Israel's Netanyahu withdraws nomination of candidate for intelligence agency
Netanyahu thanked Sharvit for accepting the nomination "but informed him that after further thought, he intends to examine other candidates", it said, giving no further reasons for the decision and naming no other candidate.
Israeli media reports said that Sharvit had taken part in the huge street protests that shook Israel in 2023 over Netanyahu's drive to restrict the power of the Supreme Court and overhaul the judiciary.
In a statement, Sharvit said he had agreed to take on the role of leading Shin Bet and he had full confidence in its capacity to meet the "complex challenges that have arisen in these days".
Netanyahu's nomination of Sharvit came in the middle of a bitter dispute over the current head of the Shin Bet intelligence service, Ronen Bar.
The move to fire Bar, who has presided over an investigation into allegations of financial ties between Qatar and a number of aides in Netanyahu's office, has been held up by a temporary injunction from the Supreme Court, which will consider the case next week.
Netanyahu's move to dismiss Bar, a member of the Israeli team negotiating a return of hostages from Gaza, has provoked large demonstrations by protesters who accuse the prime minister of undermining key state institutions for political ends.
Netanyahu has dismissed the so-called "Qatargate" inquiry by police and Shin Bet as a politically motivated witch-hunt. He has said he lost confidence in Bar and blamed Shin Bet for intelligence failures led to the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel which precipitated the Gaza war.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Scottish Government in new court battle over trans prison and school rules
Scottish ministers are being dragged back to court over claims they are ignoring a Supreme Court ruling that sex in law means biology, not gender identity. For Women Scotland is suing the Scottish Government, accusing them of defying April's landmark judgement. The gender-critical campaign group has lodged a summons at the Court of Session, served on the Scottish Ministers, the Lord Advocate and the Advocate General for Scotland on Friday. They have 21 days to respond — a deadline that will coincide with a planned demonstration outside the Scottish Parliament. READ MORE For Women Scotland threaten SNP with fresh legal action Scottish Government to review 'unlawful' trans policy EHRC issues new warning to Scottish Government over sex definition ruling For Women Scotland said they had 'little choice' but to go back to court. They first warned they were considering legal action back in June. In April, the UK's highest court ruled unanimously that a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) does not alter a person's sex for the purposes of the Equality Act. The judgment clarified that the terms 'man' and 'woman' in the legislation refer to biological sex, not acquired gender. While First Minister John Swinney welcomed the 'clarity' provided by the ruling, the Scottish Government has said it is awaiting further guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) before issuing advice to public bodies. The watchdog is expected to publish an updated statutory Code of Practice — effectively an instruction manual on applying the Equality Act — later this year. However, the EHRC has repeatedly said ministers do not need to wait before acting on the ruling. In April the court ruled that sex in law meant biological sex Speaking to The Herald in July, Dr Lesley Sawers, Deputy Chair and Scotland Commissioner at the EHRC, said ministers had 'a responsibility to ensure their adherence to the Public Sector Equality Duty' — the legal requirement for public authorities in Scotland to consider protected characteristics, including biological sex, when carrying out their functions. She warned: 'The current climate of uncertainty and widespread misinformation serves nobody.' 'The law, as set out in the Supreme Court's clear judgment, has been in effect since it was handed down on April 16. 'Service providers and public bodies should in any event be following the law while they wait for our statutory guidance, as it will not cover every eventuality. 'We have urged relevant bodies to seek their own legal advice where necessary, to inform decisions about what changes they need to make now to their existing policies and practices.' Some bodies, including the Scottish Parliament and Police Scotland, have already updated their policies in response to the ruling. READ MORE Museums Scotland warn venues may close over toilet guidance For Woman Scotland intervene in Sandie Peggie tribunal 10 most jaw-dropping moments in Sandie Peggie tribunal In a statement, For Women Scotland said they were focusing on two specific policies: Supporting Transgender Pupils In Schools: Guidance for Scottish Schools, and the Scottish Prison Service's Policy for the Management of Transgender People in Custody. The schools guidance allows pupils 'to use the facilities they feel most comfortable with', and states that 'if PE classes are organised by sex, a transgender young person should be allowed to take part within the group which matches their gender identity'. In April, following separate legal action, a Scottish judge ruled that schools must provide single-sex toilets, but ministers have yet to withdraw the guidance, first issued in 2021. Meanwhile, the prison guidance allows prisoners to be accommodated in the