Bill OBoyle: NEPA is gettin' better all the time
Apr. 26—WILKES-BARRE — If Mama Cass Elliot were here, she would read the Times Leader's Innovation tab and sing, "It's gettin' better."
As you know, Mama Cass was the powerful voice of the Mamas & Papas group and had a few solo hits, including "It's Getting Better."
"And it's gettin' better
Growin' stronger
Warm and wilder
Gettin' better every day, better every day
—And it's not hard to see
That it isn't half of what it's gonna turn out to be."
It's always good when you can find appropriate lyrics in the iconic music of the 1960s and 1970s.
But Mama Cass really belts out that song and it fits when we talk about economic development here in Northeast PA.
Just look at the Times Leader's 50-page Innovation insert today and you will see what I mean. After reading all the stories about all that is going on and will continue to happen, you will come to the same conclusion:
It's gettin' better — all the time.
Don't take my word for it — just read the stories. Then you will see that we all should be proud of where we live, work and play.
A lot of this comes down to leadership. People like Lindsay Griffin-Boylan at the Greater Wyoming Valley Chamber. And Larry Newman at Diamond City Partnership. And John Augustine at Penn's Northeast. And Wilkes-Barre Mayor George Brown, Pittston Mayor Mike Lombardo and our state and federal legislators who are trying to, as our Gov. Josh Shapiro says, "Get stuff done."
'It's a huge deal!'
Earlier this year, Augustine, President/CEO at Penn's Northeast, said a recent ranking of Northeastern Pennsylvania as a top location for economic development represents the tremendous growth in the region.
"It's a huge deal," Augustine said when the rankings came out in early March. "And most importantly, it represents the thousands of jobs that were created because of that. This ranking represents the more than 25 companies that weren't here in our area two years ago."
Did you catch that? The lofty ranking for the region represents more that 25 companies that weren't here just two years ago.
"It's gettin' better all the time."
And take note that this ranking, for the fifth consecutive year, recognized NEPA as one of the top locations in the United States for economic development projects.
Augustine said the region ranked in the Top 10 for both the number of projects and projects per capita.
Yes, NEPA — the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton region — ranked 9th in the 2024 Tier 2 Top Metros by total projects (25) — and the region ranked 8th for per capita.
And Augustine was quick to note that those thousands of new jobs pay "family-sustaining" wages.
"Competition raises wages — that's a fact," Augustine said, adding that the ranking highlights the region's continued success in attracting and expanding businesses.
Data centers are coming
Just a couple of weeks ago, Augustine said in a Times Leader story that Northeast Pennsylvania has become one of the most sought-after landing spots for data centers.
"They will bring good-paying jobs, lots of opportunities and add to the tax base," Augustine said. "It's a win, win, win situation."
Augustine said several companies have contacted his office about building a data center in the region, but they can't be revealed for confidentiality reasons.
One developer, NorthPoint Development, recently gained approval for a 15-building data center campus in Hazleton.
Two others are planned around the Invenergy natural gas plant in Jessup, and others have been checking out undisclosed locations in the region.
Augustine said. "You can reach one-third of the United States and half of Canada in a one-day's drive from Northeastern Pennsylvania."
NEPA is clean, safe, and beautiful. We have a great educational network and we have become a regional center of arts, culture, dining, and entertainment. And there's more — historic architecture, riverfront, and high-quality public environment.
In summary — NEPA has it all.
And it's gettin' better.
