Lecturers to be consulted on industrial action following ‘derisory' pay offer
The ballot will be open for six weeks and will close on August 11.
The EIS ULA, which is open to all university lecturers in Scotland, has called on its members to reject what it called a 'real-terms pay cut' and back industrial action.
It said the offer 'fails to recognise' the contribution made by university lecturers, or make up for years of below-inflation pay rises.
It also called on employers to return to the negotiating table with a 'significantly improved' offer, warning of 'widespread disruption' if industrial action were to take place.
Garry Ross, EIS ULA national officer, said: 'This 1.4% offer is not just disappointing, it is derisory and does not reflect the dedication and expertise of our university lecturers and academic-related members.
'Our members are working harder than ever, delivering world-class education and research, yet their financial security continues to be undermined by employers who appear unwilling to offer a fair deal.
'This offer fails to recognise the essential contributions of our members and does nothing to address the severe impact of rising living costs or the sub-inflationary rises they have experienced over a number of years.'
The union said the offer stood in 'stark contrast' to the 4.14% increase given to further education lecturers, and to pay awards made to NHS workers and other public sector employees across Scotland.
It said this disparity highlighted a 'clear injustice' within higher education, and demonstrated the need for a more equitable approach to staff pay,
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Staffing and operational matters are the responsibility of individual universities.
'The Scottish Government is not directly involved in higher education pay negotiations, but we are absolutely clear that Fair Work must be the guiding principle for all employment-related decisions, and we continue to urge university management and the respective trade unions to reach decisions that ensure employees are treated fairly.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer drops plans to restrict alcohol adverts after industry outcry
Sir Keir Starmer has dropped plans for a ban on alcohol advertising after warnings from the US that it would jeopardise his all-important trade deal with Donald Trump. US drinks companies complained that a ban would amount to a non-tariff trade barrier with America, while the £40 billion UK alcohol industry said it would mean a loss of investment and cancelled sports sponsorships. Proposals for restrictions on alcohol advertising and marketing were originally included in the 10-year plan for the NHS, which is expected to be unveiled this week. But The Telegraph has learnt that the plans have now been stripped out of the document, which will contain no mention of any changes to the rules on alcohol advertising, marketing or sponsorship. It is the latest in a series of climbdowns by the Government, which have included an about-turn over the winter fuel payment cut and huge concessions over cuts to disability benefits. Instead of a ban, Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, is expected to concentrate on educating the public about the health harms that can result from drinking too much. The news will be greeted with relief by not just the drinks industry, but also sports, advertising and other sectors that rely on drinks marketing for revenue. One industry source said: 'A ban never made sense and so this decision is welcomed. 'We're happy to see the Government continuing to support a special and vitally important sector of industry that is a British success story around the globe. 'The British drinks industry makes and innovates some of the best alcohol products in the world, and the Government deserves credit for recognising its importance. 'This decision not to restrict advertising, marketing or sponsorship by alcohol brands, together with the recently agreed trade deal with India that will help UK drinks brands prosper, shows what smart, pro-growth policy can deliver.' Restrictions on alcohol advertising were championed by Mr Streeting, despite the fact that there is little evidence that a marketing ban would have any marked impact on alcohol abuse. US firms had complained that restrictions on marketing would make it impossible for them to break into the UK market with new brands, giving an advantage to established UK brands which would have broken the terms of Sir Keir's trade deal with President Trump. The office of the US trade representative was gearing up to formally raise the matter with the Government if any form of ban was contained in the 10-year plan. The shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith had described proposals for a ban as 'recklessly short-sighted.' Whitehall sources said the 10-year plan would contain proposals to help prevent harmful alcohol use, but they would be in line with Mr Streeting's 'nudge not nanny' approach that he has talked about in relation to healthy eating. On Sunday he said that he would be working with supermarkets to 'make the healthy choice the easy choice' which, he said, did not amount to nanny statism but would nudge the public into making better decisions about their health. In the past the Government has paid for public information campaigns encouraging moderate drinking rather than binge drinking. A Government spokesman said: 'The 10-year health plan will not include a ban on alcohol advertising. 'We'll always back our food and drink sector and, in our recent deal with India, slashed tariffs for a variety of iconic products, including whisky and gin.'
Scotsman
24 minutes ago
- Scotsman
SNP plans to axe more than 12,000 jobs to plug near £5bn gap 'easier said than done'
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The Scottish Government's independent financial forecaster has warned plans to axe thousands of jobs from the public sector without harming frontline services is 'easier said than done' amid warnings a forecast £5 billion funding gap could rise to almost £6bn. Finance Secretary Shona Robison has published her Government's long-delayed medium-term financial strategy, which starkly warns ministers are braced for a funding gap of £2.6bn for day-to-day revenue spending and £2.1bn for capital investment plans by 2030 to cover proposed spending commitments. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad St Andrew's House is the Scottish Government's headquarters, based in Edinburgh. | TSPL More than 12,000 jobs in the devolved public sector workforce are set to be cut in the coming years to make the target. Ms Robison was unable to rule out compulsory redundancies if all other methods did not produce results at the scale required. She confirmed the Scottish Government would cut the devolved public sector workforce by 0.5 per cent on average per annum over the next five years. Statistics published by the Scottish Government on June 10 state that employment in the devolved public sector in Scotland was 550,000 as of March. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Scottish Government has claimed that frontline services will not be impacted, with the savings and job cuts hoped to be made in back offices. But Professor Graeme Roy, chairman of the Scottish Fiscal Commission, has warned the ambition to reverse a trend of employment growth in the public sector workforce would be no easy task. Professor Graeme Roy | Contributed Prof Roy stressed public sector employment made up 'over half of the Scottish Government budget', adding 'it's such an important part of how we deliver public' services. He said: 'They will be hoping for when they do start to pull out public sector workers, that does not have an effect on public services. That requires really careful planning and it's where the Government has not been for 15 years.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Prof Roy insisted that being able to 'protect job numbers in key areas like the NHS' would be 'easier said than done'. He said: 'To take 12,000 people out of the public sector in four years might seem relatively small in the overall scale of the public sector. But that goes against everything we have seen in recent years, which has seen quite substantial growth in public sector employment. 'It's easy to say this is the plan. Actually, how you do it and ensure it does not have an impact on public services, essentially, is going to be the key challenge the Government faces over the next few years.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Prof Roy warned it was not as straightforward for the Scottish Government to 'be taking numbers back to where they were just after Covid', warning 'this is quite a different policy agenda by the Government to scale back'. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned the £2.6bn gap that will need to be filled for day-to-day spending could actually become £3.5bn due to "optimistic" assumptions made that earnings will grow in Scotland faster than the rest of the UK.
