logo
13 Of The Biggest Frozen Food Recalls Of All Time

13 Of The Biggest Frozen Food Recalls Of All Time

Yahoo2 days ago

While you may have thought frozen foods were safer, it turns out that some of the biggest recalls of all time have been frozen food recalls. There are all kinds of things that can go wrong with frozen food. Like with any other food, they can end up with undeclared allergens, or foreign objects can find their way into the foods at the factory. However, what you may not have realized is that many bacteria and viruses don't die at the temperatures they encounter in your freezer. So, if you're not cooking frozen foods or not cooking them long enough, you can still be at risk from pathogens that end up in frozen foods.
While there have been plenty more frozen food recalls than the ones listed, these were the biggest in terms of pounds of food recalled, number of people hospitalized, and even lives lost. Yet, many times, it seems that routine food inspections may have caught recallable issues before they became tragic events. Our list of the 13 biggest frozen food recalls of all time starts in 2025 with the most recent large frozen food recalls and goes all the way back to 2007.
Read more: 11 Frozen Chicken Entrees, Ranked Worst To Best
The February 2025 Lyons ReadyCare and Sysco Imperial Frozen Supplement Shakes are the deadliest on our list. A total of 17 flavors of shakes were recalled because of possible contamination with listeria monocytogenes, which turned out to be deadly in this case. So, it was a "big" recall in terms of lives lost rather than physical quantities of food recalled.
One thing that made this outbreak so deadly was the fact that all the shakes had been sent to long-term care facilities. With two of the categories of people who are most at risk from listeria outbreaks being people who are age 65 and older and those who are immunocompromised, you can start to understand what a nightmare this outbreak became. Another problem is that listeria can survive and even grow in temperatures as low as 31 degrees Fahrenheit. Some frozen foods with listeria don't cause such havoc because they're ultimately cooked before consumption, but shakes are consumed cold.
The tainted products were manufactured by Prairie Farms and distributed by Lyons Magnus all over the U.S. Thus, 42 people from 21 different states fell ill. Of the people that it sickened, 41 ended up in the hospital, and 14 died by the end of the ordeal. Interestingly, Lyons Magnus had a previous beverage recall in 2022 after the FDA found various pathogens in its facility, but this is the first recall that has resulted in deaths.
The next big frozen food recall on our list is the BrucePac one in October 2024, which involved over 11.7 million pounds of frozen ready-to-eat meat and poultry products being recalled over listeria concerns. The products had made their way to kitchens making food for large quantities of people, such as schools and institutions, as well as restaurants. Plus, there were plenty of products in the recall that were available in the freezer section of regular grocery stores, especially ready-to-eat frozen TV dinners, like ones from Atkins, Boston Market, Target, Michelina's, Trader Joe's, and many more.
A recall was enacted after the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) found listeria in some of the ready-to-eat products at BrucePac in Durant, Oklahoma, during routine inspections. The products FSIS was concerned about were ones that had been produced during a period of a little over four months between May 31 and October 8, 2024.
Not only does listeria pose a large risk to people over the age of 65 and those with compromised immune systems, but it's also a big risk to pregnant people and the unborn. Luckily, FSIS doesn't list any related hospitalizations or deaths related to this particular listeria recall.
In March 2023, over 325,000 pounds of Scenic Fruit Company frozen organic strawberries were recalled for their potential of being laced with hepatitis A. The strawberries had gone out to several grocery stores and clubs, like Aldi, Costco, and Trader Joe's, under six different brand names.
The hepatitis A virus doesn't die off when frozen and needs to be heated to at least 185 degrees Fahrenheit to inactivate it. So, unless people cooked their frozen strawberries, eating them was quite risky. Ultimately, at least 10 people ended up catching hepatitis A from the strawberries, resulting in four hospitalizations in four states.
The strawberries had all been imported from a farm in Baja California, Mexico. The farm was the source of a genetically identical hepatitis A outbreak in 2022, which triggered proactive disease prevention strategies for the growers in the region as well as FDA import screening strategies for crops coming from that region in the future.
Rather than the Nestlé Hot Pockets recall in January of 2021 being about the potential for disease, nearly 763,000 pounds were recalled because of foreign object contamination. Several customers contacted the company to complain about finding glass or hard plastic in their Hot Pockets.
