University teachers call off boycott, classes resume today
The teachers of public sector universities in Sindh have decided to call off their boycott of classes from February 6, but their protest against the provincial government's controversial reforms regarding the appointment of vice chancellors will continue.
In a statement issued on Wednesday, Abdul Rehman Nangraj, General Secretary of the Sindh chapter of the Federation of All Pakistan Universities Academic Staff Association (FAPUASA), announced a shift in their protest strategy.
"We acknowledge that the prolonged boycott has disrupted students' education, and we deeply regret the academic setbacks they have faced," he said, emphasising that despite their efforts, the government has remained indifferent to their concerns.
While classes will resume, teachers will persist in their demonstration by wearing black armbands and raising awareness among students about the negative repercussions of the newly enacted legislation. The amendment, they argue, allows bureaucrats — who lack academic and research experience — to assume the role of vice chancellors, imperiling the autonomy of universities.
The teachers have resolved to boycott visits from ministers, MPAs, and bureaucrats to their campuses. They also plan to engage with national and international academic institutions to mount pressure on the provincial government to reconsider the legislation. Nangraj revealed that legal action against the amendment is also under consideration.
The protesting faculty contends that appointing bureaucrats as university heads will not only undermine academic freedom and excellence but also expose universities to increased political interference. "This legal move seems to be part of a broader strategy to suppress critical thinking and dissent within academic institutions," Nangraj asserted. He further stated that university autonomy is globally recognised as a key factor in academic progress and innovation.
The Sindh Assembly passed the Sindh Universities and Institutes Law (Amendment) Act, 2025, on February 1, despite strong opposition from academic circles, including the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan. In response, university teachers promptly launched their protest, initially boycotting classes to voice their dissent.
Although they have now resumed academic activities, their resistance against the law remains unwavering, signaling an ongoing struggle for the independence of higher education institutions in the province.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
14th August Independence Day: Journey of unprecedented sufferings
Pakistanis have endured 78 years of a painful journey comprised of unprecedented politico and socio-economic sufferings. The sufferings of Pakistanis, especially the poor and less privileged, will continue unabated no matter how many Independence Days we celebrate, unless the society is restructured on the principles of equity, fairness and justice—fundamental elements enunciated in Article 3 of the 1973 Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan ['the Constitution']. The way landmark majority judgement of 9-memebre of Supreme Court of Pakistan for rectifying the mistake of Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) in allocating reserve seats through enacting Elections (Second Amendment) Act, 2024 by the Senate & National Assembly—just a week before the 77th Independence Day—reversed in a review judgement is highly lamentable. It violated well-established jurisprudence of Article 188 of the Constitution, pushing the country towards further anarchy and constitutional breakdown. Such a mockery of justice and constitutionalism is highly deplorable, when the nation is already weary of unabated terrorism, lawlessness, economic meltdown, unprecedented tax burden and high food inflation. The regime's illegitimacy giving rise to unbated political instability and perpetual economic subjugation to International Monetary Fund (IMF) and others are not sudden isolated phenomena. These are because of State captivity in the hands of militro-judicial-civil complex, absentee landowners, pirs (spiritual leaders), industrialist-turned politicians and unscrupulous traders. Pakistan's economy serves these privileged classes. The militro-judicial-civil complex not only enjoys unprecedented tax-free benefits at the cost of taxpayers' money but has failed to deliver for what it is paid. Absentee landowners and industrialists continuously amass wealth by exploiting landless tillers and industrial workers, respectively. Greedy hoarders and dishonest traders create artificial hikes in prices of essential items and thrive on hard-earned incomes of the poor and fixed-income classes without even sparing the hapless citizens during auspicious occasions like Eid when prices go beyond the reach of even well-to-do middle-class families. Adding insult to injury, successive governments keep on imposing and increasing oppressive, unbearable indirect taxes on the poor, while extending unprecedented benefits to the rich and mighty. This has always been the real dilemma of Pakistan, where we are celebrating 78th Independence Day on August 14, 2025! The anti-people alliance of militro-judicial-civil complex is the root cause of our major ills. Through cross marriages, they 'look after' each other and manage to perpetuate control over State institutions and economic resources. For civil bureaucrats, life revolves around good postings, promotions, lucrative benefits, foreign tours and nationalities! Officers