IoD urges States of Guernsey to keep funding independent colleges
The Institute of Directors (IoD) has warned deputies against voting in favour of proposals that could see funding cut for independent colleges in the island. Blanchelande College, Elizabeth College and The Ladies' College are expected to receive funding of £2.85m for 2025/2026.But if deputies vote in favour of proposals, funding for independent colleges could be phased out and reinvested in the States-maintained education system. A spokesman for the IoD said it was "critical for deputies to consider the economic contribution and benefits of independent education".
They added: "We must acknowledge the risks to economic growth, confidence, competitiveness and therefore our future success from removing some or all of the funding."The committee for education, sport and culture has said it wants to phase out financial support for the colleges as is "not the best use of taxpayer money".It adds that funding private education is an "unfair allocation" of funding which widens inequality and that it is not necessary for the colleges to continue running.However, the IoD maintains the independent colleges represent value for money, delivering high-quality educational outcomes at a low cost to the States. The IoD said: "Guernsey would be putting itself at a distinct disadvantage at exactly the moment when ensuring educational stability and outcomes is vital for long term economic growth and success."The grant given to the colleges was £723k in 2019/20, which has increased to an expected cost of £2.85m by 2025/26.The issue will be debated by the States of Deliberation on 19 March.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
19 hours ago
- Telegraph
Rayner's workers' rights bill will damage growth, warn bosses
Angela Rayner's radical shake-up of workers' rights will hurt economic growth, bosses have warned, as companies prepare to slash hiring and curb investment. More than seven in 10 business leaders believe the Government's Employment Rights Bill will have a negative impact on the country's economy, according to a survey carried out by the Institute of Directors (IoD). Nearly half said they would be less likely to hire new staff as a result of the reforms to workers' rights. The warning will raise alarm bells for the Chancellor who has said that restoring economic growth is her priority. It threatens to deepen tensions between Ms Reeves and the Deputy Prime Minister, who is overseeing the workers' rights reforms. The pair have already clashed over the direction of economic policy, with a leaked memo recently revealing Ms Rayner was pressing the Chancellor to pursue tax rises instead of spending cuts. Under the workers' rights reforms, employees will be able to claim sick pay from the first day of their illness, instead of the fourth. The Bill will also extend the powers of unions in the workplace, making it easier for trade groups to organise strikes by weakening the thresholds currently needed to trigger a walkout. Sir Keir Starmer previously made the shake-up, dubbed Labour's 'new deal for working people', as a core part of his manifesto in the lead-up to his victory in the general election. However, it has sparked concern from business chiefs. The survey by the IoD found that more than half (52pc) of company bosses said they would be more likely to invest in automation as a result of the Bill. A quarter of business leaders polled said the Bill made it likely that they would make redundancies in a further blow to the labour market. The IoD, the so-called 'bosses' union', represents 20,000 business leaders across the country, ranging from entrepreneurial small ventures to major corporations. Already, many of those businesses have reported a slowdown in hiring since the Chancellor announced an increase in employers' National Insurance contributions and the minimum wage in the autumn Budget. The rise in labour costs has caused many businesses to cut jobs or scrap hiring plans. Alex Hall-Chen, a principal policy adviser for employment at the IoD, said: 'Government has yet to show that it is listening to the concerns of business about the potential unintended consequences of the Bill as it is currently drafted. 'If there is a silver lining, it is that more employers will invest in automation and other measures which may improve the UK's stagnating productivity levels.' Targeted changes The IoD has called on the Government to make targeted changes to the Bill, which it believes would soften the negative impact of the reforms on hiring. One of its proposed changes includes keeping the existing thresholds for statutory recognition of trade unions. Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said: 'If Labour ministers had worked in business they would know their choices mean that British workers will lose their jobs to robots and foreign workers. 'Whilst all Labour governments leave unemployment higher than they found it, this time they are actually passing laws to guarantee it.' The warning over the worker rights reforms comes after MPs warned that Britain's high energy bills and poorly coordinated efforts to fund business growth was hitting growth and prosperity. MPs on the business and trade committee said: 'The UK's high electricity prices are damaging the ability of UK businesses to compete, attract investment and decarbonise.' It pointed to evidence from Nissan that the company's Sunderland plant has higher energy bills than any of its other car factories in the world. Liam Byrne, chairman of the committee, said: 'The evidence we've heard from the nation's leading industrialists, scientists, economists and trade unionists is that this moment of history will be lost if the Chancellor's new investment is not matched by a re-making of the British state for a new economic era.' The MPs also called on the Chancellor to act to stop many of the best entrepreneurs from leaving the country for lack of funding to support their rapidly growing businesses. A government spokesman said: 'We've consulted extensively with business on our proposals, and we will continue to work closely with employers to ensure new laws work for them while putting money back into the pockets of working people.'