Luckily, Nestlé only had to recall 12 packs of Premium Pepperoni Pizza Garlic Butter Crust Hot Pockets with four different batch codes from products produced between November 13 and 16 of 2020. A total of four customers contacted Nestlé after they bit down on what appeared to be clear plastic or glass. The company enacted a recall for fear that the pieces could cause choking or lacerations if big or sharp enough. Although there was the potential for worse injuries or even death, thankfully, only one customer reported a minor mouth injury associated with the glass or plastic that was in the Hot Pocket they were eating.
In May of 2019, Conagra Brands in Russellville, Arkansas, recalled close to 2.1 million pounds of P.F. Chang's frozen food entrées from food shelves because it failed to list milk among its ingredients. Since the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act went into effect in 2006, we've seen a lot more food recalls happen because of labels that don't include food allergen warning information.
The USDA noticed the mislabeling problem when they were doing a routine label check. Since milk wasn't listed among the ingredients for P.F. Chang's Home Menu Chicken Pad Thai and P.F. Chang's Chicken Fried Rice, it triggered a recall. The offending items had production dates that spanned a little over six months between October 1, 2018, and April 11, 2019. All in all, more than 1 million products were included in the recall. Luckily, there were no reports of anyone allergic to milk who became sick from eating these products.
Another frozen food recall related to foreign object contamination was the 2018 Wayne Farms ready-to-eat frozen chicken recall. By the time the recall was complete, nearly 439,000 pounds of frozen chicken had been recalled.
A customer called to complain about finding metal pieces in their chicken on July 27, but the recall didn't take place until September 5, 2018. The Decatur, Alabama, company ultimately ended up recalling its frozen cooked chicken that it had produced between July 4 and July 17. Luckily, no other customers beyond the first one ever called in to complain about finding metal in their chicken. Still, it was a Class I recall (the most serious type) because of the potential for harm from anyone choking on or being injured by any other metal pieces that might have ended up in the chicken. It's certainly better to recall potentially dangerous food rather than hope that one piece of metal was the only one. A later Wayne Farms recall in 2022 was about undercooked chicken. So, at least the metal problem seems to have been a one-time thing.
An undeclared allergen was the cause of the June 2017 Maxi Canada frozen breaded chicken recall. Over 4.2 million pounds of frozen chicken were recalled because Maxi Canada didn't mention on the label that the products might contain milk. However, the problem began with a supplier rather than at Maxi Canada.
Basically, Maxi Canada heard from one of their suppliers that the ingredients Maxi Canada had used for its breading might contain milk. In total, the ingredient slipup affected sixteen different products that weren't labeled as possibly containing milk. The recalled products included everything from frozen chicken fries and patty fritters to and chicken strips and nuggets of various shapes.
No customers ever contacted Maxi Canada about a milk allergen issue from having eaten the frozen breaded chicken. However, undeclared allergens are a matter of health concern that triggers recalls to avoid potential tragedy.
The CRF Frozen Foods recall of frozen fruits and vegetables in April of 2016 is the largest recall on our list of all-frozen items, considering the sheer number of pounds recalled. This recall involved around 47 million pounds of frozen items, 358 specific products, and 42 brands that had the potential of being contaminated with listeria monocytogenes. Not only did the recall result in several hospitalizations, but there were also several deaths.
The recalled vegetable brands had listeria strains that were genetically related to the strains infecting those who had become sick. So, the link was officially confirmed through genetic matching. All nine of the people who became sick from the contaminated food in four states were hospitalized, and three of them died. However, only one fatality was officially attributed to listeria.
In July of 2015, Aspen Foods enacted a frozen chicken product recall because of a salmonella outbreak. At first, the recall was for nearly 545,000 pounds of frozen chicken, but it eventually reached around 1.9 million pounds of chicken. The products included raw chicken as well as breaded and stuffed chicken products.
You may not have realized that salmonella can survive in frozen chicken, but it can, even when stored at temperatures well below zero degrees Fahrenheit. While temperatures of 165 degrees Fahrenheit will kill it, salmonella can persist on raw chicken surfaces and potentially spread to other foods or surfaces before cooking. With salmonella having the potential to affect the elderly and infants as well as immunocompromised people fairly strongly, the recall was quite necessary. Fortunately, the outbreak was only limited to Minnesota, and only two of the five people who were sickened had to be hospitalized, with no reported deaths.
