
Left in limbo: How federal workers still on the job are coping with chaos
More than 100 days into Donald Trump's presidency, many federal workers have decided to do something that was unthinkable on inauguration day: quit their jobs.
As the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency cuts budgets and headcounts across the government, a workforce used to job security is now beset by low morale and deep uncertainty. Among those who've been fired or quit are tens of thousands of highly trained experts and specialists, draining the agencies of their knowledge base.
Deeper cuts are likely to come.
Weeks away from hurricane season, the Federal Emergency Management Agency is set to lose roughly 1,000 workers – 20% of its full-time staff – who took a buyout offer. About 25% of Internal Revenue Service workers, roughly 22,000 people, are planning to take buyouts. The Environmental Protection Agency this week made another offer to all employees – open through May 5 – to quit now and be paid through the end of September.
Those left behind now face a highly uncertain future in which a job that once seemed secure could disappear in a flash, leaving them wondering if it makes any sense to stay.
Many of the more than a dozen workers who spoke to CNN describe a culture of fear that now permeates.
Just last week, some agencies moved to end flexible work schedules. Some workers' lives are being uprooted by mandatory reassignments and relocations. Many feel they are being pitted against each other because rules around seniority and status mean some staffers could still be displaced from their jobs by coworkers.
Some federal workers said normal activities – such as stepping away from their computers to collaborate in-person with other workers, or attending after-hours retirement parties – are being more closely scrutinized.
Shannon Walsh, a federal worker with the Environmental Protection Agency in Chicago, says that an email employees recently received informing them that their PIV card swipe data is being tracked felt threatening – causing paranoia and uncertainly over how their time is being truly monitored and for what reason.
'Confused. And afraid. It honestly makes me feel both those things but also angry because I feel that that is the point,' said Walsh, a member of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 704. 'It makes me feel like we are being smoked out.'
Ellie Hagen, also an EPA employee in Chicago and a member of the local union, described a 'very intense culture of fear' at work.
Hagen said an office 'retirement' party to celebrate those who were terminated was canceled recently by management. Even though the party was to take place outside of work hours, there was worry it would appear they were being unproductive.
'People are afraid to do things that were once routine,' she said.
Still, many federal workers who spoke to CNN remain resolute and insist they aren't leaving until they are given no choice.
Almost all federal workers in February were offered deferred resignation: quit now and be paid through the end of September. Since then, Trump-appointed agency heads have begun reducing their ranks through multiple efforts, including some that have offered their own buy-outs.
Those efforts have met legal challenges and political backlash from Democrats who are highlighting the implications of those cuts ahead of next year's midterm elections.
One employee at the US Department of Agriculture who spoke to CNN said they recently decided to take the second deferred resignation offer in April after being terminated and then reinstated earlier this year, undermining their sense of job security.
'If I do this, I'm going out on my own terms. I'm choosing it,' the worker said, noting that they'll be paid through September 30 under the program's terms.
When the first buyout was offered earlier this year, the employee didn't give it any thought. They wanted to continue working for USDA, and their boss told them they didn't have anything to worry about. Two days later, they were terminated, along with tens of thousands of other probationary federal workers.
Even those who are staying face continued uncertainty as layoffs are implemented.
The IRS issued a memo last week telling its approximately 90,000 employees that it was withdrawing from an agreement that allowed employees to work a flexible schedule.
As part of a 2022 labor agreement, the IRS allowed employees to work some nine-hour days, so they could take a full typical workday off after they logged enough hours. The deal also allowed employees to pick their start time, giving them additional flexibility over their time.
Those deals were nixed by the IRS as part of the Trump administration's broader efforts to end collective bargaining for federal workers. It also came amid a Trump administration push to shrink the size of the workforce by offering time-limited buyouts in exchange for quitting.
'A lot of people are upset that this was not announced before the option to resign,' a Utah-based IRS employee told CNN. 'Things are sure different around the office these days.'
At the Veterans Health Administration, a draft document from late March reviewed by CNN detailing its 'reductions in force' effort laid out 'a process where one employee may 'bump' another employee out of their position.'
It goes on to explain that employees would be organized based on factors including their tenure and status – such as whether they meet veterans' preference status that helps military veterans get hired.
The document says: 'If you 'bump' another employee, you would retain employment. You may be eligible for grade and/or pay retention. If another employee is ranked higher, you may be 'bumped' out of your role and released from employment.'
Max Stier, CEO of the Partnership for Public Service, said on a call with reporters Friday that displacing other federal employees is typically part of federal reduction-in-force efforts, though he noted that no prior administration has conducted a reduction like this.
'If somebody's been RIF'ed, they may have the opportunity of moving into another position where they have seniority that is specifically similar to the job that they had before,' Stier said. 'They can, in effect, take that job from the incumbent that's there and push that person out. That is part of the RIF procedure.'
