logo
Man acquitted of manslaughter in North End slaying due to unreliable evidence: court decision

Man acquitted of manslaughter in North End slaying due to unreliable evidence: court decision

CBC10-03-2025

A judge has acquitted a Winnipeg man accused of manslaughter in a fatal shooting at a North End apartment, citing unreliable evidence and inconsistent witness testimony.
"I will never know the truth," said Judge Sheldon W. Lanchbery.
Angus John Maple was 40 years old when he was gunned down on the evening of Nov. 24, 2021. The killing happened in his apartment, where he sold and traded drugs and stolen merchandise, by two men who intended to rob him, according to a written decision from the Court of King's Bench.
Timothy Wilfred Christopher Lecoy Maple, 33 years old at the time he was charged, walked free last month. He was originally charged with second-degree murder after Maple was brought to hospital with a gunshot wound from Mountain Avenue, between Salter and Main streets, where he later died.
His co-accused Thunder Lightning Fontaine, who was 22 years old when charged in Maple's death, will serve 12 years in prison after his 2023 manslaughter conviction by a judge.
'Silent witnesses defeated'
The decision published on Feb. 12 says the deceased's roommate was Chelsea Paul, a leading witness in the case and the mother of Fontaine's children, who lived with Maple to help him to monitor his diabetes and cancer diagnosis and ensure he took his medications.
The night of Maple's death, footage from a camera installed inside the apartment pictured Fontaine carrying a gun inside the apartment, followed by Lecoy Maple, who was carrying a shopping bag.
While speaking to Fontaine, Paul is pictured walking toward a camera, called a Wyze Cam, and twisting the video camera "flat against a solid object" before the shooting.
"Chelsea spoke as she moved towards the Wyze Cam, 'oops, my bad.' Her words were spoken in a very casual manner bordering on a joke," said Lanchbery.
Around one hour later, a gunshot sound was captured on the interior camera which still could record audio despite the obscured vision on the video footage.
Paul testified that after the shooting, she took the deceased's cellphone, which had access to a video from a doorbell camera installed in the suite across the hall, and the doorbell camera installed in the other suite.
Lanchbery said Paul's actions to "defeat two silent witnesses" by concealing video evidence along with a "demonstrated inability to firmly identify people" in the suite at the time of the shooting made her an unreliable witness.
Paul was also interviewed by officers several times, but there were inconsistencies in the three statements she provided to police, the decision said
The cellphone and doorbell video footage and doorbell camera were never found, court heard.
"Without having access to the video evidence Chelsea prevented the court from viewing, I am left with reasonable doubt that [Lecoy] Maple was even present at the time of the shooting," said Lanchbery.
"Therefore, the Crown's case results in the Crown failing to prove beyond a reasonable doubt [Lecoy] Maple acted in a common purpose with Thunder to commit robbery," Lanchbery said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MANDEL: Lawyer with 'underlying psychosis' was on bail for domestic assault when husband killed
MANDEL: Lawyer with 'underlying psychosis' was on bail for domestic assault when husband killed

Toronto Sun

time4 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

MANDEL: Lawyer with 'underlying psychosis' was on bail for domestic assault when husband killed

