Ben Roberts-Smith appeal dismissed
Matt Mason: So we're going to try and be the first and fastest classic style boat to row across the Indian Ocean. That's a different type of boat compared to a lot of the majority of ocean rowing boats. Slightly tougher rowing and takes us a lot longer.
Samantha Donovan: War veteran Ben Roberts-Smith is vowing to take his defamation case all the way to the High Court after the Federal Court dismissed his appeal today. In 2023, the court found in favour of three newspapers upholding their truth defence and finding it was more likely than not that Mr Roberts-Smith had been involved in the murder of four Afghan prisoners while he was serving in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012. Mr Roberts-Smith has consistently denied those allegations and hasn't been charged with any criminal offences. Alison Xiao has this report on the latest in his multi-million dollar defamation case.
Alison Xiao: It was all smiles as lawyers for Nine left the Federal Court this morning.
Reporter: How is your client feeling about this decision? Any celebrations planned for later tonight?
Alison Xiao: Decorated war veteran Ben Roberts-Smith has been ordered to pay Nine newspapers legal costs after the full bench of the Federal Court shot down his appeal to overturn the decision in his defamation case against the media outlet. The former Special Forces Corporal had unsuccessfully sued three Nine-owned newspapers for defamation over a series of articles in 2018 which contained allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan as well as bullying and domestic violence. His appeal was heard in February last year and his legal team argued there were several legal errors. The judges hearing the appeal disagreed, explaining their unanimous decision in an executive summary.
Judges' Statement: Having carefully considered all these matters, we are unanimously of the opinion that the evidence was sufficiently cogent to support the findings that the appellant murdered four Afghan men and to the extent that we have discerned error in the reasons of the primary judge, the errors were inconsequential.
Alison Xiao: The Victoria Cross recipient has also lost a bid to reopen the appeal with the inclusion of new evidence. Nine's management and its journalist Nick McKenzie have described their win as emphatic and vindication for Australian soldiers who told the public the truth. Lara Khider from the Australian Centre for International Justice has welcomed the decision but called for Mr Roberts-Smith to be held criminally accountable.
Lara Khider: It's very important for whistleblowers and for investigative journalists to be able to feel protected, to be able to do such important work that helps to expose war crimes and allegations of the sort that are very serious and the public must be aware of. We would be hoping for not just a positive civil outcome but an outcome in relation to criminal accountability.
Alison Xiao: The defamation case is estimated to have cost more than $25 million and lasted more than 100 days. This morning at Federal Court in Sydney, Mr Roberts-Smith didn't appear and his lawyers stayed silent outside court.
Reporter: Is this the end of the road for Ben Roberts-Smith?
Alison Xiao: The saga looks set to continue. Ben Roberts-Smith says he will immediately seek a High Court challenge to today's decision. In a statement he says, I have only ever asked for a fair and just hearing. That has not occurred. Mr Roberts-Smith has always denied the allegations made against him and no criminal charges have been laid against the former Special Forces Corporal.
Samantha Donovan: Alison Xiaoa with that report. The reasons for today's judgement by the Federal Court's full bench won't be released until next week. Dr Michael Douglas is a barrister specialising in defamation law at Francis Burt Chambers in Perth. He told me he's not particularly surprised Mr Roberts-Smith lost his appeal.
Michael Douglas: It was always going to be a difficult task for Mr Roberts-Smith to overturn what was quite a rigorous first instance judgement. And part of the difficulty facing Mr Roberts-Smith is that he was essentially challenging factual findings. Ordinarily for a defamation case, it's the application of the Lord of the facts that's where usually you'll go to challenge a first instance judge on appeal. But here, he's not all made findings about the allegations of Ben Robert Smith committing essentially war crimes that they were justified and trying to overturn factual findings about what evidence meant. That's always going to be quite difficult within an appeal court.
Samantha Donovan: Ben Roberts-Smith is now adamant that he'll challenge the judgement in the High Court. Do you think it's a case the High Court will take on?
