarter overall, US-dollar NBSK pulp list prices to China averaged US$793 per tonne, up US$26 per tonne, or 3%, from the prior quarter.
Pulp and paper segment outlook.
While global pulp demand and pulp producer inventory levels are currently stable, looking ahead, global softwood pulp markets are anticipated to remain subdued as increasing uncertainty associated with economic concerns and potential trade disruptions weigh on market conditions.
Like Canfor, CPPI continues to monitor the trade situation between Canada and the US and is prepared with mitigation plans to mostly offset the impact should tariffs on US shipments be imposed. CPPI is also monitoring the broader global trade situation. With its high quality, specialty product offering and market diversification, CPPI is positioned to respond to any potential tariffs.
In addition, CPPI will continue to evaluate operating conditions and adjust operating rates at its pulp mills to align with economically viable fibre supply. These factors could also affect CPPI's operating plan, liquidity, cash flows and the valuation of long-lived assets.
Looking forward, CPPI has revised its maintenance schedule for the second half of 2025. A maintenance outage is now scheduled in the third quarter of 2025 at CPPI's Intercon Pulp mill and at its Paper machine. This maintenance outage is projected to reduce both NBSK market pulp production and paper production by 2,000 tonnes each. In the fourth quarter of 2025, a maintenance outage is now scheduled at CPPI's Northwood Pulp mill which is projected to reduce NBSK market pulp production by 10,000 tonnes.
Additional information and conference call.
A conference call to discuss the first quarter's financial and operating results will be held on Friday, May 9, 2025, at 9:00 AM Pacific time. To participate in the call, please dial Toll-Free 1-888-510-2154. For instant replay access until May 23, 2025, please dial Toll-Free 1-888-660-6345 and enter participant pass code 27122#.
The conference call will be webcast live and will be available at www.canfor.com. This news release, the attached financial statements and a presentation used during the conference call can be accessed via the Company's website at www.canfor.com/investor-relations/webcasts.
Non-IFRS financial measures.
Throughout this press release, reference is made to certain non-IFRS financial measures which are used to evaluate the Company's performance but are not generally accepted under IFRS and may not be directly comparable with similarly titled measures used by other companies. The following table provides a reconciliation of these non-IFRS financial measures to figures reported in the Company's condensed consolidated interim financial statements:
3. Attributable to equity shareholders of the Company.
Forward-looking statements.
Certain statements in this press release constitute "forward-looking statements" which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Words such as "expects", "anticipates", "projects", "intends", "plans", "will", "believes", "seeks", "estimates", "should", "may", "could", and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are based on Management's current expectations and beliefs and actual events or results may differ materially. There are many factors that could cause such actual events or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements to differ materially from any future results expressed or implied by such statements. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and Canfor assumes no obligation to update such information to reflect later events or developments, except as required by law.
About Canfor Corporation.
Canfor is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-value low-carbon forest products including dimension and specialty lumber, engineered wood products, pulp and paper, wood pellets and green energy. Proudly headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canfor produces renewable products from sustainably managed forests, at more than 50 facilities across its diversified operating platform in Canada, the United States and Europe. The Company has a 77% stake in Vida AB, Sweden's largest privately owned sawmill company and also owns a 54.8% interest in Canfor Pulp Products Inc. Canfor shares are traded on The Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol CFP. For more information visit canfor.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Brokenhead Ojibway Nation votes against proposed silica mining partnership
Members of Brokenhead Ojibway Nation (BON) have voted against a proposed partnership with a silica mining company following a community referendum held last week. According to results shared by the First Nation on Facebook, 310 ballots were cast. A total of 181 members voted 'no' to the proposal, while 129 voted 'yes.' In the social media post, Chief and council thanked community members for participating and said they respect the outcome. 'Any proposal to extract resources from our territory must be presented to our membership,' the post read. 'This is the expectation of BON for all resource development proponents and is an important step in ensuring our members are meaningfully involved in decision-making.' The leadership said the referendum will serve as a foundation for developing clearer, community-driven processes for future engagement. Brokenhead Ojibway Nation is located about 70 kilometres northeast of Winnipeg.


