Explainer-What is the High Seas Treaty to protect world oceans?
LONDON (Reuters) - While many countries have agreed to take steps to protect the vast, ungoverned swathes of the world's oceans, they have yet to see their High Seas Treaty go into effect. This week's U.N. Oceans Conference in the French city of Nice hopes to change that.
WHAT IS THE HIGH SEAS TREATY?
The treaty, signed in 2023, provides a legal framework for creating marine protected areas on the "high seas", or the ocean areas that lie beyond any national jurisdiction.
Currently, less than 3% of the oceans are under some form of protection, although altogether the world's oceans cover two-thirds of the planet.
The treaty contains 75 points covering areas such as protecting, caring for and ensuring responsible use of marine resources, and includes a provision for requiring environmental impact assessments of any economic activities in international waters.
The treaty also aims to ensure that all countries have fair and equitable access to the ocean's resources. While it is widely referred to as the High Seas Treaty, officially it is called the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Treaty.
As of Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron said 50 countries had ratified the treaty, with 60 needed for it to go into effect.
Separate to the High Seas Treaty, countries agreed under a 2022 U.N. biodiversity pact to put 30% of their territorial waters under conservation.
WHY DO WE NEED AN OCEAN TREATY?
Oceans support coastal economies and livelihoods through tourism, fishing, shipping, mining, offshore energy and more.
Oceans also absorb about a third of the world's carbon dioxide, or CO2 - the primary gas driving climate change - while ocean-swimming phytoplankton provide about half of the world's oxygen.
But marine life is now struggling, and human industry and development are almost entirely to blame.
More than 1,500 ocean plants and animals are now at risk of extinction, and that number is expected to rise amid ongoing pollution, overfishing, ocean warming and acidification, according to scientists at the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
Additionally, new threats to ocean organisms and ecosystems could emerge in coming years in the form of deep-sea mining for rare-earth minerals. In Nice, Macron is expected to urge countries to support postponing sea-bed exploration while researchers work to understand deep sea ecosystems.
Scientists are also concerned about the possibility that governments could look to modify ocean chemistry to boost its capacity for absorbing CO2 - a scenario that researchers say could help to limit global warming but could also have unintended consequences.
WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS FOR THE TREATY?
Macron's news on Monday of 50 governments having ratified the treaty means it is still short by 10 signatures.
The treaty will enter into force 120 days after 60 countries have ratified it. Work then begins on setting up institutions and committees to implement the treaty, while its signatories expect to hold a first conference within a year.
Despite its involvement in the original treaty negotiations, the United States under current President Donald Trump is not expected to ratify the treaty.
WHAT ELSE IS HAPPENING AT THE U.N. OCEANS CONFERENCE?
Macron is co-hosting this third U.N. Oceans conference with Costa Rica, and with at least 55 heads of state, business leaders and civil society groups expected to attend the five-day event.
Aside from discussions to advance the treaty, delegates are also expected this week to discuss overfishing, water pollution and other threats to marine life.
They'll also be looking for fresh ideas on how to pay for it all - with ocean-linked financing lagging far behind other sustainable investment areas. For the five years spanning 2015-2019, ocean-related spending totalled $10 billion.
By comparison, the U.N. estimates that every year at least $175 billion is needed for marine protection.
