All The Gaura Bais
For ten months members of an all-women household in a tribal village in MP – 80-year-old Gaura Bai, her widowed daughter-in-law and her three small grandkids – have lived under a tree, after razing their own kuccha house in village Lohari, Dhar district. They demolished their hut last Sept because, as TOI's July 7 story of the shocking incident ('House Lost, Hope Stalled') reported, their panchayat told them that to claim the amount under PMAY-Rural, she would have to demolish the structure, 'show the computer an image proving' she had no house. This was, of course, a total misreading of the scheme. Tragedy is that most of India's disadvantaged rural groups, like Dalit or tribal women, are so impoverished, they aren't equipped to spot an absurdity or a fraud – far less cross-check or factcheck a sarpanch or officials. And should they dare to question officials, consequences can be severe.
Her application was made using her MNREGA card. But a 'system glitch' stalled her allotment. Till March 2025, in MP, over 37L PMAY-Rural houses had been built. Gaura Bai can be seen as one case that fell through the cracks, unseen in all the govt and thinktank audits on PMAY-R. But that's not the point. She has paid the devastating cost of an overly tech-dependent system, which has no Plan B that can be locally addressed. Given 60% of PMAY-R allotment is meant for SCs and STs, how can govts not see the chasm between tech-enabled systems and beneficiaries of the scheme – a largely digitally unlettered population? The TOI report resulted in govt assuring Gaura Bai accommodation till her allotment is resolved. Who compensates her for the hardship of 10 months? Who is accountable for technical flaws? Gaura Bai's case came to light courtesy TOI's report. How many Gaura Bais may be out there, stranded on a technical error?
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email
This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Still waiting in the wings: Why Karnataka has never had a Dalit chief minister
Bengaluru: Despite constituting a chunk of Karnataka's electorate, Scheduled Castes (SC) have never seen one of their own rise to the chief minister's chair. Over decades, entrenched caste hierarchies and shifting political calculations have ensured Dalit functionaries remain contenders — but never the chosen ones. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The top position has historically alternated between the state's two dominant communities — Vokkaligas and Lingayats — leaving Dalits sidelined despite their numerical and political significance. Even within Congress, a party that has long championed social justice, Dalits have never got past the final hurdle. "Over decades, Karnataka has seen several Dalits emerge as strong contenders for the CM post, but none made it to the chair," said Prof Ravindra Reshme, political commentator. "B Basavalingappa, a progressive voice in the 1970s, enacted groundbreaking reforms abolishing manual scavenging, but his 'boosa' remark on Kannada literature led to a political fallout. KH Ranganath, known for administrative acumen, was considered in 1992 but overlooked in favour of Veerappa Moily. Later, his dissent on forest denotification marked his exit. In 2013, then KPCC chief G Parameshwara was a frontrunner but lost his own seat, allegedly due to internal sabotage. Mallikarjun Kharge, long seen as an able administrator, failed to make it to the top post due to various reasons." BJP, despite attempts to woo Dalit voters — especially from the Madiga sub-group — by elevating members like Govind Karjol and A Narayanaswamy to ministerial roles, did not seize the opportunity to appoint a Dalit CM when Lingayat strongman BS Yediyurappa stepped down in 2021. JD(S) has never projected a Dalit chief ministerial candidate either, though it claims to have supported Kharge during alliances with Congress in 2004 and 2018. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now On both occasions, Congress chose CMs from other castes — N Dharam Singh, a Rajput, and HD Kumaraswamy, a Vokkaliga — for the top job. "A variety of factors have denied Dalits the CM post," said psephologist Sandeep Shastri. "While dominant and backward caste politics has been key, prominent Dalits have missed the bus simply because they were in striking range at the wrong time or faced setbacks when the time was ripe — especially Kharge in 1994, 1999, 2008 and Parameshwara in 2013 and 2023." In 2023, Parameshwara staked his claim citing the party's performance in SC/ST-reserved constituencies — it won 35 of the 51, including two general category seats. But his efforts did not yield the top post. Though incumbent Siddaramaiah is from the OBC Kuruba community, many Dalits see him as a proponent of their cause. Meanwhile, Kharge, now national Congress president, has consistently distanced himself from caste-based narratives. "I have never sought the CM's post as a Dalit," he said in 2018. "If people are ashamed to accept me as a leader, let them consider me a worker. I will welcome it if the party considers me for the top post based on my seniority and not my caste. " A significant roadblock remains the divide within the Dalit community itself. The SC Right — which includes the likes of Kharge and Parameshwara — is politically more influential than the socially and economically disadvantaged SC Left, including Madigas. This division has fragmented support between Congress and BJP. "It's not only Karnataka but in most other states too we have not had a Dalit CM," said political analyst Prof Harish Ramaswamy. "This is not a coincidence, but a deliberate and calculated attempt by caste-ridden society and a conspiracy against SC/ST castes to keep them out of power. In Karnataka's case, we were nearly there when B Rachaiah, a moderate, and current home minister Parameshwara were to be made CM. Unfortunately, these missed opportunities under Congress have reinforced the domination of major communities, sometimes benefitting Brahmins as consensus candidates. However, given the rising clamour, it looks like no party can deny a Dalit the top post for too long."
