Will 700,000 pensioners lose out on PIP changes this year?
The government has insisted that close to 700,000 disabled pensioners will not have their personal independence payments (PIP) taken away, despite concerns that thousands of people are at risk of missing out on vital support.
PIP is a benefit that helps disabled people with their living and mobility costs. It currently requires an assessment so that the department for work and pensions (DWP) can see how much help a claimant needs.
But under wide-ranging welfare reforms laid out in March, the government said the number of people claiming PIP had become "unsustainable" and that stricter eligibility rules were needed to cut down the welfare budget.
It is believed approximately 800,000 of the total 3.7 million PIP claimants will either miss out on payments as a result of the new rules, which are expected to come into force in November 2026.
Now, the welfare information and advice service Benefits and Work has questioned whether or not pensioners who claim PIP will have their awards withdrawn.
In a post published on its website on 17 May, it claimed that the DWP is "desperately trying to hide the truth about pension age PIP claims", adding: "Pension age PIP claimants will be subject to the four point rule, no matter how hard the DWP tried to hide that fact".
In a written statement last week, a DWP minister insisted pensioners would "not be affected" by the changes because their claims are not "routinely reviewed", but some campaigners remain concerned that some older people could miss out regardless.
Age UK told Yahoo News that PIP makes up 38% of net income among people aged 60 to 65 and said it was "very worried about the prospect of people losing this vital money".
Here's what has concerned PIP claimants and pensioners — and what the government has said in response.
Generally, new PIP claims are only accepted by the DWP from individuals who are under state pension age, but some pensioners can claim PIP because of specific eligibility rules related to when their claim started.
For example, if someone's claim started when they were below pension age, they can continue to receive it as a pensioner.
Additionally, if someone was eligible for PIP in the year before reaching state pension age but they did not claim, they may still be able to make a new claim.
Individuals over state pension age are not subject to full reassessments but may still undergo 'light touch' reviews. These reviews, typically conducted every 10 years, are less comprehensive and generally involve a short form to confirm that the claimant's condition has not significantly changed.
If you report a change of circumstances, this may trigger a reassessment.
Around 690,000 pensioners are eligible for PIP, according to the DWP's official statistics released in January.
We know that around 12,000 pension age claimants had a "planned award review" in 2024. Planned award reviews happen when a PIP claimant's award period runs out, which is normally after anytime from nine months to 10 years.
In addition, 19,238 pension age PIP claimants had a "change of circumstances" review in 2024, according to the data.
What has concerned campaigners is that when pensioners come up for these reviews, they could be subjected to the new, stricter eligibility rules rolled out in the controversial reforms announced in March.
These new rules can be read in full here and, crucially, include the requirement to score a minimum of four points in one single activity to qualify for support - making it much harder for many claimants to successfully claim support.
Benefits and Work has already urged the government to clarify what the proposals will mean for PIP-claiming pensioners.
It wrote to the DWP, asking two questions:
'Will existing PIP claimants of pension age who are subject to a planned award review from November 2026 be required to score at least four points in one daily living activity in order to maintain their award?'
'Will existing PIP claimants of pension age who request a change of circumstances review from November 2026 be required to score at least four points in one daily living activity in order to maintain or increase their award?'
While disability minister Sir Stephen Timms said pensioners claiming PIP are "not routinely reviewed" and "will not be affected by the proposed changes", questions have still been raised as to whether the group will be exempt.
This is because the Green Paper does not explicitly address this, and while pension age people are 'not routinely fully reviewed', many of them have undergone reviews in the past.
For example, a change of circumstances application can still trigger a full reassessment, potentially putting their entitlement at risk including if they don't meet the new requirement after November 2026.
Timms, in part, addressed this in a response earlier this month.
'All claimants are required to notify the department of any change to their circumstance, be that an improvement or deterioration in their needs."
"Upon notification of a change, a case manager will consider what further action might be required to ensure the claimant is receiving the correct level of support.'
Yahoo News approached the DWP to query the perceived ambiguity and were told: 'In keeping with existing policy, people on state pension age are not routinely fully reviewed and will not be affected by these changes."
There's no doubt PIP payments are a lifeline for many older people.
Age UK has warned that many people in their early- and mid-sixties - before they hit pension age - who are struggling financially can suffer a decline in health.
Many of them rely on a disability benefit like PIP to get by, with the charity's own polling revealing four in 10 people aged 55-65 are worried about affording essentials like food.
"For those with long-term conditions or disabilities, working up to state pension age can be difficult, leaving many in a precarious financial position," Caroline Abrahams, Charity Director at Age UK, told Yahoo News.
