Labour councillor ‘called for far-right protesters' throats to be slit'
In the wake of rioting following the Southport murders, Ricky Jones, 58, described demonstrators as 'disgusting Nazi fascists', his trial was told.
The now-suspended councillor had been told by the Labour Party to stay away from the protest, but turned up anyway, jurors heard.
A video showing Jones addressing the crowd in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year went viral on social media after the protest.
Wearing a black polo top and surrounded by cheering supporters, the councillor said: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.'
He also drew his finger across his throat as he spoke to the 'tinderbox' crowd.
The demonstration had been organised in response to plans for a far-right march outside Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau, jurors at Snaresbrook Crown Court were told.
It followed the nationwide violent disorder that occurred last summer after the Southport murders.
Prosecutor Ben Holt said Jones used 'inflammatory, rabble-rousing language in the throng of a crowd that we will hear described as a tinderbox'.
Opening the case on Monday, Mr Holt said: 'Last summer, three young girls were killed at a dance-themed party in Southport.
'There was some hysteria… Some of that grief manifested itself in anger, and regrettably, violence.'
The incidents brought out counter-protests, one of which Jones decided to go to, the prosecutor said.
'He attended in the face of considered advice not to do so,' Mr Holt added.
'At Walthamstow that day, rumours had spread that there was going to be a protest outside an immigration centre.
'During that event, he made a speech, amplified through a public address system, to the crowd.
'He called the other side disgusting Nazi fascists. He said that their throats needed to be slit.
'He drew his finger along his throat as he said that.
'This, in a setting where, we suggest, violence could readily have been anticipated.
'We ask rhetorically, what did Mr Jones think was going to happen?'
In the days before the protest, the councillor had been warned to stay away by his party.
A letter sent to him said: 'With heightened tensions in many areas of the country due to the threat of further violent disorder, we wanted to remind all Labour party councillors to follow the clear advice issued by the police which is not to take part in, attend or encourage others to attend, any sort of demonstration or counter demonstration.'
Jones, of Dartford, who denies one count of encouraging violent disorder, told police he was 'sorry' he made the comments 'in the heat of the moment', and had not intended for them to be 'taken literally', Mr Holt said.
The councillor also told police he was upset having been sent pictures of National Front stickers that had been left on a train, which had razor blades hidden behind them.
Jones, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was suspended by the Labour Party the day after the alleged incident.
The trial continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
5 minutes ago
- Atlantic
The Virtue of Integrity
Jean Guéhenno lived in Nazi-occupied France, where, unlike so many of his contemporaries, he refused to write a word for a publishing industry under Nazi control. He felt shame about the Vichy government's collaboration with Nazi Germany. 'What to make of French writers, who, to stay on the right side of the occupation authorities, decide to write about anything but the one thing all French people are thinking about,' Guéhenno asked in his journal, later published as Diary of the Dark Years, 'or worse still, who, out of cowardice, bolster the occupants' plan to make it appear as though everything in France continues as it did before?' In an essay for Liberties, Ian Buruma writes that Guéhenno's journal 'is wise, witty, and scathing about his fellow writers' who had elected to proceed as if nothing had changed. 'Incapable of being in hiding for long,' Guéhenno wrote, this type of literary figure 'would sell his soul just to keep his name in print.' The United States today isn't occupied France, and nothing currently in America is comparable to the worst of Nazism. But any number of regimes, though they fall short of the German Reich, act in ways that are morally problematic or even wicked. Collaboration and capitulation—the selling of a soul—take many forms, including in America. INTEGRITY IS A VIRTUE on which good character is built. Other virtues can be admirable but isolated. One can be courageous in the pursuit of injustice. A person can be honest but ungenerous, forgiving but lazy. Al Capone, after all, sponsored a soup kitchen during the Great Depression. Peter Wehner: The unconstitutional conservatives Integrity—whose root word, integer, means wholeness, a thing complete in itself—assimilates other virtues. A person of integrity possesses an inner harmony, a moral coherence. As