Lecturers to be consulted on industrial action following ‘derisory' pay offer
The ballot will be open for six weeks and will close on August 11.
The EIS ULA, which is open to all university lecturers in Scotland, has called on its members to reject what it called a 'real-terms pay cut' and back industrial action.
It said the offer 'fails to recognise' the contribution made by university lecturers, or make up for years of below-inflation pay rises.
It also called on employers to return to the negotiating table with a 'significantly improved' offer, warning of 'widespread disruption' if industrial action were to take place.
Garry Ross, EIS ULA national officer, said: 'This 1.4% offer is not just disappointing, it is derisory and does not reflect the dedication and expertise of our university lecturers and academic-related members.
'Our members are working harder than ever, delivering world-class education and research, yet their financial security continues to be undermined by employers who appear unwilling to offer a fair deal.
'This offer fails to recognise the essential contributions of our members and does nothing to address the severe impact of rising living costs or the sub-inflationary rises they have experienced over a number of years.'
The union said the offer stood in 'stark contrast' to the 4.14% increase given to further education lecturers, and to pay awards made to NHS workers and other public sector employees across Scotland.
It said this disparity highlighted a 'clear injustice' within higher education, and demonstrated the need for a more equitable approach to staff pay,
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Staffing and operational matters are the responsibility of individual universities.
'The Scottish Government is not directly involved in higher education pay negotiations, but we are absolutely clear that Fair Work must be the guiding principle for all employment-related decisions, and we continue to urge university management and the respective trade unions to reach decisions that ensure employees are treated fairly.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
24 minutes ago
- STV News
Congestion charge could force businesses to leave city, council warned
The introduction of a congestion charge in Glasgow could lead to businesses moving out of the city, the Chamber of Commerce has warned. Glasgow City Council has been considering a number of charging options for road users and, while plans for a workplace parking tax have now been shelved, an 'at-city-boundary' congestion charge and tolling of the Clyde Tunnel remain on the table. The city's SNP group has said it would seek to exempt Glasgow residents from any new charge, which would be paid by those entering the city from other council areas. The options are being investigated as part of efforts to reduce car use and increase revenue. But Stuart Patrick, chief executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce, said: 'We cannot support a city-wide congestion charge until public transport improvements have been made in line with the conclusions of the Connectivity Commission. 'We are very concerned about the possible displacement of business out of Glasgow. We believe the city council needs support from the Scottish Government to deliver priority transport projects such as the Clyde Metro and the Glasgow City Region Bus Partnership improvement plan.' The Connectivity Commission, chaired by Professor David Begg, proposed a range of measures to upgrade the city's transport capacity, including a Metro system. The city's Labour group also opposes the proposed congestion charge and Clyde Tunnel toll. It has said residents from Ayrshire, Lanarkshire, East Renfrewshire, East Dunbartonshire and beyond would be forced to pay to visit Glasgow for work, family or social reasons. Cllr Angus Millar, SNP, the council's convener for climate, transport and city centre recovery, said: 'I think it is important that we as a council fully explore any and all opportunities we have to utilise powers and to raise revenues to support the sustainable transport transition that we are undertaking.' He was 'a little bit confused around some of the statements from Labour colleagues' as the group had previously supported proposals for congestion charging and it had been included in the council's strategic plan, which passed unanimously. Cllr Millar said it was 'a chicken and egg discussion', adding: 'If we want to see significant improvements on public transport then we need to be able to identify where the investment is coming from to make those investments.' He was speaking at the city's economy, housing, transport and regeneration city policy committee,which received an update on potential charging options today. They were asked to note progress, including the decision to halt work on a workplace parking levy, rather than approve any plans. Bailie Anthony Carroll, Greens, proposed an amendment which would have seen a possible workplace parking charge revisited once controlled parking zones are in place across the city. A parking scheme would have required businesses and workplaces to hold a licence for spaces they provide to staff and visitors, with licence charges based on the number of places available. It was estimated it could have raised over £8m per year. But officials reported there is 'limited commercial and public appetite' for the scheme and they will direct resources towards other options. Bailie Carroll said funds raised through a levy could help to 'actually improve our public transport systems' as the council has not received the same UK Government support as regions in England. Cllr John Carson, Glasgow Labour's deputy leader, said: 'We are against a workplace parking levy. 'People can dress it up in various narratives, but ultimately we see it very clearly as the Scottish Government passing the buck onto local authorities rather than giving us the money that we need to run and enhance our city.' The amendment only received two votes as SNP councillors supported the initial recommendations to note the update and Labour members chose to abstain. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Herald Scotland
38 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Parole hearings in Scotland could be opened to the public
