logo
After pet raccoons and squirrels became campaign issue, GOP lawmakers pitch law in NH

After pet raccoons and squirrels became campaign issue, GOP lawmakers pitch law in NH

Yahoo06-03-2025
House Bill 251 would allow raccoons and gray squirrels to be kept as pets without a permit under certain circumstances. (Photo by)
A state agency's seizure and euthanasia of a New York man's pet squirrel and raccoon ignited viral outrage this fall — even drawing attention from the presidential campaign trail.
Now, a group of Republican lawmakers are seeking to allow the creatures as pets in New Hampshire under certain circumstances, but opponents warn the move could carry serious negative consequences for animal welfare and public health.
Peanut the squirrel and Fred the raccoon became symbols of anger in November after they were taken and put down by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation. The move came after the agency received complaints about illegally held wildlife at a man's home and animal sanctuary, according to the Associated Press.
For some conservatives, the deaths became a rallying cry against government overreach. J.D. Vance criticized the agency at a North Carolina campaign rally, and said then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump was 'fired up' about the issue.
Joan O'Brien, an animal advocate from Amherst, said she was heartened to hear so many people around the country care about these creatures and express outrage over their deaths. Still, she told lawmakers in a February hearing, she opposes the measure that would legalize raccoons and gray squirrels as pets in the state in some cases.
'Wild animals belong in the wild,' she said. '… We don't want to do anything that would encourage more people from taking wild animals and bringing them into their homes'
House Bill 251, which has yet to receive a vote in either chamber of the Legislature, would allow raccoons and gray squirrels to be kept as pets without a permit 'if a wildlife rehabilitation facility makes the determination that the animal cannot survive in the wild and such animal is up to date on any vaccines required.'
But there are problems with the vaccine requirement in the text of the bill, said Dan Bergeron, the chief of the Fish and Game Department's wildlife division, who told lawmakers on the House Environment and Agriculture Committee that the agency opposes the legislation.
'The bill references that a squirrel or raccoon would have to have any required vaccinations,' Bergeron said. 'Currently, there are no statutes that we have that requires vaccinations for either of these animals, and one of the main reasons for that is because there are no approved vaccines for these animals, because they are wild animals. Any vaccination given to them would be considered off-label use, and the effectiveness is not proven.'
The animals can carry serious diseases, he said, including rabies, which has a virtually 100% fatality rate once symptoms appear. Rep. James Spillane, a Deerfield Republican and bill sponsor, expressed support for adding language to the bill that would spur rulemaking around vaccines for these animals.
Additionally, the bill allows those who relocate from a state where the animals are allowed as pets to keep them if they move to New Hampshire.
It also says that the animals 'shall not be confiscated or euthanized without the permission of the owner.' Spillane, in response to a question from a committee member, said he wouldn't be opposed to adding language to the bill that requires confiscation in a case where the animal bites someone, though he would still prefer that it be encouraged to seek an owner's permission before euthanizing an animal.
Bergeron also raised concerns about that portion of the bill as it was introduced. While he hopes that most owners would agree to euthanasia and confiscation when appropriate, 'I would not want to hang my hat on that … for a disease as deadly as rabies,' he said.
Kurt Ehrenberg, the New Hampshire state director for the Humane Society, an animal welfare nonprofit, said that these are wild animals with wild behaviors that are unpredictable. Their 'complex physical and social needs' can't be met in captivity, he said.
'They are often confined to small, barren cages, which prevent them from exhibiting natural behaviors, and suffer from poor nutrition, inadequate veterinary care, and mental distress,' Ehrenberg said. 'When they become too difficult to handle or care for, as they frequently do, owners often abandon them, turning them loose where they may die or threaten the native ecosystem.'
Meanwhile, Spillane sees the bill as a better alternative to the status quo, giving animals that are not fit to be returned to the wild another chance at life. Bergeron pointed out that not even rehabilitation centers can keep these animals indefinitely; if they cannot return to the wild, the state's rules say they should be euthanized. There may be opportunities to obtain an exhibitor permit, in which case the animal can be kept for educational purposes, he said.
In online testimony submissions, 17 people supported the bill, one — a representative from the Department of Health and Human Services who said the bill could potentially increase the risk of rabies — was neutral, and 78 opposed it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

