Social landlords forced to fix dangerous mould from October under Awaab's Law - as charity criticises 'delay'
The legislation is named after two-year-old Awaab Ishak, who from a respiratory condition caused by prolonged exposure to mould in the social home his family rented in Rochdale, Greater Manchester.
Politics latest:
The tragedy sparked after an inquest heard how action to treat and prevent the mould was not taken - despite the boy's father repeatedly raising the issue with Rochdale Boroughwide Housing (RBH).
In response, the then Conservative government pledged to introduce Awaab's Law to hold social landlords to account, with Labour vowing to implement and extend it to the private sector if they won the general election, which they did last July.
Setting out the next steps, Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner said it will come into force in the social rented sector from October this year.
It means social landlords will be required to address damp and mould hazards that present a significant risk of harm to tenants within fixed timescales.
The timescales were not set out in Ms Rayner's statement.
A consultation under the Tories had proposed forcing landlords to investigate the problems within 14 days, and fix them within a further seven, but it is not clear if this will still be the case - with more details expected later down the line.
Ms Rayner said that from October 2025, social landlords will also have to address all emergency repairs, whether they relate to damp and mould or any other hazard, as soon as possible and within no longer than 24 hours.
What happens after 2025?
From 2026, the requirements will apply to a wider range of non-emergency hazards beyond damp and mould, including excess cold and excess heat, falls, structural collapse and fire, electrical and hygiene hazards.
Then in 2027, the requirements of Awaab's Law will expand to the remaining hazards as defined by the Housing Health and Safety Rating System (excluding overcrowding).
This includes issues like keeping a property secure against intruders, inadequate lighting and exposure to noise.
'Delays put people at risk'
Ms Rayner said the phased approach "in no way means that social landlords have any leeway" when it comes to meeting their existing duties to keep tenants safe, amid criticism from housing campaigners.
She said the sequencing is required so protections to damp and mould can be introduced earlier than would be the case if the government sought to apply Awaab's Law to all hazards from the outset.
But Polly Neate, chief executive of Shelter, said: "Four years after Awaab's death, and nearly two years after the Social Housing Regulation Act received Royal Assent, today's announcement means social housing tenants will have to wait years longer for this vital protection.
"These delays to implementation represent a real risk to the health and safety of tenants, and puts lives at risk."
Awwab's Law follows campaigning from his parents, who said they hoped it would stop other families going through what they did.
There are widespread issues with damp, mould and disrepair across homes in England, which are in the worst condition of all European countries while being more expensive to buy,
Complaints over social housing increased by over 300% in 2024, while almost half of private renters , Sky News has previously reported.
Read More:
It is not clear when Awaab's Law could be extended to the private sector, as promised in Labour's manifesto. The government said this will be done through its which is currently going through parliament.
Ministers are also consulting on a new Decent Homes Standard, which sets minimum standards for the condition of social homes, and will separately legislate to require social landlords to carry out electrical safety checks and appliance inspections.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Council pulls cash from arms firms supplying Israel
A council has begun the process of withdrawing its investments from companies which supply arms to Israel. Cumberland Council's leader Mark Fryer, Labour, said the decision had been made following the "disproportionate aggression" by the current Israeli government against the people of Gaza. He has written to the council's chief executive, Andrew Seekings, to request the changes to the local authority's investments and for similar changes to be made to its pension scheme. But local Conservative leader Mike Johnson accused Fryer of "trying to be foreign secretary" and said he should focus on council issues such as "the harsh financial pressures it is currently facing". "Companies that the council would be boycotting would include, for example, BAE, JCB, Google and Airbnb," Johnson said. "And every single penny of lost investment income from these companies into the pension fund will have to be made up by council taxpayers." Fryer's request to divest from the Israel-linked companies follows on from a letter he sent to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer last month, in which he called for the government to take "any action necessary to secure an immediate lifting of aid restrictions" in Gaza and for a ceasefire to be encouraged. The local Liberal Democrat and Green Party members supported the council's divestment plans, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. Councillor Roger Dobson, Lib Dems, said his party fully supported "applying all legitimate pressure on the Netanyahu government to enable the delivery of vital humanitarian aid and to agree to an immediate ceasefire". The Prime Minister has said the UK will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agrees to meet certain conditions, which include addressing the humanitarian crisis, implementing a ceasefire and reviving the prospect of a two-state solution. But Starmer insisted the move did not mean he supported Hamas and said the "terrorist organisation" could play "no part in any future government". Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram. More on this story Council vows finance problems 'will be addressed' Council's finances had 'significant weaknesses' Related internet links Cumberland Council
