Humiliated Kim fuming as new 5,000-ton warship is ‘CRUSHED' in catastrophic launch during grand unveiling ceremony
TYRANT Kim Jong-un has slammed a "serious accident" at the launch of his new 5,000-ton warship after it was "crushed" and left lying on its side.
The humiliated North Korean dictator branded the catastrophic launch as a "criminal act" which could not be tolerated.
8
A new North Korean warship at the harbour ahead of its catastrophic launch
Credit: AFP
8
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un described the failed launch as a 'criminal act'
Credit: EPA
8
The Choe Hyon is said to be capable of housing a vertical launchpad which can fire nuclear missiles
Credit: Credit: Pen News
8
The disastrous launch came after Kim launched a destroyer of the same class, Choe Hyon, last month
Credit: Credit: Pen News
8
The rare admission of failure came after the fuming despot witnessed the
Mortified Kim watched on in horror as the
North Korea's state broadcaster said a malfunction caused the stern of the colossal destroyer to slide prematurely into the water.
It crushed parts of the
hull
and left the bow stranded on the shipway.
But the broadcaster did not report any casualties or injuries as a result of the blunder.
Raging
He added that the "irresponsible errors" of those involved will be dealt with.
Most read in The US Sun
The seething dictator
It is currently unclear what punishment exactly the hermit kingdom's leader will unleash upon those deemed at fault.
US Demonstrates Military Power Over Korean Peninsula Amid Rising Tensions
The menacing vessel is now lying on its side in the water according to South Korean military analysis.
Naval analysts say the damage done to the vessel in such a launch malfunction could be "catastrophic".
State media did not immediately release images of the accident.
The launch failure marks a huge setback for Kim, who has recently been ramping up naval modernization in a stark warning to the west.
Last month, the tyrant unveiled
8
Kim Jong Un and his daughter Ju Ae attending the launch ceremony of a newly-built destroyer at the Nampo port in April
Credit: AFP
8
South Korean news showed footage of the warship at the harbour
Credit: AFP
Dubbed the Choe Hyon, it is believed to be the same 5,000-ton class ship as the one which spectacularly failed on Wednesday.
The mighty
North Korea's state media - which also serves as Kim's leading propaganda machine - reported that the vessel was equipped with the "most powerful weapons".
The ship is named after anti-Japanese revolutionary fighter Choe Hyon, the report said.
And at over 5,000 tonnes, the destroyer is set to become the largest warship in North Korea's naval arsenal, surpassing the current largest vessel, a 1,360-tonne frigate.
It was previously reported that North Korea's new class of warship was able to accommodate dozens of vertical launch cells to carry missiles that its military has already developed.
Military analysts say these launchers will be capable of firing guided cruise missiles, which North Korea says could carry nuclear warheads.
Footage from North Korea's state-run television KRT showed Kim arriving in Nampho with his daughter Ju Ae after travelling to the western port city by train.
Read more on the Irish Sun
Kim, in a speech from the launch reported by KCNA, said the warship would be handed over to the navy and go into service early
next
year.
8
Last month the tyrant unveiled North Korea's largest naval destroyer yet in an extravagant ceremony
Credit: Credit: Pen News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
EPA projections require a frank reassessment of Irish climate policies
Judging by the EPA's latest greenhouse gas projections , Ireland's climate policies are in urgent need of an overhaul . The projections issued annually relate to likely carbon emissions across the Irish economy up to 2030, but also for following decades up to 2050. It is clear existing policies are failing to deliver significant emission reductions or are being overtaken by increases in energy demand or economic growth. At best, Ireland might achieve a 16 per cent reduction in agricultural emissions compared with the 51 per cent that is required under law, which is reasonably aligned with our Paris Agreement commitments. This would be with full implementation of measures in the Government's climate action plan. READ MORE But even that 16 per cent is not guaranteed: the EPA reports that emissions under an 'existing measures' scenario might even increase by 2030 above their 2018 levels. That must not be allowed to happen. Why is Ireland failing in climate policy , you might wonder. Don't we have a gold standard climate law? While it's true that our 2021 Climate Act is well designed from a governance point of view, any law – even a good one – is no substitute for political will. That the political will has waned is obvious from a reading of the Programme for Government and the choice of rural independents as coalition partners. But other decisions and non-decisions, delays and prevarications suggest that the Government has little interest or commitment to acting on the recommendations of its climate experts , and prefers to bend to the will of major exporters and a highly self-serving reading of public opinion. Though the policy framework has been considerably improved, it seems to take an age to implement what should be straightforward decisions (and I'm not even speaking of major infrastructure projects). [ Q&A: What should we do about multiple climate risks threatening Ireland? Opens in new window ] The Departments of Finance and Public Expenditure still dictate the pace of investment, and administrative delays in making decisions of any kind are common. Public bodies are notoriously cautious and risk-averse, but that mindset means that we are not getting the decisive actions that the public was promised to clean up our energy system and put Ireland on a path to climate neutrality – ideally, before 2050. The director general of the EPA, Laura Burke, remarked last week at a conference in Dublin Castle that 'additional measures and accelerated implementation' are required if we are to even get close to the 2030 targets. She stated that 'scaling up' efforts will be