"The poverty rate for people aged between 60-64 is 22%, one of the highest among all age groups. PIP is an essential key element of income for disabled people in this age group, providing the ability to meet their basic needs.
"Currently PIP makes up 38% of net income among people aged 60 to 65 so we are very worried about the prospect of people losing this vital money," Abrahams added.
*The government is running a consultation to find out what the public think about some of its proposals for PIP. You can submit your thoughts here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
How much money could families get if Labour scraps two-child benefit cap?
Scrapping the two-child benefit cap could lift up to 470,000 children out of poverty, according to the latest estimates, by allowing low-income families to claim an extra £3,513 per year in universal credit for every extra child. After months of firm support for maintaining the limit, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has appeared to leave the door open to the possibility of lifting the limit, put in place by the Conservative government in 2017. 'We'll look at all options of driving down child poverty,' Sir Keir said last week, in response to questions on whether he would scrap it. It came after mounting pressure from his own MPs and Reform leader Nigel Farage, who committed to scrapping the limit if he were PM. There are 1.2 million families with three or more children in the UK and around 370,000 of these are households on universal credit (UC). Families receiving UC - who are on low or no income - receive an extra £339 each month for their first child born before 2017, and £292.81 for first or second children born after 2017. This amounts to £7,581 per year for families with two children. But in most cases, parents are unable to claim UC benefits for any further children. There are rare exemptions, for example, in the case of twins, or adopted children. Most families can still claim general child benefit payments for more than two children, which amounts to £897 per child per year. But if the government scrapped the two-child benefit cap, families on UC could claim a further £3,513 per year for every extra child. However, there is an upper limit to how much families can claim in benefits with an overall cap of £22,020 a year, or £25,323 for households in London. The number of children living in poor households has been steadily increasing over the past decade, with 4.5 million children - around 1 in 3 - now living in poverty. Poverty can be defined in several ways but the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) uses 'relative low income' as a marker, referring to people in households which earn below 60 per cent of the median income of £36,700 in 2024, or £14,680. Some of these children are going without essentials, according to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, such as food, heating, clothing or basic toiletries. Removing the two-child benefit cap could lift 350,000 out of poverty, according to analysis from researchers at the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG). A further 700,000 children could see their lives improved with the extra cash, their research has found. Meanwhile, the Resolution Foundation has estimated that around 470,000 children could be taken out of poverty by lifting the cap, or 280,000 if the limit was extended to three children. Since the Labour government came into power in July last year, some 37,000 more children have been pushed into poverty by the two-child limit, according to CPAG estimates. 'No road to better living standards, economic growth and wider opportunities starts with record child poverty. The policy must go - and sooner rather than later,' said CPAG's CEO Alison Garnham. Since the cap applies to families receiving UC, the children affected are in low-income households. And 6 in 10 families affected by the two-child limit have at least one parent in work, CPAG found. The estimated cost of removing the two-child limit, extending it to three children, or removing a household cap varies. Getting rid of the cap could cost the government £3.5bn in 2029/30, according to estimates from think tank the Resolution Foundation earlier this year. Meanwhile, CPAG suggests that the move would cost £2bn. The Independent's own calculations suggest that extending the limit to three children could cost at least £1.3 bn a year; assuming that 370,000 households claim an extra £3,513 of UC each year. Consecutive governments have refused to commit to removing the cap, despite its unpopularity with voters. Last year, Sir Keir enforced the whip on seven Labour MPs who voted against their party to oppose the two-child benefit cap. The current Labour government had consistently maintained that they would not take action to remove the cap, due to tight resources in the budget; yet Sir Keir's statements last week appeared to open up the possibility of a U-turn.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
DWP PIP cuts blamed on likes of benefit cheat mum as she's forced to pay back £20k
