Ireland to back proposal to extend EU protection for Ukrainian refugees into 2027
Ireland will support a proposal to extend
European Union
protection for people fleeing the
war in Ukraine
for another year into 2027 when EU justice and home affairs ministers meet later this week.
Ukrainians arriving in EU countries since the Russian invasion in 2022 have benefited from temporary protection.
More than 112,000 people from Ukraine have arrived in Ireland over those three years, though almost a third of these are believed to have since left the State.
There are almost 33,000 people from Ukraine in State-supported accommodation at 320 locations around the country.
READ MORE
Temporary protection for Ukrainian refugees in the EU is due to expire in March 2026. However, with no end in sight to the war, the EU's Justice and Home Affairs Council is expected to reach a political agreement on extending temporary protection for displaced persons from Ukraine until March 2027.
Minister for Justice
Jim O'Callaghan
, who is due to attend the meeting in Luxembourg later this week, briefed Cabinet on how Ireland will support the proposal to extend the protection into 2027 in principle.
At the beginning of February, there were 112,189 beneficiaries of temporary protection from Ukraine, an increase of 8,833 or 8.5 per cent on the same time in 2024, according to annual figures produced by the Central Statistics Office (CSO).
However, the number of active PPSNs in November belonging to Ukrainian people was just 71 per cent of the total, suggesting 29 per cent have most likely left the State and are living elsewhere.
[
Ukrainians in Ireland succeeding in asylum applications at twice rate of other nationalities
Opens in new window
]
In January last year, the Government reduced payments to new arrivals from €232 a week to €38.80. Since that move there has been no month where the number of newly arrived Ukrainian refugees has surpassed 700.
As of the February statistics, women and children make up three-quarters of all Ukrainian refugees, and 23,803 were working.
Counterterrorism
Separately, Mr O'Callaghan received Cabinet approval to publish a law aimed at strengthening Ireland's counterterrorism laws.
A
Department of Justice
statement said the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) (Amendment) Bill 2025 will 'allow for the prosecution of a broader range of terrorist activities in light of the evolving nature of terrorism'.
These include terrorist acts with a cross-Border element, and cyberattacks where the aim is to cause widespread harm.
This bill – which includes three new offences: receiving training for terrorism; travelling for the purposes of terrorism; and organising or facilitating travelling for the purposes of terrorism – will bring Ireland's counterterrorism laws into line with those of other EU member states.
[
Crimea was once a crossroads of civilisations, now it's stuck in a wartime cul-de-sac
Opens in new window
]
Mr O'Callaghan said the proposed Bill will 'strengthen Ireland's laws by broadening the scope of prosecutable offences in respect of terrorist activity and marks a significant step forward in ensuring that Ireland's counterterrorism framework is robust and fit for purpose in the face of modern terrorist threats'.
Along with the new offences, Mr O'Callaghan said the Bill 'also permits courts, when sentencing a person convicted of recruiting or providing training for terrorism, to treat as an aggravating factor that the offence was committed against a child'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
BBC will not appeal against Gerry Adams's defamation case victory
The BBC will not appeal over Gerry Adams's defamation victory against the organisation. Mr Adams, a former president of Sinn Féin , said there needs to be 'substantial reform' of the broadcaster. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, that he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. READ MORE The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Féin leader's legal costs. After the decision, the broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it took time to consider an appeal. However, on Friday, the BBC confirmed it would not pursue an appeal. A spokesperson said: 'We have given careful consideration to the jury's decision.' 'We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences,' the spokesperson said. In a statement issued through the Sinn Féin press office on Friday, Mr Adams said the decision not to appeal by the 'British Broadcasting Corporation' has to be followed by a 'substantial reform of its internal journalistic processes and a recognition that it cannot continue to be a voice for the British state in Ireland'. He said the broadcaster must become 'more accountable to the public'. 'The Dublin court found the BBC guilty of libel and rejected its claim that its journalism was fair and reasonable and in the public interest,' he said. 'The British Broadcasting Corporation is a public service provider. There is an onus on the BBC to ensure that in the future its ethics and journalism reflect the principles and values of a public broadcast service. 'As I have already said, the damages will be donated to good causes,' he said. —Press Association
