DHS Issues Heightened Terror Threat for Americans
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a threat summary in a National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin Sunday following Saturday's strikes on three key-nuclear facilities in Iran.
"The ongoing Iran conflict is causing a heightened threat environment in the United States," the DHS statement said.
DHS also said, "low-level cyber attacks against US networks by pro-Iranian hacktivists are likely, and cyber actors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against US networks."
The warning came amid escalating tensions between the US, its allies, and Iran and its supporters.
President Donald Trump authorized the strikes on nuclear weapons facilities because he felt that Iran was no longer negotiating in good faith and instead was waiting out the clock to continue to build up their nuclear power, Vice President JD Vance said during an interview on Meet The Press Sunday.
The department has issued information on resources to stay safe, outlining who to call and how to report concerns.
This is a breaking news story. Updates to come.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A coal-fired plant in Michigan was to close. But Trump forced it to keep running
Donald Trump has made several unusual moves to elongate the era of coal, such as giving the industry exemptions from pollution rules. But the gambit to keep one Michigan coal-fired power station running has been extraordinary – by forcing it to remain open even against the wishes of its operator. The hulking JH Campbell power plant, which since 1962 has sat a few hundred yards from the sand dunes at the edge of Lake Michigan, was just eight days away from a long-planned closure in May when Trump's Department of Energy issued an emergency order that it remain open for a further 90 days. The move, taken under emergency powers more normally used during wartime or in the wake of disaster, stunned local residents and the plant's operator, Consumers Energy. 'My family had a countdown for it closing, we couldn't wait,' said Mark Oppenhuizen, who has lived in the shadow of the plant for 30 years and suspects its pollution worsened his wife's lung disease. 'I was flabbergasted when the administration said they had stopped it shutting down,' he said. 'Why are they inserting themselves into a decision a company has made? Just because politically you don't like it? It's all so dumb.' The 23 May order, by the US energy secretary, Chris Wright, warns that the regional grid would be strained by the closure of JH Campbell with local homes and businesses at risk of 'curtailments or outages, presenting a risk to public health and safety' without it. But Miso, the grid operator for Michigan and 14 other states, has stressed it has had 'adequate resources to meet peak demand this summer' without JH Campbell and Consumers Energy had already set about making plans for life after its last remaining coal plant. 'What's remarkable is that this is the first time the energy secretary has used these powers without being asked to do so by the market operator or power plant operator,' said Timothy Fox, an energy analyst at ClearView. 'It shows the Trump administration is prepared to take muscular actions to keep its preferred power sources online.' Wright – whose department has bizarrely taken to tweeting pictures of lumps of coal with the words 'She's an icon. She's a legend' – has said the US 'has got to stop closing coal plants' to help boost electricity generation to meet demand that is escalating due to the growth of artificial intelligence. The administration has also issued a separate emergency declaration to keep open a gas plant in Pennsylvania, although it has sought to kill off wind and solar projects, which Trump has called 'ugly' and 'disgusting'. The president, who solicited and received major donations from coal, oil and gas interests during his election campaign, has signed an executive order aimed at reviving what he calls 'beautiful, clean coal' and took the remarkable step of asking fossil fuel companies to email requests to be exempt from pollution laws, again under emergency powers. So far, 71 coal plants, along with dozens of other chemical, copper smelting and other polluting facilities, have received 'pollution passes' from the Trump administration according to a tally by the Environmental Defense Fund, allowing greater emissions of airborne toxins linked to an array of health problems. Coal is, despite Trump's claims, the dirtiest of all fossil fuels and the leading source of planet-heating pollution. Trump has launched a 'political takeover of the electricity grid' to favor fossil fuels, according to Caroline Reiser, an attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'The result of this will be higher electricity bills, more pollution in our communities and a worsening climate crisis,' she added. In Michigan, the cost of keeping JH Campbell open is set to be steep. Consumers Energy initially estimated its closure would save ratepayers $600m by 2040 as it shifts to cheaper, cleaner energy sources such as solar and wind. Reversing this decision costs $1m a day in operating costs, an imposition that midwest residents will have to meet through their bills. It is understood the company privately told outside groups it fears the administration could keep adding 90-day emergency orders for the entire remainder of Trump's term. 'Consumers Energy continues to comply with the [Department of Energy] order and will do so as long as it is in effect,' a company spokesperson said. 