Gabbard claims Obama officials ‘manufactured intelligence' of 2016 Russian election interference
Gabbard asserted in a statement that former officials engaged in a 'treasonous conspiracy' and said her office was turning over evidence to the Justice Department for possible criminal referrals
'The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government,' Gabbard said. 'Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people.'
Friday's memo cites officials such as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director Jim Comey, among others.
President Trump has for years claimed the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether his campaign colluded with Moscow was a 'hoax,' targeting officials like Brennan and Comey with frequent attacks.
Trump in March signed a memo ordering the declassification of 'all files related to Crossfire Hurricane,' the name given to the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The very intelligence agencies that Gabbard now oversees have long concluded that Russia sought to influence the 2016 election – an assessment that was backed by other outside entities.
That includes a three-year bipartisan Senate investigation that concluded in a more than 1,300 page report that Russia was aggressive in seeking to interfere with the election on Trump's behalf, including by launching a massive social media campaign.
Gabbard's memo, as well as another 114 pages of related documents, primarily rest on claims there was no indication of a Russian effort to directly manipulate the actual vote count.
However, that is not at odds with the conclusion of the intelligence community or the Senate report, which determined there was 'no evidence that any votes were changed or that any voting machines were manipulated.' The Obama administration said it had seen no evidence that hackers tampered with the results.
Gabbard's release was immediately panned by Intelligence Democrats, who noted that it comes amid fractures within the Trump administration over how to handle scrutiny over the Jeffrey Epstein case.
'It's a day that ends with 'y' and Donald Trump desperately wants to change the subject, so Director Gabbard is rehashing decade-old false claims about the Obama Administration. Few episodes in our nation's history have been investigated as thoroughly as the Intelligence Community's warning in 2016 that Russia was interfering in the election,' House Intelligence ranking member Jim Himes (D-Conn.) said in a statement.
'Every legitimate investigation, including the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee investigation, found no evidence of politicization and endorsed the findings of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment.'
Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, also criticized Gabbard.
'It seems DNI Gabbard is unaware that the years-long Russia investigation carried out by the Senate Intelligence Committee reaffirmed that 'the Russian government directed extensive activity against U.S. election infrastructure' ahead of the 2016 election, and that it 'used social media to conduct an information warfare campaign' in order to benefit Donald Trump. This conclusion was supported on a unanimous basis by every single Democrat and Republican on the committee,' he said in a statement.
The Gabbard allegations also come shortly after reports that she had fallen out of favor with Trump over intelligence related to Iran's nuclear program.
Also Friday, the Justice Department moved to release some evidence from the Epstein case, including some grand jury testimony, under pressure to release more information about a figure Trump used to socialize with.
The move from Gabbard comes not only amid fallout from the Epstein saga, but shortly after reports that she had fallen out of favor with Trump over intelligence related to Iran's nuclear program.
Friday's release underscores how probing the origins of the Russia investigation has remained a fixation for the president nearly a decade later. The memo also focuses on the Steele Dossier, a collection of salacious allegations about Trump's ties to Russia, some of which has been discredited.
Gabbard received praise from GOP figures for the report.
'DISMANTLING THE DEEP STATE!' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) wrote on the social media platform X.
'The Russia hoax was a political hit job manufactured by Obama officials and weaponized by intel agencies to take down President Trump. Accountability is long overdue!'
However, in Democratic circles, Gabbard has been accused in this instance as well as other of tailoring intelligence to suit the needs of the administration.
Warner noted that Gabbard previously called on Trump to pardon leaker Edward Snowden, who released thousands of National Security Agency documents showing the bulk collection of Americans' communications data.
'It is sadly not surprising that DNI Gabbard, who promised to depoliticize the intelligence community, is once again weaponizing her position to amplify the president's election conspiracy theories,' Warner said.