Reach Bill O'Boyle at 570-991-6118 or on Twitter @TLBillOBoyle.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Indicators 2025: Regional economy persists while facing multiple challenges
Jun. 8—WILKES-BARRE — Jill Avery-Stoss, president at The Institute, said this week that recovery from the pandemic has been relatively swift. According to The Institute's Annual Indicators Report, areas such as GDP, income and unemployment have all shown signs of strength and resilience. This has led to a tightening labor market, with the region approaching full employment by 2024. Despite these improvements, however, Avery-Stoss said challenges persist — especially in sectors like health care, which face ongoing workforce shortages. Avery-Stoss says that many strategies are needed to address workforce needs. These strategies involve talent recruitment and retention, developing career pathways starting in middle school, and removing barriers to participation in the workforce. "Issues such as limited access to childcare and transportation, as well as housing insecurity, interfere with the ability to secure a job and keep a job," Avery-Stoss said. Historically, Avery-Stoss said NEPA has had higher unemployment and slower economic growth compared to state and national averages. Though wage levels are beginning to climb, rising living costs — particularly for housing and food — continue to put pressure on households. "Poverty remains a pressing concern in the region," Avery-Stoss said. "Approximately one in five households in the region report incomes below $25,000 — an amount insufficient to cover basic living expenses. Even those who live above the official poverty line may struggle to meet basic needs, increasing the demand on social services and charitable organizations." Avery-Stoss said trade policies, such as tariffs, also pose significant risks to the regional economy. As of the time of the report, a 90-day hold on tariffs had been implemented, but economic activity related to imports and exports, was slowing. "Any prolonged downturn in these areas could lead to reduced economic output, higher unemployment, and falling tax revenues, affecting businesses and public services," Avery-Stoss said. More specifically: As of the most recent data, unemployment rates are low — 3.7% in Lackawanna County, 4.2% in Luzerne County, and 3.8% in Wayne County. Over 70% of households in Lackawanna and Luzerne Counties rely on wages, with Wayne County slightly lower at 66.6 percent. Households also rely on Social Security and retirement income, with small percentages depending on cash assistance. Per capita income is growing, but remains lower than the state average across all three counties. Wayne County had the highest growth in aggregate personal income between 2022 and 2023, outpacing the Commonwealth. Job growth has outpaced population growth, which signals economic expansion. "This growth can only continue if the region maintains a sufficient working-age population, and if the region can accommodate the workforce in terms of housing, health care, and other needs," Avery-Stoss said. Health care and social assistance are the largest employment sectors in Lackawanna and Luzerne Counties. In Wayne County, government jobs are most prevalent. "NEPA's economy is in a state of moderate growth, but structural challenges persist," said Avery-Stoss. "Wages are increasing, but not enough to offset living costs for many residents. The labor market is tight, yet access to good jobs is hindered by systemic barriers. Future economic resilience will depend on coordinated workforce development, social infrastructure investment, and proactive responses to global economic shifts." Reach Bill O'Boyle at 570-991-6118 or on Twitter @TLBillOBoyle.
Fast Company
3 days ago
- Fast Company
Supreme Court rewrites NEPA rules—changing the game for environmental reviews
Getting federal approval for permits to build bridges, wind farms, highways, and other major infrastructure projects has long been a complicated and time-consuming process. Despite growing calls from both parties for Congress and federal agencies to reform that process, there had been few significant revisions —until now. In one fell swoop, the U.S. Supreme Court has changed a big part of the game. Whether the effects are good or bad depends on the viewer's perspective. Either way, there is a new interpretation in place for the law that is the centerpiece of the debate about permitting—the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, known as NEPA. Taking a big-picture look NEPA requires federal agencies to document and describe the environmental effects of any proposed action, including construction of oil pipelines, renewable energy, and other infrastructure projects. Only after completing that work can the agency make a final decision to approve or deny the project. These reports must evaluate direct effects, such as the destruction of habitat to make way for a new highway, and indirect effects, such as the air pollution from cars using the highway after it is built. Decades of litigation about the scope of indirect effects have widened the required evaluation. As I explain it to my students, that logical and legal progression is reminiscent of the popular children's book If You Give a Mouse a Cookie, in which granting a request for a cookie triggers a seemingly endless series of further requests—for a glass of milk, a napkin, and so on. For the highway example, the arguments went, even if the agency properly assessed the pollution from the cars, it also had to consider the new subdivisions, malls, and jobs the new highway foreseeably could induce. The challenge for federal agencies was knowing how much of that potentially limitless series of indirect effects courts would require them to evaluate. In recent litigation, the question in particular has been how broad a range of effects on and from climate change could be linked to any one specific project and therefore require evaluation. With the court's