having a political clout are requisitioned by federal and provincial ministries for lucrative posts with unbelievable perks and benefits. The so-called civil servants (behaving like brown sahibs believing to be even more privileged than gora rulers) serve their political masters' interests rather than the people, sometimes in defiance of established rules and regulations, destroying the entire structure of civil services, where 'political connections' is now the name of the game. Polarisation, favouratism and politicisation within State institutions are showing their disastrous results. While law and order has always been a grave concern, terrorists now freely attack law enforcement personnel and even the members of armed forces with impunity. Despite taking enormous taxes, people are forced to arrange their own security while the government machinery serves the rulers alone. Even after taking oath for the second time, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has not learnt any lessons from his past mistakes as he continues to act like the 'servant' of those who matter in the land, and keeps on promoting nepotism and cronyism. Once again, under his previous and present rule, many high-clibre officers are denied postings/promotions they deserve on merit or placed in surplus pool on flimsy grounds, while 'loyalists', though junior and incompetent, are enjoying lucrative posts and benefits. There seems no end to such brazen acts on the part of elites that keep on humming the mantra of democracy, but act in an authoritarian and irresponsible manner. Militro-judicial-civil complex and their cronies will never make Pakistan an egalitarian State—as demonstrated repeatedly by them. The latest evidence is the Finance Act, 2025 not imposing a single tax on the rich and mighty to bridge the huge fiscal deficit. On the contrary, indirect taxes have been raised, even under the garb of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, to further crush the poor and overburden the fast-squeezing middle-class. The same pro-rich approach was adopted in federal budget for FY 2024-25, which not also imposed unbearable tax burden of the lower and middle class salaried persons. Mindless borrowings simultaneously from banks and foreign lenders continue to push the nation in darker abyss of 'debt prison'—debt servicing alone is now the largest burden on the economy absorbing all taxes collected by Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), after 57.5% share to provinces, and even non-tax revenue—all happening due to ruthless spending to fund luxuries of the State Oligarchy. The fiscal deficit, projected in Budget 2025-26 is Rs. 6.5 trillion whereas debt servicing at Rs. 8.2 trillion! In fiscal year (FY) 2025, deficit was Rs. 7.4 trillion and debt servicing was Rs. 8.9 trillion. In FY 2024, budget was prepared under the guidance of MuhmmadIshaq Dar, with debt servicing allocation of Rs. 7.3 trillion that ultimately overran to Rs. 8.16 trillion! The jubilation and merriment over staff-level agreement with IMF on July 12, 2024 for 37-month Extended Fund Facility (EFF) programme of US$7 billion speaks volume of moral bankruptcy of our ruling elites. What a pity that that they celebrate further indebtedness! Just three days before the 84th Pakistan Day, March 23, 2024, Press release of IMF confirming successful completion of SBA was treated as an advance gift of Pakistan Resolution to the nation—height of shameless behaviour! The elites are, however, still happy as they enjoy unprecedented benefits and perquisites, free plots, foreign trips, foreign nationalities, free club facilities, just to mention a few, all funded by the poor taxpayers. On the other hand, there is no political will to provide free health and education to the ordinary people, what to speak of fulfilling other obligations mentioned in the Constitution. Dr. Ishrat Husain, in his book, Pakistan: The Economy of an Elitist State, has aptly observed that in sharp contrast to the East Asian model of 'shared growth', based on rapid economic development, coupled with a rapid reduction in poverty and more equitable distribution of the benefits of development, in Pakistan, the elitist model confers political and economic powers to a small coterie of elite (parasites). While quoting Dr. Ishrat's work, Dr. Khalil Ahmad, in his book, Pakistan Mein RiastiAshrafiyaKaA'roj (Rise of State Oligarchy in Pakistan), has also concluded: 'Pakistan is presently owned and exploited by elites whereas it should belong to the people of Pakistan'. Powerful State officials, in hand with the rich and mighty men in khaki and corrupt politicians, exploit the system for self-aggrandisement. For example, FBR through SROs [Statutory Regulator Orders] at the behest of political masters provides 'legal' ways and means to society's powerful sections to amass huge wealth—exemptions and concessions given to them by acts of Parliament are worth billions of rupees. It is worth mentioning that under Ishaq Dar during 2013-17, FBR issued many favourable notifications, especially for sugar and steel industry. In 2012 when officers of Grade 19-22 were allowed compulsory monetized transport allowance, SRO 569(I)/2012 was issued on 26 May 2012 [still operative] providing that government officials in Grade 20-22 would pay just 5% tax on this allowance. The powerful bureaucrats use official cars, get monetized allowance, and pay meagre tax. On the contrary, their counterparts in private sector pay tax on this perquisite at the normal rate! This injustice was