Michael Douglas: It's hard to say. The High Court doesn't take on many cases. You need what's called special leave to appeal to the High Court. And it's unclear whether this is the sort of case where special leave would be granted. It does raise an issue of public importance in the sense that whether or not Mr Roberts-Smith committed war crimes and did the things he was alleged to do, those are topics that go to really important issues about not just Mr Roberts-Smith, but the treatment of the military and various other things. So that part of the test is satisfied. But the reason why I'm quite sceptical is that there doesn't seem to be any issue of legal principle that really jumps out at me that anyone has got wrong. The first instance judgement was pretty orthodox, an orthodox approach to evidence. So it's going to be really difficult for Mr Roberts-Smith to get special leave. But that said, I wouldn't want to prejudge what the High Court does and they may take a different view. So we'll have to wait and see.
Samantha Donovan: Dr Douglas, what sort of costs bill do you think Mr Roberts-Smith will be up for at the conclusion of this appeal to the Federal Court?
Michael Douglas: I honestly don't know. I know, however, that it's going to be massive and it will dwarf nearly any other defamation case in the history of our country. Whatever it is, I'm sure Kerry Stokes will be able to afford it. But nonetheless, it's not a sum that any ordinary person could afford.
Samantha Donovan: And in terms of defamation law, what is the significance of this case?
Michael Douglas: I don't see it as being of huge legal significance. It's more of, I guess, cultural or political significance in that Mr Roberts-Smith is a public figure and he's taken up a large part of the Australian public consciousness. But in terms of setting a legal precedent, I'm not sure that it's going to change much. But I stand to be corrected if the reasons for decision deal with issues that I'm unfamiliar with, it may be more significant than I think.
Samantha Donovan: Dr Michael Douglas is a defamation barrister in Perth and he was referring there to billionaire WA businessman Kerry Stokes, who's been financing Mr Roberts-Smith defamation case. Well, to another defamation case now, and the former leader of the Victorian Liberal Party, John Pesutto , is at risk of being bankrupted and booted from state parliament after an order he pay more than $2 million in legal costs. Last December, the federal court found he defamed his Conservative Party colleague, Moira Deeming , by falsely implying she had links to neo-Nazis. Mr Pesutto lost the Liberal leadership as a result of the case. The moderate MP who had been trying to stop the state Liberal Party moving further to the right says he's determined to stay in parliament. Kimberley Price has more.
Kimberley Price: The public stoush between John Pesutto and his Conservative colleague, Moira Deeming, has resulted in the former Victorian opposition leader facing bankruptcy. It is understood Mr Pesutto cannot pay the $2.3 million ordered by the court after Ms Deeming successfully sued him for defamation. If he's declared bankrupt, Mr Pesutto will be unable to sit in parliament. A GoFundMe page has now been launched to help pay Mr Pesutto's fees. All of Victoria's living former Liberal premiers have financially supported Mr Pesutto, including Geoff Kennett. He's called on the party and the public to help.
Jeff Kennett: I think and hope there'll be a whole range of people, fair-minded people out there in the public arena, who will help John Pesutto meet this extraordinary bill. What's occurred is very, very sad and I've never seen it occur in my political life before.
Kimberley Price: But Liberal leader Brad Battin, who ousted Mr Pesutto in December, did not indicate whether or not the Liberal Party or the party's investment arm, the Cormac Foundation, should help Mr Pesutto. And he refused to answer questions about the future of Mr Pesutto's grip on the seat of Hawthorne.
Brad Battin: It is a hypothetical at the moment. We haven't had any conversations about that. I have had a focus to work with John as I have in the past and I will in the future. I would like to see John there in November 2026.
