logo
UK conservation goals insufficient to save ants and bees, says expert

UK conservation goals insufficient to save ants and bees, says expert

The Guardian08-02-2025
The UK's targets to stop the destruction of the natural world are so inadequate that they could be met even if all the country's bees, wasps, ants and moths were to go extinct, the government has been warned.
Natural England's red list and the government's biodiversity indicators are used to measure changes in species abundance and as the baseline measures for targets to halt species extinction.
However, the government has admitted the lists have critical gaps as they do not account for large groups such as moths, lice and hymenoptera (bees, wasps, and ants).
On Friday, the government told the science committee it had no plans to expand the lists owing to limited availability of data.
The chair of the science, innovation and technology committee, Chi Onwurah, said: 'While the department acknowledged that there were gaps in its species abundance and risk indicators, it stopped short of agreeing to fix these gaps, citing a lack of data.
'Insects and invertebrates are as crucial as pollinators in supporting natural and agricultural environments, and their numbers need to be monitored. If they are not included in official metrics, statutory targets to halt and reverse species extinction could be met even if all the UK's bees, wasps, ants and moths go extinct.
'This is very worrying. I hope that the government will be able to tell us how it will monitor the decline of all these species, and how it will fill its data gaps.'
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said: 'It is important to note just because a species is not included in the species abundance or extinction risk indicators, this does not mean that we will not be taking steps to conserve it.'
The committee also asked for an update on the national action plan on sustainable pesticide usage and recommended that it include targets for reduction. The first plan was published in 2013 and an update was due in 2018 but is seven years late.
Defra said it was 'working on publishing' the plan, but did not commit to including pesticide reduction targets.
Vicki Hird of the Wildlife Trusts said: 'Action from this government can not come fast enough to reverse the disastrous decline in insects in the UK - not only critical pollinators but all the vital species building soils, circulating nutrients, feeding other animals and keeping pest in check. Whilst these are promising words we need to see more resources such as for the Environmental Land Management schemes helping farmers support beneficial insects. We've been waiting 8 years for the national Action Plan in pesticides - how much longer?'
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
A spokesperson for the charity Buglife said: 'We welcome the government's recognition that insects are in decline and that it threatens food security, but it is more urgent than ever that we understand and address the root causes.
'Insects and other invertebrates are the foundations of a healthy environment, helping to do far more than just pollinate crops. They underpin our ecosystems and without healthy populations, it will be impossible to halt nature's decline.
'We urge the government to be more ambitious, by filling gaps in our knowledge beyond a small select group of species. Action must be taken without delay, applying the precautionary principle to address crucial neglected issues such as light pollution, habitat fragmentation and the widespread use of everyday chemicals to reduce their impact on invertebrates and wider wildlife.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New hope for honeybees following breakthrough in tracking predators
New hope for honeybees following breakthrough in tracking predators

Telegraph

time4 days ago

  • Telegraph

New hope for honeybees following breakthrough in tracking predators

Giant Asian hornets kill British honeybees and destroy entire hives in hours - but scientists now have a new weapon in the fight against the destructive insects. The sound the predatory hornets make is lower in tone than that of native honeybees and this could speed up the discovery, identification, and destruction of nests before they can wipe out nearby colonies. Asian hornets eat honeybees and can eviscerate a beehive in just two days. The non-native bug with yellow legs is twice the size of a normal bee. They are increasingly being found in the UK, with twice as many sightings so far in 2025 as in the same period for 2024. Officials ask members of the public who see an Asian hornet nest to report it to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), who will destroy it if confirmed. Scientists from the University of Southampton conducted the first analysis of the sound the hornets make and found they have a lower tone than the buzz of honeybees. The work has been presented at conferences and is in the process of publication in a scientific journal. There is about an octave of difference between the two pitches of the flying insects analysis found, with English honeybees at 210Hz and the Asian hornets humming at 125Hz. 'Asian hornet nests can be difficult to find because there is no typical place where they build them,' said Sophie Gray, co-author of the research. 'They can be underground, or 50 feet up a tree, or in a bird box, or a bush – they can be anywhere. 'It typically takes two to three days to find the nest once a sighting of an Asian hornet is reported – and in that time the hornets can have completely killed a beehive of upwards of 20,000 bees.' She added: 'We believe that the acoustic signature of Asian hornet nests can be used to locate and destroy the nests. 'Importantly, we believe this detection can be done from a safe distance as we have found that Asian hornets become highly aggressive within 10 metres of the nest, which is difficult since the nests are often well camouflaged despite their size.' The Asian hornet arrived in Europe in 2004 and is now established in France and other countries, and was first seen in Britain in 2016. This year is on track to be a record high for Asian hornet sightings with 37 confirmed sightings already. Experts urged officials to take advantage of the 'window of opportunity' before they become fully established. The Liberal Democrats have accused the Government of not taking the issue sufficiently seriously and demanded Defra set up a task force to deal with the problem. Martin Wrigley, the MP for Newton Abbot, said: 'The previous Conservative government was asleep at the wheel in their response to Asian hornets so the government has got to wake up to the risks and get a grip on this invasive species now – especially ahead of August and September, when new females are born. 'We urgently need a fully fleshed task force dedicated to this invasive insect to reduce delays between reporting nests and their destruction. It's time this Government took our biodiversity and the safety of our communities seriously.'