What started out as a recall of nearly 282,000 pounds of frozen pretzel hot dogs in November of 2014 ultimately turned into a 1.2-million-pound recall. The problem with these products was that all of them failed to list soy lecithin as an ingredient on the label, and it's a known allergen.
Soy lecithin is derived from soybeans, which definitely raised concerns for sensitive individuals. While soy lecithin wasn't an actual ingredient mixed into the pretzel hot dogs, FSIS noticed during its inspections that the company was using a non-stick product with soy lecithin on surfaces to help keep the pretzel hotdogs from sticking. With soy lecithin having the potential to cause an allergic reaction, City Line Manufacturing had to enact a recall. Affected brands with tainted pretzel dogs included Auntie Anne's, West Creek, Kunzler, Berks, Nathan's, and City Line.
The Hallmark/Westland beef recall of 2008 is notorious for being the biggest meat recall in U.S. history, with a whopping 143 million pounds of beef involved in the recall. While all the recalled beef wasn't frozen, some of it was, making it necessary to include it on our list. Despite it being such a landmark recall, nobody became sick or died from the affected beef, which is a wonder since some of the meat came from sick cows.
The recall ended up being so big because it covered meat that had been produced any time between February 2006 and February 2008. Within that long time span, most of the meat -- headed off to be part of school lunches -- had probably already been consumed. The Humane Society released a video in January of 2008 showing workers at Hallmark/Westland not only mistreating cattle but especially the ones that were also too sick to walk, indicating a potential for mad cow disease. In such cases, the company was required to have a USDA veterinarian inspect the animals and ensure they were safe to slaughter and sell for consumption but failed to do so.
After the recall, the company went bankrupt, and two of the employees were charged with felony and misdemeanor-level charges, including ones related to animal cruelty. The Humane Society still took the company to court, and Hallmark/Westland ended up having to pay a $317 million settlement on a $497 million judgment.
Another company that went bankrupt after its enormous food recall was Topps Meat Company, which recalled 21.7 million pounds of frozen beef patties in 2007. Before the recall, the company had been in business for 67 years. However, 40 people getting sick from an E. coli outbreak in eight states was the nail in the coffin for Topps. While the outbreak could have been deadly, no deaths were reported.
With no requirement for meatpackers like Topps to test products for pathogens like E. coli, it was an outbreak that was easy to miss. Plus, there was a concern that the company might have been carrying over meat from one day to the next, causing the E. coli to keep spreading. So, the recall covered frozen meat produced over the span of an entire year, which is what made the recall so big. Freezing also doesn't kill E. coli, but cooking the hamburger patties to temperatures of at least 165 degrees Fahrenheit does, which likely means those who became sick didn't eat thoroughly cooked meat.
An earlier recall might have prevented at least some of the 40 illnesses that occurred. E. coli is hardest on those under age five or over age 65, as well as people with compromised immune systems. Although officials from the Agriculture Department knew Topps beef was contaminated, it didn't order a recall for 18 days. By that time, 30 people had already gotten sick.
The highest number of hospitalizations from any of the recalls on our list happened from frozen pot pies contaminated with salmonella in 2007. These were sold under the Banquet name as well as several grocery store brand names, like Albertson's and Kroger. The fact that 401 people in 41 states ended up with salmonellosis after consuming undercooked pot pies makes you pause and consider just how many times you've eaten food from the freezer that wasn't quite cooked all the way through. Further, 108 of the people who became sick ended up in the hospital, which was 32% of them.
One problem with the microwave instructions on these pot pies from ConAgra Foods, Inc. was that they didn't account for the varying wattage of different microwaves. Cooking times for one microwave won't necessarily work for all microwaves, which can leave some parts still cold or even frozen. However, there were some other problems here as well. For one, the packaging for these Banquet pot pies had different cooking times listed in different areas. Other problems fell to consumers, like not realizing the product continues to cook during the cool down time you're supposed to allow before eating. Still, some consumers reported cooking more than one pot pie at a time in the microwave, using the same cooking time for single pie or cooking them in the oven when there wasn't an oven cooking time listed on the packaging.
Read the original article on Tasting Table.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