necessary across the board. But what does that actually mean? For you and me, scaling up our efforts might mean an additional journey by bike or a meat-free dinner once a week, or installing solar panels (if you're privileged enough to own a roof). Worthy actions taken voluntarily make us feel better but they won't put a significant dent in Ireland's emissions. Systemic change requires a different set of levers – the use of regulations, mandates, incentives, subsidies and enforcement. The truth is that our public representatives and policy experts seem unwilling to discuss the big decisions that will be needed to dramatically transform our energy system and land use and prefer to rely on policies and measures that the EPA now acknowledges will not be sufficient. [ The 'foot may be coming off the action pedal': Climate plan fails to build on ambition Opens in new window ] For instance, the Dáil hardly ever debates climate policy though the actual words are mentioned frequently. When the numbers are going in the right direction (eg, chemical nitrogen use) everyone wants to claim the credit (good policy, good farmers, etc). When the numbers are going in the wrong direction (chemical nitrogen figures have increased in 2024 again, which will be confirmed by EPA inventories in coming weeks), no one accepts responsibility. When the pressure mounts to make a decision, policymakers revert to default and recommend another report or a new consultation. And meanwhile we are blowing through the first carbon budget by between 8 and 12 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, which adds up to the total annual emissions of countries like Armenia or Nicaragua. And whenever a negative news story comes out about emissions or climate science, the Government is quick to report Ireland's stellar progress in renewable electricity, even though this, too, is but a small flicker (excuse the pun) of what we will actually need to deliver by 2050. The kind of bold interventions we now need would restrict the energy consumption of large energy users like data centres , restrict urban private car use, and deploy effective, catchment-based limits on nitrogen, ammonia and greenhouse gas pollution from agricultural sources . [ Tech giants' indirect emissions rose 150% in three years amid AI growth, UN says Opens in new window ] Imaginative and brave measures to accelerate the roll-out of renewables and to ensure that their environmental impact is properly assessed and mitigated will be essential. We are facing into a global climate emergency , with global temperature increases now heading well north of 1.5 degrees and the prospect of dangerous climate breakdown occurring within our lifetimes. Clearly the newly established Joint Oireachtas Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy doesn't view it as much of an emergency: following lengthy delays in setting up the Oireachtas committees, it has met just twice since the general election in late November 2024, and only to elect a chair and vice chair. Yes, scaling is hard to do, so we had better do what we know already works and what we are good at delivering. If the magic beans (small-scale nuclear reactors, feed additives, biomethane) don't deliver, then we have to consider more radical pruning. Everything should be on the table, including livestock herd reductions, transport hubs in every town and village, mandatory afforestation in suitable areas and urgent State investment in making heat pumps, solar panels, sustainable building materials and shared mobility services affordable and accessible to all as a priority over the demands of incumbent energy, water and land-hungry industries. And no one needs to be left behind. Sadhbh O'Neill is a climate and environmental researcher and activist
Irish Independent
6 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Higher food prices for consumers are here to stay, says Agriculture Minister on trip to boost sales in Japan
Irish consumers have seen food prices rise more than 4pc in the past year, Central Statistics Office data showed in May. That's around three times faster than general consumer inflation. 'We historically had a long sustained period of very low food prices,' Mr Heydon said. 'Farmers will tell you that maybe those food prices were not matching the cost of production, and had put farmers in a very difficult space. We saw a significant increase in farmers' input costs, and the increase in the price of food didn't [initially] catch up. 'That has changed in more recent times, and I think the price of food and beverages is now more reflective of the cost of production, and I think it's unlikely to change.' He was speaking in Tokyo, where the minister and senior officials from the Department of Agriculture and Bord Bia are on a trade mission looking to expand Irish exports into the world's third largest economy. Mr Heydon had meetings with the Japanese ministers for agriculture and health. The minister said he was 'very mindful' of cost pressures and pointed to wider actions by Government, including Enterprise Minister Peter Burke, around competitiveness. However, his role as agriculture minister was to open the maximum number of opportunities and markets for Irish food and drink producers, to allow them to get the best possible return. Only 10pc of the food and drink we produce is consumed at home – 90pc is exported Food and agriculture represent 40pc of GDP in rural areas, Mr Heydon said. 