highlighted in an earlier column. It was hoped that with the new Chairman of FBR, Rashid MahmoodLangrial, personal choice and confidant of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, this benefit would be withdrawn. However, he himself continued to enjoy it! It is worth mentioning that in Finance Act 2013, the flying allowance of airline pilots was clubbed with salary, but Ishaq Dar did not extend similar treatment to mighty bureaucrats for their transport allowance showing how elites protect each other and professionals like pilots get raw deals just because they are not part of State Oligarchy. The problem of Pakistan is not scarcity of resources, but unwillingness in tapping and/or properly utilizing and managing their equitable distribution, absence of effective administrative and justice systems to check socio-economic injustice. It has been repeatedly highlighted by different writers that without imposing any new tax or raising the rates of the existing ones, the total revenue collection at federal level alone can be Rs 30 trillion (Rs. 18 trillion direct taxes and Rs. 12 trillion indirect taxes) if existing tax gap is bridged and informal economy is brought into tax net. This level of collection is possible but as a first step, we will have to reform our administrative machinery and judiciary. Expensive State property occupied by State elites (judges and high-ranking civil-military bureaucrats) as 'residences' must be utilized commercially through long-term lease. Their benefits and perquisites should be monetized. Consolidated Pay Package for them, fair and adequate, would reduce corruption, remove a strong sense of elitism and improve governance. For politicians and all State functionaries, an independent and effective accountability apparatus is necessary. Without fundamental structural reforms, we cannot establish a true democratic polity extend socio-economic justice for all, ensure rapid growth with job opportunities for millions of young people, whose frustration is on the rise with every passing day as elites are showing apathy towards them while enjoying luxuries at the State's expense. Brutal and naked exploitation of the have-nots in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and dehumanization of society are leading to gruesome incidents where people are committing suicides or killing innocents without any remorse and repentance. We will have to move fast to reverse this trend and make Pakistan a true democratic republic for the people, not jagir [fiefdom] of elites. Time has come to make a firm resolve on 78th Independence Day and take definitive actions to implement in letter and spirit Article 3 of the Constitution which says: 'The State shall ensure the elimination of all forms of exploitation and the gradual fulfillment of the fundamental principle, from each according to his ability to each according to his work'. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
CJP faces scrutiny over ignoring full court order in 26th Amendment case
Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi is facing criticism after Supreme Court (SC) committee minutes revealed that he ignored a majority decision last year to form a full court to hear petitions challenging the 26th Constitutional Amendment. The three-member committee, operating under the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act 2023 to form regular benches, was chaired by CJP Afridi in late October last year, with Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Munib Akhtar as members. The majority — Justices Shah and Munib — had ordered the petitions be fixed before a full court on November 4, 2024. According to the minutes, CJP Afridi argued the committee lacked legal authority to direct the formation of a full court. He also consulted all judges individually and nine of the 13 supported the formation of a constitutional bench to hear the case. Now that the CJP's justification for the non-formation of a full court is in public domain, lawyers are questioning his conduct by asking who will determine how many judges had opposed and what question was placed before each judge. "How could judges have been consulted on a matter which, according to the statute, was not within their jurisdiction? Why every week all 23 are not consulted?" asked a lawyer, speaking to The Express Tribune on the condition of anonymity. Likewise, advocate Abdul Moiz Jaferii said he failed to understand why an informal poll of other judges was taken by the CJP after the practice and procedure committee - as it then was - had made a majority decision. "I similarly fail to understand why such a determination, if it was needed after the committee decision, was not taken in a formal full court meeting. I also fail to understand why the CJP was willing to interpret the 26th Amendment in favour of the executive's influence, and reluctant to have the Amendment's constitutionality first tested by a full sitting of his peers," said advocate Jaferii. Read: SC judges urge CJP to call full court on 26th Amendment pleas Meanwhile, advocate Asad Rahim Khan said that the job of the chief justice, before everything else, is to preserve the independence of the judiciary; not to accept its subordination by the executive. "Should [former] chief justice Nasirul Mulk have put off a full court from hearing the challenge to the 21st Amendment, by arguing that Article 175(3) had already been amended, and there was nothing left for the Court to do about it? For or against, the judges decided according to their consciences, and