Trump passport policy a 'fundamental rejection of my identity' says transgender plaintiff
This order has prevented Orr from getting a passport that matches his gender identity.
In early January, Orr was flying from West Virginia to New York City. At the TSA security checkpoint, he was accused of presenting fake documents as he had a male designation on his driver's license but a female one on his passport.
Orr said he needed to explain in great detail that he was a trans man.
"Not only was this a frightening and humiliating experience, but it was just so invasive," Orr told As It Happens host Nil Köksal.
He went to renew his passport four days before Trump took office to request a passport with a name change and a sex designation that reflects who he is.
But more than two months have passed, and he is still waiting. Together with a group of transgender, intersex and nonbinary people, Orr is suing the administration over the passport policy.
Orr says he always travels with his passport on domestic and international flights, though a passport is not required to fly domestically in the U.S.
He spoke to Köksal about how the delay has impacted his life. Here is part of their conversation.
Are you going to be able to live without a passport that represents who you are?
The reality is, if I receive my passport back and the sex designation marker is incorrect, receiving that passport that misgendered me isn't just a bureaucratic mistake.
It's a fundamental rejection of my identity and my existence.
International travel becomes a minefield of humiliation, of invasive scrutiny, and the risk of being denied entry at borders.
It is very difficult to know that I am having to juggle and [weigh] my safety versus traveling not only for pleasure but also for health care.
What have you been told about why you haven't received your passport yet?
My application went from being in-process to not available, and that's when I began to reach out to the passport agency.
They were telling me we have no further guidance for you at this time.
After a few weeks, I received a phone call from a supervisor in San Francisco who was overseeing my application, and I was basically told that I needed to prove my biological sex.
I was told you'll be receiving something either via email or certified mail explaining what more we need from you.
About a week after that phone call, I did receive something in the mail saying that at this point in time, they are unable to continue on my application until I'm able to prove my biological sex.
Since then, I have not heard anything else, and I do not have a passport at this moment in time.
The Justice Department says this policy "does not violate the equal protection guarantees of the constitution," and has also said, "some plaintiffs additionally allege that having inconsistent identification documents will heighten the risk that an official will discover that they are transgender. But the department is not responsible for plaintiffs' choice to change their sex designation for state documents but not their passport."
How do you respond to what they're saying there?
When you hear that type of language and just the framing of this overall issue — this constant scrutiny really does erode the dignity of the trans community.
When we are having our identities questioned in public spaces, be it at work or by government agencies, [it's] reinforcing the harmful idea that we are not who we say we are.
This invalidation takes such a mental and emotional toll on our well-being.
We regularly face challenges in accessing essential services. That includes health care, education, and legal documentation, because these systems are designed to question and police our identities rather than affirm them.
WATCH | Transgender Americans feel unsafe following Trump changes:
Trans Americans look to Canada for safety after Trump's re-election
2 months ago
Duration 7:51
As U.S. President Donald Trump rolls back trans rights in America, some families are looking to leave the country. CBC's Katie Nicholson talks to people caught up in the climate of fear, including parents who are considering claiming asylum in Canada.
So being questioned about our identity in public settings puts us at even more risk of harassment or violence, be it at DMV offices or TSA screenings, or even when using the restroom. [It] increases risk of discrimination in employment and housing and healthcare for trans individuals.
When we are having the government and institutions casting doubt on our identities as trans people, it's sending a broader message that legal recognition of gender identity is conditional, rather than a fundamental right.
Ash, this case is called Orr v. Trump. How did it feel to see your name next to the U.S. president's?
There's been a lot of anxiety, just general fear about my safety and my family's safety.
But also just a lot of pride.
I'm very proud to be a trans West Virginian and I'm very proud to see my name standing up for not only myself but for the entire trans community across the United States.
I've just been gaining a lot of strength, not only from my community, but from those who came before me.