The Office of Personnel Management regulations for RIFs include details about so-called bumping and retreating rights, which should apply to any agency conducting a reduction in force, said Jenny Mattingley, vice president for government affairs at the Partnership. However, it can take many months for agencies to properly categorize all the federal employees subject to the layoffs.
It's 'pretty complicated,' she added, noting that an employee's appointment category (such as career staffer or probationary worker), length of service and performance are taken into account, in addition to veteran status.
National Treasury Employees Union National President Doreen Greenwald criticized the Trump administration's 'aggressive mismanagement' of the federal workforce.
'The exodus of talent and nonpartisan dedication to public service makes it harder for our federal agencies to accomplish the important missions assigned to them by Congress. And for those who stay on the job, this administration continues to unnerve them with unnecessary changes to their schedules, petty disruptions to their working lives, deep cuts to their operating budgets and threats to their careers,' Greenwald said in a statement.
At the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health, roughly two dozen top officials placed on administration leave during the mass April 1 layoffs were given the option to be reassigned to the historically understaffed Indian Health Services.
Those officials – ranging from longtime lab researchers to regulatory and policy experts – received an email with five IHS sites, including Albuquerque, New Mexico, Billings, Montana, and Juneau, Alaska, asking them to rank their preferences.
They were given one day to decide.
At NIH, at least four institute directors, overseeing infectious diseases, minority health and disparities, pediatric disease and nursing research, were placed on administrative leave and given the IHS option.
'Things are broken and confused here,' said a remaining NIH employee. Nearly a month after the mass layoffs, 'we're still learning who is here and who is gone.'
The reassignments to Indian Health Service also angered tribal communities that are in dire need of physicians and nurses at understaffed, remote clinics – not longtime officials and researchers shunted away from their bureaucratic roles.
It was a 'slap in the face,' said Liz Carr, a member of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians who served as a senior IHS advisor during the Biden administration. 'They are painting our communities as a relegation, a hellscape, a place of punishment for these people that want to provide services to HHS in other capacities.'
She added: 'Our people deserve the best of the best, and so sending people to places they don't want to be is not going to create adequate or beneficial health care.'
Most of the officials did not respond to the email and are still in limbo, according to three people familiar with the reorganization efforts. One CDC official responded with their preferences and has received no further communications since then, two of those people said.
'Administrative leave is a pretty big deal. It's closely monitored, but there's so much going on right now [that] I don't even know if there's enough people in HR to be processing putting people on administrative leave,' one former official said.
Overall, Department of Health and Human Services officials' reorganization aimed to slash 20,000 jobs, consolidate programs, and shutter others. Several of the cuts, like a canceled program to study women's health, brought controversy and HHS promises to reverse course.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. insisted soon after the mass layoffs that these things would happen with swift DOGE cuts. 'The part of that, DOGE – we talked about this from the beginning – is we're going to do 80% cuts, but 20% of those are going to have to be reinstalled because we'll make mistakes,' he told reporters on April 3.
But the uncertainty has left remaining health agency employees 'waiting for the next shoe to drop,' said one longtime health official who departed before the mass layoffs. 'People are confused, frustrated, saddened, and worried about the future of public health. Is this just the first step?'
Those workers say the cuts are leading to backlogs and fewer government employees handling the same amount of work.
One medical professional at the Department of Veterans Affairs now has to care for more patients – and ones with higher needs – because their colleague retired recently and a request to replace the person was denied.
'There's no way I can spend as much time on care as my colleague was,' they told CNN. 'So, the patients are suffering.'
Feeling spread very thin, the professional worries that they won't be able to keep up the pace without burning out. They went into the medical field to help people but are upset that they can't provide the type of care their patients need.
Despite all this, they are committed to sticking it out.