14 Times McDonald's Was Caught Up In Legal Issues
14 Times McDonald's Was Caught Up In Legal Issues

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

14 Times McDonald's Was Caught Up In Legal Issues

McDonald's is one of the biggest names in fast food. It operates over 38,000 locations across the world. It's a fixture in cities, suburbs, and rural communities alike, and it seems like there's no place that the Golden Arches have not touched. With a presence that large -- and over 80 years in operation -- it's no surprise that McDonald's has faced its fair share of legal battles. Indeed, the fast food giant has been the subject of many lawsuits from customers and has also filed several suits against other corporations since its founding. Some cases are well-known, including the "hot coffee incident," while others have emerged more recently due to ongoing concerns over price-gouging, deceptive marketing, and food safety. In an effort to shed light on some of McDonald's most notable and relevant legal battles over the years, we assembled the list of the lawsuits, court cases, and proceedings you need to know about. Read more: Every McDonald's Burger, Ranked Worst To Best Liebeck v. McDonald's is perhaps one of the most well-known legal cases involving the fast food behemoth. This incident set a precedent for how McDonald's would go about labeling its products and also highlighted the chain's track record for putting profits before customer safety -- which is arguably one of the worst mistakes McDonald's has ever made. In 1992, Stella Liebeck suffered third-degree burns after a McDonald's coffee spilled in her lap. The burns were extensive -- covering 16% of her body -- and took upwards of two years to heal. Liebeck tried to settle with the company for $20,000, which would cover her medical expenses, but McDonald's offered a mere $800. When Liebeck took McDonald's to court, it was revealed that the chain's coffee wasn't just hot -- it was 30 to 40 degrees hotter than coffees served at other restaurants. The legal team also noted that 700 individuals had experienced similar burns from McDonald's coffee, yet the chain required franchises to continue to serve the beverages at between 180 degrees and 190 degrees Fahrenheit. It was thought that the reason for this was that if McDonald's served its coffee as hot as possible, it would not need to give customers as many refills of it, thus saving the company money. The court eventually awarded Liebeck compensation for compensatory and punitive damages -- to the tune of $2.7 million, which was eventually reduced. Now, McDonald's coffee cups display a warning to customers noting that the contents are hot. It also prompted the chain to issue training to its employees on how to properly attach lids and serve beverages at a "drinkable" temperature. Children who grew up in the '70s and '80s may have fond memories of McDonald's television ads, complete with characters like the Hamburglar, Grimace, and Officer Big Mac. But, before there were these characters, which were as integral to McDonald's as its food, there was "H.R. Pufnstuf" -- a one-season show that appeared in 1969, a year prior to McDonald's character-filled ad campaign. "H.R. Pufnstuf" shared some commonalities with McDonaldland -- and it was easy to draw parallels between McDonald's Mayor McCheese and the large-headed dragon character in the show. The creators of "H.R. Pufnstuf" eventually ended up suing McDonald's for stealing the character and adapting it for its own ads. It was eventually revealed that the advertising company McDonald's used approached the creators of the show about a potential collaboration, but backed out at the last second -- only to allegedly lift the ideas for themselves. McDonald's was forced to pay $50,000 in damages, but both sides appealed the verdict, which eventually led to the courts yet again siding with "H.R. Pufnstuf" -- and ultimately increasing the damages to upwards of $1 million. The fast food giant also had to revise its character lineup for the ads to prevent further infringement. McDonald's seems to have capitalized on all things "Mc" -- from the Egg McMuffin to the McNugget. And, one 1988 ruling proved that McDonald's truly did have a foothold on all things "Mc." A federal district judge ruled that Quality Inns International Inc., a large hotel chain, would need to cease using "McSleep Inns," the name of its new chain