SA officials head to China to learn how to build a capable state and defeat poverty
South African public servants and elected officials are heading to China for a groundbreaking learning exchange programme aimed at enhancing state capacity and eradicating poverty, as part of a strategic initiative by the National School of Government (NSG).
The Modernisation and Professionalisation of the State programme, taking place from May 7 to 27, is hosted by the Academy for International Business Officials in China and supported by the Chinese Ministry of Commerce.
It offers delegates a unique opportunity to explore how China evolved from a largely rural society to a globally recognised industrial powerhouse, achieving the milestone of abolishing absolute poverty in 2020.
According to the NSG, this international exchange is part of its broader commitment to equipping South African public sector leaders with the tools and insights necessary to drive inclusive growth, reduce inequality, and strengthen governance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Trophy hunting in the greater Kruger area — what the study overlooks
Trevor Oertel is an Executive Committee member of the Sustainable Use Coalition of Southern Africa (SUCo-SA) and has represented SUCo-SA at CITES meetings both in Panama and Geneva. He has served under various ministers of Environmental Affairs on the Minister's Wildlife Forum. A recent study published in Biological Conservation Vol 309, September 2025, and amplified by Adam Cruise in Daily Maverick claims that communities near Kruger National Park reject trophy hunting and that alternative livelihood options should be explored ('Communities near Kruger Park reject trophy hunting, embrace ethical alternatives — study', 28 July 2025). Yet the very same study simultaneously acknowledges the conservation and economic benefits that trophy hunting has delivered in southern Africa for decades. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads This contradiction is at the heart of the problem: the study does not confront the source of public opposition to hunting, nor does it critically assess how representative the voices quoted actually are of the broader land use reality in the region. The paper states that 'public pressure could end trophy hunting of wildlife, potentially negatively affecting species conservation and the human communities that depend upon the revenue hunting generates'. This is not an insignificant point. In fact, it is perhaps the most important finding in the study, though the authors treat it as a side note. But who is driving that public pressure? Animal rights ideology It is not coming from the rural African communities who live alongside wildlife and bear the costs of its presence. It is driven largely by foreign NGOs and urban-based lobby groups rooted in animal rights ideology, not conservation science or socioeconomic realities. These groups wield emotive campaigns across digital media, often misrepresenting facts and vilifying hunting without engaging the voices of landowners, conservation professionals or rural custodians. The resulting 'public pressure' is thus manufactured by narrative, and not grounded in local truth. The paper correctly identifies that banning hunting could harm both people and wildlife, yet it fails to interrogate why public opinion is being manipulated against a practice that has demonstrably conserved habitats, maintained viable populations of wild animals and their habitats, and generated revenue for landholders and communities. A prominent example of this group is World Animal Protection (WAP), a multimillion-pound UK-based animal rights group that has consistently lobbied against all forms of hunting, including regulated and sustainable hunting. Besides the study that Cruise cites being funded by WAP, it fails to clearly disclose up front that at least three of its authors are either employed by or have formerly been employed by WAP, calling into question the neutrality of the research and its conclusions (the authors' biographies are disclosed in hyperlinks, not in an up-front disclaimer). When those crafting the questions, framing the data and interpreting the findings are aligned with an organisation vocally opposed to hunting in any form, one must ask: Is this research or advocacy under the banner of science? The Daily Maverick article and the study it draws from focus on communities bordering Kruger National Park in the north-eastern Lowveld of South Africa. However, it is also worth asking: 'How much actual trophy hunting happens in this area?' The answer is very little, particularly on communal lands in the immediate vicinity of the park. Hunting in this region is constrained by land tenure, regulation and land-use policies. This means most households surveyed in the study have had minimal, if any, direct experience of benefits from hunting in general, and specifically from trophy hunting. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads It is therefore not surprising that many interviewees do not see hunting as a livelihood opportunity — they have not been given the opportunity to benefit from it in the first place. Deeper issue This raises a deeper issue — is this study truly about assessing trophy hunting, or is it part of an agenda to explore alternatives in an area where hunting hasn't really been implemented or tested as a sustainable revenue model? The study proposes alternatives like vegetable farming, sewing or craft-making — all worthy initiatives, but hardly equivalent in income potential, ecological compatibility or explaining how they would incentivise conservation in any way. Hunting alongside photographic tourism aligns livelihoods with managing wildlife and its habitats. Generating income from vegetables, sewing or crafts moves communities away from wildlife and disincentivises conservation. For instance, vegetable farming in buffer zones around protected areas risks increasing human-wildlife conflict. Water access, crop raiding by elephants or baboons, fencing costs and soil degradation are real constraints. Yet the paper glosses over these very practical concerns. In contrast, hunting incentivises keeping wild land wild, placing value on intact ecosystems and large, free-ranging species. It doesn't require land clearance or conflict with the ecosystem — it works with it. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Instead of using communities' limited exposure to hunting as proof of rejection, the study could have investigated: Why opportunities from hunting have not reached these communities. How to expand access and equity in hunting revenue, including governance reforms. How existing conservation success in neighbouring areas like APNR (Associated Private Nature Reserves) or KwaZulu-Natal community hunting initiatives could serve as models. The Daily Maverick article is penned by Adam Cruise, who is well known for his opposition to trophy hunting. In this instance, Cruise's tone borders on celebratory. However, as a journalist Cruise would do well to temper his personal biases and acknowledge the full scope of the study's findings, including its clear warnings that banning hunting could harm both conservation and local livelihoods. The study paradoxically confirms that ending trophy hunting could harm both conservation and communities, yet it aligns itself with a movement that is pressuring governments to do just that, without addressing the source of that pressure or the sociopolitical power imbalance behind it. Real conservation solutions must be led by local needs, backed by science and sound conservation management, and shielded from ideological interference. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Disregarding proven conservation industries like hunting simply because of foreign sentiment, often divorced from African realities, risks sacrificing both people and wildlife for the sake of fashionable morality. The debate about trophy hunting should not be about emotion or optics. It should be about what actually works for conservation and for the people who live with wildlife every day. DM
The South African
5 hours ago
- The South African
Duduzile Zuma wears 'terrorist' T-shirt to court over looting tweets
Duduzile Zuma – the daughter of MK Party founder Jacob Zuma – has branded herself a 'modern day terrorist' during her Durban High Court appearance over her July unrest tweets. The MP has been charged with incitement to commit terrorism and public violence. Her trial will begin on 10 November. In a bold move, Duduzile Zuma wore a T-shirt with the slogan 'modern day terrorist' to the Durban High Court over her controversial July 2021 tweets. The daughter of former president Jacob Zuma has been charged with incitement to commit terrorism and two counts of incitement to commit public violence. The trial is scheduled to take place from 10- 21 November. Posting pictures of herself in court on her Instagram account, a beaming Duduzile thanked her supporters. She posted: 'At the end of the day, I'm a good woman, no matter what people say. 'I'm not perfect by any means, but my heart is pure, and I love hard with everything I have.' Her court appearance comes days after she rallied her supporters to take action against anyone who threatened KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. In 2021, Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla was accused of encouraging the July unrest, where properties and stores around the country were looted, vandalised, and torched. During the period, over 70 people are reported to have died in violent confrontations. Duduzile Zuma Sambudla has made headlines over her questionable social media posts. Her July unrest tweets from 2021 have landed her in hot water. Images via TikTok: @duduzumasambudla The daughter of the former president retweeted several videos of the violence, which was a direct reaction to her father's incarceration on contempt-of-court charges shortly before. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Foskor executive remains suspended after firearm threats in boardroom charges withdrawn
Foskor is a South African phosphate producer and fertilizer manufacturer. It mines and beneficiates phosphate rock at Phalaborwa in Limpopo, from where it is carried by rail to the production facility in Richards Bay in KwaZulu-Natal. Image: Supplied Suspended vice president for human capital and corporate affairs at Foskor, Vincent Matlala, has alleged that criminal charges laid against him earlier this year for pointing a firearm at a colleague had been concocted by a disgruntled subordinate at the State-Owned Entity. Matlala's assertions come in the wake of the charges being withdrawn last month at the Midrand Magistrate Court late last month. Speaking to Business Report this week, Matlala, said he had lodged a disciplinary and misconduct grievance against a colleague for processing inappropriate payments to employees who were ineligible for such benefits, including dubious travel claims and other serious allegations of misconduct. Foskor is a South African phosphate producer and fertilizer manufacturer. It mines and beneficiates phosphate rock at Phalaborwa in Limpopo, from where it is carried by rail to the production facility in Richards Bay in KwaZulu-Natal. Matlala said he had not faced any allegations of corruption from Foskor pertaining to his conduct or relating to the failed 2019 Kopano Foskor Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP) as he joined Foskor in 2023, though he confirmed playing a role in its resuscitation. "Indeed, I was hard at work to resuscitate the Employee's and Host Communities's Empowerment Share Scheme, and records on the work I have done on this are available from Foskor; the majority shareholder IDC, as well as from the engagement sessions I facilitated with with rightful beneficiaries of the Empowerment Scheme, including Employees' Trustees, as well as Host Community Trustees," Matlala said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading However, he said there has never been charged with wielding a firearm in the boardroom nor in the employer's premises. "The SAPS investigated the matter, resulting in court proceedings where the charges made against me were withdrawn as such charges were baseless and unfounded," he said. "The employer also subjected these allegations to an independent forensic firm, where I was cleared of allegations made. I was relieved of my duties pending these investigations, and I cooperated fully with the investigators." Foskor group manager corporate affairs, Vhontsia Ramashia, said Matlala remains on suspension pending an internal disciplinary process into allegations of misconduct. "This process is entirely separate from any criminal proceedings, which fall outside the company jurisdiction. This is being addressed strictly in accordance with company policy and the highest standards of corporate governance. No further comments will be provided," Ramashia said. As Matlala waits for the outcome of the internal review, he is adamant about correcting what he perceives as a smear campaign against him, rooted in his attempts to address misconduct within the enterprise. According to Matlala, he lodged disciplinary and misconduct allegations against a payroll manager for a variety of financial misconduct allegations. "I invoked disciplinary steps against him for serious misconduct, including processing material undue payments to certain employees; dishonest travel claim for himself; and other allegations," Matlala said. "He rebelled against these disciplinary steps by lodging unfounded allegations of misconduct against me with the employer, as well as with the SAPS." BUSINESS REPORT
