Extra funding to help plug National Insurance shortfall in Wales
Welsh Government steps in to protect vital services
WELSH public services are set to receive additional funding to help meet rising employer National Insurance (NI) costs—after a shortfall in support from the UK Government left a significant funding gap.
The increase in employer NI contributions has added an estimated £257 million in annual costs to the Welsh public sector. Of that, the UK Government has committed £185 million, leaving a £72 million deficit.
To help cover this shortfall, the Welsh Government has announced it will allocate £36 million from its reserves. This brings the total support package to £220 million, which will cover approximately 85% of the increased costs.
Finance Secretary Mark Drakeford said: 'We're protecting our vital public services by using £36 million from our reserves to help address the National Insurance shortfall left by the UK Government.
'While the UK Government has provided some funding, it does not match the actual financial burden now facing Welsh services. This leaves a multi-million-pound gap year after year.
'We've stepped in to support our services as much as we can, but we cannot afford to plug the entire shortfall. The UK Government should treat public services equally across the UK and honour its commitment to fully fund these extra costs.'
The Welsh Government warned that continued shortfalls could place pressure on frontline services if the funding gap is not fully addressed.
The Welsh Lib Dems responded to what they say was Mark Drakeford's National Insurance Bombshell. Leader Jane Dodds MS said: 'The Welsh Lib Dems have opposed this disastrous jobs tax from day one. Not only is it hammering our small businesses with unemployment in Wales rising, but it is now clear it will leave Wales with a gaping hole in its public finances and our public services worse off.
'The fact that the First Minister cannot even convince the UK government that the increased cost to the public sector should be covered by the Treasury shows how little influence Welsh Labour have in London.
'The Liberal Democrats will continue to argue for a reversal of the national insurance hike and fair funding for Wales.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump drops Nasa nominee Jared Isaacman, scrapping Elon Musk's pick
The White House has withdrawn Jared Isaacman as its nominee for Nasa administrator, abruptly yanking a close ally of Elon Musk from consideration to lead the space agency. Donald Trump said he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head Nasa,' the US president posted online. 'I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America first in space.' Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut who had been Musk's pick to lead Nasa, was due next week for a much-delayed confirmation vote before the US Senate. His removal from consideration caught many in the space industry by surprise. Trump and the White House did not explain what led to the decision. Isaacman, whose removal was earlier reported by Semafor, said he was 'incredibly grateful' to Trump 'and all those who supported me throughout this journey'. 'I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry,' he posted. 'It may not always be obvious through the discourse and turbulence, but there are many competent, dedicated people who love this country and care deeply about the mission.' Isaacman's removal comes just days after Musk's official departure from the White House, where the SpaceX CEO's role as a 'special government employee' leading the so-called department of government efficiency (Doge) created turbulence for the administration and frustrated some of Trump's aides. Musk, according to a person familiar with his reaction, was disappointed by Isaacman's removal. 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk wrote of Isaacman on X, responding to the news of the White House's decision. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It was unclear whom the administration might tap to replace Isaacman. One name being floated is the retired US air force Lt Gen Steven Kwast, an early advocate for the creation of the US space force and a Trump supporter, according to three people familiar with the discussions. Isaacman, the former CEO of the payment processor company Shift4, had broad space industry support but drew concerns from lawmakers over his ties to Musk and SpaceX, where he spent hundreds of millions of dollars as an early private spaceflight customer. The former nominee had donated to Democrats in prior elections. In his confirmation hearing in April, he sought to balance Nasa's existing moon-aligned space exploration strategy with pressure to shift the agency's focus on Mars, saying the US can plan for travel to both destinations. As a potential leader of Nasa's 18,000 employees, Isaacman faced a daunting task of implementing that decision to prioritize Mars, given that Nasa has spent years and billions of dollars trying to return its astronauts to the moon. On Friday, the space agency released new details of the Trump administration's 2026 budget plan that proposed killing dozens of space science programs and laying off thousands of employees, a controversial overhaul that space advocates and lawmakers described as devastating for the agency. The Montana Republican Tim Sheehy, a member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committee, posted that Isaacman had been 'a strong choice by President Trump to lead Nasa'. 'I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination,' Sheehy said. Some scientists saw the nominee change as further destabilizing to Nasa as it faces dramatic budget cuts without a confirmed leader in place to navigate political turbulence between Congress, the White House and the space agency's workforce. 'So not having [Isaacman] as boss of Nasa is bad news for the agency,' Harvard-Smithsonian astronomer Jonathan McDowell posted. 'Maybe a good thing for Jared himself though, since being Nasa head right now is a bit of a Kobayashi Maru scenario,' McDowell added, referring to an exercise in the science fiction franchise Star Trek where cadets are placed in a no-win scenario. With Reuters