of economy-level hotels. McDonald's issued warnings to the company prior to the ruling, though the hotel chain clapped back by filing a lawsuit, claiming that the name did not technically infringe on McDonald's trademark. McDonald's countersued under the premise that using "Mc" in the name of the hotel would cause consumers to falsely associate it with the fast food chain. The judge eventually sided with McDonald's, granting a permanent injunction against the use of the name and gave Quality Inns International a 30-day window to fall in line. The chain was eventually renamed "Sleep Inns." This is not the only instance of McDonald's taking legal action over its ownership of the "Mc" name. In 2019, following a complaint filed by an Irish fast food chain called Supermac's, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) ruled that McDonald's "had not proved genuine use of the 'Mc' prefix on some of the products it trademarked," according to a BBC article. However, McDonald's was given the right to ownership of "Mc" branding for several items, including some sandwiches and chicken nuggets. McDonald's wouldn't be the first company facing allegations of marketing towards children, but its actions did result in a legal firestorm in 2018, when a Canadian man sued the chain for allegedly violating a provincial law that prohibits marketing towards children under 13. Quebec is one of the few places in the world where such marketing is illegal, and the law only offers a few exceptions -- restaurants not being one of them. The father, who reportedly visited McDonald's every couple weeks with his three children, argued that the Happy Meal's toy tie-ins to pop culture, like film releases, and display of toys at a child's eye-level were evidence of the chain's alleged wrongdoing. This was not the first time that McDonald's had come under fire for similar issues. In 2010, a California mother, in partnership with the Center for Science in the Public Interest, alleged that the company's decision to pack its Happy Meals with toys is deceptive towards children. The suit argued that the use of these toys to market to children was not only unethical, but it also encouraged unhealthy eating. Much like the Canadian class action lawsuit, the California mother reported that her two children constantly requested visits to McDonald's in order to complete the set of toys hidden in the Happy Meal boxes. The California suit came after two counties in the state, Marin and San Francisco, passed laws that prohibited the inclusion of toys in children's meals that did not reach certain nutritional benchmarks. Although it may seem like McDonald's is constantly being sued by individuals, the company has taken its fair share of legal action against other entities. In 2024, McDonald's filed a federal lawsuit against the "Big Four," beef companies -- Cargill, JBS, Tyson Foods, and National Beef -- over allegations of price-fixing. McDonald's alleged that the beef producers -- which controlled about 80% of the U.S. beef market in 2018 -- had been intentionally reducing the amount of beef produced in order to charge more for it, like by closing several of their large processing facilities. The fast food giant argued that the deliberate actions to control the price of beef were in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The complaint also alleged that the "Big Four" colluded at conferences and trade shows and shared business information with each other that would increase their profits -- at the expense of companies like McDonald's. McDonald's is one of the largest purchasers of beef in the world, though the amount of money that the company sought in damages against the meat packers was not specified. Similar cases have been brought against the "Big Four" by other plaintiffs besides McDonald's, including Aldi, Sodexo, and Target. Eating at McDonald's became more difficult for halal eaters -- a dietary requirement that requires animals to be slaughtered in accordance with Islamic law and prohibits the consumption of pork -- in 2013. Two years prior, a customer sued the fast food chain, alleging that the chicken sandwich he had purchased had been falsely advertised as halal. The lawsuit detailed that although the Dearborn, Michigan franchise advertised and purchased halal McNuggets and chicken sandwiches, it started selling non-halal chicken once it had run out of halal-compliant meat -- on