UK government faces legal action over not evacuating critically ill children from Gaza
The legal action, being taken against the Foreign Office and Home Office on behalf of three critically ill children in Gaza, argues that UK ministers have failed to take into account the lack of treatment options for children in the territory before denying medical evacuations.
It also says the position not to medically evacuate children from Gaza stands in stark contrast to Britain's historical record in such circumstances, which has evacuated children during the conflict in Bosnia and, most recently, Ukraine.
'The UK government has explained its failure to facilitate medical evacuations from Gaza on the basis that it supports treatment options in Gaza and the surrounding region and that there are visas available for privately funded medical treatment in the UK. However, these mechanisms are profoundly inadequate to meet the urgent needs of children in Gaza,' said Carolin Ott from the law firm Leigh Day, who is leading the action.
The families of the three children, aged two and five, have said an urgent evacuation is needed for critical medication and treatment they are unable to access in Gaza. To date, the UK has yet to offer itself as a receiving state for medical evacuations from Gaza, and campaigners have been pushing for a separate immigration route.
The two-year-old, referred to as Child Y, has an arteriovenous malformation in his cheek which causes daily bleeding and has left him in critical condition.
The other children, two siblings referred to as Child S, have been diagnosed with cystinosis nephropathy, a chronic condition also known as leaky kidney. They have already developed kidney failure and may need transplants. One of the siblings is no longer able to move.
The action comes as Israel's war on Gaza passed 650 days. Since 7 October, more than 17,000 of the 58,000 Palestinians killed by Israeli forces in the territory were children, according to the health ministry in Gaza.
According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), it is estimated that as many as 12,500 patients in Gaza require medical evacuation. As of 10 April, 7,229 patients have been evacuated to Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, the EU and the US. Of these patients, 4,984 have been children.
However, organisations such as Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), which has evacuated 22 patients, have called on more nations to help, as the limited destinations remain a challenge, said Dr Hani Isleem, MSF project coordinator for medical evacuations from Gaza.
'Some countries are reluctant to take in patients, fearing they might be perceived as facilitating 'forced migration' or as taking on the burden of the patients' extended stay,' he said.
A government spokesperson said that since the start of the conflict the UK has provided healthcare to over 500,000 people in the Palestinian territories through supporting field hospitals and medical supplies. In May, the UK announced a £7.5m package of support for medical care in Gaza and the region.
'We have helped several children with complex paediatric conditions access privately funded medical care in the UK, supporting an initiative by Project Pure Hope, the spokesperson said.
In May, two children arrived in the UK for medical care with the assistance of Project Pure Hope. It was the first time the UK let in a child from Gaza for medical care, which was privately funded, and is the only existing route for those in need of critical care. According to legal documents, the charity had requested a Gaza-UK pathway at the government's expense and was refused.
'We have been clear the situation in Gaza is intolerable and that there must be an immediate ceasefire. We urge Israel to let vital humanitarian aid in and allow Gazans to receive urgent healthcare, including allowing the sick and wounded to temporarily leave the Gaza Strip to receive treatment,' the government spokesperson said.
The government has until 28 July to respond to the pre-action letter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
No meal deal? Striking doctors 'are offered cheaper lunches' in attempt to avert five-day walk out
Doctors rejected Wes Streeting 's last-ditch offer of meal deals and opted to strike instead. Resident doctors, previously known as junior doctors, refused the Health Secretary's offer of cheaper lunches and subsidised medical equipment and instead voted for a five-day walkout. Mr Streeting warned that he couldn't budge on pay, but instead proposed to cut the costs of exams and improve financial support, The Sun revealed. In his letter on Monday the Labour MP said he wanted to resolve the disputes without strikes and felt progress had already been made but talks broke down on Tuesday. The British Medical Association are demanding a 29 per cent pay increase instead of the 5.4 per cent initially offered. The Health Secretary accused the British Medical Association of showing 'complete disdain for patients' and described their walkout as 'unjustified' earlier this week. Health leaders were also quick to round on the union, warning their 'crushing' and 'misjudged' action would cause widespread disruption and harm. Up to 50,000 resident doctors - formerly known as junior doctors - are set to strike from 7am on Friday in pursuit of a 29 per cent pay rise. They have already received above inflation pay rises for the past three years, worth an extra 28.9 per cent in total, following previous strikes. This includes an inflation-busting rise this year of 5.4 per cent, which is the most generous in the public sector. Despite this the BMA said Mr Streeting's offer 'did not go far enough to warrant calling off strikes' and lacked any 'substantive proposal on both pay and non-pay elements'. Dr Melissa Ryan and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, co-chairs of the BMA's RDC, said: 'Disappointingly, what we saw would not have been significant enough to change the day-to-day financial situation for our members. 'The non-pay aspects of last year's pay deal have still not been delivered, which has shaken the confidence of our members that any further non-pay elements would be honoured.' Mr Streeting said: 'After a 28.9 per cent pay hike in the last three years and the highest pay rise in the public sector two years in a row, strike action is completely unjustified, completely unprecedented in the history of British trade unionism and shows a complete disdain for patients and the wider recovery of the NHS.' The announcement came after health bosses warned striking doctors will cause patients 'undoubted harm' and a new poll revealed the majority of the public now oppose walkouts. The latest YouGov poll reveals more than half (52 per cent) of people in the UK either 'somewhat oppose' (20 per cent) or 'strongly oppose' (32 per cent) the idea of resident doctors going on strike over pay. Meanwhile, only a third (34 per cent) of the 4,954 adults surveyed either 'somewhat support' (23 per cent) or 'strongly support' (11 per cent) doctor strikes. YouGov said the proportion supporting the strike over pay has dropped five points since it last asked the question in May. Then, 48 per cent opposed resident doctors striking, while 39 per cent supported them taking action. Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, said of the BMA's announcement: 'This decision is a crushing blow for patients and for the NHS. 'We urge resident doctors to help trusts minimise the harm by notifying them of their plans for strike days. 'For example we must ensure that there are enough staff for all the cancer, transplant and maternity care that cannot and must not be delayed. 'Another huge worry is the cost. 'It is vital that consultants providing cover take NHS rates of pay rather than insisting on inflated BMA rates that are simply unaffordable. 'We say to the BMA 'think again' and pull back from this hugely damaging decision.'
BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Health Check Do you really have a penicillin allergy?
Penicillin is the go-to antibiotic for many common infections - but in the UK more than 1-in-15 adults have a penicillin allergy label on their medical record. New research suggests that many with these labels are not actually allergic. Professor Sue Pavitt explains how more accurate allergy labelling might help fight the rise of antimicrobial resistance. Both Burundi and Senegal announced last week that they had eliminated trachoma. Dr Graham Easton walks us through the long road to this milestone. A passionate debate has caused division in Maharashtra, India, over the possibility of homeopaths being allowed to practice and prescribe conventional medicine. Reporter Chhavi Sachdev explains why doctors on both sides are striking. In the UK, eight babies made with the combined genetic material of three people have been born without the hereditary mitochondrial disease. We explore the implications of this breakthrough. Sex at birth might not be as random as we once thought; a new study found that families with three children of the same sex are more likely to have another child of the same sex. Presenter: Claudia Hammond Producer: Hannah Robins Assistant Producer: Alice McKee Studio Managers: Dyfan Rose and Andrew Garrett
Sky News
26 minutes ago
- Sky News
Doctors go on strike for five days - here's everything you need to know
Why you can trust Sky News Doctors in England and Wales go on strike for five days from Friday, with warnings it could lead to patient harm in emergency departments. It is the culmination of an escalating row between NHS bosses and the British Medication Association (BMA) over pay. Here is everything you need to know about the strikes. How long is the strike? From 7am on Friday 25 July to 7am on Wednesday 30 July. Who is striking? Up to 50,000 resident doctors will walk out. Resident doctors is the new name for junior doctors - it was changed to better reflect their responsibilities. Resident doctors are fully qualified doctors who are either currently in postgraduate training or gaining experience as locally employed doctors to become consultants, GPs or specialists. Their title was changed after years of calls for the term "junior" to be retired, as it was seen as both misleading and demeaning. General practice, community pharmacies, and dentistry are not impacted by the action. How will it affect appointments? During previous strikes, NHS England told trusts to cancel large volumes of non-urgent care so that consultants could step in to cover emergency care. Previous rounds of industrial action - 11 walkouts over multiple days - saw an estimated 1.5 million appointments cancelled or rescheduled. But under the leadership of new NHS England chief executive Sir Jim Mackey, hospitals have now been instructed to cancel non-urgent work only in "exceptional circumstances" – and only with prior approval. This suggests that much fewer planned appointments will be cancelled, although no exact figures have been given by either side. The BMA has warned this new approach risks spreading doctors too thinly. How will I know if my appointment has been cancelled? Patients have been advised to "choose healthcare wisely" during the strike. If your appointment has been cancelled, or rearranged, you will be contacted by the hospital directly. Priority will be given to patients with the most pressing health needs. 2:27 If you do not hear that your appointment has been changed, you should attend as usual. Will I still be able to access emergency care? If you need emergency care during the strike you should still go to hospital as normal. Patients have been told to call 999 if it is a medical or mental health emergency. If the situation is non-life threatening, patients should seek support through NHS 111, NHS 111 online, their GP or a pharmacy. Why are they striking? Doctors in England and Wales were awarded a 5.4% pay increase by the government, but the BMA still threatened strike action, claiming the increases did not account for historical pay freezes. Instead the BMA is calling for a rise of 29.2% to bring salaries back in line with 2008 levels. More than 26,000 resident doctors voted in favour of the strikes. I thought they already had a pay rise? Yes, in July last year resident doctors were awarded a raise of 22% over two years, bringing to end months of strike action. It was the highest public sector award in recent years. But the trade union argues that pay has declined significantly since 2008 when adjusting for inflation. The latest deal saw doctors given a 4% increase, plus £750 "on a consolidated basis" - which works out as an average rise of 5.4%. The BMA said no doctor "took the possibility of striking lightly" but the majority of its members believed they had "no other choice". "Doctors have spoken and spoken clearly," the union said. "They won't accept that they are worth a fifth less than they were in 2008. Our pay may have declined but our will to fight remains strong." The BMA said Mr Streeting had the power to "make the right decision" on pay. Does the public support the strikes? A new YouGov poll found support for the strikes is declining. The survey found about half (52%) of people in the UK either "somewhat oppose" (20%) or "strongly oppose" (32%) the idea of resident doctors going on strike over pay. Older people are more likely to be against, with 52% of those aged over 65 "strongly opposed", compared to 10% of those aged 18 to 24. YouGov says the proportion of people who support the strikes has dropped five percentage points since May last year. What does the government say? Talks between the government and BMA have continued, with the latter saying strikes could still be avoided. Health secretary Wes Streeting has ruled out any additional pay rises this year, but has said other aspects of the contract - including student debt, exam fees and working conditions - may be up for negotiation. 2:50 Mr Streeting previously warned the BMA the public "will not forgive" strike action. He wrote in The Times that any walkouts would be a "disaster" for the union and for patients, adding the government "can't afford" more pay rises. NHS chiefs said any return to industrial action would be "bad for patients, for staff and for the NHS". Chief executive of NHS Providers Daniel Elkeles said: "We need cool heads to de-escalate this and remove the threat of further damaging industrial action."
