German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is meeting Donald Trump for the first time, so will it be another Starmer love-in, or a Zelenskyy-style brush off?
The German chancellor will hold his first face-to-face meeting with President Trump later.
On the agenda are discussions around the war in Ukraine, the ongoing conflict in the Middle East and tariffs.
It's understood Donald Trump and Friedrich Merz will have a working lunch and early afternoon meeting before potentially holding a news conference.
The question is, will Mr Merz emerge smiling like Sir Keir Starmer, or be berated like [Ukrainian President] Volodymyr Zelenskyy?
There's no doubt the leader of Europe's largest economy has a lot to discuss with Mr Trump, the head of Germany's most important trading partner.
Berlin was trying to recover from two years of recession, only to be hit by the Trump administration's 25% tariffs on vehicles and the new 50% tariff on steel and aluminium.
The president's threat of a 50% tariff on all European goods is also still looming for July unless a deal with Brussels is struck.
In the past, the US leader hasn't minced his words, calling the Germans "very bad" as he bemoaned "the millions of cars they sell to the US".
10:47
While the EU is leading negotiations on tariffs, Mr Merz knows he must be careful not to anger Mr Trump.
The president has been clear that he believes Europe has been ripping America off and a misstep could reinforce this view, potentially making it harder to agree a deal.
Germany's reliance on the US for defence has also triggered Donald Trump in the past.
During his first term, he tweeted that Germany "owes vast sums of money to NATO and the United States must be paid more for the powerful, and very expensive, defence it provides to Germany".
However, Mr Merz will be hoping to avoid a fight over this after Germany said it would boost defence spending and the chancellor vowed to create the strongest army in Europe.
This, plus his efforts to crackdown on illegal migration, may help to counter views that German leadership is weak.
While the Germans are focused on a productive meeting, Mr Merz's past criticism of the US could come back to haunt him.
👉 Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim on your podcast app 👈
Following a 10-day period of intense criticism of Europe and Ukraine by the Trump administration in February, the chancellor warned that Europe could no longer rely on Washington.
Merz mimicked the US president
Referring to the president's assertion that European security was no longer America's primary focus - a stunning reversal of decades of US foreign policy - he said it was clear that "the Americans, at least this part of the Americans, this administration, are largely indifferent to the fate of Europe".
More recently, when asked about his first phone call with Mr Trump, he mimicked the president, highlighting how often he uses the word "great".
Ahead of Thursday's meeting, a spokesperson for the German government played down concerns of a clash, saying the pair had spoken several times on the phone and that the chancellor was well prepared.
It's understood he had a call with the French president in the lead-up.
Perhaps Emmanuel Macron was able to offer some advice after he and Mr Trump rekindled their first-term bromance during their White House encounter in February.
We have been told the chancellor will also be bringing a gift for the president.
King's invitation went down well
There's no doubt that when Mr Starmer produced an invitation to the UK from King Charles, it boosted the mood in the Oval Office during his first visit.
From the moment the embossed letter was handed over, the atmosphere became more relaxed.
The spokesperson wouldn't reveal what Mr Merz is bringing, clearly determined to maintain the suspense.
It could potentially be something from Rhineland-Palatinate, the region in southwest Germany's wine country where Donald Trump's paternal grandparents were born.
The chancellor knows the area well, having completed his military service there in the 1970s, and has already invited the president to visit his ancestral home.
3:12
Germans appear confident
Whatever it is, the Germans seem confident the meeting between the two leaders will be a success, underlining the German leader's firm belief in the transatlantic relationship and his experience holding top-level meetings with politicians.
In reality, however much he prepares, his team knows he must expect the unexpected.
It could be that vice president JD Vance decides to revisit his blistering attack on Europe, which left the audience at the Munich Security Conference speechless, earlier this year.
Or, perhaps the Trump administration will lash out again about the far-right Alternative for Germany party being classified as right-wing extremists by Germany's domestic intelligence service; the potential pitfalls are many.