Kimberley Price: In December, a federal court found Mr Pesutto defamed Ms Deeming on multiple occasions by associating her with neo-Nazis after she attended a 2023 anti-trans rally that was gate-crashed by a group who performed the Nazi salute. Ms Deeming was later expelled from the parliamentary team. After losing the case brought against him, Mr Pesutto lost the party leadership and Ms Deeming has since been returned to the party room. In a statement today, Mr Pesutto says he's committed to his electorate.
John Pesutto (Statement): Whilst I'm taking time to review today's court decision with family and advisors, I reiterate that I am determined to continue serving the people of my electorate of Hawthorne and the people of Victoria for as long as they will have me.
Kimberley Price: While the courts and money are central to this story, it's also linked to a battle within the Liberal Party between moderates and more hard-lined conservatives. Emeritus Professor of Politics at Monash University, Paul Strangio, says John Pesutto tried to steer the Victorian Liberals to become more centrist as the state turns more progressive.
Paul Strangio: That's reflected both in federal election results and at state election results. And really central to that was that the party was seen as being out of alignment with Victorians. It was too conservative-oriented.
Kimberley Price: Do you think that is a problem plaguing the Liberal Party as a whole?
Paul Strangio: Undoubtedly. I think it's worth remembering that once upon a time, Victoria was the heartland of liberalism. And what we've seen in Victoria, of course, is that the party has time and again lost the two-party preferred vote here. In fact, on 15 out of the 17 last federal elections, it has lost the two-party preferred vote in this state.
Kimberley Price: Mr Pesutto has the option to appeal today's decision.
Samantha Donovan: Kimberley Price reporting. This is PM, I'm Samantha Donovan. You can hear all our programs live or later on the ABC Listen app. Israeli military strikes in Gaza have left scores of people dead and raised further alarm in the international community. Palestinian health authorities say more than 100 people have been killed in the space of 24 hours. The latest deaths come as Israel's long-time ally, the US, raises concerns about the humanitarian catastrophe in the occupied territory. And a warning, there are some distressing details in this report from Myles Houlbrook-Walk.
Myles Houlbrook-Walk: In the south of Gaza, in Khan Yunis, a mother mourns the loss of her children killed in strikes by the Israeli Defence Force.
Alison Xiao: They are children, what did they do wrong? What did they do wrong?
Myles Houlbrook-Walk: Eerily similar scenes in Gaza's north in Jabalia. A young boy cries for his father killed in airstrikes, screaming, for God's sakes, dad, why did you leave us? According to Palestinian health authorities, more than 100 people have been killed in attacks in the last 24 hours. The Israeli military says it struck Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad fighters in southern Gaza. It's vowed to continue the strikes while Israeli hostages taken in the October 7 terrorist attacks remain in Gaza. Jennifer Tiernay is executive director in Australia for MSF, or Doctors Without Borders. She says Israel is being totally reckless with its approach, killing too many civilians, including children.
Jennifer Tiernay: They have an obligation to protect medical facilities and to protect civilians and they are absolutely not doing that.
Myles Houlbrook-Walk: Israel has stopped medicine and food flowing into Gaza since March 2. For that, it's been condemned by Australia, some European nations and the United Nations. 500,000 people face starvation, according to the UN. Jennifer Tiernay says the situation is dire.
Jennifer Tiernay: The blockade of aid has only exacerbated the fact that there has not been enough medical supply, enough food and safe enough shelter and hospitals that are open for people to be able to access. The situation has been the same for months on end.
Myles Houlbrook-Walk: Israel's strongest ally, the United States, did raise some concern today via Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Marco Rubio: We think that the elimination of Hamas is what achieves peace. We're troubled by the situation there. Both the Israelis with American backing and support have offered a plan to deliver aid that doesn't get diverted or stolen by Hamas.
Myles Houlbrook-Walk: The US supports a plan to resume aid delivery that could come into effect later this month and would see Israel secure premises where aid can be distributed from. But Jennifer Tiernay says aid distribution needs to be carried out by neutral organisations, not Israel.
