MAGA Fooled by ‘Official' RFK Jr. Plan to Ban Pharma Ads on TV
But Kennedy made no such announcement, and no such plans exist.
'BREAKING: Robert F. Kennedy Jr has announced plans to ban pharmaceutical advertisements on television,' wrote an X account named 'Unusual Whales' early Monday. Unusual Whales is a service that provides data on unusual stock trading activity.
Politicians and media personalities circulated the news, most of whom praised Kennedy for acting on his long-stated desire to bar such ads from the airwaves.
'Great idea,' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) wrote on X. 'Oh huge,' conspiracy theorist Naomi Wolf chimed in. 'What about podcasts?' MAGA podcaster Tim Pool mused.
The praise wasn't limited to MAGA types. 'Pharmaceutical Ads Banned on TV, Could Fuel Station Group M&A,' media analyst Rich Greenfield wrote alongside a flame emoji.
'I think most of us in public health would support this,' Dr. Ashish Jha, former President Joe Biden's COVID-19 response coordinator, wrote, though he noted that court challenges have impeded such efforts in the past.
Unusual Whales did not provide a source for its claim, which was also circulated on an eponymous subreddit with 223,000 members. A follow-up post pulled text from a December New York Times story that indicated Kennedy had sought to ban the ads.
The department's press office said the news was false.
'The social chatter you are hearing that HHS banned pharmaceutical advertising is not accurate,' HHS told the Daily Beast.
The incident shows how easily misinformation can spread on X despite its use of 'community notes'—a feature that allows users to add context to a post. The Unusual Whales post did not get flagged by users with a community note.
Kennedy has indeed expressed the desire to ban pharmaceutical ads from television. Only two countries, the U.S. and New Zealand, permit the ads to run unrestricted—a fact Kennedy mentions frequently.
But efforts to ban the advertisements have often been met with legal challenges. Courts have long found that commercial advertisements represented protected speech under the First Amendment. In 2011, the Supreme Court struck down a Vermont law that regulated pharmaceutical ads.
The pharmaceutical industry has grown to nearly $40 billion in advertising this year, according to an AdWeek report this month, up from $12.2 billion in 2015.
Kennedy has found others sympathetic to his views within the Trump administration. Elon Musk expressed support for Kennedy's proposed ban on pharma ads in an X post in November, declaring 'no advertising for pharma.' Federal Communications Commission chair Brendan Carr has also said he would help enforce a ban.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
Laura Loomer and the limits of posting everything
For all the power she wields with the White House's affairs, Laura Loomer does not have the traditional tools that her rivals in the MAGA influencer industrial complex have — the highest follower count, the most political power, the most internet platforms, etc. But the fact remains that she's the influencer responsible for getting Donald Trump to fire over a dozen members of his administration (and counting) for the hazily-defined crime of being disloyal to MAGA. This is something that none of her peers, individually, have been able to do. But to understand how she operates, look no further than Loomer's latest attempted power play, which, as always, involves a fair amount of self-humiliation (and some disgusting slander). Earlier this week, she leaked a private deposition that she'd given in a lawsuit wherein she explained, in her own words, why she's published some of the most outre takes and allegations against her 'enemies' on social media. The deposition was given as part of her defamation suit against HBO host Bill Maher, who claimed on a February 2025 show that Loomer was having a sexual affair with president Donald Trump. But you might have missed that context, since the social media chatter and headlines gravitated toward the sections of the deposition where Loomer was grilled about her most audacious posts: she claimed, among other things, that Sen. Lindsay Graham was secretly gay, that former Vice President Kamala Harris was a 'DEI skank', and her bitter MAGA rival Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) divorced her husband because of the 'Arby's in her pants' and was a 'political prostitute [who was] sucking McCarthy's dick all day.' Unsurprisingly, Loomer defended herself and her statements, both in the deposition ('I'm saying she literally—it's so ridiculous. I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants') and in public, after the deposition was reported on by Will Sommer at The Bulwark. 'I was asked about Lindsey during my deposition so I had to tell the truth. I was under oath,' Loomer tweeted — along with a screenshot of the section where she explained why she believed Graham was gay. HBO's lawyers immediately argued that Loomer was violating several laws by making the private deposition public, and the document was immediately re-sealed. Loomer, on the other hand, claimed that she was simply trying to showcase that her testimony 'went so well that the leftist law firm [representing HBO] wanted to SEAL my deposition.' Whether it went well is somewhat debatable, given the potential legal implications for Loomer violating a court order, as well as the incontrovertibility of Loomer saying some absolutely wild things in a legal deposition, and defending described the stunt as another example of 'Loomering,' the term that she uses to describe her internet bullying campaigns. At first glance, it's a tactic honed from her time working as a secret-camera sting operator at Project Veritas, which famously recorded members of the media and academics saying things that could be spun as anti-conservative and amoral. Loomer's stepped up her game, however, putting herself in front of the camera (and eventually the public eye) to make her fact that she constantly embarrasses herself only enhances the efficacy of 'Loomering': first, shame and embarrassment does not matter in the long term, so long as people are paying attention online. (She said as much the next day: 'I wake up everyday to another hit piece. It's because I am effective and it threatens a lot of people.') Second: the internet is forever, and even if a judge orders a deposition to be resealed, gawkers will save copies, screenshot the juicy bits, and publish them for posterity. Loomer might have been recorded reading her own tweets out loud and forced to explain the gross bits, but she has also gotten several White House administration officials it remains to be seen whether her influence extends beyond Trump's daily capriciousness, Loomer's unnerving gift for being an internet bully remains effective as long as she has allies in the administration, who leak her the insider info she publicly uses to humiliate others. (As she said to HBO's lawyers, her friends in the White House told her that Graham was gay.) And as long as the storm she creates can grab Trump's attention, he will most likely keep picking up her from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Tina Nguyen Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Politics Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Social Media Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Read Indiana University's letter sanctioning professor for speech it claims violates law
Indiana University has sanctioned an outspoken professor at its Bloomington campus following the review of an anonymous complaint about his classroom speech. Professor Ben Robinson is likely the first professor to be punished under Indiana's new intellectual diversity law enacted last year. In a discplinary letter, an executive dean found he conflated "personal life experiences, academic scholarship and pedagogical practice" in violation of the new law. The complaint against Robinson was filed last year and cited classroom comments he made about the university restricting free speech rights, times he's been arrested while protesting, and his views regarding the state of Israel. However, Robinson told IndyStar that irregularities with the handling of his case are concerning. He claims the university did not conduct an investigation and escalated the complaint unfairly. He also believes it's unfair that a single, anonymous complaint can result in this level of punishment. Additional sanctions could subject Robinson to probation, suspension, termination or a host of possible penalties related to promotions, tenure or salary, according to IU code. Read for yourself. Here is the disciplinary letter sent to Robinson: The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Judge blocks FTC probe into liberal media watchdog
A federal judge in Washington blocked the Federal Trade Commission from carrying out investigative demands against Media Matters for America, ruling Friday that the agency was likely violating the left-leaning media watchdog group's First Amendment rights.