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on proliferating drones: don't look up
This week the Dáil was warned of a dystopian future of Irish skies filled with commercial drones. People Before Profit TD Ruth Coppinger played footage of drones hovering noisily over Blanchardstown rooftops, while Social Democrats TD Gary Gannon called for a temporary restriction zone over Glasnevin. Despite the hyperbole, concerns over noise, privacy and safety are valid. At the heart of the growing unease is a company now operating high-frequency drone food deliveries in west Dublin, and reportedly planning to expand to the northern and southern suburbs before rolling out nationwide. With weekly flight volumes already in the thousands, the shift from pilot project to daily reality is well underway. Ireland finds itself at the leading edge of drone delivery in Europe, praised by operators for a regulatory environment that fosters innovation. Drones are being used not just for burgers and burritos, but for medicines and time-sensitive consumer goods. Yet what industry advocates view as forward-thinking policy, critics see as dangerously lax. They argue that existing laws are outpaced by the speed of technological development and ill-equipped to manage the risks. This is acknowledged in the Programme for Government, which commits to integrating drone oversight into the air navigation division of the Irish Aviation Authority. The Taoiseach has conceded new regulations are needed to deal with drones 'flying left, right, centre', suggesting an Oireachtas committee should investigate the matter further. READ MORE While the Government reflects, the drone economy is scaling up fast. Communities in Tallaght, Glasnevin and beyond will soon hear the distinctive buzz overhead if planning applications are successful. The concerns which have been expressed over noise and privacy are legitimate. But others border on the moralistic. The question is not whether drone deliveries will be part of modern life – they already are – but how they are regulated to ensure that innovation serves the public good, rather than intrudes upon it.
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Kneecap name high-profile legal team to defend terrorism charge against Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh
Irish-language rap group Kneecap have named high-profile legal representation to aid the defence against a terrorism charge levied at one of their members. Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara, was charged under the UK's Terrorism Act last month for allegedly waving a flag that expressed support for Hizbullah. The British government classified Hizbullah a terrorist organisation in 2019, and expressing support for them is illegal. Mr Ó hAnnaidh denies this charge and called it 'political policing' which is a 'carnival of distraction' from Israel committing genocide in Gaza. He is due to appear in Westminster Magistrates' Court next Wednesday. READ MORE Kneecap on Friday published details of the legal team, whose past work has focused on freedom of expression, international human rights law, and high-profile cases against the British state. Mayo-born barrister Blinne Ní Grálaigh KC specialises in protest law Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh KC represented South Africa last year at the International Court of Justice in its case alleging genocide by Israel in Gaza. Ms Ní Ghrálaigh, a Mayo-born barrister, specialises in protest law. In 2022, she represented a member of the 'Colston Four', who were cleared of a criminal damage charge after they toppled a statue of a 17th-century British slave-owner in Bristol during the Black Lives Matter protests. Solicitor Darragh Mackin represented families of victims of the Stardust fire. Photograph: Stephen Collins/Collins Darragh Mackin represented the families of victims of the 1981 Stardust fire at an inquest which ultimately concluded they had been 'unlawfully killed'. The families received a State apology last year. Mr Mackin has also worked on reforming Northern Ireland's abortion laws. [ Glastonbury full lineup for 2025: eyes on Kneecap's Saturday slot after gig cancellations Opens in new window ] Gareth Peirce, whose name is synonymous with representing the wrongly convicted Birmingham Six and Guildford Four, counts WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange among her recent clients. Gareth Peirce represented the Birmingham Six and Guildford Four and, more recently, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Photograph: David Sleator Barrister Rosalind Comyn practices criminal and media law, having recently acted on behalf of climate justice activists charged with vandalising Vincent Van Gogh's Sunflowers painting. Other legal representatives include Jude Bunting KC and Brenda Campbell KC, who are concerned with freedom of expression and terrorism and protest law, respectively. Kneecap wrote in a statement posted on X that 'the British establishment is conducting a campaign against' them. 'We are ready for this fight,' they said. 'We are proud to have such a strong legal team with us.'