Jennifer Tiernay: We have watched Israel ignore the needs of the Palestinian people for months on end. To put our trust in their now supposed care is really, I think, asking us to stretch ourselves to believe in a reality that we've not even seen a glimpse of. So I think it's absolutely essential we use the actors that are in place, the neutral humanitarian actors.
Myles Houlbrook-Walk: Dr Juliette McIntyre is a senior lecturer of law at the University of South Australia and says the legal standing around the provision of aid in conflicts is clear.
Juliette McIntyre: Using aid as a bargaining chip is itself in breach of international law. So aid is required to flow to civilian populations, particularly occupied civilian populations as here, and there's really no sort of negotiation to be had around that.
Myles Houlbrook-Walk: But as for enforceable consequences for potential breaches of international law that Israel has been accused of, it's yet to see many. Dr McIntyre says that's in part due to UN Security Council sanctions being vetoed by the US.
Juliette McIntyre: So the UN Security Council could order other states to, for example, either stop economic support of Israel or stop sending weapons to Israel. But as I said, the US has a veto at the UN Security Council. And so that means anything is going to be blocked in relation to Israel.
Myles Houlbrook-Walk: A tour of the Middle East by President Donald Trump now wrapping up has delivered no headway on a ceasefire or an immediate resumption of aid, nor a change to its voting intentions at the United Nations.
Samantha Donovan: Myles Houlbrook-Walk reporting. Australian Fashion Week comes to an end in Sydney today, and while there's been plenty to celebrate, the industry is concerned so few clothes are being made here. In fact, 97% of the clothing and shoes bought in Australia are imported. Now two powerful fashion figures are trying to establish a national strategy to encourage domestic manufacturing. But high labour costs may be a sticking point. Nadine Haynes prepared this report.
Nadine Haynes: It had all the runway glitz and glamour you'd expect of Australian Fashion Week. Local designers who'd spent months preparing for the event, hoping to catch the eye of Australian and international buyers. But mixed with that excitement is an air of uncertainty. How can we get more fashion manufacturing on Australian soil? Jaana Quaintance-James is the Australian Fashion Council's CEO.
Jaana Quaintance-James: We need to build greater resilience for the Australian fashion industry, which is the $28 billion industry in terms of economic value added to the Australian economy annually employs 500,000 people. Today, 97% of what is sold in Australia is manufactured offshore.
Nadine Haynes: Jaana Quaintance-James says, while we won't see 100% of our clothes being made here, we can definitely do much better than 3%. She points to RM Williams as the gold standard when it comes to manufacturing clothes in Australia. That brand's chief operating officer, Tara Moses, says doing it domestically allows greater quality control of the raw materials and the final product.
Tara Moses: What we see at RM Williams, what that means for us as an industry is that we can have more capabilities here within Australia to manufacture from the very beginning of the process to the very end of the process. And we see with our brand that our customers really care about that and want to contribute to that and have that meaning, that deep meaning and that connection to the products that they wear every day.
Nadine Haynes: Now, Jaana Quaintance-James and Tara Moses have announced a partnership. The goal is to establish a national fashion manufacturing strategy. Some of the issues they're tackling are skills gaps, high labour costs and investment in machinery. It also involves working out what we do well in Australia and building on that.
Jaana Quaintance-James: We grow amazing cotton and amazing wool and we send every single tonne of that offshore to be processed and we don't add, we add very little value in that process and sometimes we're re-importing that material.
Nadine Haynes: Both Jaana Quaintance-James and Tara Moses know the industry has been declining for years.
Jaana Quaintance-James: So the plan is to conduct a national consultation across industry. So we have hundreds of stakeholders mapped out across Australian manufacturing. What we're going to be doing is working with them to understand what the priorities for the sector are in terms of things that we need to solve. And then we'll be using that strategy, which we'll release towards the back end of the year, to really engage with government, with consumers and with industry to drive forward those outcomes.
Nadine Haynes: Tara Moses says that means being more innovative than global competitors. Uniting the scattered industry, she says, would make it easier to do things on a bigger scale. And with scale comes efficiency.