the philosopher Robert C. Solomon put it: 'Integrity is not itself a virtue so much as it is a synthesis of the virtues, working together to form a coherent whole.' Integrity is a subject of ancient interest. Plato believed that a tripartite soul included reason, desire, and spirit. For Aristotle, virtue was divided into moral and intellectual categories. Virtue was not a matter of isolated acts; it was an ingrained disposition, an orientation of the mind and heart, developed through practice and habituation. This led to a unified life, which in turn led to the highest human good: eudaemonia, or human flourishing, a life of purpose devoted to the good. To be sure, people of integrity aren't perfect. But they are individuals who possess an internal cohesiveness among distinct parts. Their values and behavior display a consistency that is the foundation of trust and mutual respect. 'No man is a hero to his valet,' says the 18th-century proverb. Many of those who serve another see a different, darker side to those whom they serve. The closer you get to other people, the more obvious their flaws become. Their public and private lives are at odds with each other. In contrast, a life of integrity works in concert with itself, has a consistency regardless of the circumstances an individual finds themselves in. 'Except for the point, the still point / There would be no dance, and there is only the dance,' T. S. Eliot wrote. People of integrity are still points in a turning world. I'VE BEEN THINKING about integrity a lot lately, in part because more and more it's seen, certainly in politics, as unfashionable. It wasn't always this way. The central figure in the American founding, George Washington, was universally respected for his rectitude. Even the British recognized the quality of his character. (When King George III heard that Washington might surrender his commission as commander in chief of the Continental Army, he reportedly said that if Washington did so, 'he would be the greatest man in the world.') Washington was a complex and elusive figure, as his biographer Ron Chernow wrote, full of pent-up passion. But Washington was also a man of sterling character, brave, devoted to his country, civic minded, and possessed of an unsurpassed sense of duty. Although he was given great power, he never abused it. As Major General Henry Lee eulogized Washington at his funeral, 'The purity of his private character gave effulgence to his public virtues.' No other president, with the possible exception of Lincoln, was Washington's equal. But for nearly the entirety of American history, up until a decade ago, Washington set the standard. Presidents had to at least appear to be better than they were, offering the tribute that vice pays to virtue. No more. Donald Trump's corruption is borderless, in ways we've never quite seen before. But what's also precedent-shattering is that he doesn't try to hide it. His depravity is all in the open. That his supporters celebrate his bad behavior makes this even more discouraging. Many of them find his behavior thrilling, including large swaths of Christian fundamentalists and evangelicals, men and women who worship Jesus with their lips while giving priority to Trump and the MAGA movement in their heart. Add to the mix the craven, across-the-board capitulation to Trump by one elite institution after another —law firms and tech giants, universities and entertainment companies, news networks and once-great newspapers. All of this ramifies through society. Every day, in a thousand different ways, Trump's corrosive ethic is validated and replicated. Cruelty is the coin of the realm; it's the way to get ahead. Americans ask themselves, and one another, the inevitable questions: If the president can get away with it, why can't we? If breaking the rules helps him, why shouldn't it help us? The only way out of this wreckage is to rewrite the cultural script, to make excellence in character admired again. And that starts with recognizing the power of moral example. 'Finally, brothers and sisters,' Saint Paul wrote to the church in Philippi, 'whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things.' MY WIFE, CINDY, AND I have recently discovered a compelling and highly entertaining way to think about such things. We've been watching Foyle's War, a British detective series that began broadcasting in 2002, was canceled for a time, and was revived until it ended in 2015. The series was initially set during World War II, in Hastings, a seaside town on the southern coast of England. The drama revolves around Christopher Foyle, a detective chief superintendent; his driver, Samantha 'Sam' Stewart; and Detective Sergeant Paul Milner. The series, notable for its meticulous attention to historical detail, later shifts to London, as Foyle and Stewart join MI5 after the war. The plots are multilayered and intricate; they deal with complex moral dilemmas—justice in