Toronto Sun
4 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
LILLEY: Softwood lumber tariffs soar as Mark Carney's plan fails to deliver
The Prime minister claimed to be the man with the plan, but that plan is clearly not working Get the latest from Brian Lilley straight to your inbox Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks during a press conference after a Cabinet meeting to discuss both trade negotiations with the US and the situation in the Middle East, at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada on July 30, 2025. Photo by DAVE CHAN / AFP via Getty Images No deal is better than a bad deal – that's the message Prime Minister Mark Carney and his team keep selling to Canadians as their efforts to find a deal with Donald Trump falter. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account That message became harder to sell Friday night as duties on softwood lumber skyrocketed to 35%. It's a major blow to Canada's industry, which a year ago saw duties rise from 8.05% to 14.54% under the Biden administration. The Trump administration had recently bumped those tariffs up further to 20.56% and now, as of Friday night, the total cumulative tariff is 35.19%. B.C.'s Forestry Minister Ravi Parmar called the move 'absurd and reckless,' but in the early hours after the change was made public there was no comment from the Carney government. Since Carney won the election, tariffs on steel and aluminum have gone from 25% to 50%, copper has had a 50% tariff added to it, anything related to automotive deemed not compliant with CUSMA has a 50% tariff, general exports not covered by CUSMA have a 35% tariff and now so too does softwood lumber. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Read More This wasn't what Mark Carney was promising as he campaigned to lead the country. 'I know the President, I've dealt with the President in the past in my previous roles when he was in his first term, and I know how to negotiate,' Carney said during the Liberal leadership race that led to him becoming PM. We've gone from Carney saying he knows Trump and how to negotiate to saying no deal is better than a bad one while the Americans don't return his calls and tariffs continue to rise. Carney has completely changed his tune on the impact of tariffs and Trump's impact on the Canadian economy. During the election campaign he portrayed Trump's tariffs as a existential threat to Canada, that the U.S. President was trying to break us – now, it's no big deal. 'We're in a situation right now where 85% of our trade with the United States is tariff free,' Carney said Friday when asked about the situation. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. That's true to a degree now, but it was also true when Carney was whipping up fear in the population, talking about elbows up and driving a huge anti-American sentiment for political gain. He's only shifted to this latest message when it became clear Canada wasn't getting a deal by the Aug. 1 deadline set by Trump. As I noted in a recent column, we went from the Trump administration – senior officials like Howard Lutnick and Jamieson Greer – calling Canada a top priority for a trade deal in March to where we are today. The Americans have lost interest in talking to Carney's team, and they have described the tactic as not really negotiating, just making demands. Again, that's not what Carney promised. It takes two to tango in any scenario, but when every other G7 country is now covered by a deal and when Mexico has an extension and exemption from further tariffs, maybe it's time to ask if we are the problem and change tactics. Whatever Carney and his team have been doing clearly has not been working. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Carney hasn't spoken to Trump since June 26; that was the day our PM told the Americans we were going ahead with the Digital Services Tax. The next day, Trump broke off all talks with Canada and two days later Carney announced he was cancelling the DST. Since then, we've had several tariff increases and a jobs report showing 51,000 full-time jobs lost last month. One of the slogans Carney liked to use during the election was that a plan beats no plan. I'd love to hear what he says about what to do when a plan clearly isn't working. blilley@ Toronto Blue Jays Sunshine Girls Sunshine Girls Editorials Tennis


Calgary Herald
6 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: Walking the walk(shed) on transit-oriented development in Calgary
Article content As a Calgarian who has spent time living outside of Alberta, I am accustomed to people asking what makes this province unique, beyond the stereotypes. My answer is often a simple one: Albertans are doers, not talkers or virtue-signallers. Article content When it comes to land use and urban planning, however, the City of Calgary has generally failed to live up to the action-oriented standard its residents expect. Article content Article content Article content Calgary has laudable goals as a city, as outlined in its Municipal Development Plan. One of these objectives relates to transit-oriented development (TOD), which is rooted in the principle that public transit nodes should be surrounded by dense, mixed-use communities, allowing the greatest number of people to benefit from the investment in transit infrastructure. Article content Article content Transit-oriented development benefits are wide-reaching. In financial terms, it ensures a better return on investment by encouraging more residents to use public transit. At a basic level, this helps Calgary Transit fund itself. It also reduces traffic congestion, alleviates strain on feeder bus routes, lowers greenhouse gas emissions and encourages healthier commute patterns through riders walking or cycling to and from stations. Greater revenue for Calgary Transit also allows the agency to reinvest these funds into better frequency and service. Article content Article content Opponents of the recent citywide upzoning