Tara Moses: It is a dying industry in Australia and if we don't right now start to make it grow, we're going to lose a lot of the skill set that exists today. We're seeing a lot of makers and a lot of people with specialty skills, they are retiring out and they aren't able to pass on their knowledge.
Nadine Haynes: Dr Carol Tan from RMIT University is an expert on the business of fashion. She says bringing manufacturing back to Australia will be a challenge.
Carol Tan: Do we have any government support? It could include incentives for local manufacturing, investment in infrastructure and training and perhaps policies that support ethical and sustainable production. And it's not just a Lone Ranger thing that you can do. You need industry collaboration. So collaboration between designers, manufacturers, textile producers.
Nadine Haynes: She says consumers also play a role.
Carol Tan: So not all consumers prioritise Australian made or sustainability over price. So a large segment of the market will likely to continue to be drawn to affordability and the wide variety offered by platforms like Temu.
Nadine Haynes: Dr Tan says it's all about educating consumers about quality, ethics and sustainability so that they're more willing to pay a premium price for a better product.
Carol Tan: At the end of the day, we cannot compete on price, right? You know that our labour costs are so expensive. I know even with economies of scale, think about what we are paying the worker compared to all these countries that have been doing it for a very long time. And they also have the technology. So unless we start investing in technology, it's going to be actually quite difficult, but possible. So it's not all doom and gloom.
Samantha Donovan: That's Dr Carol Tan from RMIT Uni. Nadine Haynes with that report. Well, can you imagine rowing a from Western Australia all the way to Africa? That's a feat two determined international crews are trying to achieve. By sheer coincidence, they're setting out within days of each other from the town of Carnarvon, 900 kilometres north of Perth. And they expect to be rowing for the best part of three months to reach the African coast. Lina El-Saadi filed this report. This is control centre.
Matt Mason: So we've got a chart plotter, switchboards that powers everything.
Lina El-Saadi: It's all aboard on No Great Shakes. This rowboat, complete with a crew of four from the UK, is in for an incredible journey from Carnarvon on the remote West Australian coast all the way to the African nation of Tanzania.
Matt Mason: So we're going to try and be the first and fastest classic style boat to row across the Indian Ocean. Carnarvon is a great launching off point because of the currency straight out. You know, we've only got a few hundred miles north to go and then we're in the trade is.
Lina El-Saadi: Crew member Matt Mason says the team is trying to row the full distance in under 90 days after careful preparations. No Great Shakes left from Carnarvon around midday yesterday. Part of what makes this cruise attempt unique is the type of boat they're rowing. It's what's called a classic style.
Matt Mason: That's a different type of boat compared to a lot of the majority of ocean rowing boats because we don't have the wind assistance. So slightly tougher rowing and takes us a lot longer.
Lina El-Saadi: In an amazing coincidence, another completely unrelated boat and crew are also making the voyage. The other vessel is called Untamed. It's leaving Carnarvon tomorrow with a crew made up of four men from the Netherlands, Bulgaria, Ukraine and China. They're hoping to make the journey of more than 9000 kilometers to Mombasa in Kenya in 75 days. Along the way, they'll be contributing to research at the University of Western Australia, which in turn is helping them plan their route. Here's one of the rowers, Evgeniy Sudyr.
Evgeniy Sudyr: They want to do this for a couple of reasons. One of them is to check dynamics of ocean rowing boat in the Indian Ocean. And also they want to research how currents and winds are affecting performance. And all of this is a good thing to do research. Nobody did it before.
Lina El-Saadi: One of the rowers on No Great Shakes, Jake Mattock, started running marathons to get ready.
Jake Mattock: These guys are military, you know, Marines and commandos. I'm a civilian that worked in tech sales. I wanted to build up that kind of mental strength that I can sustain like endurance events and have, I can stay calm under pressure in nature.