ordinary times versus justice in wartime, for example, and which moral compromises should be made for the 'greater good' of the war effort—with nuance. But what makes this series so remarkable, apart from the brilliant (and brilliantly understated) acting of Michael Kitchen as Foyle, is that the character is 'a quiet man who makes a religion of honor, responsibility and competence,' as the television critic Mike Hale wrote in The New York Times. Foyle does so without ever appearing self-righteous or moralistic. Rather, he is a good man trying to do the right thing in a fallen world. It's not so much that we know every ethical line Foyle draws is the exact right one; it's rather that we know he's doing the best he can to pursue justice. He does so even—and sometimes especially—when there's enormous pressure on him to buckle, including from those in power. Foyle's moral compass can't be demagnetized. Foyle treats those over whom he has authority with respect. He's restrained, not glamorous; wry and scrupulous; a man of quiet strength; and uncompromised. It helps, too, that his private life is unstained. He is, to invoke a rather old-fashioned word, a gentleman. You can't imagine Foyle selling his soul for anything, which makes him particularly anomalous today, when we see soul-selling all around us. THE SOCIAL SCIENTIST JAMES Q. WILSON, in his 1993 book, The Moral Sense, argued that our moral sense is rooted in human nature. He believed that we have a natural capacity for ethical behavior, but that it needs to be nurtured. 'Mankind has a moral sense,' Wilson wrote, 'but much of the time its reach is short and its effects uncertain.' And so, when it comes to cultivating moral excellence, we must take our allies where we find them. Jonathan Rauch: One word describes Trump The best allies are people in your life who personify integrity, who live with honor, and who show us the way. In my own life, I count such people among my greatest blessings. I think of them more than they may know. But fictional characters can help us too. In his essay ' On Three Ways of Writing for Children,' C. S. Lewis, who also wrote The Chronicles of Narnia, said, 'Since it is so likely that [children] will meet cruel enemies, let them at least have heard of brave knights and heroic courage. Otherwise you are making their destiny not brighter but darker.' Lewis knew the power of stories, and the power of heroes, to mold the character of children, to inspire them, even to help shape how they see the world. I'd add only that what is true for children is also true for adults. It may not be in quite the same way, but it can still make a difference. We all need to hear from time to time about brave knights and heroic tales—and even, perhaps, about police detectives in small towns on the south shore of England.
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
On social media, the Department of Homeland Security appeals to nostalgia — with motifs of White identity
A recruitment poster recently shared on the Department of Homeland Security's social media pages depicts Uncle Sam at a crossroads. In one direction point the words 'homeland' and 'opportunity.' Toward the other, 'invasion' and 'cultural decline.' In its caption, the agency overseeing the country's immigration system presents these choices as an existential national struggle: 'Which way, American man?' It's a sentiment that the agency is trying to wield to recruit new employees. Many of its posts implore viewers to apply for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which has been infused with a windfall of cash from President Donald Trump's landmark policy bill and hopes to hire 10,000 additional personnel to help with the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. But underlining the new strategy are undertones that historians and experts in political communication say are alarmingly nationalist — and fraught with appeals to a specifically White and Christian national identity. 'Persuaders succeed when they connect to emotional archetypes,' said Nicholas J. Cull, a professor of communication at the University of Southern California and historian of the role of mass communication in foreign policy. 'Fear is often the most prominent in propaganda, but nostalgia runs a close second.' 'Often they land like one/two punches in a classic boxing attack,' Cull said. 'That seems to be the intent here.' In the caption of its post featuring Uncle Sam, DHS seems to allude to 'Which Way Western Man?,' a 1978 book by White nationalist William Gayley Simpson that is rife with antisemitic tropes and is a mainstay in modern White supremacist literature. 'Calling everything you dislike 'Nazi propaganda' is tiresome,' DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. 