'I'm not leaving because I love working with veterans,' they said. 'It feels like a sacred mission, not just a job.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla's Texas robotaxi launch: Expect it to be 'low-key'
Tesla's (TSLA) robotaxi will tentatively launch in Austin, Texas, on June 22, according to CEO Elon Musk. CFRA analyst Garrett Nelson thinks this launch will be more of a "low-key" event compared to its big "Cybercab" debut last year. IN the video above, you can hear more of Nelson's take on the launch and why he thinks the stock has some near-term headwinds. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here. What are you expecting from this robo taxi launch? Yeah, thanks for having me. We think it's going to be a lot more low-key than the robo taxi day that Tesla held in Los Angeles last October, which was on a Hollywood movie set, very different type of production. I think this is going to be much more low-key. October or sorry, June 22nd is a Sunday, which is very unusual to have a major product launch, but I don't think that's a coincidence. So, I think it's, you know, expectations are high coming into this, but I think the key is really what happens in the three to six months following this event. So, initially, it's only going to be maybe a dozen or so model wise with the most recent version of full self-driving installed on them, operating in a geofenced area of Austin with the vehicle being supervised remotely as well. So, I think a lot of people are going to say, well, why is this so special? You know, what is Tesla doing here that Waymo isn't already doing with the robo taxis that they are operating in Austin. And I think people are going to look at the size of the geofenced area. Waymos is 37 square miles. How quickly they can expand that geofenced area, and then how quickly they can increase the number of vehicles on the roads and also then expand to other markets. What is the time framing for that scaling that would lead you to then raise your own rating and expectations on the stock? Well, Elon Musk thinks they can have maybe a thousand or so on the road by the end of this summer. It seems a bit optimistic, but we'll see. Our main concerns with this stock right now are number one valuation, given this really dramatic rebound since their first quarter earnings release in April. The stock is up, you know, about 100 points from when they reported earnings, only six or seven weeks ago. So, it's valuation at north of 110 times our EPS estimate for next year, but also ongoing market share losses across their three major markets of China, Europe, and the US. That has continued. You look at the China data, Tesla sales were down 15% in May. Meanwhile, total EV sales were up 38% in China. So, in Europe and the US, it's kind of a similar story. So, those near-term issues really concern us here. We know we're right around the corner from their second quarter deliveries report, which will happen in about three weeks. I don't think that's going to be a great release. And so there's some major near-term challenges and valuation being an issue for us also. In addition to the Big Beautiful Bill, in which Tesla will be losing their tax credits, not only on EVs, but for energy storage and solar products as well.


New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Elon Musk's Tesla sues former Optimus robot engineer for allegedly stealing trade secrets
Elon Musk's Tesla is suing one of its former engineers for allegedly stealing trade secrets related to its highly anticipated Optimus humanoid robot. The defendant is Zhongjie 'Jay' Li, who cofounded the humanoid robot startup Proception Inc. after working at Tesla from Aug. 2022 to Sept. 2024, according to the complaint filed in San Francisco federal court on Wednesday. The lawsuit alleges Li, who worked on 'advanced robotic hand sensors—and was entrusted with some of the most sensitive technical data in the program,' downloaded Optimus files onto two smartphones. 3 A former engineer is accused of using Optimus technology to create his own startup. REUTERS Li started Proception less than a week after leaving Tesla and the startup claimed to have built humanoid robot hands with a 'striking resemblance' to Optimus just five months later. 'Rather than build through legitimate innovation, trial, and technical rigor, Defendants took a shortcut: theft,' the lawsuit says. 'They misappropriated Tesla's most sensitive materials, sidestepped the laborious process of development, and launched a company based not on original discovery, but on stolen work.' Tesla is seeking unspecified 'compensatory and exemplary damages' against Li, as well an order barring Li and his associates from using any of the company's trade secrets. The company also requested a jury trial in the case. Proception is based in Palo Alto, Calif., according to its LinkedIn page. Li lists himself as founder and CEO of the startup, which he says is 'tackling one of the most challenging and exciting humanoid projects of our time.' Li did not immediately return a request for comment on the lawsuit. In the suit, Tesla's attorneys said that successfully building an advanced robotic hand is 'among the most challenging' tasks in robotics. 3 Elon Musk has said Optimus is key to Tesla's future. AP 'Although Tesla does not disclose the precise year-over-year investments in Optimus, the research and development costs are in the billions of dollars,' the lawsuit says. 'Such an ambitious project demands unparalleled expertise and substantial time and financial commitment to achieve even incremental progress.' Musk has repeatedly described Tesla's Optimus robot as key to the company's long-term health and growth. The billionaire specifically touted Optimus's advanced robotic hand during the company's earnings call in January. 3 The Optimus humanoid robot is still in production at Tesla. Stanislav Kogiku/SOPA Images/Shutterstock 'My prediction long-term is that Optimus will be overwhelmingly the value of the company,' Musk said at the time. Bloomberg was first to report on the lawsuit.