The last U.N. oceans summit was held in Lisbon and co-hosted by Kenya in 2022. The next, co-hosted by Chile and Korea, is set for 2028.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scientific American
an hour ago
- Scientific American
New Brain Device Is First to Read Out Inner Speech
After a brain stem stroke left him almost entirely paralyzed in the 1990s, French journalist Jean-Dominique Bauby wrote a book about his experiences—letter by letter, blinking his left eye in response to a helper who repeatedly recited the alphabet. Today people with similar conditions often have far more communication options. Some devices, for example, track eye movements or other small muscle twitches to let users select words from a screen. And on the cutting edge of this field, neuroscientists have more recently developed brain implants that can turn neural signals directly into whole words. These brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) largely require users to physically attempt to speak, however—and that can be a slow and tiring process. But now a new development in neural prosthetics changes that, allowing users to communicate by simply thinking what they want to say. The new system relies on much of the same technology as the more common 'attempted speech' devices. Both use sensors implanted in a part of the brain called the motor cortex, which sends motion commands to the vocal tract. The brain activation detected by these sensors is then fed into a machine-learning model to interpret which brain signals correspond to which sounds for an individual user. It then uses those data to predict which word the user is attempting to say. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. But the motor cortex doesn't only light up when we attempt to speak; it's also involved, to a lesser extent, in imagined speech. The researchers took advantage of this to develop their 'inner speech' decoding device and published the results on Thursday in Cell. The team studied three people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and one with a brain stem stroke, all of whom had previously had the sensors implanted. Using this new 'inner speech' system, the participants needed only to think a sentence they wanted to say and it would appear on a screen in real time. While previous inner speech decoders were limited to only a handful of words, the new device allowed participants to draw from a dictionary of 125,000 words. 'As researchers, our goal is to find a system that is comfortable [for the user] and ideally reaches a naturalistic ability,' says lead author Erin Kunz, a postdoctoral researcher who is developing neural prostheses at Stanford University. Previous research found that 'physically attempting to speak was tiring and that there were inherent speed limitations with it, too,' she says. Attempted speech devices such as the one used in the study require users to inhale as if they are actually saying the words. But because of impaired breathing, many users need multiple breaths to complete a single word with that method. Attempting to speak can also produce distracting noises and facial expressions that users find undesirable. With the new technology, the study's participants could communicate at a comfortable conversational rate of about 120 to 150 words per minute, with no more effort than it took to think of what they wanted to say. Like most BCIs that translate brain activation into speech, the new technology only works if people are able to convert the general idea of what they want to say into a plan for how to say it. Alexander Huth, who researches BCIs at the University of California, Berkeley, and wasn't involved in the new study, explains that in typical speech, 'you start with an idea of what you want to say. That idea gets translated into a plan for how to move your [vocal] articulators. That plan gets sent to the actual muscles, and then they carry it out.' But in many cases, people with impaired speech aren't able to complete that first step. 'This technology only works in cases where the 'idea to plan' part is functional but the 'plan to movement' part is broken'—a collection of conditions called dysarthria—Huth says. According to Kunz, the four research participants are eager about the new technology. 'Largely, [there was] a lot of excitement about potentially being able to communicate fast again,' she says—adding that one participant was particularly thrilled by his newfound potential to interrupt a conversation—something he couldn't do with the slower pace of an attempted speech device. To ensure private thoughts remained private, the researchers implemented a code phrase: 'chitty chitty bang bang.' When internally spoken by participants, this would prompt the BCI to start or stop transcribing. Brain-reading implants inevitably raise concerns about mental privacy. For now, Huth isn't concerned about the technology being misused or developed recklessly, speaking to the integrity of the research groups involved in neural prosthetics research. 'I think they're doing great work; they're led by doctors; they're very patient-focused. A lot of what they do is really trying to solve problems for the patients,' he says, 'even when those problems aren't necessarily things that we might think of,' such as being able to interrupt a conversation or 'making a voice that sounds more like them.' For Kunz, this research is particularly close to home. 'My father actually had ALS and lost the ability to speak,' she says, adding that this is why she got into her field of research. 'I kind of became his own personal speech translator toward the end of his life since I was kind of the only one that could understand him. That's why I personally know the importance and the impact this sort of research can have.' The contribution and willingness of the research participants are crucial in studies like this, Kunz notes. 'The participants that we have are truly incredible individuals who volunteered to be in the study not necessarily to get a benefit to themselves but to help develop this technology for people with paralysis down the line. And I think that they deserve all the credit in the world for that.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Swarm of jellyfish overwhelms nuclear power plant, causes several reactors to shut down — here's what happened