'Uncle Sam, who represents America, is at a crossroads, pondering which way America should go.' Other posts shared by the agency depict its employees as not only performing a public service, but also rendering an edict. Heavily armed men are depicted preparing for an operation while an overlaid Bible verse describes them as deliverers of a divine vengeance. Uncle Sam implores citizens to report 'foreign invaders,' join the ranks of ICE and 'step into the breach.' Pictures of handcuffed migrants flanked by masked agents are interspersed with calls to 'remember your Homeland's Heritage' and 'defend your culture!' 'The siren song of the far right, whether we call them authoritarian or fascist, is to foment a counterrevolution against a revolution that never was,' said Democratic political strategist Anat Shenker-Osorio. ''Do you know why you feel down and out? Do you know why you feel challenged? Do you know why you feel out of place in your own society? It's because of those people.'' McLaughlin said DHS 'honors artwork that celebrates America's heritage and history' and is 'pleased that the media is highlighting our efforts to showcase these patriotic pieces.' Included in the posts are tinges of a Rockwellesque nostalgia for an America that was traditional, religious — and on its surface, racially homogenous. After Trump declared Monday he would take over the Washington, DC, police department and rid the city of 'Crime, Savagery, Filth, and Scum,' DHS posted on Instagram a 1943 image of the US Capitol captioned with: 'We Can Return.' The agency's ambiguity about what it means by words like 'heritage' and 'homeland' leaves their use open to several interpretations. 'This is an active effort to promote lies designed to create fear and hysteria in a population,' said Ian Haney López, a professor of public law at the University of California, Berkeley, and author of a book on the use of dog whistles in politics. 'It's often associated with war-time efforts.' 'The United States has certainly engaged in' previous propaganda campaigns, he said, but DHS' posts are most reminiscent of 'demagogic eras' in other countries. For decades, historians have used John Gast's 1872 painting 'American Progress' to demonstrate the concept of manifest destiny, the idea popular in the 19th century that America's westward expansion was destined by Providence and rooted in an Old Testament concept of a 'chosen' people. The painting depicts a woman, a personification of America, unspooling telegraph wire as she heralds settlers, education and new technology to sparsely populated land. Indigenous people and bison flee before them. As the Anglo settlers overtake Native Americans, the sky turns from dark to light. On July 23, DHS posted a picture of the painting on its social media with the caption: 'A Heritage to be proud of, a Homeland worth Defending.' A Heritage to be proud of, a Homeland worth Progress - John Gast Patrick Fontes, a history professor at Clovis Community College in Fresno, California, who has lectured on 'American Progress,' described the painting as 'laden and saturated with racism.' 'And if you don't know the history, you wouldn't know that,' he added. 'But DHS knows the history behind this — it's a manifesto that's laden with racial connotations and bloody 19th century history against those who were not Anglo American.' The department said in its statement to CNN that the Trump administration 'is unapologetically proud of American history and American heritage.' DHS is not the only government agency trying new tactics to draw attention or solicit engagement. But government agencies typically 'avoid leaning into using those types of posts to explain policy decisions,' said Kristy Dalton, the founder and CEO of Government Social Media, a network of professionals who operate government social accounts. 'I think that that's the unique part of what we're seeing here.' DHS' posts provide the agency with engagement that could bolster its strategic vision. The agency's new posts are heavily geared toward recruitment — images of Uncle Sam pointing toward the viewer with the phrase 'Join ICE Today' and paired with captions like 'Secure the Golden Age' and 'Protect. Serve. Deport.' Other DHS posts include AI-generated artwork aiming to respond to news of the day or troll ICE's detractors. 'On the one hand, you get a lot of engagement with this type of light-hearted content, and that's something that we see with government agencies who are experimenting with it,' Dalton said. 'On the other hand, how do you ensure that you build trust with everyone, with all Americans?' Some owners of artwork shared by the agency are not pleased. DHS has been asked by several artists, or their foundations, whose creations have been shared by the agency to stop using their work. On July 14, DHS posted a painting by the artist Morgan Weistling titled 'A Prayer for a New Life,' which depicts a White pioneer family praying while holding a baby inside a covered wagon. The agency captioned the image: 'Remember your Homeland's Heritage,' and incorrectly titled the painting: 'New Life in a New Land.' Weistling told CNN in an email that he 'was never contacted by DHS and this was done completely without my permission.' 