the law was settled. Again, that was their job," said the advocate. He further said that the greatest judicial regression in 30 years – where the amendment's very passage is under a cloud – can't be treated as a fait accompli. "Going by this logic, if the Constitution were subverted through a [provisional constitutional order] PCO or some other unlawful means tomorrow, that wouldn't be heard either, as it would be [illegally] protected in the text of the Constitution," he added. The longer the amendment is undecided, the longer its automatic acceptance, and, as a result, the longer the judiciary's corrosion. Another senior lawyer opined that paragraph three of the CJP's response was bizarre. "It indicates that SC does not believe in transparency and fears criticism. Public comment is the best form of accountability. Avoiding a full court meeting at that time shows the intent. The matter should have been discussed in Full Court meeting because opinion of majority of members of committee was binding. The law was violated by the CJP," said the senior lawyer, speaking on the condition of anonymity. He asked how one member could violate the decision of a statutory committee empowered to decide how and which cases were to be fixed. The statute did not give power to one member to overrule the majority decision. The other judges were not relevant and seeking their informal individual opinion was illegal and in out right violation of law, he said. Since November last year, the constitutional bench is unable to decide the fate of 26th Constitutional Amendment. In January, the constitutional bench took up the matter and adjourned the hearing for three weeks. Later, the bench did not hear the case. Interestingly, the creation of constitutional bench itself is under challenge. Questions are being raised as to how the beneficiaries of 26th Constitutional Amendment can decide about their future. Read more: Judicial reforms shape SC's first constitutional bench Now the situation has changed in the apex court. Eight new judges are elevated to the apex court since February. Even most of them are included in the constitutional benches. Last November, SC judges Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Munib Akhtar urged the CJP to immediately fix hearings for the pleas challenging the 26th Constitutional Amendment. In their letter, the two judges, who are part of the committee responsible for fixing cases and forming benches under the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act (2023), stated that the committee has decided to hear these constitutional petitions in a full court, with the initial hearing date set for November 4. The dispute began on October 31, when Justices Shah and Akhtar formally addressed a letter to CJP Afridi, urging him to hold a meeting under the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act 2023. With no response from the CJP, Justices Shah and Akhtar held an independent meeting in the latter's chambers to determine the next steps. Following this private session, the two justices decided by majority vote to bring the amendment petitions before a full court on November 4. They then sent a second letter to CJP Afridi, expressing their concerns over the postponement. According to the letter, the judges had previously informed the registrar of their decision on October 31 and instructed the registrar to publish the decision on the Supreme Court's official website. They argued that the petitions challenging the amendment demand a comprehensive review by the full court, as this matter involves constitutional implications that go beyond standard judicial concerns. By refraining from convening a full court, the chief justice had, according to some experts, signaled a cautious approach to the handling of such cases, potentially seeking to avoid judicial overreach or political entanglements.
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
Sindh PA celebrates Independence Day
KARACHI: In a display of unity and inclusion, the Sindh Assembly on Thursday celebrated Pakistan's 78th Independence Day with a symbolic session at its historic old building, bringing together lawmakers, special students, and guests. The day began with Speaker Syed Owais Qadir Shah hoisting the national flag, followed by special prayers for the country's security, progress, and prosperity. The ceremony was attended by Deputy Speaker Anthony Naveed, Provincial Home Minister Zia Ul Hassan Lanjar, Leader of the Opposition Ali Khurshidi, ministers, women and minority representatives, and members from all political parties. Special students from the Ida Rieu Welfare Association were given seats in the members' chairs. Abid Ali, a differently-abled student, read out an Independence Day resolution from Braille, seconded by Asma Zahoor, Tauseef Ahmed, and Hans Raj. The resolution paid tribute to the armed forces, praised the success of Operation Bunyan Mursus — described as the 'Battle of Truth'— and commended Bilawal Bhutto Zardari for enhancing Pakistan's image through diplomacy. It called on the youth to stand as a united front in service of the nation. The House unanimously adopted the resolution, greeting the students with standing ovations and desk-thumping. Tauseef Ahmed recalled the night of May 7, when the Pakistan Air Force 'brought down six enemy aircraft in minutes' and the army 'held the Line of Control with their blood.' He called Operation Bunyan Mursus a decisive chapter in the spirit of the Pakistan Resolution. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