Lina El-Saadi: Both crews will have two people rowing at a time, two hours on, two hours off, 24 hours a day. That's 12 hours of rowing each, every day. The vast and dangerous Indian Ocean has always attracted adventurers. In 2023, Perth man Rob Barton became the first man to row solo from Australia to mainland Africa. It took him 86 days.
Rob Barton: You do feel very insignificant out there, but you learn to have a lot of faith and confidence in your boat. It's all down to you. Your personal strength just grows as each day goes on. Made it yesterday. Why can't you make it tomorrow?
Lina El-Saadi: And as these two crews set out, No Great Shakes rower, Matt Hemmings, thinks when it's all over, he'll look back on these few months with an odd affection.
Matt Hemmings: It's pretty much type two fun. So it's not going to be fun at the time. You'll look back on it with a weird fondness.
Samantha Donovan: I bet they will. That's Welsh rower, Matt Hemmings, speaking to our reporter, Lena El-Saadi in Carnarvon, WA. And that's PM for this week. PM's producer is David Sparkes. Technical production by Joram Toth, David Sergent and Nick Dracoulis. I'm Samantha Donovan. Have a great weekend. Good night.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Focus narrows on reducing regulation to boost productivity ahead of round table
Australia's productivity chief will assert that growth has not been a priority in policy making for years, citing the nation's growing tangle of regulation as evidence, in a speech ahead of Labor's economic reform round table this week. The warning coincides with a separate call from Australia's peak business bodies for red tape to be slashed by a quarter by the end of the decade, as Treasurer Jim Chalmers declared the government does "not want to settle for less" when it comes to productivity. Danielle Wood, chair of the Productivity Commission, will address the National Press Club on Monday, where she will argue there has been "less policy emphasis on growth and a declining reform appetite" across many wealthy nations in recent decades. "This manifests not just in less economic reform but in decisions by governments — federal, state and local — to pay less attention to growth trade-offs in pursuing other policy goals," she will say. "Nowhere is this more evident than in the growth of regulatory burden." Pointing to a significant increase in the number of words and conditional terms in acts and legislative instruments over the first two decades of the century, she will argue this "regulatory creep" is a symptom of the increasing demand for governments "to 'do something' every time an issue emerges". "When combined with Australians' tendency to look to government for answers — our 'Canberra fix' — we have ended up with a system that dampens growth." Business leaders, economists, unions and shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien will descend on Parliament House on Tuesday for a three-day meeting Mr Chalmers has billed as an opportunity to grapple with the big challenges facing the economy. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will address the attendees at the beginning of proceedings on Tuesday, and later on Wednesday, he will host the attendees at the Lodge. But expectations that the forum will lead to significant reform in the short term have been tempered by the prime minister, who earlier this month talked down the prospect of tax changes emerging from the talks. The commission has released five reports in the lead up to the round table, culminating in what Ms Wood called a "to-do list" of recommendations that could "shift the dial" on growth. Among them are many aimed at improving government regulation, including things like employing digital tools to streamline approval processes. A leaked Treasury document prepared for cabinet, first reported by the ABC this week, featured a list of possible outcomes from the round table, including a pause to changes for the National Construction Code, measures to speed up housing approvals, and a national artificial intelligence plan to cut environmental red tape. It led the opposition to label the talks a "stitch up", a claim the government has dismissed, arguing it's not unusual that the department would have provided advice on some of the already received ideas ahead of time. Mr Chalmers and Mr Albanese both once again vowed they would not pre-empt any outcomes on Sunday, with the leader telling reporters in Perth that "the agenda is whatever people want to raise". He said ideas put forward will feed into the government's decision-making, including some that can be done immediately if adopted, others that will be implemented through federal budget processes, and some that tackle "the long-term challenges in the global economy, the impact on Australia, and how we deal with those issues". Ahead of the round table, 29 groups representing small, medium and large Australian businesses have launched a