People have slammed the 'audacity' of a benefit cheat mum who falsely claimed more than £20,000. Sara Morris duped the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) into thinking she was so unwell she struggled to leave the house or look after herself. The mum-of-three was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 2005 and exaggerated its effects to claim PIP in 2020. The 50-year-old said she could not stand at the cooker and found it difficult to get out of the bath unaided. READ MORE: Midlands area where homeowners saw £45,000 wiped from value of properties READ MORE: Dad who experienced 'terrible back pain' died nine days after going to hospital Morris also claimed she was so anxious when she left the house that even a trip to the pharmacy to collect her medication left her in tears. However, in reality she was running multiple 5km and 10km races and even posted pictures of herself competing. She had failed to tell the DWP that she was a member of the Stone Master Marathoners and was overpaid £20,528.83 between October 20, 2020 and April 25, 2023. Morris, of Walton Way, Stone, admitted dishonestly making a false statement to obtain a benefit and was jailed for eight months in July 2024. During a recent proceeds of crime hearing, Judge Graeme Smith was told Morris benefited from her criminality to the tune of £22,386.02 and the available amount was £60,000. He ordered Morris to repay £22,386.02 within 28 days or serve nine months in prison in default. And BirminghamLive readers have slammed the mum's actions saying that people like her are the reason PIP payments are so difficult to obtain. Karen said: "People like this are the reason genuine disabled are being affected today." Victoria added: "Because of people like her we [are] going to suffer." "I'd laugh at the audacity but it's really not funny," Claire added. Wayne wrote: "How on earth did she manage to get away with it. With my arthritis and other issues I provided medical proof from consultants, doctors, medical exams, blood tests, MRIs and X-rays. "Did she manage to fool all the latter medical evidence or did no one at the DWP bother to check?" Lisa added: "So she should pay every penny back." "And this is the reason why it is so hard to get PIP," Kimberley said. She added: "I had my first two rejected so I had to get a disability professional to help me with the forms. I struggle walking because of my asthma and old injury." A court had heard how investigators carried out surveillance on Morris from February 5 to February 20, 2023. Prosecutor Regan Walters said: "On February 5 she took part in a five-mile race and was seen running without assistance and showed no signs of balance problems. "On February 11 she was seen running with the Stone Master Marathoners and showed no signs of discomfort." Morris competed in 73 races between May 2019 and December 2022. During an interview in May 2023, Morris said her MS had worsened and she was suffering from fatigue. She confirmed she had been a member of Stone Master Marathoners running club prior to making her claim and filled in her PIP form on her worst day, StokeonTrentLive reports. Paul Cliff, defending, said the 'severity' of her condition's 'impact ebbs and flows to a degree'. He said: "But it is accepted by her that the application did not give the full picture. It crossed over into the realms of dishonesty." The court heard how Morris's marriage broke down in the spring of 2020 and she did not enjoy a lavish lifestyle as a result of her fraudulent claim, Mr Cliff said. He added: "She lost her home because of financial problems and was struggling to keep her head above water financially. "The application did not give the full picture. She did say running was one of the ways she tried to manage her multiple sclerosis. "She has found it difficult to come to terms with her dishonesty." Morris must also pay a £187 surcharge. At an earlier hearing, the court was told that Morris would not have been awarded PIP had she been honest about her condition. Mr Walters said: "The benefit was paid on the basis she would notify the DWP of any changes which affected the amount of benefits. "The DWP obtained photographs of the defendant and some Facebook posts taken by Morris herself. "She had been taking part in marathons, races and orienteering. "The first photo was taken a month after she signed her initial claim form. "The defendant can be seen to have been taking part in a competitive run two days prior to making that initial claim. "At no point was information received from the defendant reporting any improvement in her condition during her claim for PIP. "The defendant reported receiving assistance in almost every aspect of her life. "On some days her stress and anxiety led to her being housebound." She added she used a walking stick when she felt tired and unsteady. "The defendant exaggerated her issues throughout the claim process."
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Benefits cheat who said she couldn't stand to cook caught after posting 10k run photos on Facebook
A benefits cheat who lied about her multiple sclerosis (MS) to claim more than £20,000 was caught after competing in scores of running events and sharing them on social media. Sara Morris, 50, was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 2005 but in 2020 she exaggerated the extent of her condition and claimed Personal Independence Payment (PIP). The mother-of-three inflated the severity of her MS and also claimed to be so anxious when she left the house that even a trip to the pharmacy to collect her medication left her in tears. She had also claimed that she lacked balance, and was unable to get out of her bath nor stand at her cooker. Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court heard she failed to mention to the Department for Works and Pensions (DWP) that she was in fact a member of the Stone Master Marathoners and regularly ran 5km and 10km races. She was caught out by her own Facebook posts of her running. Morris, of Walton Way, Stone, was overpaid £20,528.83 between October 20, 2020 and April 25, 2023. She pleaded guilty to dishonestly making a false statement to obtain a benefit and was jailed for eight months last July. During her court case, she accepted that her application 'crossed over into the realms of dishonesty'. She ended up serving nine weeks in total and recently reappeared at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court for a Proceeds of Crime hearing. Judge Graeme Smith was told Morris benefited from her criminality by £22,386.02 and the available amount was £60,000. He ordered Morris to repay £22,386.02 within 28 days or serve nine months in prison in default.