'They even changed the title of the painting to fit whatever they were trying to say,' he added. 'It's a complete misuse of my copyrighted material.' Another post features a painting by the artist Thomas Kinkade titled 'Morning Pledge,' which depicts schoolchildren gathered around an American flag in an idealist suburban setting. It is captioned: 'Protect the Homeland.' The family foundation for Kinkade, who died in 2012, said it strongly condemns 'the sentiment expressed in the post and the deplorable actions that DHS continues to carry out.' 'Like many of you, we were deeply troubled to see this image used to promote division and xenophobia associated with the ideals of DHS, as this is antithetical to our mission,' the foundation said in a statement, adding that it has asked the agency to remove the post and is exploring its legal options. One band whose song is featured in a recruitment video the agency posted to Instagram sent a cease and desist letter, only for it to be rebuffed. The video depicts law enforcement surveying the borderlands from a helicopter, accompanied by dialogue from a movie quoting Isaiah 6:8 — a verse in which the subject declares a willingness to serve God. It's also accompanied by the alternative rock band Black Rebel Motorcycle Club's copyrighted rendition of 'God's Gonna Cut You Down,' a traditional American folk song that talks of divine punishment as the consequence of sin. The band was outraged and demanded DHS stop using its music. In a July 30 response obtained by CNN, a DHS lawyer declined to comply. The audio has since been removed from the video on X and Instagram; a person involved with the band's management told CNN that occurred after it complained to both companies. 'DHS's use promotes the public interest, as its purpose is to advance the work of a government agency — specifically removing dangerous illegal aliens from our communities,' a lawyer for the agency wrote in its response. If attention is what DHS is seeking in its new strategy, there are some indications it is paying off. Among federal agencies on social media, DHS routinely receives a significant amount of engagement — and job applications. The agency announced this week it has received more than 100,000 applications over the past two weeks.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Inheritance tax changes under consideration amid spending gap concerns
The Treasury is reportedly exploring options to raise additional revenue from inheritance tax ahead of the autumn budget. According to The Guardian, officials are examining whether tightening rules around the gifting of assets and money could help address the UK's multi-billion-pound fiscal shortfall. Government U-turns over winter fuel payments and welfare reform have left Chancellor Rachel Reeves with a multibillion-pound spending gap to fill, amid similarly controversial pushes for a 'wealth tax' by some Labour MPs. Among the reported inheritance tax measures under consideration is a potential cap on lifetime gifts, part of a broader review into how assets can be transferred before death to minimise inheritance tax liabilities. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'The best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT.' Under current UK rules, gifts made more than seven years before a person's death are exempt from inheritance tax. Gifts made between three and seven years prior are taxed on a sliding scale, depending on their value and the total estate. Last week, National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr) predicted Rachel Reeves is now set for a £41.2 billion shortfall on her 'stability rule' in 2029-30 and has been left with an 'impossible trilemma' of trying to meet her fiscal rules while fulfilling spending commitments and upholding a manifesto pledge not to raise taxes. She will need to raise taxes or cut spending in the autumn budget to plug the gap, Niesr cautioned. In July, some Labour Party figures, including former leader Lord Neil Kinnock and Wales's First Minister Baroness Eluned Morgan, called for a wealth tax. Ms Reeves has not ruled out the possibility of a new wealth tax but has been eager to highlight that she will stick to her commitment not to hike tax for 'working people'. However, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds dismissed the idea. 'This Labour Government has increased taxes on wealth as opposed to income – the taxes on private jets, private schools, changes through inheritance tax, capital gains tax,' he told GB News. 'But the idea there's a magic wealth tax, some sort of levy… that doesn't exist anywhere in the world. 'Switzerland has a levy but they don't have capital gains or inheritance tax. 'There's no kind of magic (tax). We're not going to do anything daft like that.'