initiative often claim that the 'burden' of density should fall within a certain radius of these transit nodes rather than in their communities. Even the most car- and single-family-home-loving city councillors vaunt the benefits of transit-oriented development, arguing that if density must happen (which it does, to boost housing supply and lower prices), that it should happen near transit stations so as not to induce greater vehicular traffic in low-rise communities. Article content While I would argue that the 'burden' of modest citywide densification is overstated, it is fair to suggest that the most dense forms of development should be reserved for transit nodes. If all sides of the housing debate purport to support TOD, why do we see less of it in Calgary than almost any other major city in Canada? Article content The simple answer: the city refuses to legalize it, with more than 70 per cent of residentially zoned land within a 10-minute walk of most CTrain stations being reserved for very low-density homes. Article content In the North American context, transit-oriented development can be thought of in two ways: public-private partnerships to build on city-owned land around stations (e.g., park-and-rides) and private or non-profit developments on privately owned parcels near a station. The city's current strategy relies on the former approach. Article content While developing on city-owned land is necessary, it won't lead to enough growth in housing stock for Calgary to meet its housing objectives and create truly desirable transit-friendly communities. Development on privately owned parcels near LRT stations must accompany the public lands approach. Article content Unfortunately, this is made nearly impossible in Calgary due to antiquated and unambitious zoning policies. Article content Article content Using publicly available land-use data from the City of Calgary and GIS tools, I dug into Calgary's situation and found the overwhelming majority of land near CTrain stations zoned for residential use prohibits both medium- and high-scale density of any kind. Article content Let's dig into the numbers. Article content Calgary's total area is 853 square kilometres, 29.3 per cent of which is zoned for low-density residential use. Only 4.2 per cent and 0.3 per cent (2.2 square kilometres) is zoned for medium- or high-density residential use, respectively. This means that 33.7 per cent of Calgary is zoned for residential use, of which the majority (87 per cent) is zoned for low-density exclusively. The rest of Calgary is zoned for uses such as parks, commercial, industrial, utilities and institutions. Article content Ideally, the 4.5 per cent of Calgary's land zoned for medium- or high-density residential use would be concentrated around CTrain (or MAX BRT) stations. Article content Article content Rather than draw a generic radius around each station, I calculated an isochrone — or a 10-minute 'walkshed' — around each of Calgary's 45 CTrain stations. On a map, this creates a shape that represents everything within a 10-minute walk of each station (assuming a walk speed of five km/h). These walksheds take into account sidewalk access, local geography and other features. Article content If Calgary were serious about enabling transit-oriented development, all land zoned for residential use within a 10-minute walk of each CTrain station would be zoned for medium- or high-density residential use. Article content Medium-density residential includes townhouses and fourplexes. High-density residential refers to any development greater than five storeys. In an ideal TOD world, no residential land within these walksheds would be zoned for low-density residential, which in Calgary largely refers to single-family homes and, more recently, rowhouses and duplexes. Article content Of course, much of the land surrounding CTrain stations is zoned for other important non-residential uses. This is important to facilitate job access for workers and provide transit connections to amenities such as parkland and hospitals. While one might persuasively argue that more land around CTrain stations should be zoned for some kind of residential use, let us put that conversation to the side for now and focus exclusively on land already zoned for residential use, regardless of how much density is permitted. Article content Of Calgary's 45 CTrain stations, 33 (almost all outside the downtown) have land zoned for some kind of low-density residential use within a 10-minute walk. On average, 29 per cent of the areas within a 10-minute walk of these 33 stations is zoned exclusively for low-density residential use. For at least four of these stations, that number surpasses 50 per cent. On the surface, this may not seem like a bad percentage. Surely this would imply that the rest of the residential land within these walksheds is zoned for medium- or high-density. Article content Article content A deeper look at the data, however, demonstrates this not to be the case. Article content Only 12 per cent of Calgary's 36 square kilometres zoned for medium-density residential use are within a CTrain walkshed; for high-density residential, this share is 19 per cent. Put more simply: 71 per cent of the residentially zoned land within a 10-minute walk of the 33 CTrain stations is zoned exclusively for low-density residential use. Article content Where the city does allow homes to be built near transit stations outside of downtown, it overwhelmingly refuses to allow anything denser than a duplex. How can Calgary expect to foster car-light, transit-oriented communities when its own zoning policies quite literally prohibit it from doing so? Article content Calgary should take its lead from other forward-looking municipalities across the country and proactively upzone the areas near its CTrain stations. This would send a strong signal that Calgary is serious about tackling the housing crisis and cultivating the kind of communities that many newcomers and skilled workers want to live in.