concerted campaign to cull red tape, warning that it needs to be easier to do business in Australia to attract investment. The alliance will also use the forum to call for reform of the approval process for planning and major projects, boosts for investment and innovation, and a process for "productive" tax reform that doesn't raise costs for consumers or businesses. Council of Small Business Organisations Australia chair Matthew Addison said the round table was an "opportunity to reset the economy in a way that supports business, not stifles it". "Our small businesses are buckling under the weight of excessive red tape, with regulatory burden and a patchwork of complex compliance obligations slowing growth," he said. Business Council of Australia chief executive Bran Black echoed that changes were needed to make it easier for businesses to operate, "so a cafe owner in Melbourne doesn't face 36 licences before they can pour a cup of coffee". He also pointed specifically to the need to cut red tape to make it faster to approve and build new homes, something the government has identified needs to happen to solve the housing crisis. Ms Wood will reference Productivity Commission research that found the time it takes to build houses and apartments has ballooned by 50 per cent over the past three decades. "It's not the time laying bricks that's blown out. It's the approvals processes: from planning, to heritage, to building approvals, environmental and traffic impact statements," she will say. "And these regulatory hairballs have found their way into almost every corner of our economy." According to Ms Wood, prioritising growth means there will be uncomfortable trade-offs, for example, heritage and density restrictions coming at the expense of more and cheaper housing, but that a "growth mindset means elevating growth and its benefits across all policy decisions". "It does not mean government should never intervene or pursue other conflicting goals, but the benefits of growth should not be traded away quietly or lightly," she will say. In an interview ahead of the round table, Mr Chalmers told the ABC that there was a lot of appetite in cabinet for cutting red tape and improving regulation where possible, and it would be a "really, really big focus" of the talks. "There are a number of reasons for our productivity challenge and we're going to chip away at trying to address it over time," he said. "We don't want to waste the next decade on productivity, the way our predecessors wasted the last, and that's what drives us." Andrew Bragg, the Coalition's shadow minister for productivity and deregulation, will also lay out the opposition's plan to increase productivity on Monday, arguing Australia has become "inefficient, bureaucratic and unproductive". "Many regulations are well intentioned, but we must now confront their cumulative effect," he will say, arguing it is costing the economy billions each year. Like Ms Wood, he will warn against the impulse of solving issues by simply announcing new laws or regulations. "More rules is always seen as good. The minister can announce the problem is solved. The caravan moves on. The dog barks," he will argue. "There is limited interest in how the new rules are enforced — unless there is a scandal." The Coalition's answer is deregulation, with a focus on "genuine enterprise with limited, rather than repressive, controls".
News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Hunger for growth ‘missing' from economic policy, productivity tsar says
Decision makers must adopt a 'growth mindset' to fix the productivity problem plaguing the economy, according to Australia's productivity tsar. Labor's highly anticipated Economic Reform Roundtable will kick off on Tuesday, bringing together 'a range of people with a range of views', as described by Anthony Albanese. The point of getting unions, business leaders, and policy experts in the same room as politicians is building consensus on how to boost productivity, or how efficiently an economy produces goods and services. Productivity Commission (PC) chair Danielle Wood will use a major speech on Monday to call on fellow roundtable attendees to be bold as they 'thrash out potential reforms to kickstart Australia's flagging productivity growth', warning that failure could bust the 'generational bargain' of handing over a better country to the future. 'I'm thrilled by the new appetite for economic reform that the roundtable has created over the past two months,' Ms Wood will tell the National Press Club, according to a copy of her speech seen by NewsWire. 'Ultimately the government will be judged on its actions and the outcomes they achieve. 'But it has taken an important step by recognising and pursuing economic growth, and the productivity that drives it, as a prime goal of policy. 