'We are pursuing recovery of the costs of running the Campbell plant in a proceeding currently before [the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission]. Timely cost recovery is essential.' Should the Trump administration go further and force all of the US fossil fuel plants set to retire by 2028 to continue operating, it will cost American ratepayers as much as $6bn a year in extra bills, a new report by a coalition of green groups has found. This would almost certainly be met by legal action – Dana Nessel, Michigan's attorney general, has already filed a lawsuit arguing the 'arbitrary and illegal order' to extend JH Campbell's lifespan will unfairly heap costs upon households in the state. Trump's efforts may bear some fruit, with US coal production expected to tick up slightly this year, although the longer-term trend for coal is one of decline amid cheaper gas and renewables. 'The administration may slow the retirement trend although they are unlikely to stop it,' said ClearView's Fox. 'The economics don't change but the administration could be a savior for these plants at least while Donald Trump is in office.' For those living next to and downwind of coal plants, there is a cost to be paid that isn't just monetary. Tiny soot particles from burned coal can bury themselves deep into the lungs, causing potentially deadly respiratory and heart problems. The closure of such plants can lift this burden dramatically – a recent study found that in the month after a coal facility was closed near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 2016, the number of childhood asthma visits to local hospitals declined by 41% and then continued to fall by about 4% each month. The study shows 'the closure of a major industrial pollution source can lead to immediate and lasting improvements in the lung health of the those who live nearby', said Wuyue Yu, research co-author and postdoctoral fellow at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine. For those living in the township of Port Sheldon, a mostly bucolic setting on the shore of the vast Lake Michigan, a pollution-free future beckoned once JH Campbell had been scheduled to close, with lofty plans for new parkland, housing and a battery plant touted for the site. Now there is uncertainty. Last week, a few dozen residents and activists held a protest event next to the sprawling plant, which hummed and whirred in the summer heat, one 650ft chimney puncturing the horizon, another, smaller flue striped red and white, like a candy cane. Dozens of train cars full of coal, hastily procured after the plant's supply was used up ahead of a closure that has been scheduled for four years, backed up in the sunshine. When burned in the huge 1.5GW plant, this coal emits about 7.7m tons of carbon dioxide a year. 'Trump is just trying to keep the money coming into coal companies as long as he can, I suppose,' said David Hoekema, who has lived a couple of miles from the plant since 2006 and has had to clean coal dust from his windows. Trump easily won this county, called Ottawa, in last year's election, but Hoekema said even his staunchest conservative neighbors don't want the coal plant. 'I've not met anyone along the lake shore who says, 'Oh yeah, let's keep this open' – even the conservative Republicans are concerned about their health,' he said. 'Republican ideology says local control is best but the Trump administration is saying, 'We don't care what the hell states do, we will impose our order on them.' I know there's a lot of competition, but this would have to be one of their craziest decisions.' The Department of Energy did not respond to questions about its plan for JH Campbell once the emergency order ends on Thursday. The battle over the coal plant's future has taken place to a backdrop of a scorching summer in Michigan, one of its hottest on record, with algal blooms sprouting in its lakes, both symptoms of an unfolding climate crisis. 'The talk in neighborhoods has been how hot it's been this summer – my kid was prepared to be outside every day and it's been so hot so often it's been irresponsible to do that,' said Stephen Wooden, a Democratic state lawmaker who added that Michigan residents are also 'pissed off' about increasing power bills. 'We're seeing the impacts of climate change daily, it is impacting our state,' Wooden said. 'And this is being caused by the continuation of outdated, expensive fossil fuels that Donald Trump wants to prop up.' Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
US and EU frame the ongoing deal between the trading partners and solidify some commitments
WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States and the European Union on Thursday issued a joint statement that frames the ongoing deal between the trading partners and solidifies some trade commitments. 'This Framework Agreement will put our trade and investment relationship — one of the largest in the world — on a solid footing and will reinvigorate our economies' reindustrialization,' the document reads. Together, the U.S. and the EU have 44% of the global economy. Key points in the letter include a 15% U.S. tariff rate on most European goods, with specifics on auto tariffs tied to EU legislative actions. In addition, the EU agrees to eliminate tariffs on industrial goods and many agricultural products, while the U.S. will reduce tariffs accordingly. The agreement also covers $750 billion in energy purchases and $600 billion in EU investments by 2028. The agreement also addresses non-tariff barriers, digital trade and environmental regulations. In July, President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen met briefly at Trump's Turnberry golf course in Scotland and announced a sweeping trade deal that imposes 15% tariffs on most European goods, warding off Trump's threat of a 30% rate if no deal had been reached by Aug. 1. Before the Republican U.S. president returned to office for his second term, the U.S. and the EU maintained generally low tariff levels in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, with about $2 trillion, around 1.7 trillion euros, in annual trade.