Times
7 days ago
- Times
Hvivo blames US trade disruption for halving in share price
Uncertainty caused by trade disruption in the United States and an adverse funding environment has resulted in the cancellation of a big contract for Hvivo, sending shares in the tester of infectious and respiratory disease products sharply lower. The Aim-listed group said that one of its clients had cancelled a 'significant' contract and another had postponed a smaller one, which Hvivo believes was a result of 'current uncertainties in the pharmaceuticals industry', particularly in the US. This had led to an increase in cancellations and delays of clinical trials across the industry, the company said, also citing a 'continued depressed biotech financing market'. Hvivo infects volunteers with safe doses of virus agents then quarantines them before testing the efficacy of vaccines and antivirals in so-called human challenge trials. The company, formerly known as Open Orphan and once a large holding in Woodford Capital's Equity Income Fund, provides clinical development services to clients that include a number of the world's biggest biopharmaceutical groups, such as Pfizer. It said it had £47 million of revenue contracted for the present financial year, including cancellation and postponement fees, and anticipated further contract wins over the course of the year. The company warned, however, that if these contract wins did not materialise then it was likely that the group would fall to a mid-single-digit operating loss for the year. All but one of the contacts for 2025 have started, Hvivo said, giving management confidence that 'there is a low risk of any further cancellations'. Shares in Hvivo more than halved in value during morning trading before paring some losses. They ended the day down 7½p, or 46.3 per cent, at 8¾p. • Biotech boss takes clinical approach to acquiring unloved assets Dr Yamin 'Mo' Khan, chief executive at Hvivo, said: 'Whilst we are disappointed to have received notification from these clients due to matters beyond our control, we still remain confident in the continued growth of human clinical trials and the overall prospects of Hvivo as we also continue to diversify our revenue streams.' Analysts at Shore Capital said concerns of a slowdown in the contract research organisation sector had also been flagged by Hvivo's larger peers, who have cited more cautious spending and clients delaying their decision making. 'Some of the negative narrative towards vaccines from Trump appointees at the US health department and the US Food and Drug Administration has clearly been an added cause for concern,' Sean Conroy, an analyst at Shore Capital, said. 'We would still caution against forming any endemic view towards vaccine development and the longer-term prospects of the human clinical trial business.'