ruling, federal agencies' days of uncertainty are over. Biggest NEPA case in decades On May 29, 2025, the Supreme Court (minus Justice Neil Gorsuch, who had recused himself) decided the case of Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, the first major NEPA dispute before the court in 20 years. At issue was an 85-mile rail line a group of developers proposed to build in Utah to connect oil wells to the interstate rail network and from there transport waxy crude oil to refineries in Louisiana, Texas, and elsewhere. The federal Surface Transportation Board reviewed the environmental effects and approved the required license in 2021. The report was 637 pages long, with more than 3,000 pages of appendices containing additional information. It acknowledged but did not give a detailed assessment of the indirect 'upstream' effects of constructing the rail line—such as spurring new oil drilling—and the indirect 'downstream' effects of the ultimate use of the waxy oil in places as far-flung as Louisiana. In February 2022, Eagle County, Colorado, through which trains coming from the new railway would pass, along with the Center for Biological Diversity appealed that decision in federal court, arguing that the board had failed to properly explain why it did not assess those effects. Therefore, the county argued, the report was incomplete and the board license should be vacated. In August 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit agreed and held that the agency had failed to adequately explain why it could not employ 'some degree of forecasting' to identify those impacts and that the board could prevent those effects by exercising its authority to deny the license. The railway developers appealed to the Supreme Court, asking whether NEPA requires a federal agency to look beyond the action being proposed to evaluate indirect effects outside its own jurisdiction. A resounding declaration Writing for a five-justice majority, Justice Brett Kavanaugh delivered a ringing, table-pounding lecture about courts run amok. Kavanaugh did not stop to provide specific support for each admonition, describing NEPA as a ' legislative acorn ' that has 'grown over the years into a judicial oak that has hindered infrastructure development.' He bemoaned the 'delay upon delay' NEPA imposes on projects as so complicated that it bordered 'on the Kafkaesque.' In his view, 'NEPA has transformed from a modest procedural requirement into a blunt and haphazard tool employed by project opponents.' He called for 'a course correction . . . to bring judicial review under NEPA back in line with the statutory text and common sense.' His opinion reset the course in three ways. First, despite the Supreme Court having recently reduced the deference courts must give to federal agency decisions in other contexts, Kavanaugh wrote that courts should give agencies strong deference when reviewing an agency's NEPA effects analyses. Because these assessments are 'fact-dependent, context-specific, and policy-laden choices about the depth and breadth of its inquiry . . . (c)ourts should afford substantial deference and should not micromanage those agency choices so long as they fall within a broad zone of reasonableness.' Second, Kavanaugh crafted a new rule saying that the review of one project did not need to consider the potential indirect effects of other related projects it could foreseeably induce, such as the rail line encouraging more drilling for oil. This limitation is especially relevant, Kavanaugh emphasized, when the effects are from projects over which the reviewing agency does not have jurisdiction. That applied in this case, because the board does not regulate oil wells or oil drilling. And third, Kavanaugh created something like a 'no harm, no foul' rule, under which 'even if an [environmental impact statement] falls short in some respects, that deficiency may not necessarily require a court to vacate the agency's ultimate approval of a project.' The strong implication is that courts should not overturn an agency decision unless its NEPA assessment has a serious flaw. The upshot for the project at hand was that the Supreme Court deferred to the board's decision that it could not reliably predict the rail line's effects on oil drilling or use of the oil transported. And the fact that the agency had no regulatory power over those separate issues reinforced the idea that those concerns were outside the scope of the board's required review. A split court Although Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote that she would have reached the same end result and upheld the agency permit, her proposed test is far narrower. By her reading, the federal law creating the Surface Transportation Board restricted it from considering the broader indirect effects of the rail line. But her finding would be relevant only for any federal agencies whose governing statutes were similarly restrictive. By contrast, Kavanaugh's 'course correction' applies to judicial review of NEPA findings for all federal agencies. Though the full effects remain to be seen, this decision significantly changes the legal landscape of environmental reviews of major projects. Agencies will have more latitude to shorten the causal chain of indirect effects they consider, and to exclude them entirely if they flow from separate projects beyond the agency's regulatory control. Now, for example, if a federal agency is considering an application to build a new natural gas power plant, the review must still include its direct greenhouse gas emissions and their effects on the climate. But emissions that could result from additional gas extraction and transportation projects to fuel the power plant, and any climate effects from whatever the produced electricity is used for, are now clearly outside the agency's required review. And if the agency voluntarily decided to consider any of those effects, courts would have to defer to its analysis, and any minor deficiencies would be inconsequential.