multiple occasions. As a result of the $700,000 settlement and lawsuit, the last two McDonald's franchises to serve halal options -- both located in Michigan -- removed halal products from their menus in 2013. While this was the first case brought against McDonald's concerning halal food, it was not the first one brought against McDonald's with labeling-related concerns. In 2002, McDonald's paid a $10 million settlement to Sikh, Hindu, and vegetarian groups after mislabeling its french fries as vegetarian when the fry oil actually contains added beef flavor. The confusion emerged after the chain announced it would be switching from frying with beef tallow to vegetable oil in the '90s. McDonald's was hit with a somewhat unique discrimination lawsuit in 2016 after plaintiff Scott Magee alleged that the chain violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Magee, who is blind, claimed he attempted to order food from a Louisiana McDonald's in 2015, but was ultimately denied service after the lobby had closed. This would mean he would have had to use the drive-thru, and, at the time, the chain prohibited pedestrians from ordering via the lane. The suit alleged that the company did not offer the accessibility needed to serve visually-impaired customers after its lobbies had closed. The federal judge ultimately sided with McDonald's, ruling that the disability itself was not the reason why Magee couldn't use the drive-thru, therefore McDonald's was not in violation of the ADA. Moreover, the judge believed that McDonald's corporate couldn't technically be held responsible, since the three franchises that Magee said were in violation of the ADA operated via corporate franchise agreements. These agreements allow the independent operators to decide how they want to handle late-night business, in compliance with federal laws. 2024 was arguably not a good year for food safety, as evidenced by the infamous McDonald's E. coli outbreak. The October 2024 outbreak was linked to McDonald's Quarter Pounders, specifically the onions added on top of them. By the end of the outbreak, 104 cases of E. coli contamination were reported, with one death and 34 hospitalizations across 14 states. McDonald's and other fast food chains pulled onions from stores following news of the outbreak, but it did not stop the legal firestorm that ensued. A resulting $5 million class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of two plaintiffs who fell ill after eating contaminated sandwiches. This lawsuit was the third of its kind filed following the E. coli outbreak; Two people in Nebraska and Colorado also filed lawsuits against McDonald's. The $5 million class action suit, more specifically, alleged that McDonald's engaged in "fraudulent, unfair, deceptive, misleading, and/or unlawful conduct stemming from its omissions surrounding the risk of E. coli contamination affecting the Products," as reported by NBC News. You would think that McDonald's would have learned its lesson about hot food by now. But the chain faced yet another legal run-in in 2019 when a 4-year-old girl suffered second-degree burns by "unreasonably and dangerously" hot chicken McNuggets inside of her Happy Meal, as reported by NBC6. The girl's family sued both the Florida franchise and McDonald's corporate for the incident and requested upwards of $15 million in damages. Both McDonald's and Upchurch Foods Inc., the franchisee, argued that they were not responsible. But, the jury found both parties failed to put ample warning on the packaging to indicate risk. That said, McDonald's was not found negligent in this case, but the jury awarded the family $800,000 in damages. The HACER scholarship program, launched by McDonald's in 1985, has given more than $33 million to Latinx and Hispanic students since its inception. However, it faced legal challenges in 2025 after the American Alliance for Equal Rights sued the company, alleging that the HACER scholarship violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (which "prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance"). The plaintiffs also argued that the program violates Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race and ethnicity when forming contracts. The "contract" implied is the privacy policy that applicants sign when they fill out the HACER scholarship application. In a statement issued by McDonald's in January 2025, the company said that