Dismay as north of England universities miss out on share of £54m talent fund
Dismay as north of England universities miss out on share of £54m talent fund

The Guardian

time6 days ago

  • The Guardian

Dismay as north of England universities miss out on share of £54m talent fund

Ministers have been accused of undermining innovation in the north of England after five universities from the south-east were awarded £10m to hire overseas talent – with none selected between Birmingham and the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow. Twelve universities across Britain have been handed a share of the government's £54m global talent fund, which Labour said would 'put rocket boosters' under its innovation plans. The money is intended to attract top international academics and was awarded to three 'golden triangle' universities – Oxford, Cambridge and Imperial College London – and two others from the south-east of England. MPs and researchers said it was 'deeply disappointing' that no universities in the north of England were chosen, given their strong research record and the government's stated aim to rebalance the UK economy. Chi Onwurah, the Labour chair of the Commons science, innovation and technology committee, said she was demanding an explanation from the science minister, Patrick Vallance. She said: 'I'm writing to Lord Vallance for further details on how the government selected the 12 institutions that will receive funding, and why no region north of Birmingham was prioritised. 'The process he set out in his response to me is neither evidence-based policy nor place-based policy, nor even policy-based evidence, but some kind of mishmash which does not stand up to scientific scrutiny. 'This funding decision seems to be at odds with the government's stated mission to boost opportunities in every part of the country, and I hope the minister will be able to provide clarity.' The global talent fund was administered by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), an arms-length government body. The Northern Powerhouse Partnership, a thinktank, said the criteria for selecting the universities was 'arbitrary and inconsistently applied' and unfairly overlooked large institutions such as Manchester, Durham, and York. It obtained UKRI's selection criteria under the Freedom of Information Act and found that seven northern universities met a key threshold of spending at least £5m on international research funding. These were Manchester, Leeds, York, Newcastle, Lancaster, Sheffield and Durham. It said many of these institutions were unfairly disadvantaged by two further criteria related to their proportion of overseas staff. Larger universities are less likely to meet the 35% quota of international staff given their size, it said, although the University of Manchester missed out by just 0.3%. Henri Murison, the chief executive of the Northern Powerhouse Partnership, said it welcomed the principle behind the fund but it 'undermines innovation in the north'. 'The north isn't pleading, it's simply asking not to be overlooked in favour of special treatment for nations like Wales, which, while important, are far smaller in scale,' he said. 'The north remains the UK's only credible economic counterweight to London and the greater south-east. If the government is serious about delivering growth across every part of the country, it cannot allow UKRI, the intermediary between government and our world-class research councils, to stand in the way of that ambition.' A government spokesperson said: 'The £54m global talent fund will help some of our leading universities and research institutions to attract top researchers and their teams to the UK. Institutions across all four nations of the UK were selected based on measurable criteria. 'We are determined to maximise the opportunities in every part of the country, including the north of England, through our regional growth strategy, by building more cross-national research partnerships, and by investing our record £22.6bn funding for R&D through schemes like the local innovation partnerships fund.'

Endangered crayfish returning to Nottinghamshire waterways
Endangered crayfish returning to Nottinghamshire waterways

BBC News

time03-08-2025

  • BBC News

Endangered crayfish returning to Nottinghamshire waterways

A rare species of endangered crayfish is slowly returning to its natural habitats, environmental experts have white-clawed crayfish is the UK's only native species, but it has been under threat for a number of years, particularly following the arrival of the North American signal crayfish in the North American crayfish competes with other native species for food and habitats, and also carries a deadly fungal disease called the crayfish plague, which has been rapidly killing the white-clawed the white-clawed crayfish is now returning to areas of Nottinghamshire following work from environmental groups. The Environment Agency said it has been working with Natural England to secure the white-clawed crayfish's future across the Nottinghamshire, a partnership to protect the species has been formed among various has included the Nottinghamshire Biodiversity Action Group, White Post Farm, and other environmental groups from further and volunteers are creating new safe havens, known as "ark sites", for the crayfish to relocate to, and moving numbers of them that are under threat to these protected McDaid, from the Nottinghamshire Wildlife Trust, said losing the native species would be "heart-breaking".He added: "Our waterways wouldn't be the same if they went extinct as they keep the ecosystems in our rivers healthy. If a native species like that goes, the environment around it is impacted pretty badly."We really want to prevent that, and volunteers play a vital role in helping to stop that from happening." Danielle Grieves, an officer at Natural England, said the work she has observed from volunteers in Bulwell gives her hope for the future of the added: "We are seeing fewer numbers of the North American invasive species in ponds at Bulwell Hall. "It's been so rewarding to see vulnerable, native crayfish being moved to their new homes in Nottinghamshire."By protecting the white-clawed crayfish, we're helping to preserve the biodiversity and ecological health of Nottinghamshire's waterways for future generations."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store