estate that matches their acquired gender — both at admission and at any later stage. It also permits a male prisoner with a history of violence against women or girls to be housed in the female estate, or — if deemed too high a risk to be placed there — to nonetheless take part in women-only activities and programmes. According to the latest Scottish Prison Service (SPS) figures, of the 8,190 prisoners currently in custody, 16 identify as transgender. The SPS does not disclose where they are being held. Among them is Paris Green, formerly known as Peter Laing, who was convicted of murder and torture in 2013. The SPS allows trans prisoners on the estate of their acquired gender (Image: PA) The new legal action is not a judicial review but an 'ordinary' action for the 'reduction' — or quashing — of the government policies. If successful, the court would rule the policies unlawful and effectively annul them. For Women Scotland said: 'We campaigned against the introduction of the prison guidance in February 2024, and in May 2025 the Cabinet Secretary for Justice confirmed her continued refusal to withdraw the policy in response to a letter from MurrayBlackburnMackenzie. 'The Cabinet Secretary for Education stated the government 'will not withdraw' the schools guidance, as did the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice at a meeting in May 2025. 'We have since asked Scottish Government officials, including the Permanent Secretary, to withdraw both policies, and numerous questions have been raised in Parliament, most recently by Annabelle Ewing and Pam Gosal, challenging the continuing operation of the policies following the UK Supreme Court judgment. 'Nothing has persuaded the government to take action, and both policies remain stubbornly in place — to the detriment of vulnerable women and girls — leaving us little choice but to initiate further legal action. 'The Scottish Ministers have 21 days to respond to the summons. If the policies have not been withdrawn by then, we will lodge the summons for calling, and the government will have to defend its policies in court. 'We are asking the court to issue a declarator that the school guidance and the prison guidance are unlawful and that they be reduced in whole. We are also asking that both policies are suspended in the meantime.' The Scottish Government has already spent around £216,000 of public money fighting the first case and at least £157,816 on the second. The total bill to the taxpayer is now expected to exceed £600,000. Dr Michael Foran, the incoming Associate Professor of Law at Oxford University, said: 'The rule of law is undermined when judicial decisions are ignored by governments seeking to create ambiguity where there is none. If the clear decision of the Supreme Court doesn't prompt the Scottish Government to act, losing a third case brought by For Women Scotland might.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment on live court proceedings.'
USA Today
43 minutes ago
- USA Today
I'm Israeli. The world must stop our government's genocide in Gaza while we still can.
Knowing my own society is committing these crimes has shattered everything I thought I knew about myself, about my country, about humanity. The international community has failed us all. A few years ago, at a meeting of Israeli and Palestinian peace activists, we sat on the grass trying to brainstorm new initiatives. Some Palestinians I had just met proposed, sarcastically, to form a Palestinian 'reservation' that would preserve their culture, along the lines of Indigenous reservations in North America. As a Jewish Israeli who hadn't fully grasped the depth of injustice baked into Zionism's premise of Jewish supremacy, I was horrified. I couldn't believe their imagination had taken them so far. Now, looking back, I see it was no joke. It was a warning. What I once found unthinkable is quickly becoming our reality. The combination of genocide in the Gaza Strip, accelerated ethnic cleansing in the West Bank and demolition of entire Bedouin villages within Israel makes it clear: There is a coherent logic behind the actions of the Israeli regime since its establishment. Maintaining Jewish supremacy over the entire territory reflects an apartheid logic that restricts or erases Palestinian rights. The genocide in Gaza is its most extreme manifestation, showing how far the regime is willing to go to achieve its objective. As a Jewish Israeli, I ask Americans not to look away Immediately after Hamas' criminal atrocity on Oct. 7, 2023, Israeli politicians, military commanders and members of Knesset openly declared their goals. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tied the war to the biblical commandment to "blot out the memory of Amalek" – a message every Israeli understands as a call for total annihilation. Defense Minister Yoav Gallant announced a complete siege on Gaza City ‒ no electricity, no food, no fuel. President Isaac Herzog claimed that it was false to speak of innocent civilians in Gaza, and that 'an entire nation ... is responsible' for Hamas' crimes. Words quickly turned into actions. As early as November 2023, Brig. Gen. Yogev Bar-Sheshet reported from inside the Gaza Strip: 'There's nothing left. Anyone who comes back here, if they come back at all, will find scorched earth. No homes, no agriculture, nothing. They have no future.' The attack on the population of Gaza goes far beyond the staggering number of deaths. It is a methodical policy with a