Currently, parole hearings, unlike criminal trials, are heard behind closed doors Scotland. Some victims of the most serious offenders being allowed to attend. Since 2022 parole hearings have been open to journalists and members of the public in England and Wales. The law there was changed to lift a blanket ban on public parole hearings. It meant anyone can apply for a public hearing, with the Parole Board making the final decision on whether to do so. The UK Government said the "decisions will consider the welfare and interest of victims and reach a conclusion based on the 'interests of justice'". The moved follows calls for greater transparency after the decision to release black cab rapist John Worboys in 2018. The ScottishGovernment consultation asks if victims registered under a Victim Notification Scheme should have the automatic right to attend and observe oral hearings. It also asks if all victims - regardless of the type of sentence the person in custody is serving - should have the right to request to observe a parole board oral hearing if one is held. The consultation then goes on to ask whether accredited journalist, members of the public, social workers or researchers should have access to parole hearings. Victims of prisoners serving a life or extended sentence, or order for lifelong restriction, who are registered to make representations under a Victim Notification Scheme, can apply to observe the parole hearings for their case. Under the reform ministers are considering whether survivors should be given an automatic right to attend the hearings. READ MORE: Prisoners serving shorter sentences may have their case decided without an oral hearing through a casework meeting. If an oral hearing is held for those cases, there is no direct entitlement or specific procedure for a victim to request to attend. However, they may still request to attend, as an observer, at the panel's discretion. To date the Scottish Government has said that it is "mindful" of the risks to victims and survivors of observing oral hearings because of concerns they could be re-traumatised during the process. But it is now considering whether the decision should be left to individuals in the interests of having a transparent system. Currently victims of prisoners serving a life sentence or if the victim has died a close family member can give oral representations to a board member of the Parole Board for Scotland (not a member on the case panel) ahead of the parole hearing via a victim interview, while in some other cases victims can provide written representations to the Parole Board for Scotland ahead of its considerations,. But under the reforms ministers are also considering whether all victims - regardless of the type of sentence the person in custody is serving - have the right to give oral representations to the Parole Board for Scotland ahead of the Parole Board considering a case. Ms Constance said: "The parole system must command the confidence of everyone it affects and work well for victims, their families, justice partners, and those seeking rehabilitation. We know it could be improved so we want to make further reforms based on the views of those it affects. "This consultation is an opportunity to gather all perspectives to deliver a parole process that is fair, transparent, and trusted. We want a system that puts people first while ensuring decisions are focused on public safety. "I encourage everyone with experience of the parole process to share their views. These insights are essential to shaping a system that reflects our shared values of justice, safety, and dignity." In addition to seeking greater transparency and fairness, the consultation is also examining how licence conditions are used in the parole process and reviewing the system of recall, where offenders who breach licence conditions may be referred to the Parole Board to make a decision on their potential return to custody.
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
New plans to help unemployed and disabled Scots find and stay in work
Three pilot projects will share £228,000 of Scottish Government funding to enable people with diverse needs. The Scottish Government has announced three new initiatives to help people find and stay in work, including disabled people and those with long term health conditions. The pilot projects will share £228,000 of Scottish Government funding to enable people with diverse needs to enter, stay in or progress in the workplace. They will be used to expand flexible working in sectors such as manufacturing and help diversify the public sector workforce. It will allow three separate organisations to run distinct pilot projects - all with the aim of providing workplace support. Training specialists Flexibility Works will receive £96,100 to equip manufacturing sector employers with knowledge and tools to adopt and embed sustainable, flexible working practices. National representative body the Scottish Union for Supported Employment (SUSE) will access £98,737 to support employers, disabled people and people with long term conditions, to stay in work helping to reduce the Disability Employment Gap. SUSE will work intensively with a group of 16-20 employers over the life of the pilot, delivering training and practical support. Business in the Community will use £33,969 to deliver workshops on inclusive hiring and progression initiatives within public sector organisations and help managers to attract and support diverse talent. Business and Employment Minister Richard Lochhead welcomed the launch at Scottish Leather Group in Bridge of Weir, Renfrewshire, where staff are already benefiting from initiatives such as compressed hours and reduced hours for people approaching retirement. He said: 'This new funding will help provide flexible and supportive working environments and contribute to a more dynamic, diverse, and resilient jobs market in Scotland. 'This has significant benefits for workers and means employers like Scottish Leather Group can draw from a wider talent pool. 'The Scottish Government is committed to helping people remain in work and strengthening pathways into employment for those furthest from the jobs market. This new funding will promote flexible working, support disabled employees and people at risk of economic inactivity.' Nikki Slowey, co-founder and director of Flexibility Works, said: 'People's lives are constantly changing, whether that's with children, caring for older relatives or for health needs, and we know many people drop out of work altogether if the juggle between work and home life becomes too stressful. 'Employers that are attuned to this and are able to be flexible can keep hold of talented and experienced staff. Often people only want small changes, such as a little home working or to start and finish at slightly different times. This enables people to keep working, which is good for their finances and wellbeing as well as delivering benefits for their employer and our wider economy.'
