logo
Gabbard's Russian interference claims directly contradict what other Trump officials have said

Gabbard's Russian interference claims directly contradict what other Trump officials have said

Yahoo3 days ago
When President Donald Trump sided with Vladimir Putin over his own intelligence community on the topic of Russia's interference in the 2016 US election, then-Sen. Marco Rubio sharply rebuked Trump.
The Florida Republican said in 2018 that the intelligence community's 'assessment of 2016 is accurate. It's 100% accurate. The Russians interfered in our elections.'
He added: 'I think it was not a good moment for the administration, obviously. Hopefully, something like that never happens again.'
But seven years later, it just keeps happening — over and over again — as Trump and his most loyal allies seek to sow doubts about that 2016 episode and punish their political enemies. That's now taken the form of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard threatening criminal referrals and even floating allegations of treason for key officials in the Obama administration.
Her argument is full of holes, as even critics of the Russia investigation such as the National Review's Andrew McCarthy have noted. (Basically, the whole thing conflates Russia's attempts to influence the 2016 election with nonexistent attacks on election infrastructure that changed votes. )
But just as notable is that Gabbard's move to cast doubt on Russia's 2016 interference is wholly at odds with several top Trump administration officials, most especially Rubio, along with a pair of congressional investigations spearheaded by Republicans.
To be clear, Gabbard is basically suggesting there was no Russian interference.
Her memo last week cited what it cast as false reporting 'that the CIA 'concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened' in the election to help President Trump.'
The memo said the assessment 'falsely alleges … that Putin directed an effort to help President Trump defeat Hillary Clinton.'
Gabbard in Fox News interviews accused the Obama team of ordering a 'a manufactured piece of intelligence that detailed not if, but how Russia tried to influence the outcome of the United States election.' She cited an intelligence document that purportedly said Russia 'did not attempt to affect the outcome of the election.'
In fact, that document — a President's Daily Brief, or his daily intelligence report — merely said Russia hadn't impacted the election results 'by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.'
It was referring narrowly to a very specific (and severe) type of potential election interference. The Obama administration never alleged such interference took place or that Russia manipulated actual votes that were cast.
This is a kind of sleight of hand we've seen before with Trump allies trying to call Russia's election interference into question.
But Gabbard's commentary is especially striking when juxtaposed with those she serves with in the second Trump administration.
Rubio didn't just rebuke Trump for siding with Putin's denials back in 2018; he also spearheaded the Senate Intelligence Committee's big, bipartisan Russia report in 2020.
The report concluded that Russia had 'engaged in an aggressive, multi-faceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence, the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.'
It not only said Russia had interfered, but also that it had done so to benefit Trump.
'The Committee found that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian effort to hack computer networks and accounts affiliated with the Democratic Party and leak information damaging to Hillary Clinton and her campaign for president,' the report said. 'Moscow's intent was to harm the Clinton Campaign, tarnish an expected Clinton presidential administration, help the Trump Campaign after Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee, and undermine the U.S. democratic process.'
The report differed slightly from a similar report from the House Intelligence Committee in 2018. The House report, which was written by Republicans, did not say that Russia aimed to help Trump, but it did say it interfered and that Putin had ordered it.
'In 2015, Russia began engaging in a covert influence campaign aimed at the U.S. presidential election,' the Republican-led House report said. 'The Russia government, at the direction of President Vladimir Putin, sought to sow discord in American society and undermine our faith in the democratic process.'
Gabbard, who was a Democratic member of Congress until 2021, now suggestively casts all three of these pillars as false: that Russia interfered, that Putin ordered it, and that it was meant to help Trump.
And her conclusions also run afoul of other Trump administration members' statements.
During his 2020 confirmation hearing to become Trump's director of national intelligence, now-CIA Director John Ratcliffe — who then served on the House Intelligence Committee — made clear Russia interfered.
'Chairman, my views are that Russia meddled in or interfered with active measures in 2016,' Ratcliffe said. 'They interfered in 2018. They will attempt to do so in 2020. They have a goal of sowing discord, and they have been successful in sowing discord.'
Even just days before Gabbard launched her effort last week, Ratcliffe issued a report that not only didn't dispute that Russia interfered, but actually praised the initial intelligence assessment's 'analytical rigor.'
Mike Waltz, Trump's nominee for United Nations ambassador and his former national security adviser, has also issued strong statements on the topic.
He at one point even warned that people were conflating Trump's claims of 'no collusion' with the idea that Russia didn't interfere at all.
'We do have to draw a bright line between 'no collusion' … versus the Russians attacking our constitutional system and attacking our electoral system, which they absolutely are doing,' Waltz, then a Florida congressman, told CNN's Jake Tapper in 2019.
He added: 'We have to stay focused on that, because that is our democracy under attack.'
Today, Trump's administration is yet again seeking to blur those lines. The conflations are continuing. And these officials will apparently just keep doing it — no matter what they said before.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Planned Parenthood closes 5 Northern California clinics, citing Trump budget bill
Planned Parenthood closes 5 Northern California clinics, citing Trump budget bill