Wales Online
38 minutes ago
- Wales Online
We could lose thousands if we lose our street's free parking
We could lose thousands if we lose our street's free parking Traders say the loss of two hours free parking would be a huge loss and could put some at risk of going out of business Alwen Lewis owns Iechyd Da, an eco-friendly healthy food shop on the high street. She says her business could lose thousands if the village is stripped of their free parking. (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne ) Traders have opposed plans to strip a Welsh high street of free parking, claiming it could cost them thousands in lost trade. The car parks surrounding Whitchurch High Street in Cardiff currently have two hours of free parking, allowing locals and visitors to shop without additional charge. The council put a plan to abolish this free car parking in car parks such as Merthyr Road Pay and Display, and Penlline Road Pay and Display, though it has since U-turned on plans to completely scrap it and instead has offered 30 minutes free. Never miss a Cardiff story by signing up to our daily newsletter here But business owners operating from the High Street claim the plans would damage their business. Alwen Lewis, owner of Iechy Da, an eco-friendly refill healthy food shop, said she estimates that the decrease in footfall would cause her business an loss of around £7,000 per year. "This is especially concerning for businesses like myself, as my profits mean I am earning less than minimum wage as it is. My staff earn more money than I do, and that is how I keep my business open," she said. "I figured out that the customers I would be losing if that happens are the customers that are spending under £2. If I lose, then I have calculated that I would lose about £7,000 per year. "Those are the customers that come in and spend under £2 but they are popping in all the time and it mounts up. Now why would you spend another pound on parking if you are only buying a pound worth of porridge. You wouldn't, would you? It would double the value of what you're buying." 1,386 individuals have signed a petition against the proposed changes with people being asked to give their views on the plans on RoadTrafficOrderObjections@ Last week Cardiff council announced a U-turn on plans to scrap all the free parking from its city car parks and announced some is set to remain with up to 30 minutes free as well as the possibility of a reduction in Sunday parking charges. "We thought we were being extremely reasonable in our response," Alwen said. "What we as traders are asking for is an hour free, rather than two, because within an hour you can support maybe three local businesses within that time. "You can pop and get your fruit and veg, you can pop here to get porridge and pasta, and then you could pop to the post office or grab a newspaper. "Having a shop, or an independent business like this, anyone can tell you, does not make a living at all - you're not doing it for the money." Councillor Marc Palmer said the council would propose 30 minutes free instead of zero after listening to local concerns. He said: "Following feedback from local residents, businesses, and councillors on the proposed removal of the two hours free parking in some district car parks, Cardiff Council will be making a change. "We're pleased to confirm that, instead of removing free parking entirely, the Council is now looking to offer the first 30 minutes free at the affected car parks. This will help support quick visits such as school drop-offs, collecting prescriptions, takeaways, or picking up a newspaper — without the need to pay. "They will also be keeping other measures, like community group permits, to help reduce the impact of the changes. "To implement this, they will need to carry out a revised Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) consultation — details will be shared soon, so until further notice the current two free hours will remain." A spokesman for Cardiff Council said: "Following public consultation on removing two hours of free parking in specific district shopping centres, the council is now progressing a new traffic regulation order (TRO) to allow free parking for 30 minutes at these car parks. "While the legal order is still progressing two hours of free parking will remain in place at these locations." Article continues below "In addition to the proposed 30 minutes free parking at these locations, as part of the TRO process the council will also be consulting on proposals to reduce parking charges on Sundays – where applicable, issuing additional weekend-only season tickets, increasing the charge for long-stay parking, and extending the time period for pay and display from 5pm to 6pm. "At this stage these are only proposals and they will be determined through the legal process. Further information will be provided when the legal process is complete."
