Applications for Tennessee's new school voucher program to open on May 15
A total of 20,000 scholarships will be available for the upcoming school year to use at more than 200 private schools across Tennessee. The scholarships are made possible by the Education Freedom Act, which state lawmakers passed in January. The scholarships allow a child who attends a public school in grades K-12 to use state funds to attend a private school. The amount available to students is around $7,000.
$10,000 reward offered in 40-year-old Campbell County cold case
'A quality education has the power to change the trajectory of a child's life, and for the first time, families across Tennessee have the opportunity to choose the best school for their child,' said Gov. Lee. 'I'm grateful that the vast majority of eligible schools intend to participate in Education Freedom Scholarships, and I have full confidence in the Department of Education's ability to implement the program.'
Of the scholarship available, 10,000 will be reserved for eligible students based on income, IEA eligibility, or ESA eligibility. The Department of Education released a student application checklist, which provides detailed eligibility requirements. To be eligible, the student must live in Tennessee, be a U.S. citizen or be lawfully in the U.S., have not more than 13 years in school and entering grades K-12 and must be 5 years old by September 30, 2025.
'I appreciate all the families and schools who engaged throughout this implementation phase as we continue to best prepare them for the upcoming application launch on May 15,' said Lizzette Reynolds, Commissioner of Education.
East Tennessee public schools respond to passage of Governor's school voucher bill
According to the Vanderbilt Poll, 8% of parents with public school children said they plan to use the vouchers, while 34% of parents of private school students said they plan to apply for a voucher to help pay tuition.
If the number of applicants exceeds 75% of the vouchers available, the act allows for the number of scholarships to be increased by up to 5,000. To learn more, visit the Education Freedom Scholarship webpage.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
Dangerous nostalgia: Trump wants to turn back time
In the 1978 film 'Superman,' the hero performs many impossible feats, including traveling backward in time by flying around Earth at super speed. Donald Trump, who seems to fancy himself an all-powerful Super President, appears eager to go back in time as well in an effort to return America to 'the good old days' of his youth. Trump was born in 1946, eight years after Superman made his comic book debut. Discrimination based on race, sex and other characteristics was widespread and legal. Most schools taught children a whitewashed version of America's story, glossing over racism and largely ignoring the achievements of people of color. Movies usually portrayed Black people as slaves, servants, cowards, criminals or buffoons. Consequently, 'the good old days' for Trump — born rich, white and male — were 'the bad old days' for many people of color, women, LGBT individuals and those not born to wealth and privilege. Obstacles to advancement facing these Americans — among them my Black parents — were far greater than they are today. Trump grew up at a time when white men dominated the ranks of most professions and elected offices far more than they do now. Only about 34 percent of women were in the workforce in 1950, compared with 57 percent today. Key civil rights laws were not enacted until Trump was in his late teens and 20s. They include the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the 1965 Voting Rights Act and the 1968 Fair Housing Act, which together outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin in federally funded programs, employment, public accommodations, voting and housing. America has made great progress to become a more just and equitable society since Trump was born. But now the president is sparing no effort to roll back that progress and harm millions of Americans. Trump is obsessed with ending programs promoting diversity, equity and inclusion. He has falsely denounced DEI programs as illegal discrimination against white people and men, when in truth they simply open the doors to the American dream a little wider to take advantage of the talents of all Americans. Trump's Department of Education is investigating more than 50 universities for their DEI programs and has cut billions of dollars in federal funding to higher education, prompting schools to end DEI efforts in hopes of restoring aid. Trump has halted DEI programs in the federal government and demanded a halt to DEI in the private sector. The Republican majority on the Federal Communications Commission required that Paramount (parent company of CBS) and the movie studio Skydance agree to not operate DEI programs as a condition for approving the companies' $8 billion merger. The president seems to believe that white Americans — particularly white men — are hired for jobs based on merit, while many people of color and women are less qualified and get into college and jobs primarily because of DEI. He has forced highly qualified federal officials and members of the military who are not white men out of their jobs. Trump fired the chairman of the military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force Gen. CQ Brown, a Black man, after Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth vowed to end DEI in the military and claimed Brown placed a higher priority on DEI than on the effectiveness of the armed forces. The first women to head the Coast Guard and the Navy were both forced out of their jobs, as were women who served as the senior military assistant to Hegseth and the head of the Defense Health Agency. Trump successfully pushed Kim Sajet, the director of the National Portrait Gallery, to resign after denouncing her as 'a strong supporter of DEI' and fired Carla Hayden, the first woman and first Black person to head the Library of Congress. The president and the Republican-controlled Congress have turned back the clock on American progress in many other ways. The White House launched a program designed to deport millions of unauthorized immigrants, reminiscent of Operation Wetback, which deported an estimated 1 million people to Mexico in 1954, including some who were in the U.S. legally. The administration is seeking to increase U.S. oil, natural gas and coal production, along with nuclear power generation, by reducing environmental protection regulations imposed starting in the 1970s. Trump and Congress have also cut federal support for renewable energy programs enacted under the Biden administration. Trump has called global warming a Chinese hoax designed 'to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.' The White House and Congress eliminated all $1.1 billion in previously approved funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which was created under a law enacted in 1967 to help fund PBS, NPR and their member stations. The Corporation soon announced that it would be shuttering. Nostalgia is a powerful emotion. It is understandable that Trump has fond memories of growing up rich in a world of white male privilege before most Americans alive today were born. But nostalgia should not drive public policy. Our country has achieved greatness because — until now — our leaders have been focused on the future, rather than fixated on recreating the days of their youth. Christopher Reeve's portrayal of Superman traveling back in time was great entertainment. But it was fantasy. We need a president who accepts reality and works to build an inclusive and equitable future for everyone in our diverse population.