Leahain Malcolm Shortly after the Jamaican gay couple claimed refugee status here in 2020, Leahain Malcolm was taken to CAMH after telling husband Dr. Rupert Brown that he was hearing the voice of Justin Trudeau and wanted to see him. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account In January 2021, Malcolm was charged with assaulting Brown after being accused of infidelity and was hospitalized at CAMH again, this time for 12 days, and diagnosed with amphetamine-induced psychosis. A few weeks later, Malcolm called 911 to report that voices told him to kill his 38-year-old husband because he was a demon, according to the Crown. On Feb. 27, 2021, police found Brown's body in the couple's blood-spattered Eglinton Ave. W. apartment. He'd suffered more than 30 sharp force injuries, including two that would have been fatal: a stab wound to the chest and an incised wound to the left arm that severed an artery. Malcolm has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder — with his defence team expected to argue before Superior Court Justice Heather McArthur that he's not criminally responsible due to a mental disorder. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Testifying for the defence, Dr. Lisa Ramshaw told lawyer Andrea VanderHeyden that her 2023 assessment found Malcolm 'likely' has an underlying psychotic disorder and it's 'likely' he did experience psychotic symptoms at the time he allegedly killed his husband. Dr. Rupert Brown. But the forensic psychiatrist admitted she can't be definitive in her opinion, especially when Malcolm told her he doesn't remember the slaying, so there are a lot of 'ifs' in her conclusion. 'If he was psychotic and he feared he was going to be killed by his husband, thinking that his husband was a form of a demon, it is likely that he would have been unable to access the moral wrongfulness at the time. It's an 'if, then' scenario. It is not a firm opinion,' she explained. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'But I can't tell you, with the information I have, whether that is truly the case.' While Ramshaw admitted that she's can't offer a firm opinion whether she supports or doesn't support a finding of NCR, it was clear to her that the accused killer wants to be found not criminally responsible and that could have tailored his answers during his assessment. 'When a human being wants something, it will impact his storytelling,' she said. Court heard Malcolm was first hospitalized in Jamaica in 2019 after a suicide attempt — he was depressed over a series of issues: he'd graduated with a law degree in 2014 but failed his certification three times, he'd contracted HIV and felt his sexual orientation wasn't accepted. He reported stopping his anti-psychotic medications after coming to Canada in January 2020. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Crown attorney Brady Donohue grilled the defence expert, suggesting Malcolm's claim about 'hearing voices' on the 911 call and to police is self-serving. He didn't report hearing voices when he was at CAMH just weeks before the killing and he's only been diagnosed in the past with substance-induced psychosis — not schizophrenia. She questioned why he wasn't exhibiting any of those symptoms in his police interview just hours later. Ramshaw insisted it's 'not that unusual' for psychotic symptoms to disappear and cautioned that she hasn't diagnosed Malcolm with schizophrenia – only that she can't rule it out. Read More This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Donohue pressed her on Malcolm's police interview where he's calm, gives nuanced answers, shows no problems with his memory and knows where he is. 'From the interview, from watching it, he doesn't have any overt psychosis,' Ramshaw agreed. Donohue pointed to many times where Malcolm chooses not to answer certain police questions. 'Doesn't that indicate that he's capable of making a decision?' the prosecutor asked. 'Mr. Malcolm could be psychotic and still capable of exercising rational choice.' The forensic psychiatrist agreed that appears to be true during his police interview. 'But that doesn't necessarily translate to what he was experiencing earlier on with his husband and his beliefs at the time.' Ramshaw then repeated that she's 'not definitive' about her opinion. 'Mine is really based on, if he was psychotic and if he truly feared that his husband was Satan.' The trial continues. mmandel@ RECOMMENDED VIDEO NHL Toronto Maple Leafs Editorial Cartoons Columnists Toronto Blue Jays

Crown concedes appeal of convicted double-murderer just days after dropping case against second suspect
Crown concedes appeal of convicted double-murderer just days after dropping case against second suspect

Calgary Herald

time7 hours ago

  • Calgary Herald

Crown concedes appeal of convicted double-murderer just days after dropping case against second suspect