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
‘God Will Never Forgive Those Who Framed Us'
Mumbai/Pune: It has been painful to endure accusations for 17 years, Lt Col Prasad Purohit told TOI after being acquitted in the on Thursday. Purohit, currently stationed at an Army unit in Mumbai, said, "I did not do anything against my country. There is nothing above the nation. How can a serving army officer, who sacrificed so much while serving for the nation, be involved in acts of terrorism?" He spent almost nine years in jail. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "I lost the cream period of my active service, facing difficulties on multiple fronts - personal, professional, family, friendships, and societal. What was more painful was that my wife, children (2 sons) and my family members endured these painful years." At the time of arrest, Purohit was with the Army's corps of military intelligence. "I fought for justice to prove I was never involved in this. The journey was long and unbearable. But I had faith in the judiciary, and today's verdict is testament to my belief," he said. Pragya Thakur, dressed in saffron robes, sat in the witness box and broke down after the verdict was pronounced. "I was detained illegally for 13 days and tortured. I was living my life as a sanyasi and was labelled a terrorist. My life was destroyed by the allegations," she said, addressing the court. She added, "Ye bhagwa ki vijay hui hai, Hindutva ki vijay hui hai (Saffron has won, Hindutva has won)." She said she was happy at least the judge heard their side. "My life has become meaningful now. Whoever did wrong with us, God will never forgive them," she said. Referring to police in the courtroom, she said, "The way those people did illegal work within the law, our life has been ruined. I can't live a moment in peace. I want to keep myself alive; maybe I am alive because I am a sanyasi. You have defamed the bhagwa." Sudhakar Chaturvedi, another of the acquitted accused, said, "I was framed and tortured by police. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A bomb was planted at my house. My nails were plucked. It was not a Hindu-Muslim thing. A verdict has been delivered, not justice… It wouldn't be considered justice until those who framed us are charged." He added their legal battle was still on. "NIA has mentioned ATS planted a bomb at my house, and I was targeted due to my bhagwa attire," he said, adding that when he was taken into ATS custody, he was forced to take the names of Yogi Adityanand and RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat. Major Ramesh Upadhyay (Retd) told TOI, "My family and I went through pain and agony for 17 years but today is a day of celebration. Life will be much happier for me after today… On this day, I remember Balasaheb Thackeray, who stood by us." Another acquitted accused, Sameer Kulkarni, said when he was arrested, he felt like "a dirty blame" had been put on him. He argued his case himself; he said if other accused had not hired a lawyer, the trial would have ended 15 years ago. He accused the defence and prosecution of prolonging it. The verdict, he said, "is a rebirth for us." Talking to media outside the court, Purohit said, "I am extremely grateful to the court and all those who stood by me for understanding the case and delivering justice... Malice is over, and it should not be there. We are a great country, a developing nation. I expect and wish everyone should contribute positively towards the country. Let's be forward-looking." (Reported by Mateen Hafeez, Shourya Avankhedkar, Pushkraj Vernekar, Prasad Kulkarni & Sandip Dighe)
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Trumped? Not Yet
He may rant but the road to a trade pact is open. India should study how Japan, EU, S Korea did it The sky didn't fall after Trump's tariff shock. Sensex ended Thursday just 0.36% lower, and if the markets have held their nerve, so should Indian negotiators working on the trade deal. It's impossible to answer 'what now' when Trump's diktats end in ellipses. One moment he rants about India's 'strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers', then says talks are still on, 'You'll know by the end of this week,' then vents again: '(India and Russia) can take their dead economies down together, for all I care.' Notes of petulance and impatience, but no clarity on the Russia penalty he'll charge on top of a 25% tariff starting today. Which is why Trump's act feels like a bluff. Perhaps, Trump's more keen on a deal with India than he lets on. So the Indian side should learn from his recent actions. His 40% additional tariff on Brazil – total of 50% – is instructive. Starting with the lowest rate of 10% in April, Trump's hit Brazil with the highest rate now, to meddle in its internal affairs. But that's his way. On Thursday, he also said Canadian support for Palestinian statehood 'will make it very hard for us to make a trade deal with them.' Yet, Brazil isn't too badly bruised because its aircraft, iron, precious metals, wood pulp, energy, fertilisers – and orange juice – industries have been spared. Largely because Brazilian negotiators got their US clients to lobby for them. The Indian side should do likewise. Korea's deal also has useful pointers. Trump posted on Wednesday it would have to 'buy down' its tariff rate from 25%, and the Koreans bid $350bn to get the 15% rate that Japan and EU got earlier with investment pledges of $550bn and $600bn, respectively. In the bargain, Korea can keep its rice and beef markets closed. Since agriculture and dairy are key sticking points in Indian negotiations, India could take this approach. Meanwhile, there's no point losing sleep over Pakistan's 'deal', with an undisclosed tariff and Trump's promise of 'developing their massive oil reserves'. Instead, the Russian oil question needs all of India's attention. Until 2022, Russia supplied less than 1% of India's oil, so scaling back from the current 35-40% level is possible, especially with the per barrel discount down to about $2 from a high of $18-20. But it's a geopolitical question, bigger than the economics of tariffs. After all, Russian S-400s, not American Patriots, took down Pakistani missiles and drones in Op Sindoor. India must choose very carefully. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