Swarm of jellyfish overwhelms nuclear power plant, causes several reactors to shut down — here's what happened A swarm of jellyfish has forced the partial shutdown of one of Europe's largest nuclear power plants, according to The Weather Channel. While officials stressed that the situation posed much more of an inconvenience than a threat to public safety, the circumstances highlighted the impact that wildlife can have on human infrastructure. It also cast a spotlight on how rising temperatures on land and in the world's oceans are altering human-wildlife interactions. What's happening? Four of the six nuclear reactors at France's Gravelines nuclear power plant were shut down after an intake pipe used to draw water for cooling from a canal became clogged with jellyfish, Reuters reported. At full capacity, the plant is capable of producing 5.4 gigawatts of electricity, according to Reuters. This makes it the largest nuclear plant not only in France but in all of Western Europe, per Islander News. The plant's nuclear reactors are cooled using water from a canal that connects to the North Sea. Over the weekend of August 9-10, currents drew a swarm of English barrel jellyfish into the canal, where they likely got stuck in the suction of the cooling system's water intake, according to Aäron Fabrice de Kisangani, a citizen scientist who spoke to Reuters. Barrel jellyfish are the largest jellyfish in the United Kingdom, capable of reaching nearly 3 feet in diameter and weighing over 150 pounds, per The Wildlife Trusts. Fabrice de Kisangani, the citizen scientist, told Reuters that warmer ocean temperatures potentially led to a larger-than-usual bloom of jellyfish, while warmer temps also allowed the jellyfish to remain in the area for later into the year than formerly was possible. After the jellyfish were cleared from the intake pipes, officials planned to bring the nuclear reactors back online one at a time over the following week, per Reuters. Why do jellyfish clogging a power plant matter? While government officials have emphasized that the situation posed no risk to the public or the environment, the circumstances highlight the impact that rising temperatures on land and in the sea are having on human-wildlife interactions. Would you feel safe living close to a nuclear power plant? Absolutely It's not my first choice Depends on how close No way Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. As Fabrice de Kisangani pointed out, English barrel jellyfish are native to the North Sea, but warmer weather may have resulted in larger-than-usual jellyfish blooms and the animals staying in the area later in the season. The situation highlighted how rising global temperatures have been changing wildlife behavior around the globe, leading to potential conflicts between humans and animals. While barrel jellyfish are native to the North Sea, rising temperatures on land and in the ocean have fueled the spread of dangerous invasive species, as well. Invasive species outcompete local species, disrupting the delicate balance of ecosystems. Even native species remaining in certain regions longer than usual during the year can have unforeseen consequences, as the barrel jellyfish have demonstrated. What's being done about rising ocean temperatures? As global temperatures rise, 90% of that extra heat is absorbed by the world's oceans, causing the water temperature to increase drastically, according to NOAA. The resulting increase in water temperatures disrupts important ocean currents, fuels the spread of invasive species, and contributes significantly to sea-level rise through a process known as thermal expansion. In order to reverse this trend, it is necessary to drastically reduce the amount of heat-trapping pollution entering the atmosphere. To make a difference at the political level, you can use your voice to support political candidates who share your policy priorities. Taking things a step further, you can reduce heat-trapping pollution directly by driving an EV or installing solar panels on your home. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
Business Insider
7 hours ago
- Business Insider
A human species unknown to scientists has been discovered in East Africa's oldest country
The fossil dates back about 2.65 million years. The discovery, which was unearthed in the Afar Region's Ledi-Geraru region, provides fresh insight into a crucial and little-known phase of early human history. Ten teeth from two people were found in the discovery: six molars, two incisors, one premolar, and one canine. These were found to belong to a new species in the genus Australopithecus, which is a group of early human progenitors distinguished by a combination of human and ape-like traits. Only six species of Australopithecus have been discovered from fossil sites in Africa thus far. This is the genus's seventh recognized species. Adding to the significance, scientists discovered three more teeth in the same location that were dated to 2.59 million years ago and belonged to the oldest known species of Homo. This is the same early human species that was found in 2013 using a neighboring jawbone. Existence of different human species in Africa The age and location of these fossils point to a surprising overlap: this newly found Australopithecus species coexisted with early Homo in the same region, raising fascinating concerns regarding resource rivalry and ecological relationships. This cohabitation implies that about 2.6 million years ago, at least four separate hominin species lived in East Africa, including another Australopithecus species and a Paranthropus species specialized for intensive chewing. "This reinforces the idea that the story of human evolution is not of a single lineage changing slowly through time," said University of Nevada, Las Vegas paleoanthropologist Brian Villmoare, lead author of the research published on Wednesday in the journal Nature, opens new tab. "Rather, the pattern of human evolution is similar to that of other organisms, repeatedly branching into multiple species throughout the fossil record, many of whom lived at the same time," Villmoare added. By examining the 13 teeth, the researchers hope to get insight into the type of contact that may have occurred between the Australopithecus and Homo species, as reported by Reuters. "We are currently analyzing teeth to see if we can tell if they ate the same thing," said Arizona State University paleoecologist and project co-director Kaye Reed. The age of the fossils was estimated using argon dating on feldspar crystals found in volcanic ash layers in the sediment.