Newsweek
4 days ago
- Newsweek
Permitting Reform Can Ensure a Lasting Manufacturing Renaissance
For manufacturing to continue growing our economy, creating jobs and developing the best products in the world, the United States must update its permitting laws and procedures. Permitting delays and associated costs make it harder for manufacturers to compete and win in the global economy. To fulfill President Donald Trump's plan to build America into a manufacturing powerhouse, permitting reform needs to go hand-in-hand with the administration's industrial strategy, which also includes tariffs on steel, tax cuts, and deregulation. Construction workers are pictured. Construction workers are pictured. Getty Images Bold actions are needed to fix the generational difficulties of building in the U.S. The administration has taken strong steps to alleviate the issues, such as the permitting technology action plan and the move to drastically cut approval times for energy projects. However, this requires a comprehensive, whole of government approach. The solutions must come from Congress and the administration to ensure certainty that cannot be wiped away with a new administration. Any reforms should do the following: —Ensure Regulatory Certainty Constantly shifting regulations are a nightmare for compliance and raise costs for all manufacturers. For instance, under the prematurely revised particulate matter (PM2.5) standard, the compliance level shifted from a tough but achievable number to an aspirational goal that is impossible or implausible for manufacturers to achieve. If the revised standard remains, economic growth will stall, as under the revised standard, the naturally occurring background levels of airborne particulate matter may put much of the country into non-attainment, meaning no construction permits will be issued. Manufacturing thrives on certainty, ensuring that regulations are achievable and stable helps manufacturers plan long-term and make positive investment decisions. —Streamline the Paperwork and Process Obtaining permit approvals for critical infrastructure projects often takes years. Before the 2023 debt ceiling deal, the White House Council on Environmental Quality issued a report stating that environmental impact statements, which are mandated under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), took on average four and a half years. The mandatory studying of potential environmental impacts under NEPA takes longer than building a new steel mill. Streamlining the permitting process and reducing the endless required studies can ensure America is able to take advantage of incoming investment opportunities. —Reform Litigation and Case Review NEPA is the most litigated federal environmental statute. There are few limits to who can sue and when they can sue, which can dramatically delay the time to begin construction. Tightening limits on who can litigate and expediting review of cases is vital to ensuring swift adjudication. Putting a stop to endless delay tactics through the courts will help more projects break ground and bring much needed economic growth. —Create an Approval "Shot Clock" Manufacturing depends on access to our nation's plentiful natural resources. However, restrictions on the development of these resources are hindering our ability to strengthen domestic supply chains and making manufacturing more reliant on raw material imports. The National Mining Association reports that Australia and Canada, two countries with environmental protections that are arguably more stringent than those in the United States, have mine permitting processes that last two to three years on average, whereas in the U.S. the permitting process averages seven to 10 years. Creating a shot clock for approvals can dramatically expedite much needed projects. —Expand One Federal Decision One manufacturer reported lengthy delays of up to an entire year for the issuance of permits by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers due to the failure of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to complete the informal consultation required for confirming no adverse project impacts under the Endangered Species Act. For an entire year, potential workers sat on the sidelines and a community lost out on economic opportunity waiting on informal paperwork that should not have taken longer than 90 days to complete. Having a single point of contact for all federal permitting decisions can ensure that no project waits years for an agency without primary jurisdiction to act. Permitting affects every aspect of our lives—from our economic security to our national security. If we fail to modernize existing processes, we risk falling behind international competitors. However, if we create lasting solutions that make the federal process more efficient, we can make America a global manufacturing powerhouse again. Philip K. Bell is president of the Steel Manufacturers Association. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