6th Republican-led state sends National Guard troops to DC
6th Republican-led state sends National Guard troops to DC

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

6th Republican-led state sends National Guard troops to DC

The number of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., increased again on Tuesday as a sixth Republican-led state sent some of its soldiers to the nation's capital as part of the president's activation to fight what he claims is rising crime in the city. Tennessee sent 160 troops to the nation's capital on Tuesday, bringing the total number of troops ordered to the city to 2,021. About 900 members, which include members of the military police, have actually mobilized as of Tuesday afternoon and many of those members are unarmed. Aside from members of the D.C. National Guard, five other states previously sent their military members to serve in Trump's mobilization: Louisiana, Ohio, South Carolina, West Virginia and Mississippi. Guard troops are now helping law enforcement at 10 Metro stations, in addition to keeping a small presence along the National Mall, according to officials in charge of the operation, which they are now calling "D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force." MORE: Sen. Van Hollen says an armed National Guard in DC would be 'troubling' Stations include L'Enfant Plaza, Gallery Place, Metro Center and Union Station. Officials previously said Guard personnel are not arresting people, only helping to detain individuals briefly if necessary before handing them off to law enforcement. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced later in the day there have been a total of 465 arrests since Trump launched federal law enforcement in Washington on Aug. 7. There were 52 arrests Monday night, according to Leavitt. Information about potential charges from those arrests has not been revealed. "Four more homeless encampments were also removed during yesterday's reporting period. To date, a total of 48 homeless encampments have been cleared in Washington, D.C., by multi-agency teams," she added. When asked by a reporter how long residents in the city should expect the National Guard to remain deployed in the district, Levitt said that they don't have a "timeline" to share. ABC News' Anne Flaherty contributed to this report.

Veterans' voices shape a report on the Afghanistan War's lessons and impact
Veterans' voices shape a report on the Afghanistan War's lessons and impact

Boston Globe

time21 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Veterans' voices shape a report on the Afghanistan War's lessons and impact

Advertisement 'What can we learn from the Afghanistan War?' asked an Aug. 12 discussion session with four of the commission's 16 members. What they got was two straight hours of dozens of veterans' personal stories — not one glowingly positive, and most saturated in frustration and disappointment. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'I think the best way to describe that experience was awful,' said Marine veteran Brittany Dymond, who served in Afghanistan in 2012. Navy veteran Florence Welch said the 2021 withdrawal made her ashamed she ever served there. 'It turned us into a Vietnam, a Vietnam that none of us worked for,' she said. Members of Congress, some driven by having served in the war, created the independent commission several months after the withdrawal, after an assessment by the Democratic administration of then-president Joe Biden faulted the actions of President Donald Trump's first administration for constraining US options. A Republican review, in turn, blamed Biden. Views of the events remain divided, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered yet another review this spring. Advertisement The commission wants to understand the bigger picture of a conflict that spanned four presidential administrations and cost more than 2,400 American lives, said cochair Dr. Colin Jackson. 'So we're interested in looking hard at the end of US engagement in Afghanistan, but we're equally interested in understanding the beginning, the middle, and the end,' he said in an interview in Columbus. Cochair Shamila Chaudhary said the panel is also exploring more sweeping questions. 'So our work is not just about what the US did in Afghanistan but what the US should be doing in any country where it deems it has a national security interest,' she said. 'And not just should it be there, but how it should behave, what values does it guide itself by, and how does it engage with individuals who are very different from themselves.' Jackson said one of the commission's priorities is making sure the final report, due in August 2026, isn't 'unrecognizable to any veteran of the Afghanistan conflict.' 'The nature of the report should be representative of every soldier, sailor, airman, Marine experience,' he said. Dymond told commissioners a big problem was the mission. 'You cannot exert a democratic agenda, which is our foreign policy, you cannot do that on a culture of people who are not bought into your ideology,' she said. 'What else do we expect the outcome to be? And so we had two decades of service members lost and maimed because we're trying to change an ideology that they didn't ask for.' Advertisement The experience left eight-year Army veteran Steve Orf demoralized. He said he didn't go there 'to beat a bad guy.' 'Those of us who served generally wanted to believe that we were helping to improve the world, and we carried with us the hopes, values, and principles of the United States — values and principles that also seem to have been casualties of this war," he told commissioners. 'For many of us, faith with our leaders is broken and trust in our country is broken.' Tuesday's report identifies emerging themes of the review to include strategic drift, interagency incoherence, and whether the war inside Afghanistan and the counterterrorism war beyond were pursuing the same aims or at cross purposes. It also details difficulties the commission has encountered getting key documents. According to the report, the Biden administration initially denied the commission's requests for White House materials on the implementation of the February 2020 peace agreement Trump signed with the Taliban, called the Doha Agreement, and on the handling of the withdrawal, citing executive confidentiality concerns. The transition to Trump's second term brought further delays and complications, but since the commission has pressed the urgency of its mission with the new administration, critical intelligence and documents have now begun to flow, the report says.