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Disposable vape ban begins - here's everything you need to know
A ban on disposable vapes is now in force across the UK. The ban on selling or supplying disposable vapes, announced in January last year, applies both in shops and online. Vapes have skyrocketed in popularity in recent years, with usage growing by more than 400% between 2012 and 2023, according to the government. But why is the government cracking down on disposable ones, what are the punishments for continuing to sell them - and could there be wider vape bans in the future? Why are disposable vapes being banned? The UK-wide ban is designed to tackle waste and the impact of vapes on the environment. It only applies to disposable vapes, also known as single-use vapes, while reusable vapes can still be sold. Analysis by Material Focus released in December showed an estimated 8.2 million vapes were being thrown away or littered every week in the UK - the equivalent of 13 per second. Disposable vapes are typically thrown away in general waste bins or littered rather than being recycled, according to the government. Even when recycled, they usually need to be disassembled by hand, which is a slow and difficult process, it said. The government, in its latest guidance on the ban, called them an "inefficient use of critical resources" that "causes harm to biodiversity". It said their lithium-ion batteries can also cause fires, adding the ban would stop plastic, lead, and mercury from "leaching into the environment, which can cause waterways to be contaminated and poison our wildlife". The government has also said it hopes the ban will make vaping less accessible to children, as statistics show a growing popularity among those aged 11 to 15. NHS figures from last year showed nearly a quarter of children in that age bracket had tried vaping and nearly one in 10 did it frequently. 1:06 Is it illegal to own a disposable vape? No, having disposable vapes in your possession is not illegal if you are not intending to sell or supply them. Customers who still have disposable vapes will still be able to return the vapes and vape parts to shops that have sold them, and those shops will have an obligation to dispose of them properly. What if I still have a supply of disposable vapes? Any leftover disposable vapes will have to be recycled. The government says they should only be disposed of in vape bins and collected for recycling. 0:52 What is the punishment for continuing to sell and supply them? A variety of government agencies, including the Border Force, can inspect shops for illegal vapes and report anyone breaking the rules. Methods of punishment vary slightly depending on where in the UK you are found to be violating the rules. Here's a summary of how it will work in each country: England and Wales Civil sanctions can be applied in the first instance if you're found selling or supplying vapes. These can include a stop notice, a compliance notice or a fine of £200. If you continue to violate the rules, you can be charged with an unlimited fine, a prison sentence of up to two years, or both. Scotland If you are found violating the rules, you could be slapped with a fixed penalty notice of £200, which, if paid within 14 days, would be discounted to £150. The fine rises by £200 every time you are caught. If you do not accept the fixed penalty notice, or in instances where an enforcement officer does not consider a fine appropriate, the offender can be fined £5,000, sentenced to two years in prison, or both. Northern Ireland There will be no civil sanctions in Northern Ireland, and anyone breaking the rules could instead receive a fine of up to £5,000 on summary conviction in a magistrates' court. On further conviction, you could face a prison sentence of up to two years. How to know the difference between a disposable and reusable vape A reusable vape must be rechargeable and refillable, meaning it has to have a battery and needs to have either a removable and replaceable coil or a chamber, pod or tank that can be refilled with e-liquid. To be considered reusable, replacement components like pre-filled pods, e-liquid refill bottles and coils must be separately available to buy either in-store or online. You can check whether specific products are reusable by checking the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency's notified products list. If you search for a product and it doesn't appear, it means it is not legal to sell or supply, as all legal nicotine-containing vapes are listed. From 1 June, any single-use ones will be removed. Has the ban changed much so far? It was Rishi Sunak's Conservative government that originally proposed the ban before it was adopted by Sir Keir Starmer's Labour Party. While the ban is only coming in now, a study by University College London (UCL) looked at the impact after it was announced in January 2024. Researchers found the proportion of people vaping increased by nearly a quarter each year from January 2022 to January 2024, but stayed constant between January 2024 and January this year, including for young people. They also said they saw a steep decline in disposable vape use after January 2024, particularly among 16- to 24-year-olds, whose use of disposables almost halved from 63% to 35%. While it's a positive development for the environment, lead author Dr Sarah Jackson said results suggested the ban "may have limited impact on vaping rates in general" and said it was "likely that people using these products will move to reusable versions rather than stop vaping completely". Vaping has been marketed as a way for cigarette smokers to quit and is generally considered to be healthier because you inhale nicotine in a vapour rather than smoke. Also vapes do not produce tar or carbon monoxide - two of the most damaging elements in tobacco smoke. But the long-term effects of vaping on people's health is not fully understood. The government has backed a 10-year study to track 100,000 young people and collect health data, which is expected to provide the most detailed information yet on the impacts of vaping. While there is no further ban on vapes in the works, the government's Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which is currently in the committee stage at the House of Lords, includes powers to potentially restrict the packaging, marketing and flavours of e-cigarettes.