Knowing that we are fighting for equality for our community, that's really just helping me to stay focused on what the end goal is here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Former aide to Eric Adams pleads guilty to soliciting straw donations for mayor's campaign
NEW YORK (AP) — A former aide to New York City Mayor Eric Adams pleaded guilty Tuesday to soliciting straw donations in a case tied to separate corruption charges against Adams that the Trump administration ultimately decided to drop. Mohamed Bahi, who served as City Hall's chief liaison to the Muslim community, admitted in federal court that he helped solicit the illegal donations for Adams' mayoral campaign from employees of a Brooklyn construction company at a December 2020 fundraiser. 'I understood that the Adams campaign would then seek matching funds for those donations,' Bahi told a judge, adding that he knew the employees would be reimbursed and 'that it was wrong.' Bahi, 41, was originally charged in October with witness tampering and destroying evidence as part of a sweeping federal investigation into Adams, culminating in the indictment of the mayor on charges of accepting bribes and campaign contributions from foreign interests in a separate fundraising scheme. At the time, prosecutors said it was 'likely' that others would be charged as part of 'several related investigations.' Then, in February, the Justice Department ordered federal prosecutors to drop the charges against Adams, arguing the case was interfering with the mayor's ability to assist in President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. The remarkable intervention prompted protests and resignations from several top prosecutors, including the interim U.S. attorney in Manhattan, who accused Adams of striking a quid pro quo with Trump. Adams has adamantly denied any wrongdoing and pledged to continue his re-election campaign on an independent ballot line. But even as the mayor no longer faces legal consequences, it has remained an open question how prosecutors will handle the web of investigations into his inner circle and campaign apparatus. They have not provided any information about the status of other cases, including investigations that resulted in federal agents seizing phones last fall from the city's police commissioner, multiple deputy mayors and other close advisers to Adams. The owner of a separate construction company, Erden Arkan, pleaded guilty in January to funneling illegal campaign contributions to Adams. He is scheduled for sentencing later this week. Bahi will be sentenced on Nov. 17 on a charge of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. He faces a maximum prison sentence of five years. Bahi and his lawyer declined to comment as he left the courtroom Tuesday. A spokesperson for the U.S. attorney in Manhattan did not respond to an emailed inquiry. A spokesperson for Adams also did not return messages seeking comment.
Winnipeg Free Press
7 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
What to know about Trump's potential change in federal marijuana policy
President Donald Trump is taking a new look at reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug in a move that could nudge the federal government closer to an approach already embraced in many states. Trump said Monday that he hopes to decide in the coming weeks about whether to support changes to the way marijuana is regulated. The renewed focus on marijuana comes more than a year after former President Joe Biden's administration formally proposed reclassifying marijuana. No decision was made before Biden left office. Meanwhile, many states have already gone further than the federal government by legalizing the recreational use of marijuana for adults or allowing it for medical purposes. What's the federal policy on marijuana? Possessing marijuana remains a federal crime punishable by fines and prison time. Selling or cultivating marijuana is a more serious offense, punishable by prison sentences of five years to life, depending on the quantity of the drug. The Justice Department last year proposed to reclassify marijuana from a Schedule I drug, alongside heroin and LSD, to a less dangerous Schedule III substance, which includes such things as ketamine and some anabolic steroids. But that switch involved a lengthy bureaucratic process. Nearly 43,000 public comments were submitted to the federal government about the proposed change. The Drug Enforcement Administration was still in the review process when Trump succeeded Biden in January, triggering a re-examination of policies across the federal government. What would reclassifying marijuana mean? Reclassifying marijuana would not make it legal for recreational use by adults nationwide. Rather, it would change the way it's regulated and taxed. Federal income tax deductions for business expenses aren't available to enterprises involved in 'trafficking' any Schedule I or II drug. Changing marijuana to a Schedule III drug could mean significant tax savings for businesses licensed to sell marijuana in states where it is legal. It also could make it easier to research marijuana, since it's very difficult to conduct authorized clinical studies on Schedule I substances. Due to the potential for federal penalties, many banks and financial institutions don't provide debit or credit services, loans or other common banking products to marijuana businesses authorized under state laws. That's unlikely to change merely by rescheduling marijuana under the federal Controlled Substances Act, according to a Congressional Research Service report. What is there for Trump to consider? Trump is weighing the pros and cons of a marijuana policy change, noting it's a 'very complicated subject.' 