it plans to "safeguard HACER" going forward. It also announced it would be dropping the criteria for one parent of the applicant to be of Hispanic or Latino origin and would instead require applicants to share their impact and contributions to the Latinx and Hispanic community in the application. Although it settled the lawsuit, McDonald's stated that it "[disagrees] with this claim" and plans to evolve its program going forward so it can continue to meet the needs of scholarship recipients. McDonald's broken ice cream machines have become a running joke, but customers may not have to wait much longer for their local franchise to get its machines up and running again. In October 2025, the U.S. Copyright Office gave the fast food chain the opportunity to work around digital locks on its ice cream machine, which previously meant that only the original manufacturer could fix them. The Taylor Company -- which has been supplying the machines to McDonald's franchises for over 70 years -- held a copyright on its machines under the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which essentially prevents tampering or the circumventing of control access on copyrighted technologies, including those pesky McFlurry machines. The case also established an exemption to the act for retail-scale commercial food businesses going forward. However, there are still barriers to companies bypassing this technology. For one, it's illegal to sell digital lockpicks that would allow others to repair the machines independently. The COVID-19 pandemic changed a lot of the ways that food service outlets operate, and one decision at an Oakland McDonald's sparked new controversy for the fast food chain. Workers at one franchise filed a public nuisance lawsuit in spring 2020 after they were told by their managers to wear doggy diapers and coffee filters as masks. The chain also allegedly did not comply with social distancing requirements, and managers did not perform proper temperature checks on employees before they started work. A total of 25 workers and their family members contracted COVID-19, and the managers' actions led to a 33-day strike -- one of the longest in McDonald's history. As part of the settlement, the Oakland franchise was required to follow worker safety guidelines and establish a worker safety committee. McDonald's corporate was not a defendant in the case and, in a statement issued to SF Gate, said that the conduct that occurred at the Oakland franchise was not reflective of pandemic-era procedures required at other locations. No breakfast at McDonald's is complete without orange juice -- but you may not know you're paying extra for it. That's the claim in a class action lawsuit filed against the fast food giant in 2023 in California. The plaintiffs argued that McDonald's did not adequately disclose the orange juice up-charge on its breakfast menus. The lawsuit suggested that McDonald's uses deceptive advertising on its menu boards by suggesting the OJ is included, without any asterisk or notation to indicate the charge. The plaintiffs on the case claimed that they only found out about the charge after they had purchased their meal, and one plaintiff claimed she would not have ordered the beverage if she'd known about the additional charge. The lawsuit also allegeed that employees were not trained to inform patrons about the charge before they ordered their meal. Your morning cup of coffee is supposed to be the pick-me-up that helps you get through your day. But for one customer, it turned into nothing short of a nightmare. A woman who visited a Dothan, Alabama McDonald's in 2020 alleged that her caramel macchiato was tainted with chemicals that workers were using to clean the machine. She reported that her mouth went numb when she sipped the coffee, which she claims caused permanent scarring in her throat and may require corrective surgery. The woman said that she asked for help, but that the drive-thru employees slammed the window in her face and would not disclose what chemicals they had used to clean the machine -- nor did they call for emergency assistance. The woman sued McDonald's corporate, the Alabama branch of the chain, and the owner-operators of the Dothan franchise for a whopping $13 million total in damages. The case was eventually dismissed by a judge following mediation and a motion to dismiss from both sides. Read the original article on Chowhound.

