Free school meals for half a million for kids confirmed in spending review by Chancellor Rachel Reeves
As part of her spending review today, Rachel Reeves announced that every child in a Universal Credit household will now be eligible for state-sponsored lunches.
1
Addressing the House of Commons she said: "Last week, this government announced that Free School Meals will be extended to over half a million more children.
"That policy alone will lift 100,000 children out of poverty from Tower Hamlets to Sunderland to Swansea."
Currently, Universal Credit households must earn under £7,400 per year to qualify.
The move is expected to save parents on benefits £500 a year, according to the Department for Education.
Kids in UC households currently not eligible will be able to start claiming lunches from the start of the 2026 school year.
The entitlement will apply in all settings where free school meals are available, including school-based nurseries and further-education settings.
Most parents will be able to apply before the start of the new school year by providing a national insurance number.
Education Secretary Bridget Philipson previously told The Sun the move was a "game changer".
'This will make a big difference to children's attendance and behaviour at school because we know that if kids are hungry, they don't concentrate well."
The expansion of the scheme comes ahead of ahead of the government's Child Poverty Taskforce publishing a ten-year strategy to drive down poverty.
Labour are also facing mounting pressure to scrap the two child benefit cap,
If you are keen to apply for the support you need to do so via your local council.
You can find out what council you are in by visiting www.gov.uk/find-local-council.
Elsewhere, Rachel Reeves also vowed to pump £39billion to build more social and affordable housing across the UK, alongside a new rent policy for social housing starting in 2026.
What age do kids get free school meals in the UK?
In England, all eligible children from reception to year two qualify for free school meals - so kids aged roughly between four and seven.
In Scotland, all children between four and nine will qualify, while in Wales, pupils aged around four get free school meals.
But, of course, all primary school-aged children should be eligible for the scheme by the end of 2024.
That means children between four and 11.
In any part of the UK, from year three onwards, your children could qualify for free school meals.
But this is when the eligibility criteria kicks in, meaning you'll need to be receiving certain benefits and your income may be taken into consideration.
Currently, your child may be able to get free school meals if you get any of the following:
Income Support
income-based Jobseeker's Allowance
income-related Employment and Support Allowance
support under Part VI of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
the guaranteed element of Pension Credit
Child Tax Credit (provided you're not also entitled to Working Tax Credit and have an annual gross income of no more than £16,190)
Working Tax Credit run-on - paid for 4 weeks after you stop qualifying for Working Tax Credit
Universal Credit - if you apply on or after 1 April 2018 your household income must be less than £7,400 a year (after tax and not including any benefits you get)
WHAT OTHER HELP IS AVAILABLE?
You get child benefit if you're responsible for bringing up a child who is under 16 or under 20 if they are in approved education or training
The payment is used to help parents cover the costs of childcare.
It is paid at two weekly rates - £26.05 for your eldest or only child and £17.25 for any additional children.
Payments are usually made every four weeks, on a Monday or Tuesday, but sometimes are made weekly.
If you are claiming child benefit for a child under 12, you also receive National Insurance (NI) credits.
NICs count towards your State Pension so claiming the benefit can be useful if you are missing any.
Parents can also get help with free food vouchers through the government's Household Support Fund.
What help is available for parents?
CHILDCARE can be a costly business. Here is how you can get help.
30 hours free childcare - Parents of three and four-year-olds can apply for 30 hours free childcare a week.
To qualify you must usually work at least 16 hours a week at the national living or minimum wage and earn less than £100,000 a year.
Tax credits - For children under 20, some families can get help with childcare costs.
Childcare vouchers - If your employer offers childcare vouchers you can get up to £55 a week in tax and national insurance savings.
You pay for your childcare before your tax contributions are taken out.
This scheme is open to new joiners until October 4, 2018, when it is planned that tax-free childcare will replace the vouchers.
Tax-free childcare - Available to working families and the self-employed, for every £8 you put in the government will add an extra £2.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
25 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
What can students expect from this summer's exam results?