'It is appalling to hear DNI Gabbard accuse her own IC workforce of committing a 'treasonous conspiracy' when she was unwilling to label Edward Snowden a traitor.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

24 minutes ago
Critics say Trump trying to distract from Epstein by talking about everything but that
Critics of President Donald Trump are accusing him of trying to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein files as the administration faces pushback for more transparency regarding the case. Among a recent flurry of wide-ranging posts on his social media platform, Trump on Sunday demanded that the Washington Commanders reverse the team's name change, claiming that there is "a big clamoring for this." He then followed up several hours later, saying, "My statement on the Washington Redskins has totally blown up, but only in a very positive way," and threatened to not facilitate a deal for the football team's new stadium in Washington, D.C., if it does not change its name. In response to the post, Joe Walsh, a former Republican congressman who ran against Trump for president in 2020, said on social media, "Trump is scared to death of the Epstein files." The Department of Justice and FBI's announcement in a July 6 memo that they would not release any additional files on Epstein, after the Trump administration earlier promised to do so, has angered many of the president's supporters. The memo also said they determined that there is no Epstein "client list," which has been the subject of conspiracy theories boosted by the FBI's Kash Patel and Dan Bongino prior to joining the Trump administration, further angering some of Trump's most vocal supporters. After the Trump administration announced the release Monday of 230,000 files related to the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., Rev. Al Sharpton claimed the move was a "desperate attempt to distract people from the firestorm engulfing Trump over the Epstein files and the public unraveling of his credibility among the MAGA base." California Sen. Adam Schiff has also accused the president of trying to distract from the Epstein firestorm. In a post on Sunday, Trump continued his attacks on Schiff, claiming the Democrat should go to prison for allegedly falsifying loan documents regarding his Maryland residence. Schiff previously said that Trump's accusation is a "convenient distraction" from the Epstein controversy. "What really is going on here is this is Donald Trump trying to bring about political retribution, retaliation, trying to distract from his Epstein files problem," Schiff said in a video message last week. Among other recent posts, Trump on Monday called for an immediate end to cashless bail and railed against the federal judge overseeing Harvard University's challenge to the Trump administration's withholding billions of federal funds from the school, calling her a "TOTAL DISASTER." He also weighed in on the case involving Bryan Kohberger, who is set to be sentenced this week after pleading guilty to murdering four University of Idaho students, in a social media post Monday that appears to be the first time that the president had spoken out publicly about the 2022 killings. Trump also turned his attention to the Wall Street Journal, pushing back against what he called a "typically untruthful story" published Sunday that reported that in the past few days, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent privately laid out his case to Trump for why he shouldn't try to push out Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Trump's criticism of the Wall Street Journal comes days after the president filed a $10 billion libel lawsuit against the paper, Rupert Murdoch and others over the Thursday report about Trump's alleged birthday message sent to Epstein in 2003, which he says does not exist. The president also reposted a video on his social media platform on Sunday that included fake footage of former President Barack Obama being arrested in the Oval Office and behind bars. Trump has in recent days baselessly accused Obama and other Democrats of making up and doctoring Epstein files. Democratic strategist Sawyer Hackett argued that with posts like the Washington Commanders name change and Obama arrest video, Trump is attempting to "distract from the Epstein scandal." ESPN's Stephen A. Smith also called Trump's Commanders remarks "petty" and "evasive," claiming in a broadcast of ESPN's "First Take" on Monday that Trump was attempting to distract his base from "other issues, including the Epstein files." Trump did address the Epstein uproar on Saturday, reiterating on his social media platform that he has ordered the Justice Department to request the release of more details on the probe into the wealthy financier and convicted sex offender, who died by suicide in jail in 2019. The move follows calls from both Republicans and Democrats for transparency in the wake of the DOJ and FBI's July 6 memo. Though in his post on Saturday, Trump claimed that releasing grand jury testimony in the Epstein case may do little to quell the outspoken criticism of his administration's handling of the case, writing, "Even if the Court gave its full and unwavering approval, nothing will be good enough for the troublemakers and radical left lunatics making the request. It will always be more, more, more." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt maintained on Monday that Trump is being transparent with his base about the Epstein case. "He knows what his supporters want. It's transparency, and he has given them that on all accounts when it comes to everything this administration has done," Leavitt told reporters. "No question is off limits here at this White House, not just for the president, but myself as well," she added. Beyond the handling of the Epstein case, Trump appears to have lost ground on issues that once were among his strongest attributes, including immigration. A recent Gallup poll shows Trump's approval rating on immigration is underwater among American adults, and particularly among Hispanic Americans. Among American adults, 62% disapprove of Trump's handling of immigration, according to the poll. Only 21% of Hispanic Americans approve of how Trump is handling immigration issues, according to Gallup. In recent polling from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research (AP-NORC), only 43% of U.S. adults said they approved of his handling of immigration -- down from the 49% in March, the poll found. In addition to immigration, Trump earned less than 50% approval on every issue included in the poll, including the economy, government spending, taxes, trade, health care and natural disaster relief. Overall, 58% of U.S. adults disapprove of his job as president, the poll found.


Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Federal judge blocks Trump administration from defunding Planned Parenthood
A judge on Monday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from stripping Medicaid funds from Planned Parenthood after Congress and President Donald Trump agreed to partially defund the nonprofit through passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Judge Indira Talwani of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts said in her order partially granting a preliminary injunction that the bill unconstitutionally punishes Planned Parenthood member organizations that do not provide abortions. The injunction will risk "at most minimal harm—financial or otherwise—to" the Trump administration while the lawsuit proceeds," Talwani, an Obama appointee, wrote. Talwani's order arose from a lawsuit brought by Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion vendor, over the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a massive budget bill that passed Congress this month with no Democrat support. Trump signed the bill into law on July 4. A provision in the bill stripped Medicaid funding from Planned Parenthood, which the nonprofit said could force it to close about 200 of its 600 facilities and deprive about half of its customers, more than one million people, of services that do not include abortion. Planned Parenthood attorneys noted in court filings that Medicaid does not cover abortion. The attorneys argued that cancer and sexually transmitted infections would go undetected, especially for low-income people, and that more unplanned pregnancies would occur because of a lack of contraception access. They said the consequences of losing Medicaid funding "will be grave." Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys had previously argued in court filings that the purpose of the budget provision was to stop "federal subsidies for Big Abortion" by freezing federal funds for certain Medicaid recipients who provide abortions. Weakening Planned Parenthood has been one of the pro-life movement's leading priorities since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Talwani granted a temporary restraining order two weeks ago in favor of Planned Parenthood. The judge initially offered no explanation for her decision, a move that led to widespread backlash among Republicans who described it as judicial overreach. Days later, Talwani offered more context in a subsequent order. The preliminary injunction will leave in place the pause on defunding Planned Parenthood indefinitely, but the Trump administration is likely to appeal the order to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. DOJ attorneys had previously argued to the court that blocking a measure that was passed by Congress and signed by the president was an extraordinary move and unjustified. "Beyond the futility of the claims on the merits, Planned Parenthood fails to demonstrate imminent irreparable harm to justify an injunction, asserting only classically reparable economic injury and irrelevant potential harm to patients, who are third parties not before this Court," DOJ attorneys wrote.


E&E News
40 minutes ago
- E&E News
Zeldin pulls Biden-era permitting proposal
A mothballed legal clash over industrial air pollution permitting requirements dating back to President Donald Trump's first term could resume after EPA scrapped a package of proposed changes. On Monday, Administrator Lee Zeldin withdrew the 2024 draft, which would have overhauled a policy set seven years earlier that loosened the threshold for deciding whether expansions and other major upgrades at a variety of industrial facilities require permits under the agency's New Source Review program. In opting to pull the proposal, released during former President Joe Biden's tenure, Zeldin wrote that he agreed with critics who said it 'would impose additional burdens and uncertainty on regulated stationary sources without clear and justifiable corresponding benefits.' Advertisement Zeldin's move had been expected. It could now lead to a restart in dormant legal challenges to the Trump-era policy known as 'project emissions accounting' brought by environmental groups and a coalition of Democratic-leaning states.