No plans for new 5G towers, providers say
The Oamaru Mail was recently contacted by a concerned Kakanui resident after they saw workers connected to a mobile infrastructure group, but all providers contacted by the Mail have stated they have no plans for new towers.
National company FortySouth, which owns the cellular structure network operated by OneNZ, told the Mail it had no immediate plans for new 5G cell towers in Oamaru.
A spokesperson for 2degrees also confirmed it had no plans for new 5G towers anywhere in the district.
"We constantly review and prioritise our coverage investment based on customer needs and demand.
"There are two 2degrees sites with 5G enabled in Oamaru, one central, one on the south edge.
"We don't currently have plans for additional 5G sites, but we have plans to upgrade the RAN equipment at a couple of other nearby sites to provide enhanced 4G service."
A spokesperson for Spark said it had recently upgraded one 5G cell site serving Kakanui and the surrounding area but was not planning to build new towers.
"For Oamaru and North Otago, the 5G rollout is still in progress with some sites still to be upgraded — this means existing cell towers will have 5G technology added to them rather than new towers built."
A spokesperson for the Waitaki District Council said the council had "no knowledge" of any providers with plans for 5G towers in Kakanui or anywhere else at the time.
At present, councils have limited control on where 5G cell towers are erected if National Environmental Standards for Telecommunication Facilities (NESTF) are met, as the activity is classed as permitted.
On private land, installation requires only the landowner's agreement, bypassing public notification completely.
The NESTF, part of the Resource Management Act 1991 framework, allow companies to install low-impact telecommunications infrastructure, including 5G cell towers, as long as they adhere to local district plan rules.
The government is consulting on changes to the national policy statement for infrastructure.
"The current environmental standards around telecommunication facilities were drafted in 2016 and are now very out of date.
"Changes to the standards will update rules around poles and other infrastructure and create a more efficient consenting environment," Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop said.
That consultation ended today.
While not mentioning cell towers specifically, the consultation document states one of the intended results is to provide "greater certainty, particularly in growing cities, that infrastructure services can continue to be provided or as planned, and that housing and other development can also occur in a compatible way".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Family Home In Labour's Tax Crosshairs
Press Release – New Zealand National Party Labour crashed the economy, has opposed every measure to get it growing, and has no economic plan except imposing higher taxes on homes, businesses, and savings. Kiwis deserve to know why and how Labour would do this. Labour's refusal to rule out taxing the family home is a frightening prospect for ordinary Kiwis, says National MP Chris Bishop. 'As Kiwis continue to deal with the cost-of-living consequences of Labour's high tax, high spend record, it defies belief that its leader can't rule out piling more costs on Kiwis with a tax on their family home. 'Earlier this month, a former Labour Party advisor publicly confirmed the party had agreed to progress a Capital Gains Tax so it's unclear why Chris Hipkins can't bring himself to explain even the most basic detail. 'Similar to last week when Hipkins had to be corrected by Megan Woods on the party's position on oil and gas, and last month when Kieran McAnulty corrected Hipkins' position on public-private partnerships, it could be that he just doesn't know. Or he might just have to wait for permission from Labour's Policy Council and the Greens. 'Labour crashed the economy, has opposed every measure to get it growing, and has no economic plan except imposing higher taxes on homes, businesses, and savings. Kiwis deserve to know why and how Labour would do this.'
NZ Herald
3 days ago
- NZ Herald
New road user charge calculator: How much could you pay?
Under the soon-to-be-replaced fuel tax system, you pay less if your vehicle is efficient. Illustration / AI generated Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Under the soon-to-be-replaced fuel tax system, you pay less if your vehicle is efficient. Illustration / AI generated Transport Minister Chris Bishop last week announced 'the biggest change to how we fund our roading network in 50 years'. Herald data editor Chris Knox explains the change and what it could mean for you. The Government has announced it's preparing to stop funding roads from fuel taxes - and switch to road user charges in 2027. What could this mean for you? Currently, for every litre of petrol you put in your car you pay 70.024 cents into the National Land Transport Fund - used to build and maintain our roads. Or, if you own a diesel or electric car you pay into the fund via road user charges, because electric cars don't fill at the pump and the price of diesel doesn't include a 70c per litre charge. The 70c per litre fuel tax is also subject to GST so switching to road user charges will remove 80.53 cents per litre from the current cost of petrol. Your petrol will be cheaper.
Otago Daily Times
6 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
AA questions new electronic road user charges system
The Automobile Association has poked holes at the government's new electronic road user charges scheme being based partly on vehicle weight. Fuel taxes are due to be replaced in coming years, with all vehicles coming into the scheme. Transport Minister Chris Bishop announced this week petrol, diesel, electric and hybrid vehicles will pay for the road network based on distance travelled and the weight of vehicles. That would mean the end of the petrol tax of about 70c per litre being paid at the pump. AA principal policy adviser Terry Collins said basing road upkeep on vehicle weight in the nation's light fleet was flawed because heavy vehicles were the major contributor. There was "negligible" difference between a 1200kg car and a 2000kg car in relation to the damage they did to roads, he said. "It kind of irritates me when I hear about this weight thing on vehicles. The light fleet is not the vehicle that's causing the damage to the road, it's the trucks. You have to be about eight tonnes and then depending on your axle configuration that's when you are really starting to do damage to your roads. The light fleet subsidises the heavy industry [who] are the ones smashing up our roads and the potholes." A fair system would need to look at who was causing road damage and who should pay the repair bills. The government did not want to fully do this because they did not want to drive the cost of freight up as 94% of goods were delivered by truck, he said. AA members are also seeking assurances about private companies expected to gather charges and the privacy of data being collected. Mr Collins said car drivers wanted to know who would collect valuable data tracked electronically and how it would be used after the scheme was first introduced. He questioned if driver movements would be used for police enforcement or road safety by the Ministry of Transport. "Or will it be sold for somebody who wants to know how far you are travelling so they can sell you a car?" The administration costs of private firms would include a profit margin and they could be expected to "clip the ticket", he said. A cost breakdown for the road user charge had yet to be set, but was expected to be more than already being paid. Yet to be announced was whether plans to raise the fuel excise duty by 22c per litre over three years from 2027 would transfer to road user charges. Mr Collins said the government would take a hit on GST no longer being paid from 7c of tax removed for each litre of petrol bought at the pump. Overall, the AA supports the changes in principle because of their potential to unlock other benefits. Distance travelled was considered a better indicator of road risk than the amount of fuel being used as a basis for ACC contributions. Car drivers pay about 6c per litre for petrol towards ACC payments. Mr Collins said changes should also be made to motorbike registrations as motorcyclists often owned several bikes, but could only ride one at a time yet made multiple ACC contributions when not on the road. "By going to distance based it will be a much fairer way for them to make their contribution. So, we think that would be a really good outcome. We also think warrant of fitness should be based on the distance a car travels because distance travel is a better indicator of wear and tear than the age of the vehicle." Modern vehicles with a three year warrant could have completed 100,000km, yet a collector's car such as a 1955 Chevrolet had to be tested every year even though it might have only done 5000km a year. Combining all the systems based on distance would be better for motorists, he said. The AA will also watch with interest the scheme's impact on the uptake of more energy efficient vehicles. Road users on a distance-based charge who are paying $1.60 per litre for fuel after the tax is removed may be tempted to drive larger vehicles than a Suzuki Swift because they would not cost as much to run.