What will happen is anyone's guess and the uncertainty ensures this meeting of political heavyweights will be a fascinating watch.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
Man Utd odds SLASHED in Jamie Vardy next club market as Wrexham & Rangers trail
JAMIE VARDY is still on the lookout for his next challenge after quitting Leicester City. And judging by the sustained support with the bookmakers, a move to MANCHESTER UNITED is looking ever more likely by the day! 2 2 The 38-year-old has been linked with several clubs across Europe since he revealed he was quitting the Foxes. A club legend - described by Leicester as 'our greatest-ever player' - Vardy leaves having scored 200 goals in 500 appearances for the side. He also worked under 10 different managers in his 13 years at the King Power. In a lengthy statement, he closed it off by saying: "It's finally time to call it a day, which I'm devastated about it, but I think the timing it right." Vardy has been strongly linked with a move north of the border, with former boss Brendan Rodgers at Celtic before more concrete claims of interest from Rangers, who have recently been taken over. A move to Serie A is the current frontrunner with BetVictor, priced at 9/4 to move to any club. But without doubt the market mover in the Vardy next club market is for Manchester United, who were reportedly interested at the end of the January window. Ruben Amorim is desperate for options up to, with Marcus Rashford and Alejandro Garnacho on the way out and Rasmus Hojlund potentially exiting with them. Only Everton and the three, poor relegated sides scored less goals than United in the Premier League last season. They're trying to resolve that issue, having splurged over £60million on Matheus Cunha and in advanced talks with Bryan Mbeumo. So this move for Vardy on a free would be a much cheaper option to bolster the front line and likely be an attractive proposition for both parties. Such is the incredible nature of this market, Championship new boys Wrexham come next at 8/1 third favourites. The Hollywood-owned side were coined the 'obvious transfer choice of the century' for Vardy when he first revealed he was leaving Leicester but that seems to have cooled. A switch to Scotland, Crystal Palace and Sheffield Wednesday are all also 8/1. Remember to gamble responsibly A responsible gambler is someone who: For help with a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline on 0808 8020 133 or go to to be excluded from all UK-regulated gambling websites.
The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
Kemi Badenoch BACKS Donald Trump-style travel bans and says Britain is being ‘mugged' by migration
KEMI Badenoch has said she would back Trump-style travel bans — as she warned Britain is being 'mugged' by illegal immigration. The Tory leader said there are scenarios where blocking people from certain countries is 'viable'. 3 3 3 It comes days after the US President signed an executive order banning citizens from 12 countries from entering America — in the name of national security. Asked by The Sun if she would ever consider following suit, Ms Badenoch said: 'Parliament needs to be able to decide who comes into the country, for how long, and who needs to leave — and that does include travel bans. 'On a country-specific basis it's much tougher, it's often more vague. "But I think there are scenarios where that is viable.' She added: 'That doesn't mean that I agree with what Donald Trump has done… I haven't actually seen the list of countries that he's banned people from. "I'm much more focused on what's happening here.' Mr Trump's new executive order blocks entry to nationals from 12 countries — including Iran, Libya, Somalia, Yemen and Afghanistan — citing the threat of foreign terrorism. The crackdown revives his first-term 'Muslim ban' and forms part of his hardline immigration pledge. Back in London, the Tory leader delivered a fiery speech declaring the UK had 'lost control' of its asylum system and said she would "likely" pull Britain out of the European Convention on Human Rights to fix it. She warned: 'We cannot become the destination for everyone looking for a new home or a better life. Nor can we be the world's softest touch. 'In some years our approval rate was above 80 per cent. Last year, Japan's was 2 per cent. "Britain is being mugged.' She said human rights laws had been 'stretched and distorted' by activist lawyers and were now being used to block deportations of dangerous criminals. The Tory chief announced a commission, led by Shadow Attorney General Lord Wolfson, to draw up plans for how the UK could leave the ECHR — with a final decision due by the autumn Tory Party conference. Ms Badenoch said: 'I have always said that if we need to leave the Convention, we should. "And having now considered the question closely, I do believe that we will likely need to leave — because I am yet to see a clear and coherent way to fix this within our current legal structures.' She also confirmed the Tories are working on a new third-country deportation scheme to replace the scrapped Rwanda plan. Her intervention comes amid growing anger over blocked deportations - with Nigel Farage 's Reform UK already pledging to quit the ECHR altogether. Calls to overhaul the ECHR are also gaining traction across Europe - with the treaty's own chief yesterday saying there should be 'no taboo' on rewriting the rules. Council of Europe boss Alain Berset told The Times the 75-year-old convention must 'adapt' to tackle the scale of modern migration. He urged governments - including Britain - to open political talks, saying: "We need discussion about the rules that we want to have, and there is no taboo.' It comes after leaders in Italy, Denmark and seven other nations have demanded more power to deport criminals and block irregular migration. Downing Street this morning welcomed discussion about changing the Convention. The Labour Government has always vowed to pass laws ordering courts to throw out ridiculous appeals to European laws by foreign offenders or illegal migrants. A No 10 spokesman said: 'Border security is vital to national security, and we welcome efforts to ensure the European Convention on Human Rights is being applied correctly and allowing countries to protect their borders. 'It's important there is discussion on how the ECHR operates to ensure it can safeguard human rights while meeting the needs of democracies. The Prime Minister has been clear on this, it should be Parliament that makes the rules on immigration and Government that makes the policy. 'That's why this Government is actually taking action on the ECHR. Our immigration White Paper sets out new plans through legislation to tighten the application of the ECHR, giving courts the clarity they need so our immigration rules are no longer abused, and as the Prime Minister has said, we want to ensure the right balance is made in migration cases in relation to the national interest.'