The Dairy Alliance Brings Milk's Got Game to the Plate for Biloxi Shuckers' 10th Anniversary
The Dairy Alliance Brings Milk's Got Game to the Plate for Biloxi Shuckers' 10th Anniversary

Business Wire

time11 hours ago

  • Business Wire

The Dairy Alliance Brings Milk's Got Game to the Plate for Biloxi Shuckers' 10th Anniversary

ATLANTA--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The Dairy Alliance, a nonprofit organization funded by dairy farm families in the Southeast, is proud to serve as the presenting sponsor of the Biloxi Shuckers' 10th Anniversary Game on June 6, 2025. The game, which also celebrates the return of the fan-favorite Biloxi Beach Chickens theme night, will be held at Keesler Federal Park in Biloxi, Mississippi, as the Shuckers take on the Montgomery Biscuits. 'This partnership brings together our Alabama and Mississippi dairy farm families for an exciting night of baseball and a focus on fueling strength, performance, and hydration with real dairy,' said Geri Berdak, Chief Executive Officer at The Dairy Alliance. 'We're excited to be a part of this Shuckers milestone and showcase how our Milk's Got Game initiative helps athletes and fans perform at their best, both on and off the field.' Fans will enjoy an exhibit with free ice cream donated by Prairie Farms, branded giveaways, and the chance to meet local dairy farmers from both Alabama and Mississippi. Fans are also encouraged to arrive early to see a local dairy farmer throw the ceremonial first pitch, kicking off the game with a nod to the hardworking individuals behind every glass of real dairy milk. 'We're honored to support The Dairy Alliance and the Biloxi Shuckers by donating Prairie Farms ice cream for this special night,' said Gary Davis, Chief Marketing Officer at Prairie Farms. 'It's a fun way to celebrate local dairy farmers and help fans enjoy the game with a taste of what real dairy has to offer.' With game attendance consistently topping 4,000 fans, the Biloxi Shuckers are a beloved part of the Gulf Coast community. This partnership aligns perfectly with The Dairy Alliance's commitment to promoting health, wellness, and the nutritional benefits of real dairy, especially its role in supporting active lifestyles. To learn more about The Dairy Alliance, visit or follow them on Facebook or Instagram @TheDairyAlliance. The Dairy Alliance is a nonprofit funded by dairy farm families of the Southeast. We work diligently with dairy farmers, schools, sports teams, health professionals, local organizations, state leaders, the media, and the public to promote dairy foods and knowledge about the dairy industry. Our efforts center in eight states: Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia.

Scientists raise red flag after discovering traces of dangerous mosquito-borne disease in new location: 'Already widespread'
Scientists raise red flag after discovering traces of dangerous mosquito-borne disease in new location: 'Already widespread'

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Scientists raise red flag after discovering traces of dangerous mosquito-borne disease in new location: 'Already widespread'

A new mosquito-related health scare is making headlines in the United Kingdom, and it's raising alarms far beyond British borders. For the first time, scientists have detected traces of West Nile virus in mosquitoes on British soil. As reported by the Guardian, genetic material from the virus was identified in two samples of Aedes vexans mosquitoes collected from wetlands near Nottinghamshire in July 2023. The discovery came from the Vector-Borne Radar program, a joint initiative of the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) and the Animal and Plant Health Agency. "While this is the first detection of West Nile virus in mosquitoes in the UK so far, it is not unexpected as the virus is already widespread in Europe," Dr. Meera Chand, the UKHSA deputy director for travel health, explained. The virus is a glimpse into how increasing global temperatures are expanding where insects like mosquitoes can thrive and spread disease. Aedes vexans mosquitoes are already native to the UK, but they haven't typically been hosts for West Nile virus because the temperature hasn't allowed it, although that's starting to change. At around 86 degrees Fahrenheit, the virus can become infectious inside a mosquito within two to three weeks. That means hotter weather gives viruses more time to develop and fewer obstacles to transmission. Although most people infected with West Nile virus don't experience symptoms, about one in five may suffer flu-like effects, and a small percentage may develop serious complications involving the brain or spinal cord. This discovery follows a growing number of similar health stories. Earlier this year, a mysterious fungal infection affecting dogs was linked to prolonged exposure to heat. Do you worry about getting diseases from bug bites? Absolutely Only when I'm camping or hiking Not really Never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. There have also been reports on how viruses like dengue, once considered rare in Europe or parts of the southern U.S., are now creeping into those regions. In response, the UK Health Security Agency has strengthened surveillance efforts and issued updated guidance to health care providers. Health professionals are being urged to test for West Nile virus in unexplained cases of brain inflammation. Fortunately, there are some easy ways to stay proactive. Planting mosquito-repelling herbs like citronella or lavender can make outdoor spaces more comfortable. On a bigger scale, reducing air pollution by walking or biking more, switching to electric tools, or unplugging devices when they're not in use can help slow the overheating that allows these viruses to thrive. In some regions, local leaders are launching targeted mosquito control programs, while researchers are using climate data to better predict and prepare for outbreaks. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store