Just days after dropping murder charges against one suspect in a cold-case double homicide, the Crown has conceded the appeal of a second man already convicted in the case. Article content Defence lawyer Balfour Der said Tuesday he received a letter from the prosecution saying they would not oppose his application for a new trial for Leonard Brian Cochrane. Article content Article content 'I got a letter today saying the Crown is conceding the appeal and is asking to have it sent back for a new trial,' said Der, who is currently out of the country. Article content Article content 'I'm very pleased that that's the result,' Der said. Article content Article content 'We had some good grounds of appeal on some novel arguments that we were confident in succeeding.' Article content One of the novel issues in the case against Cochrane was the use of investigative genetic genealogy, which police forces have been using in recent years to solve historical cases. Article content Last Friday, the prosecution stayed two first-degree murder charges against Calgarian Stuart Douglas MacGregor in a letter filed with Calgary Court of King's Bench by Edmonton Chief Crown prosecutor Sarah Langley. Article content MacGregor was charged in the same 1994 killings for which Cochrane was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder. Article content 'Pursuant to section 579 of the Criminal Code you are hereby directed by counsel instructed by the Attorney General for that purpose to make an entry on the record that the proceedings against the above named accused on the above named charges are stayed,' Langley's letter stated. Article content Article content Der said he didn't have details about the decision to drop the charges against MacGregor, which could be revived within 12 months, but said the concession on Cochrane's appeal could be related. Article content 'I suspect it is, but I do not know the situation on MacGregor,' he said. Article content The letter conceding the Cochrane matter was sent by appeal Crown prosecutor Christine Rideout, Der said. Article content

Judge urges jury ‘to exercise patience' in McGill Ghetto murder trial
Judge urges jury ‘to exercise patience' in McGill Ghetto murder trial

Montreal Gazette

time8 hours ago

  • Montreal Gazette

Judge urges jury ‘to exercise patience' in McGill Ghetto murder trial

Montreal Crime By One of the jurors in the murder trial of the man accused of stabbing 24-year-old Romane Bonnier in the McGill Ghetto more than three years ago expressed their impatience over how François Pelletier has been testifying in the case. The frustration was expressed in a note sent from the 12-member jury to Superior Court Justice François Dadour on Tuesday afternoon while Pelletier, 39, was in his fifth day of testifying in his own defence. He is acting as his own lawyer, and this has created the unique situation where Pelletier is not answering questions. His testimony is in the form of a long monologue full of confusing asides, references to songs and other cultural references. Pelletier has often taken more time to explain his asides than he has referred to actual evidence. For example, he has mentioned a television show called Black Mirror at least a few times and, earlier on Tuesday, the juror asked the judge if they can watch one hour-long episode. The Crown's theory in the case is that Pelletier met Bonnier through an ad she placed seeking a roommate to share an apartment she was already renting. Pelletier moved in and they started what turned out to be a brief relationship. Pelletier moved out on Sept. 1, 2021 and sent Bonnier many text messages for weeks asking why she ended it. On Oct. 19, 2021, he staked out Bonnier's workplace, a store owned by her parents, and followed her as she walked home before he killed her. Following a morning of hearing similar testimony, the jury member sent Dadour a note 'concerning the evidence of Mr. Pelletier.' The juror wrote that the 'mental health of the jury is important' to the trial. The person wanted to address 'the elephant in the room' and called Pelletier's testimony repetitive and lacking relevance. When Pelletier testified Tuesday morning about a relationship he had with a different woman in 2010, one of the male jurors could be seen leaning back in his chair with his head staring at the ceiling. He appeared to have tuned out Pelletier. 'It is common to have a witness testify for days, if not weeks,' Dadour told the jury in his reply to the note. 'His examination takes the form of a monologue because he is not being asked questions.' He said that 'all judges must be patient,' reminded them that Pelletier is close to finishing his testimony and noted that the accused will soon be cross-examined by one of the two prosecutors in the case. 'I invite you to exercise patience,' the judge said. 'We have started this trial and now we must finish it.' While testifying, Pelletier has admitted several times that he stabbed Bonnier 26 times on Aylmer St. in front of several stunned witnesses. In her opening statement to the jury, prosecutor Marianna Ferraro told the jury the case is not a whodunit. This is because the horrific slaying was recorded by a surveillance camera and the jury has now seen the video. The questions for the jury to consider will involve what was Pelletier's state of mind when he killed Bonnier.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store