The Independent
7 days ago
- The Independent
States are rolling out red carpets for data centers. But some lawmakers are pushing back
The explosive growth of the data centers needed to power America 's fast-rising demand for artificial intelligence and cloud computing platforms has spurred states to dangle incentives in hopes of landing an economic bonanza, but it's also eliciting pushback from lawmakers and communities. Activity in state legislatures — and competition for data centers — has been brisk in recent months, amid an intensifying buildout of the energy-hungry data centers and a search for new sites that was ignited by the late 2022 debut of OpenAI's ChatGPT. Many states are offering financial incentives worth tens of millions of dollars. In some cases, those incentives are winning approval, but only after a fight or efforts to require data centers to pay for their own electricity or meet energy efficiency standards. Some state lawmakers have contested the incentives in places where a heavy influx of massive data centers has caused friction with neighboring communities. In large part, the fights revolve around the things that tech companies and data center developers seem to most want: large tracts of land, tax breaks and huge volumes of electricity and water. And their needs are exploding in size: from dozens of megawatts to hundreds of megawatts and from dozens of acres up to hundreds of acres for large-scale data centers sometimes called a hyperscaler. While critics say data centers employ relatively few people and pack little long-term job-creation punch, their advocates say they require a huge number of construction jobs to build, spend enormous sums on goods and local vendors and generate strong tax revenues for local governments. In Pennsylvania, lawmakers are writing legislation to fast-track permitting for data centers. The state is viewed as an up-and-coming data center destination, but there is also a sense that Pennsylvania is missing out on billions of dollars in investment that's landing in other states. 'Pennsylvania has companies that are interested, we have a labor force that is capable and we have a lot of water and natural gas,' said state Rep. Eric Nelson. "That's the winning combination. We just have a bureaucratic process that won't open its doors.' It's been a big year for data centers Kansas approved a new sales tax exemption on goods to build and equip data centers, while Kentucky and Arkansas expanded pre-existing exemptions so that more projects will qualify. Michigan approved one that carries some protections, including requirements to use municipal utility water and clean energy, meet energy-efficiency measures and ensure that it pays for its own electricity. Such tax exemptions are now so widespread — about three dozen states have some version of it — that it is viewed as a must-have for a state to compete. 'It's often a nonstarter if you don't have them, for at least the hyperscalers,' said Andy Cvengros, who helps lead the data center practice at commercial real estate giant JLL. 'It's just such a massive impact on the overall spend of the data center.' Zoning, energy fights often frustrate developers In West Virginia, lawmakers approved a bill to create 'microgrid' districts free from local zoning and electric rate regulations where data centers can procure power from standalone power plants. Gov. Patrick Morrisey, a Republican, called the bill his 'landmark policy proposal' for 2025 to put West Virginia 'in a class of its own to attract new data centers and information technology companies.' Utah and Oklahoma passed laws to make it easier for data center developers to procure their own power supply without going through the grid while Mississippi rolled out tens of millions of dollars in incentives last year to land a pair of Amazon data centers. In South Carolina, Gov. Henry McMaster signed legislation earlier this month that eased regulations to speed up power plant construction to meet demand from data centers, including a massive Facebook facility. The final bill was fought by some lawmakers who say they worried about data centers using disproportionate amounts of water, taking up large tracts of land and forcing regular ratepayers to finance the cost of new power plants. 'I do not like that we're making customers pay for two power plants when they only need one,' Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey told colleagues during floor debate. Still, state Sen. Russell Ott suggested that data centers should be viewed like any other electricity customer because they reflect a society that is 'addicted' to electricity and are 'filling that need and that desire of what we all want. And we're all guilty of it. We're all responsible for it.' Some lawmakers are hesitant In data center hotspots, some lawmakers are pushing back. Lawmakers in Oregon are advancing legislation to order utility regulators to ensure data centers pay the cost of power plants and power lines necessary to serve them. Georgia lawmakers are debating a similar bill. In Virginia, the most heavily developed data center zone in the U.S., Gov. Glenn Youngkin vetoed a bill that would have forced more disclosures from data center developers about their site's noise pollution and water use. In Texas, which endured a deadly winter blackout in 2021, lawmakers are wrestling with how to protect the state's electric grid from fast-growing data center demand. Lawmakers still want to attract data centers, but a bill that would speed up direct hookups between data centers and power plants has provisions that are drawing protests from business groups. Those provisions would give utility regulators new authority to approve those agreements and order big electric users such as data centers to switch to backup generators in a power emergency. Walt Baum, the CEO of Powering Texans, which represents competitive power plant owners, warned lawmakers that those provisions might be making data center developers hesitant to do business in Texas. 'You've seen a lot of new announcements in other states and over the last several months and not as much here in Texas," Baum told House members during a May 7 committee hearing. "I think everybody right now is in a waiting pattern and I worry that we could be losing to other states while that waiting pattern is happening.' ___