– When are exam results this year? A-level and AS results are out on August 14, while GCSE results will be released on August 21. Pupils in England will receive results for T-levels – which were launched to provide high-quality technical alternatives to A-levels – on August 14. Thousands of pupils will also receive results for vocational technical qualifications (VTQs) this month. Results for VTQs at Level 3 taken alongside or instead of A-levels, such as BTecs, will be released to students on or before August 14. Results for many Level 2 VTQs are expected on or before August 21. – What can students expect? Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson told the PA news agency that she expects a 'pretty straightforward year' for students as things have 'returned to normal' since the pandemic. Last year, 27.8% of UK A-level entries were awarded an A or A* grade, up from 27.2% in 2023. It was the highest proportion of entries scoring top grades outside the pandemic-affected years of 2020-22. In 2019 – the last year that summer exams were taken before the pandemic – 25.4% of entries were awarded A or A* grades. The Covid-19 pandemic led to an increase in top A-level and GCSE grades in 2020 and 2021, with results based on teacher assessments instead of exams. – How does the situation differ in the devolved nations? In 2023, GCSEs and A-levels returned to pre-pandemic grading arrangements in England. In Wales and Northern Ireland, exam regulators returned to pre-pandemic grading last summer – a year later than in England. Scotland has a different qualification system and students received their results on Tuesday last week. Figures released by the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) showed that 78.4% of those sitting National 5 exams passed with grades A to C – up from 77.2% last year. For Highers, 75.9% passed with the top bands, up from 74.9% last year, and for Advanced Highers 76.7% of students achieved A to C grades, up from 75.3% last year. – Will it be tougher to get university places? A record number of 18-year-olds are likely to be successful in securing their first choice of university this A-level results day even if they narrowly miss their grades, the head of Ucas has suggested. Jo Saxton, chief executive of the university admissions service, told PA it was a 'good year to be a UK-domiciled 18-year-old' that wants to go to university. She has suggested that British universities are keen to recruit UK school and college leavers because there is more 'uncertainty' around the international market and which overseas students are going to turn up. Dr Saxton added that domestic undergraduates offered universities 'stability' for their 'financial planning'. Nearly 22,700 courses with vacancies for undergraduate students living in England were available on the Ucas clearing site as of Wednesday last week – eight days before results day, a PA analysis showed. A sample of 129 of the UK's largest higher education providers showed 17 of the 24 elite Russell Group universities had more than 3,600 courses with vacancies for English residents on clearing. – What can students do if they do not get their first-choice university? Clearing is available to students who do not meet the conditions of their offer on A-level results day, as well as those who did not receive any offers. Students who have changed their mind about what or where they wish to study, and also those who have applied outside the normal application window, can also use the clearing process through Ucas. Applicants will be able to add a clearing choice from 1pm on results day. In England, if a student is unhappy with their grade they can ask their school or college to request that the exam board review the marking. If there are still concerns, the student can ask their school or college to appeal against the result. – Were pupils given extra support in exams due to Covid-19? Exam aids have been given to GCSE pupils in England in mathematics, physics and combined science since 2022 to limit the impact of Covid-19 on learning. In October last year, the Education Secretary asked England's exams regulator Ofqual to continue providing formulae and equation sheets to GCSE pupils in these subjects in 2025, 2026 and 2027. Most pupils who took their GCSE exams this summer were in Year 6 when schools closed after the national lockdown in 2020.
Times
39 minutes ago
- Times
How to erase the misery of student loneliness
T here are many implausible things about the Netflix campus romance My Oxford Year — an American visits the dreaming spires and falls for her handsome, castle-dwelling, cancer-stricken tutor — but perhaps the most unlikely part is the way new students confidently start chatting on first meeting. In my experience, they are more likely to stare intently at their shoes or phones in awkward silence, especially the boys. The real story is that many feel deeply lonely during their degrees, as several polls and studies confirm. A bit of future loneliness may not seem like a big deal to parents facing the ordeal of A-level results day this week, more concerned about whether their offspring will get to university at all. They probably assume things haven't much changed since their own time spent propping up the student bar; that eventually all but the most antisocial are bound to make friends. But in fact, quite a lot has changed — even leaving aside the negative effects of smartphones or lockdowns on burgeoning social skills.