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Embattled Rachel Reeves urges public to be patient with Labour on rescuing economy
Rachel Reeves has urged the public to be patient with Labour on the economy, saying that the change they voted for in last summer's election was 'never going to happen overnight'. The chancellor insisted she was 'impatient' to deliver and said ministers had made a start on turning things around, but there was 'lots more to do' as she blamed the last Tory government for the nation's financial problems. Her comments come just days after the Bank of England warned the public of months of sharp price rises ahead, driven by higher food costs. The central bank said Ms Reeves's national insurance contributions hike and the rise in the minimum wage were helping to push up the cost of the supermarket shop. It also slashed interest rates to 4 per cent, in a bid to boost the UK's stumbling economy. Ms Reeves has also been warned of a £50bn black hole in the government's finances, which leading economists say means she may have to raise taxes, cut public spending, or tear up her fiscal rules in order to fill. The forecasts piled pressure on the chancellor, less than 24 hours after Sir Keir Starmer pledged that this autumn's Budget would make sure 'people feel better off'. But in a piece for the Sunday Mirror, Ms Reeves cautioned that this would take time. She said her 'mission' was to 'end the cycle of decline, tackle the unfairness in our economy, give every community the chance to thrive and to make the lives of every working person better off'. But she warned: 'I'm impatient for the change people voted for to be delivered, but I have always known it was never going to happen overnight.' She hit out at the last Tory government, which Labour has accused of leaving a £22bn black hole, which Ms Reeves had said she had to grapple with when she entered the Treasury last year. She wrote: 'We know whose side we are on – the side of working people who for too long have seen promises made but never delivered, because politicians ducked the big decisions.' She also accused the Tories of presiding over ten years of 'endless spirals of chaos'. The progress that has been made so far includes trade deals with the United States, India and the European Union, she added. Earlier this week, the Bank of England said headline inflation would accelerate to 4 per cent by September, while inflation on food is set to hit 5.5 per cent between now and Christmas – putting a squeeze on household budgets. And Sir Keir Starmer opened the door to increasing tax rises this autumn, declining to explicitly rule out breaking Labour's manifesto pledge not to raise VAT, income tax and corporation tax. It came after the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) – a leading economic think tank – said the chancellor could also look at spending cuts in the autumn Budget as a way to raise the money needed by 2029-30 to remedy a £41.2bn shortfall on her borrowing targets, set out by her self-imposed 'stability rule'. To restore the almost £10bn 'buffer' that the government has maintained since last year's Budget, the chancellor would have to raise a total of £51.1bn, they warned.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Labour accepted £40k donations from criminal it kicked out of party
Labour has said it is returning more than £40,000 donated by a convicted criminal who the party had already expelled as a member. The donations came from businessman Abdul Sattar Shere-Mohammod, 55, known as Shere Sattar, who was convicted of actual bodily harm in 2022, and thrown out of Labour later that year. The money includes £10,300 given to the central party last June, a figure that is just below the threshold to be disclosed to the elections watchdog, the Electoral Commission, the Sunday Times reported. The revelations raise questions about Labour's procedures for accepting political donations, a hot topic in the wake of reports earlier this year that Elon Musk planned to give Nigel Farage's Reform UK party $100m. In its manifesto at the last election, Sir Keir Starmer's party pledged to 'protect democracy by strengthening the rules around donations to political parties'. As well as the money given to the party, £15,000 was donated by Mr Mohammod to, in part, support the re-election of Portsmouth MP Stephen Morgan, the early education minister. The party said Mr Morgan was not aware of his conviction. His local party should have declared these, but blamed an 'administrative error' that it said was being 'rectified'. Mr Mohammod also gave £10,000 to the local party of Southampton MP Satvir Kaur and £5,000 to Amanda Martin, another Portsmouth MP. Both declared the money in their parliamentary register of interests. The paper said the donations to Mr Morgan and his local party only emerged when a reporter contacted Mr Mohammod. Asked about his conviction this week, Mr Mohammod said he had been present during a violent confrontation after his son's bike had been stolen. He said he had tried to prevent a 'bad situation' but that his sons had gotten into a fight. He denied personally assaulting the victim. Labour told the paper the £10,300 donation to the party was below the £11,180 limit set by the Electoral Commission, meaning it didn't need to be declared. In a statement, the commission said: 'Donations that have been reported late by parties and accounting units are considered in line with our enforcement policy. We can confirm we are currently considering this matter.' Labour said that because Morgan's crowdfunding page said that donations would also support other campaigns in Portsmouth, it could not be considered a direct donation to him and did not need to be declared in his register of interests. It added that the donations would be submitted to the Electoral Commission in the party's next quarterly return. A spokesman said: 'These donations were made to Portsmouth Labour Party. Action has since been taken to return them.' They also said that Ms Kaur returned her donation last year, Martin was in the process of doing so, while the national party did so on Thursday after being contacted by the paper.