Trump offers assurances that US troops won't be sent to help defend Ukraine
Trump offers assurances that US troops won't be sent to help defend Ukraine

Boston Globe

time21 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump offers assurances that US troops won't be sent to help defend Ukraine

The Republican president, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders held hours of talks at the White House on Monday aimed at bringing an end to Russia's war against Ukraine. While answering questions from journalists, Trump did not rule out sending U.S. troops to participate in a European-led effort to defend Ukraine as part of security guarantees sought by Zelenskyy. Trump said after his meeting in Alaska last week with Russian President Vladimir Putin that Putin was open to the idea of security guarantees for Ukraine. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But asked Tuesday on Fox News Channel's 'Fox & Friends' what assurances he could provide going forward and beyond his term that American troops would not be part of defending Ukraine's border, Trump said, 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president.' Advertisement Trump would have no control over the U.S. military after his term ends in January 2029. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later on Tuesday emphasized that 'U.S. boots will not be on the ground' as part of any potential peacekeeping mission. The president also said in the interview that he is optimistic that a deal can be reached to end the Russian invasion, but he underscored that Ukraine will have to set aside its hope of getting back Crimea, which was seized by Russian forces in 2014, and its long-held aspirations of joining the NATO military alliance. Advertisement 'Both of those things are impossible,' Trump said. Putin, as part of any potential deal to pull his forces out of Ukraine, is looking for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, as well as recognition of Crimea as Russian territory. Trump on Monday said that he was arranging for direct talks between Putin and Zelenskyy. But the Kremlin has not yet said whether Putin, who has resisted previous calls by Trump and others for direct negotiations on ending the war, is committed to a face-to-face meeting with the Ukrainian leader. Asked whether Putin has promised Trump that he'll meet directly with the Ukrainian leader, Leavitt responded affirmatively. 'He has,' Leavitt said of Putin. Trump, early on Monday during talks with Zelenskyy and European leaders, said that he was pressing for three-way talks among Zelenskyy, Putin and himself. But after speaking to Putin later in the day, Trump said that he was arranging first for a face-to-face between Zelenskyy and Putin and that three-way talks would follow if necessary. 'It was an idea that evolved in the course of the president's conversations with both President Putin, President Zelensky and the European leaders yesterday,' Leavitt explained. But when discussing a phone call held after the meeting between Trump and the Russian leader, Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov gave no indication that either a bilateral or a trilateral meeting with Ukraine had been agreed. Trump said he believed Putin's course of action would become clear in the coming weeks. Advertisement 'I think Putin is tired of it,' Trump said. 'I think they're all tired of it. But you never know. We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks. That I can tell you.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store