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
NHS body revokes guidance advising hospitals to allow trans people to use chosen bathrooms
An NHS body has been criticised after it quietly withdrew guidance advising hospitals to allow trans people to use bathrooms and changing rooms of their choice. The NHS Confederation - which represents NHS trusts across the UK - confirmed to The Independent that it had removed the guidance from its website as it became 'dated' after April's Supreme Court ruling. The judgment found that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex, sparking disputes on how Britain should treat its equality policy. In the weeks after the ruling, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) issued interim guidance which stated that trans women 'should not be permitted to use the women's facilities' in workplaces or public-facing services such as shops and hospitals'. The guidance is being legally challenged by trans-rights groups. The NHS Confederation said it had withdrawn its previously trans-inclusive advice and will issue new guidance when the EHRC updates its official Code of Practice. But trans rights groups have warned guidance on access to single-sex spaces is currently a legal 'minefield'. "The Supreme Court decision about the Equality Act doesn't mention toilets - not even once - and their provision is governed by separate legislation,' founder and executive director of Good Law Project, Jo Maugham KC, told The Independent. 'What the Supreme Court was very careful to say is that its judgment about the meaning of "woman" was solely about that word in the Equality Act. The 'toilets question' will be determined in judicial review proceedings that Good Law Project is filing today. 'For the NHS (or any other service provider) to take a position before the outcome is known is to invite lawsuits against it and risk wasting money that ought to be spent on patient care in the pursuit of ill-advised culture wars." TransActual, an organisation that supports the rights of trans people, said the development highlights the confusing implications of the ruling. "This decision may - or may not - be required as a result of the recent Supreme Court ruling,' a spokesperson said. 'However, what appears abundantly clear, based on advice from multiple lawyers and experts in this field, is that the supposed 'clarity' welcomed by the prime minister shortly after the ruling is, itself, in need of some clarification. "The law, based on a narrow interpretation of the Equality Act, may support this action. Equally, any future challenges on human rights grounds, which were not considered by the Supreme Court, may lead to a different outcome. It is a minefield. Organisations are damned if they act; damned if they do not. "We sympathise with the NHS Confederation and the position they find themselves in. Nonetheless, we believe they have reached the wrong conclusion - and that will, in turn, lead to significant harm to trans people needing medical care, as they now put off, or refuse treatment that may require a hospital stay." The NHS Confederation - which does not set official NHS policy - said its intention remains to provide its members with 'information that helps them best support their staff and patients', as it confirmed it had taken its previous guidance down. A spokesperson said: 'We will update and reinstate our guide as soon as the EHRC has updated its Code of Practice, which will need to be approved by the UK government, and when NHS England has then updated its guidance for what the changes mean for NHS organisations. 'The withdrawal of our guide does not change our explicit commitment to support our members to reduce the unacceptably high levels of bullying, abuse and discrimination at work that trans and non-binary staff and patients face.' On Monday, a hearing in a case against the EHRC over its consultation period for guidance in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling is set to go ahead. Human rights group Liberty is arguing the equalities watchdog had breached its statutory duties by implementing a six-week consultation period rather than a 12-week one. The EHRC will issue official post-ruling guidance after the consultation period.