The Herald Scotland
44 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Edinburgh books festival has a few questions to answer
'Fury over £300k for Sturgeon book fest' was the splash headline over pictures of the former First Minister and her ex-aide Liz Lloyd. Ms Lloyd was appointed a director of the Edinburgh International Books Festival in May, the paper reported. In June, the Scottish Government announced it had given the festival £300,000. Meanwhile, Ms Lloyd's old boss had been given a plum spot at the festival to publicise her new memoir, Frankly. My nose twitched. The eyebrows went skywards, but why? Here's the Sunday Mail again: 'The book festival said it would be 'spurious' and 'misleading' to suggest any link between Lloyd's appointment and the announcement of the cash, which it said had been planned for months.' Interesting choice of words there, particularly 'spurious'. It's the kind of ten-dollar word a lawyer might use when a simple 'wrong' would have done. It is there to send a message: nothing to see here folks, so let's all just shuffle on. Read more It is true. On the face of it, there is nothing wrong. As the festival said when news of Ms Lloyd's appointment emerged, she was appointed following 'a fully advertised recruitment process'. I could have applied, you could have applied, but we didn't. Moreover, she would bring 'valuable experience in communications, leadership and public affairs'. It has been more than the regulation two years since Ms Sturgeon and Ms Lloyd held positions in public life, the former as FM and the latter as her strategic adviser. Ms Sturgeon has carried on as an MSP, controversially as she has not been seen much in the Scottish Parliament. Those memoirs won't write themselves, you know. But Lloyd is different. She is a free agent, able to do what she wants, no permission required or sought. She has every right to earn a living by selling her skills wherever she pleases. Hence the application to the books festival. The same goes for her appointment to a firm called Flint. On its website, Flint says it 'helps businesses and investors succeed in an increasingly complex world'. Its CEO is James Purnell, former Labour MP, former minister under Blair and Brown, ex-BBC and think-tanker. Click through and you will eventually meet the Flint team, which now includes Ms Lloyd. Listed as a specialist partner with expertise in devolved administrations, operations team, policy and political analysis, her work for the FM is outlined in glowing terms. It's impressive stuff. She's an impressive woman. Once again, she's doing nothing wrong. Countless former aides, and elected representatives, have gone the same route, using what they learned in the public sector and applying it in the private. Put your knowledge and experience to work. Everyone who ever progressed in a career has done likewise. To summarise, Ms Lloyd was appointed a director at the Edinburgh International Book Festival. Nothing wrong in that. She advises businesses and investors using the expertise acquired while working for the First Minister. Nothing wrong in that. As for her book festival appointment coinciding with the award of a £300k Scottish Government grant, remember the latter had been 'planned for months', according to the event organisers. The Scottish Government said the same thing when it announced the money at the end of June: the deal had been signed off months before by ministers but was not publicised. What I would like to know, as a taxpayer if nothing else, is exactly when Ms Lloyd was appointed books festival director, and whether anyone at the festival knew that the £300k was in the pipeline. Why was the Government announcement held back? The money is part of a larger package of help given to the event by the Scottish Government, and there is a lot more to come. Again, were those involved in the appointment of Ms Lloyd aware of this? It's a matter of public record, after all. Once again, nobody has done anything wrong. That happens a lot in Scotland, particularly when the Scottish Government, and the current administration in particular, is involved. You can pass any number of faces on the stairs, familiar ones like John Swinney, and swear they had a case to answer for something or other, but when it comes to holding them to account, there is nobody there. Ferries, education, NHS waiting times, growth - you name it, no one is taking the blame for failure any time soon. You will never see any of these faces take the sort of pasting handed out last week to Professor Iain Gillespie, former principal of the University of Dundee, by the Education Committee. Yes, ministers have been questioned, but not like that. One of the unfortunate principal's mistakes was to fail downwards when the done thing in Scottish public life is to fail upwards. Move on, move up, take the rewards but accept zero blame unless there is no other option. It was and is the Westminster way and it has transferred to the Scottish Parliament. We'll be seeing it a lot more of this moving on as the elections approach. Get ready to hold your nose as departing MSPs, and their aides, compete for jobs in the public and private sectors. And if the SNP should win a majority again, despite their record, the failing upwards can carry on as normal. I wonder if Ms Sturgeon will address the subject of failure when her much-anticipated session at the books festival comes to pass. If she is up for it, I would like to hear Ms Lloyd's thoughts as well. Now that she is a festival director and in what they call 'a public-facing role', there shouldn't be a problem. John Swinney too - all are welcome. Until then, I'll keep wrinkling my nose. Bewitched, no. Bothered, plenty. Alison Rowat is a Herald feature writer and columnist