clear objective: full occupation of the Gaza Strip and ethnic cleansing of its residents. The siege, starvation tactics, leveling of entire cities, relentless air strikes and manipulative use of humanitarian aid to force population transfer through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's 'aid centers' – all this is designed to eliminate Palestinian life in the Gaza Strip. More than 90% of the population has been displaced, and about 92% of all housing units have been destroyed or damaged. Most hospitals and schools have been attacked, and many have been put out of service by Israel. The options Israel leaves to 2 million people of Gaza range from expulsion to death by starvation, disease, shooting or air strikes. We must call the suffering in Gaza what it is: genocide This is not about random acts of cruelty. This is genocide, in the full sense of the word: a coordinated attack on all aspects of the lives of a group of people, aimed at erasing the foundations of their existence. The vision of a land 'cleansed' of Palestinians, free for Jewish Israelis to take over, is not limited to the Gaza Strip. While the attack in Gaza is underway, Israel has also ramped up efforts to drive Palestinians in the West Bank into ever-shrinking enclaves and degrade their living conditions. The military has taken over and destroyed entire neighborhoods, displacing about 40,000 people. Also, in recent months, consistent attacks by settlers have driven 40 communities out of their homes, while many others face imminent expulsion. Meanwhile, the network of checkpoints installed by Israel severely restricts Palestinians' freedom of movement, blocks farmers from accessing their land and damages the economy. In Gaza and in all the areas under Israel's control, we are witnessing the complete stripping away of Palestinians' rights, both as individuals and as a collective, in the face of unrestrained, deliberate and systematic Israeli violence. When I talk with Palestinian friends and partners, I can hardly look them in the eye anymore. Knowing my own society is committing these crimes has shattered everything I thought I knew about myself, about my country, about humanity. To begin rebuilding from the ashes, the genocide must stop. Yet this will not happen from within. There is no institution or mechanism in Israel today capable or willing to stop the government's campaign of annihilation. The international community has also failed. Some leaders have issued hollow statements, while others – especially the United States, both under the Trump administration and the Biden administration – are directly assisting Israel in the horrors. Only sustained public pressure on world leaders, and an uncompromising demand that they use every measure available under international law, can bring this genocide to an end. That is the only hope of saving whoever and whatever little remain from this catastrophe. Yair Dvir is the spokesperson for the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
For Women Scotland launches legal action against Scottish ministers on gender
A campaign group which won a legal victory on the definition of gender is taking action against the Scottish Government over policies it says are 'inconsistent' with the ruling. For Women Scotland's legal battle with Scottish ministers on the definition of a woman ended in the UK Supreme Court, which ruled in April that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. However, the group said that it now has 'little choice' but to take further legal action as some policies regarding transgender pupils in schools and transgender people in custody remain in place – which the group said is 'in clear breach of the law'. The schools guidance for single-sex toilets says it is important that young people 'where possible, are able to use the facilities they feel most comfortable with'. The prison guidance allows for a transgender woman to be admitted into the women's estate if the person does not meet the violence against women and girls criteria, and there is no other basis to suppose that she poses an unacceptable risk of harm to those housed in the women's estate. For Women Scotland has now applied to the Court of Session seeking to quash the policies, which it says are 'inconsistent with the UK Supreme Court judgment of April 16 2025'. It has raised an ordinary action for reduction (quashing) of the policies relating to schools and prisons. In a statement, the group said: 'Nothing has persuaded the government to take action and both policies remain stubbornly in place, to the detriment of vulnerable women and girls, leaving us little choice but to initiate further legal action. 'The Scottish ministers have 21 days to respond to the summons. If the policies have not been withdrawn by then we will lodge the summons for calling, and the government will have to defend its policies in court. 'We are asking the court to issue a declarator that the school guidance and the prison guidance are unlawful and that they be reduced in whole. 'We are also asking that both policies are suspended in the meantime.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment on live court proceedings.' For Women Scotland previously brought a series of challenges over the definition of 'woman' in Scottish legislation mandating 50% female representation on public boards. The last step of these ended in the Supreme Court ruling, which the campaign group's supporters hailed as a 'watershed for women'.