Times
39 minutes ago
- Times
Even I see the point of prenups these days
As summer weddings roll by, does the thought of prenuptial contracts reassure or disgust you? It may depend on your generation, but their rising popularity certainly reflects a change in the idea of marriage. Even 20 years ago most of us associated 'prenups' with American billionaires, Hollywood stars with chronically unsettled emotions or George Clooney getting gloriously suckered in the Coen brothers' Intolerable Cruelty. But ideals erode: four years ago the Marriage Foundation estimated that one in five couples in the UK sign prenups, and a YouGov survey finds more than 60 per cent liking the idea. Inquiries to law firms reflect the change and so, cautiously, does the law itself: since a 2009 Supreme Court ruling, a contract between a couple ring-fencing their separate assets can be taken into consideration during divorce proceedings. • Why are couples who meet online more likely to fall out of love? And last year Sir Robert Buckland KC wrote here that it's already time to make prenups fully enforceable. As Boris Johnson's lord chancellor he knows the turf, having introduced no-fault divorce. He calls prenups a 'wise and practical choice'. It's worth discussing, though traditional spirits may wince. Ancient vows echo down the centuries: 'For richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health, forsaking all others, till death us do part.' The bride's promise to obey, of course, got shuffled out of the service in the 1920s, though Princess Elizabeth endearingly opted to say it to Philip Mountbatten in 1947. But even harder to find in use is one magnificent 16th-century promise that bridegrooms made: 'With all my worldly goods, I thee endow.' Women never said it, since it was pretty much implied for centuries that we'd hand everything over, unless protected by some upper-crust web of trusts or entails. But now, even in church weddings, that majestic phrase is nearly gone, enduring only if you choose the 1559 Book of Common Prayer. Otherwise it's Alternative Services: Series One (as used by the Prince of Wales) which more cautiously says: 'All my worldly goods with thee I share.' Still more commonly in our age of self-analysis and identity-pride, each just says: 'All that I am I give to you.' In the Catholic service there's no mention of money-sharing. Yet there is an ancient, haunting bravery about that lordly promise to 'endow' every penny of your wealth on the beloved. The word suggests permanent, irrecoverable; an almost monastic plunge of dedication. It certainly contrasts with the fashion for writing your own florid vows, like 'You are my sunrise and sunset, the dream I have dreamt all my life'; 'I promise to never lose our spark' or — apparently quite popular — the Backstreet Boys-style 'You are my fire, my one desire'. None of these specifically implies endowing any assets. • Inside Picasso's studios: the secrets of the places where he lived and loved Tracking the phrase, I hit upon Mumsnet. Here, in a very modern take, is a young woman worriedly unsure whether, during her register office wedding, she somehow accidentally 'endowed' her chap with a right to half the £10,000 she got by selling a possession from her single days. Was it, she asks, written in law? Because if so, 'I'm just uncomfortable with the idea of not having control of my stuff!'. Someone else asks if selling her clothes on eBay entitles him to half the dibs. The discussion continues sensibly enough, with talk of fairness and joint accounts and pensions in divorce. But the uncomfortable lack of clarity, and frequent depressing stories of rough divorces, began to change my mind about prenups. And, as one commenter sapiently observed, by marrying in the UK you're sort of signing one anyway: it's just that if you do separate it'll be the courts, not you, deciding who gets what. And — aside from the obvious need for child support — who wants strange lawyers running your life? It is easy to mock prenup absurdities, American or domestic. One law firm, conceivably tongue in cheek, suggests terms that couples might include. Like at what age you can each retire, the frequency of family visits, restricted screen time, sexual action or stipulations on future weight (one comedian jokes that there are two stone of her man which she certainly never married). Another suggested stipulation was to dictate 'how long either party is expected to wait before dating somebody else if they separate'. • Alison Steadman: 'My secret? A few gins and tonic in the evening' Most of these are enough to make any onlooker turn down the wedding invitation and bin the gift list; few firms would even draft them and no court admits their validity. But it could be that if they became fully enforceable, as Buckland suggests, only rational and financial ones would be written. And money does matter when more than four out of ten marriages break up. We have an inexcusably wide wealth gap; a twistedly absurd housing market makes it worse. Prenups are very tempting if one party has built up assets: it's middle-aged couples who still inquire most about prenups because implicitly 'endowing' half a business or property feels risky. Our intergenerational wealth gap is an even bigger driver of worry. Homeowner parents who donated a deposit on a first flat or might leave a small fortune within a decade or so may flinch and murmur about a prenup if their child's whirlwind romance looks like a gambler, drinker or reckless investor. Some might make paying for the wedding conditional on such a precaution, since only the wealthiest can afford the complexity of setting up trusts. It's all fuel for sad long-term rifts. But maybe if prenups do become the norm, like insurance or fire extinguishers, and were known to be fully enforceable, it might all feel less creepy. Maybe it's time. But, sigh! It's not romantic …