Newsweek
13 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How Trump-Friendly Home Depot Got Caught in America's Immigration Wars
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration crackdown is targeting illegal migrants—not only at airports and border crossings but also in Home Depot parking lots nationwide, putting the retail giant with a history of support for the president in a difficult position. Scenes of protest and riots that erupted in Los Angeles last week were partly sparked by an unexpected immigration raid on Friday at a Home Depot in the Westlake neighborhood. Dozens were arrested in a coordinated sweep that also hit garment factories downtown and additional Home Depot locations in suburban cities like Paramount and Huntington Park. The big-box retailer, founded in 1978 and now boasting over 2,300 stores, has long been more than just a place to buy lumber and paint—it's also been an informal hiring hub for day laborers, many of them undocumented. The parking lots of Home Depot stores around the country have functioned, for decades, as sites where homeowners and contractors can connect with available laborers for their immediate needs, no resume required. That unofficial relationship has now collided with federal immigration policy. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller talks to reporters outside of the White House West Wing on May 09, 2025 in Washington, DC. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller talks to reporters outside of the White House West Wing on May 09, 2025 in Washington, White House adviser Stephen Miller, the architect of President Trump's immigration strategy, has explicitly ordered ICE to target informal labor gathering points such as Home Depot and 7-Eleven. "Why aren't you at Home Depot?" Miller reportedly asked ICE leadership in a Washington meeting last month, frustrated that arrests weren't meeting daily targets. Over the weekend, the consequences of those orders were visible across Los Angeles. In Paramount, anti-ICE protesters clashed with sheriff's deputies as raids unfolded. In Huntington Park, a predominantly Latino suburb, raids resumed Monday morning. And in Westlake, witnesses described a chaotic scene as agents detained workers while others fled. The raids are also having an economic impact, as frequent enforcement at Home Depot locations may be driving away customers. On Tuesday in northern New Jersey, the Wall Street Journal reported far fewer workers showed up for contractors than a few months ago. At two Home Depot stores in Los Angeles, store security kept the few men who did come confined to the public sidewalks. And at three stores around Houston, no laborers were seen at all. "Even workers who I know have legal status were running," said Jorge Nicolás, a senior organizer at the Central American Resource Center, or CARECEN, in an interview with the Los Angeles Times. "We felt powerless." 'We are not involved' Day laborers wait near a Home Depot home improvement store in hope of finding work for the day on August 15, 2008 in Los Angeles, California. Day laborers wait near a Home Depot home improvement store in hope of finding work for the day on August 15, 2008 in Los Angeles, California. Getty Images The sudden visibility of the immigration raids, combined with Miller's comments, has placed Home Depot at the center of a public controversy—one in which the company has denied any involvement. "We're not notified when raids are going to happen, and we are not involved in the operations," said Margaret Smith, a spokesperson for Home Depot, in a statement to Newsweek. Smith said Home Depot instructs its employees not to engage with ICE activity and to report any incidents to management. She added that workers who feel uncomfortable after witnessing immigration actions near the stores are given the option to go home for the day and still receive pay. "When ICE arrives at a parking lot or outside one of our stores, we ask our associates to report it immediately, not engage with the activity, and if associates feel uncomfortable after witnessing ICE activity, we offer associates the option to go home for the day with pay." However, critics of the company have long argued that this falls short, given the company's history and its often-contentious relationship with workers—drawing criticism from both pro- and anti-immigrant groups. It also raises questions about its ties with the administration. Home Depot CEO Bernie Marcus poses for a portrait in a Home Depot store October 15, 1998. Home Depot CEO Bernie Marcus poses for a portrait in a Home Depot store October 15, 1998. Erik Lesser/Liaison via Getty Bernie Marcus, the company's co-founder and former chairman, was one of Donald Trump's earliest and most vocal financial backers, donating more than $14 million to support his 2016 campaign and related political efforts. Though Marcus retired from the company in 2002 and died last November — one day before the election — at the age of 95, his longtime status as a GOP megadonor sparked previous boycott calls and continue to shape perceptions of the company's political alignment. Ken Langone, another Home Depot co-founder, has had a more complex relationship with Trump. Initially critical, Langone expressed renewed support for Trump in 2024, praising his resilience following the assassination attempt in Butler, Penn. and suggesting it could solidify the president's place in history. Home Depot has long worked to distance itself from the personal politics of its founders. "His views do not represent the company," a spokesperson said of Marcus during the 2019 backlash. The company also stresses that it does not endorse presidential candidates. But its political action committee has made substantial donations to Republican causes. In the 2024 election cycle, Home Depot contributed $1 million to the School Freedom Fund and $220,151 to the National Republican Congressional Committee. Another $143,569 was directed to Trump's campaign, according to OpenSecrets. In the current political climate, those past connections and donations have resurfaced amid a public reckoning over what some progressives say is a theme in corporate America of complicity and silence surrounding the most controversial policies of the Trump administration. Despite Home Depot's claims of noninvolvement, the recurring presence of ICE near its stores continues to draw national attention. The raids come at a time when the company is already under financial pressure, largely related to Trump's on-again, off-again tariff policies. First-quarter earnings dipped slightly from a year earlier, and shares fell after news of the raids broke. Analysts have warned that if public protests and customer anxiety persist, the company could face both reputational and operational fallout.