Newsweek
11 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Iran Reacts to Nuclear Deal Threat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Tehran has been preparing "for years" to counter the possible reimposition of U.N. sanctions under the existing nuclear deal's "snapback" mechanism, Iran's foreign minister said on Wednesday as tensions over stalled nuclear talks threaten to renew conflict between Iran and the West. Newsweek has reached out to European Commission's foreign affairs spokesperson for comment. Why It Matters The E3 nations of France, Germany and the United Kingdom have threatened to invoke a sanctions clause under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) if there remains no progress on a new deal with Iran before the old one expires in October. Iran in turn has openly signaled that it is coordinating with China and Russia to withstand the growing Western pressure on its nuclear program, which the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says poses a threat due to Tehran's enrichment levels. In this photo released by an official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a ceremony commemorating military personnel, nuclear scientists and other people who were... In this photo released by an official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a ceremony commemorating military personnel, nuclear scientists and other people who were killed during Israeli airstrikes in June, in Tehran, Iran, Tuesday, July 29, 2025. More Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/AP What To Know "We have had various joint meetings and designed a series of joint measures that we will implement if the snapback is activated," Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said regarding coordination with allies Moscow and Beijing. The three capitals have been "working for years on a plan to counter the snapback," Iran's official news service IRNA quoted him as saying. The JCPOA capped Iran's uranium enrichment at 3.67 percent, enough for civilian energy uses but far below the threshold needed to create a bomb. President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the deal in 2018, citing its ineffectiveness at curbing Tehran's nuclear program. The snapback mechanism in the existing deal now remains the only U.N.-backed mechanism to penalize Iran for serious non-compliance. The return of U.N. sanctions on Iran would include an arms embargo, missile and drone restrictions, bans on most nuclear activity, and travel, banking and asset freezes on designated Iranian entities and individuals. Araghchi, however, dismissed their effectiveness. "The economic sanctions of the Security Council are far more limited than the current unilateral U.S. sanctions." "Things will not become any worse than the current situation. Yes, from a psychological and political, and even strategic point of view, there are consequences, but not to the extent that it would bring diplomacy to a dead end or paralyze the country," he said. What People Are Saying Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, said in an interview on Wednesday: "They think the snapback is the only tool they have. Here we have clearly explained our position: first, you have basically no right to use it as you, too, have effectively withdrawn from the deal following the U.S. withdrawal, and with your recent positions, including the zero enrichment. So you're no longer a participant in the JCPOA, and the right to snapback belongs only to remaining members." Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia's permanent representative to international organisations in Vienna, said on X on Wednesday: "The above-mentioned European states are themselves in violation of res.2231 and the #JCPOA. Therefore, legally speaking, they as violators don't have the right to launch SnapBack." Lin Jian, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, said on Friday: "China stays committed to peacefully resolving the Iranian nuclear issue through political and diplomatic means, opposes invoking Security Council 'snapback' sanctions." What Happens Next With the JCPOA's so-called "sunset clauses" set to expire in October, Tehran is hardening its position on nuclear enrichment by steering future IAEA cooperation under the authority of its Supreme National Security Council, the country's top national security body.