San Francisco Chronicle​

time27 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Planned Parenthood closes 5 Northern California clinics, citing Trump budget bill

President Donald Trump's budget cuts to Medicaid have forced Planned Parenthood Mar Monte to shutter five clinics across Northern California and the Central Coast, including one in South San Francisco, the group said Thursday. The GOP-led federal spending bill that Trump signed into law earlier this month eliminated federal Medicaid funding for any type of medical care to organizations that perform abortions. Mar Monte is the largest Planned Parenthood affiliate in the country, with health care centers from Bakersfield, the Bay Area, Stockton and Sacramento. The now-shuttered facilities also include San Mateo, Santa Cruz, Gilroy and Madera. The closures represent the first wave of how the recent federal budget cuts will have real-life consequences for health clinics across the country — particularly for low-income Americans. They are also a crushing blow to a state that set it up to be an abortion haven after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. In the year after the decision, political leaders in California — led by Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Democratic-controlled Legislature — passed more than a dozen new laws and invested more than $200 million to increase access across the state. Thursday's announcement drives home the extent of the federal government's tremendous power to impact abortion access. Roughly 80% of Mar Monte's patients received Medi-Cal, California's version of Medicaid. Ten million people are expected to lose their health insurance because of nearly $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts over the next decade in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Meanwhile, the wealthiest Americans will receive a disproportionate share of the tax cuts funded by those cuts, according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. In just one week since Mar Monte stopped billing Medicaid, the Planned Parenthood affiliate with 35 locations said it saw 5,000 patients — amounting to about $1.7 million in care costs it covered without reimbursement — Mar Monte Chief of Staff Andrew Adams told the Chronicle Thursday. 'It's just not sustainable,' said Adams. 'We can't keep our doors open if we continue doing that.' Mar Monte said the funding law also forced it to end services in family medicine, behavioral health and prenatal care. The Planned Parenthood affiliate estimates it will lose $100 million in annual revenue from care that can no longer be reimbursed under the law because they provide abortion care. Americans tend to support abortion rights, according to public polling. A May 2025 Gallup Poll found that 51% of respondents described themselves as 'pro choice' while 43% described themselves as 'pro life.'Of those respondents who said they were 'dissatisfied' with the nation's abortion polices, 42% said they would like to see them made 'less strict' while 14% wanted them to be 'stricter.'

Bloomberg Daybreak Asia: One Week Left For Trade Talks
Bloomberg Daybreak Asia: One Week Left For Trade Talks

Bloomberg

time28 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Bloomberg Daybreak Asia: One Week Left For Trade Talks

The US and Japan this week reached what President Donald Trump called the largest trade deal in history after Tokyo pledged to set up a $550 billion fund for investment into the US, details of which remain obscure. The lack of clarity about how the fund will work adds to questions about the viability of the agreement, which imposes 15% tariffs on Japanese cars and other goods. While the start date and other basic elements are still unknown, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned this week that the US would monitor implementation and bump the rate up to 25% if Trump isn't satisfied. In his latest column, Bloomberg Opinion's Gearoid Reidy writes that after three months, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba finally has his trade deal. Gearoid joins us to explain why it may be Ishiba's final act. Plus - the S&P 500 inched to a new record Thursday - its 10th in 19 days - driven by tech gains that papered over a broader weakness as most stocks in the benchmark dropped. The S&P 500 has surged 28% from its April lows as investors grew optimistic that President Donald Trump's tariff war won't hurt the economy and corporate earnings as initially feared. Meantime, South Korea's trade ministry said Friday that Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan and US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick reaffirmed their will to reach a mutually beneficial trade agreement before August 1st deadline. For more on the economic impact of ongoing negotiations, we heard from Janet Henry, Global Chief Economist at HSBC. She speaks with Bloomberg's Shery Ahn and Haidi Stroud-Watts on The Asia Trade.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store