'I've heard great things having to do with medical' use of marijuana and 'bad things having to do with just about everything else,' Trump said Monday. Marijuana advocacy groups have long pushed for the federal government to soften its stance. As a candidate, Trump appeared open to relaxed regulation, posting on his social media platform last year that he would 'focus on research to unlock the medical uses of marijuana to a Schedule 3 drug.' But reclassification faces resistance from some conservatives and law enforcement groups. The National Sheriffs' Association was among those submitting written opposition, highlighting prior determinations that marijuana has a 'high abuse potential' and pointing to cases of 'extreme intoxication' and fatal vehicle crashes. What's happening in the states? The medical use of marijuana is already allowed in 40 states and the District of Columbia. Over the past dozen years, the number of jurisdictions legalizing recreational marijuana for adults rose rapidly to 24 states and the District of Columbia. But the movement suffered some recent setbacks. Ballot measures to legalize recreational marijuana failed last fall in Florida, North Dakota and South Dakota. Florida's measure received a majority vote, which would have been sufficient in most states, but fell short of the 60% threshold needed to approve amendments to the state constitution. Idaho lawmakers this year referred a proposed constitutional amendment to the ballot that would forbid citizen initiatives to legalize marijuana and instead leave such decisions only to the Legislature. Initiatives continue elsewhere to try to place recreational marijuana on the ballot, including in Oklahoma, where voters defeated a measure in 2023. What does the data say about marijuana use? About 6 in 10 voters across the country said they favor legalizing recreational use nationwide, according to AP VoteCast, a survey of more than 120,000 U.S. voters conducted during last year's election. Polling from Gallup shows support for marijuana legalization has grown significantly, from just 36% support in 2005 to 68% last year. Marijuana use has also increased. More than 64 million Americans age 12 and older — or 22.3% of people — used marijuana during the past year, according to a 2024 national survey released recently by the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. That was up from 19% of people in 2021. The growth in marijuana use was driven by adults aged 26 and older, according to the survey. However, people ages 18-25 remained the most likely to partake in marijuana, with 35% reporting use during the past year.
Canada News.Net
20 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
$50M reward offered for capture of Venezuela's president
MIAMI, Florida: The Trump administration has doubled its bounty for the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to US$50 million, accusing him of being one of the world's most prolific narco-traffickers and working with cartels to smuggle fentanyl-laced cocaine into the United States. "Under President Trump's leadership, Maduro will not escape justice and will be held accountable for his despicable crimes," Attorney General Pam Bondi said this week in a video announcing the reward. Maduro was first indicted in 2020 in Manhattan federal court during Trump's previous term, alongside several close allies, on charges of narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine. At that time, the U.S. offered $15 million for his capture. The Biden administration later increased the bounty to $25 million — the same amount once offered for Osama bin Laden after the September 11 attacks. Despite the escalating reward, Maduro has retained his grip on power, defying the U.S., the European Union, and several Latin American governments that denounced his 2024 reelection as fraudulent and recognized his opponent as Venezuela's legitimate president. Last month, the Trump administration negotiated the release of 10 Americans imprisoned in Caracas in exchange for deporting scores of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador under its immigration crackdown. Soon after, the White House reversed a previous sanctions block and allowed U.S. oil giant Chevron to resume drilling in Venezuela. Bondi said the Justice Department has seized more than $700 million in assets tied to Maduro, including two private jets, and linked nearly seven tons of confiscated cocaine directly to him. Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil dismissed the reward as "pathetic" and accused Bondi of running a "crude political propaganda operation." He referenced her past controversies, including backlash over the Justice Department's statement that a long-rumored "client list" tied to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein does not exist. "Her show is a joke, a desperate distraction from her misery," Gil said.