'This 'growth mindset' – an elevation of growth and the benefits it brings – has been missing from Australian policy for far too long.' Faced with challenges posed by geopolitical turmoil, climate change and an ageing population, she will point out that young Australians do not believe they will have 'better lives than their parents'. 'The expectation that life will get better for each successive generation is Australia's generational bargain,' Ms Wood said. 'For many generations we have fulfilled its promise. Until, perhaps, this one. 'Overwhelmingly, young people today believe they won't live better lives than their parents did. 'As chair of the Productivity Commission, I'm worried too.' She will note that the PC has already given the Albanese government some options. Her agency released five reports over the past month zooming in on key areas, ranging from increasing economic agility and workforce training to harnessing artificial intelligence and the net zero transition. On economic dynamism, the PC proposed reforming Australia's corporate tax system to encourage business investment, which has declined since the Global Financial Crisis. It would cut the corporate tax rate for most businesses to 20 per cent and introduce a 5 per cent cashflow tax on all businesses, with a view to creating friendlier conditions for investors. The result, according to Ms Wood, 'would increase investment by $7.4bn and GDP by $14.6bn'. 'Big enough to get out of bed for, I would think,' she will say. On AI, the PC warned against a new overarching regulatory framework for AI and instead update existing regulations to address risks like fraud and discrimination. 'This would translate to an additional $116bn in economic activity – equivalent to boosting incomes for each Australian by $4300 a year over that period,' Ms Wood will say. 'A growth mindset means that we must not regulate our way out of this opportunity.' Less regulation was an overarching theme in all the PC's reports. Using those the reports as guides, Ms Wood will put forward three 'lessons about what a growth mindset looks like'. 'Regulate with growth in mind,' she will say, calling for 'leadership from the top when the policy sausage is being made'. In a nod to AI, she will say, 'Real growth comes from new ideas and technology,' arguing that productivity growth comes from new ideas, products, processes, and ways of managing people. While physical inputs have limits, human ingenuity does not, Ms Wood will say. Therefore, a growth mindset should focus on fostering innovation and enabling Australia to benefit from its own inventions and those of others. Her final lesson is that productivity 'is a game of inches'. 'There is simply no single policy reform that can bring productivity growth back to its long-term average of 1.6 per cent,' Ms Wood will say. 'To shift the dial, governments will have to make a lot of pro-productivity decisions.' Though, acknowledging the mammoth task, she will say she is 'optimistic that there is a package here that can make a difference to Australia's prosperity'. 'Governments must embed the importance of growth in every decision they make,' Ms Wood will say. 'This means engaging with trade-offs, better program delivery and design, and the 'boring but important work' of reducing administrative burden. 'We must ensure that governments pursue a growth agenda, for the benefit of businesses and workers today and, more importantly, for the generations to come. 'And that's worth a few days locked in a room.'
ABC News
7 hours ago
- ABC News
One man dead, another seriously injured in shooting outside Forest Lodge pub in Sydney's inner-city
One man has died and another has been seriously injured in a shooting outside a hotel in Sydney's inner-city. Police were called to The Harold Hotel on Ross Street in Forest Lodge about 6:40pm, following reports of a public place shooting. When officers arrived, they found two people had been shot multiple times by unknown people who fled in a car. Paramedics treated the two men at the scene, but one could not be saved. The other man was treated for gunshot wounds and was taken to hospital in a serious condition. Detectives have cordoned off part of the street with police tape, as a manhunt for the gunmen continues. Nearby resident Imogen said she heard about six "really loud bangs" but initially mistook them for fireworks. "I saw some people running across the road, so away from where the sound was coming from, and a few other people running up the road," she said. "It hasn't quite hit me yet. My family had just arrived to mine maybe 10 minutes earlier so to think they were walking at the same time [is] a bit scary." Ivan and Charlotte said they heard a number of shots. "There was probably eight to ten gunshots, and then a pause, and then another half dozen maybe," Ivan said. Charlotte said the man who was taken to hospital was conscious as paramedics treated him. "He'd been shot multiple times, maybe six times," Charlotte said. "He'd been shot in the neck, the chest, the abdomen, arms, legs, just everywhere." #moretocome