'Only 10pc of the food and drink we produce is consumed at home – 90pc is exported. It is my job to make sure we get the best possible return for that.' Under a Japan-EU trade agreement that came into force in 2019, the Asian economy opened up to food imports in exchange for increased EU access for Japanese products, including cars and machinery. The deal means tariffs on imported Irish dairy and beef, once as high as 40pc, are being gradually eliminated. It was the first trade deal of its kind to include an explicit commitment to make a 'positive contribution' to combat climate change, creating an additional opportunity for eco-friendly products. Irish food sales to Japan have doubled since the 2019 trade agreement came into effect – though at just €168m last year, it remains a small fraction of Ireland's €19bn food exports. Cheese accounts for 34pc of Irish food sales in Japan, followed by pig meats (28pc), beef (14pc), fish (10pc) and beverages – including Irish whiskey (6pc). The market for butter remains restricted through non-tariff barriers, and full access for Irish poultry and cooked meats is under discussion. Despite its distance from Ireland, Japan represents a significant market opportunity and offers a strategic diversification away from dependence on the UK and US markets, Mr Heydon said. He said there is a pressing need to diversify with whiskey, due to the impact of US tariffs. The sector is now experiencing 'significant cash flow issues' following a decade of expansion and capital investment. Whiskey is a popular drink in Japan, with domestic producers and Scotch brands serving the market, offering an opportunity for Irish brands to expand. Japan is already the biggest importer of Irish beef tongue – accounting for around 70pc of the market. As the product is unpopular in Ireland and its immediate markets, this helps maximise the value per Irish beef carcass without adding to the number of animals slaughtered. Beef tongue is popular in Japan, sliced thin and grilled, and sold by restaurants including the Negishi chain of 49 outlets that serve 100,000 meals a week around Tokyo. There is also a market for premium steak cuts, with Ireland's leaner, grass-fed beef providing an alternative to the fat-rich wagyu style in which Japanese beef farms specialise. Local Japanese chefs say the leaner Irish alternative is finding a niche with younger, health-conscious consumers, helping overcome a perception that grass-fed beef is tough. The push from Ireland includes consumer goods. Keogh's Crisps has struck an agreement with a Japanese partner and is supplying a number of retailers, while Cashel Blue cheese has entered the market under its own branding. It's about developing relationships, building trust and respect Bord Bia CEO Jim O'Toole said Japan, along with South Korea, represented a significant opportunity for Irish producers but would take time to develop. Both countries have high levels of disposable income and neither is self-sufficient in food, so they are both often among the top five of global import markets. For Irish producers, understanding the market cultures and the mechanics of supply chains was vital. 'The business culture is specific and quite formal and Japanese buyers don't do things opportunistically,' Mr O'Toole said. 'It's about developing relationships, building trust and respect, and developing that for an enduring business.' He sees a market opportunity in fish, as Ireland is already shipping mackerel. 'To the point about the discerning quality demands of Japanese buyers, I know in some processing plants in Ireland, there will be a Japanese person watching to make sure that the specification is fulfilled,' he said. 'So this is not about quick wins. This is about painstaking detail.'
The Journal
9 hours ago
- The Journal
Government rejects motion calling on it to stop sale of 'Israeli war bonds'
GOVERNMENT HAS REJECTED a joint-proposal from the opposition which called on the Central Bank to stop facilitating the sale of Israeli bonds within the EU, an issue that has moved up the political agenda in Ireland in recent months. The motion, put forward by the Social Democrats and supported by Sinn Féin, People Before Profit and the Labour Party, sought the reversal of a previous government decision to block a bill calling for the same measure last month . Members of those parties on Monday requested that a free 'vote of conscience' take place on the issue – meaning that government TDs would not have to vote with their party. The motion was defeated this evening 85 to 71 in the government's favour. Israeli State Bonds have been advertised as a method to support the country's economy and, more recently, websites promoting the investments have emphasised their importance to Israel's military operations in Gaza. Some TDs, as a result, have dubbed the securities as 'Israeli war bonds'. Coalition-supporting TDs, independents Barry Heneghan and Gillian Toole, repeated their vote to support the opposition's call . Both TDs previously said that they had a right to vote, as independents, in a manner they agreed with, pointing out that the programme for government does not include references to the issue. Advertisement Bonds from countries outside the EU must have legal documents approved by a central bank from a member state in order for the securities to be sold within the European single market. In the case of Israel, the country is Ireland. A protest outside the Dáil today calling on government to support the opposition's motion. Alamy Alamy The Central Bank itself is responsible for assessing whether the products it offers are compliant with these EU requirements. Since Hamas's attack on Israel on 7 October 2023 and Israel's subsequent bombardment and siege of Gaza, there has been mounting pressure on the Government from pro-Palestinian activists in Ireland to stop the facilitation of the sale of these bonds. But, Governor of the Central Bank Gabriel Makhlouf today defended its offerings, telling TDs at an Oireachtas Committee that the UN's Genocide Convention applies only to the Irish State, not the country's banking regulator. Activists have demonstrated at the site in Dublin over the last number of months and have called for legislation that would give Ireland the power to refuse the sale of Israeli 'war bonds' over human rights concerns. Speaking during a Fine Gael parliamentary party meeting this evening, finance minister Paschal Donohoe told members that oppositional TDs wanted the government to tell the state's banking regulator what to do, despite its mandated independence. The Dublin Central TD said government cannot approve legislation that impedes on the independence of the Central Bank for legal purposes. Opposition TDs argued this evening that, as the bonds are intended to fund the war in Gaza, Ireland has obligations under the UN's Genocide Convention to use 'all means likely to have a deterrent effect' on those suspected of committing such crimes. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