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: While S.F. Mayor Lurie is making progress, what has Oakland Mayor Lee been doing?
While San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie has demonstrated urgency and measurable results in his first months — crime is down, homeless encampments are being cleared and he pushed through the passage of sweeping building code reforms — Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee's early tenure has been frustratingly quiet. Since assuming office in May, Lee has announced a flurry of initiatives: permitting reform, charter modernization, illegal dumping enforcement and budget stabilization. Yet few of these have progressed beyond meetings or task force formation. Lurie's administration has legislated tangible changes, while Lee's has remained in blueprint mode. Oakland residents deserve transparency — not just press releases. If Lee's deep network of political allies can't deliver execution, it's fair to ask whether coalition-building is masking inertia. Where in the world is Barbara Lee? Right now, it feels like Oakland is still waiting for her to show up. Robert Townsend, Oakland New political weapon Regarding 'Outlaw gerrymandering' (Letters to the Editor, Aug. 6): Gerrymandering was outlawed by the Voting Rights Act of 1965. It prohibited states with a history of voter suppression from changing voting laws without Department of Justice approval, called 'preclearance.' But in 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in Shelby County v. Holder that preclearance was no longer necessary. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg famously dissented, writing, 'Throwing out preclearance, when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes, is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.' Poll closures and other forms of voter suppression skyrocketed after the ruling. In 2019, the Supreme Court ruled in Rucho v. Common Cause that, while racial gerrymandering is illegal, political gerrymandering is outside the purview of the federal judiciary and up to states to decide its legality. Democrats have repeatedly tried to get the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act passed to reinstate the 1965 law and have been blocked by Republicans in Congress. Chris Witzel, Palo Alto Money talks Behind all the show, behind Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency and the big beautiful bill, there is one underlying purpose: make Musk and his oligarch brothers even richer. They will not escape the judgment of history. James Heron, San Francisco
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Advocates fear Trump's plans after directive for transparent college admission data
Some higher education advocates have long sought transparency in college admissions data, but President Trump's latest actions to bring that dream to reality comes with trepidation in how the administration will use the information. In a memorandum signed Thursday, the president moved to require universities to give the Department of Education more admissions data. Education Secretary Linda McMahon is then instructed to build it into a database easily accessible to parents and students. While the information could be eye-opening into how institutions are choosing students, it comes with a backdrop of fear the president will target universities that produce unfavorable data in his view. 'I'll say lots of folks in the space, researchers and think tanks alike, have wanted more transparency on the black box that is college admissions. So, I think that from that perspective, lots of folks would be interested in seeing this data. What I question with this administration is the intention around the collection of the data,' said Wil Del Pilar, senior vice president of EdTrust. McMahon has 120 days to expand the scope of reporting requirements, leaving universities with the options to submit or fight in the legal the system. The move was made over the administration's concern universities are using 'race proxies' such as diversity statements, to circumvent the 2023 Supreme Court ruling that stated race cannot be considered in college admissions. 'American students and taxpayers deserve confidence in the fairness and integrity of our Nation's institutions of higher education, including confidence that they are recruiting and training capable future doctors, engineers, scientists, and other critical workers vital to the next generations of American prosperity. Race-based admissions practices are not only unfair, but also threaten our national security and well-being,' the order reads. Universities that accept federal money are already required to share some data with the Education Department, such as enrollment numbers and graduation rates. However, admissions data has largely been kept under wraps for various reasons. One reason is due to the complexities of compiling the data into an accurate spreadsheet. College admissions offices consider not only GPA and test scores, but extracurricular activities and personal essays that are hard to quantify. Universities may also fear what the public will think regarding whom they do and do not admit. 'I think one of the things that people are going to see is the amount of legacy admissions that have been taking place for a long, long time, and those admissions are typically white people,' said Marybeth Gasman, executive director for Rutgers University's Center for Minority Serving Institutions. After the affirmative action ruling, attention turned to legacy admissions, the practice of admitting applicants with connections to alumni or wealthy donors. Experts argue this practice largely favors applicants who are rich and/or white. The practice has been decried along partisan lines, and some schools have voluntarily banned it. Schools could also receive flack if it is discovered they admit fewer Pell Grant recipients or other types of applicants compared to rival institutions. 'I think that — that information — institutions have guarded that because they don't want narratives around them being closed to access for certain populations of students due to increased numbers of denied students. They don't want that narrative out,' Pilar said. Whatever the outcome, advocates fear the Trump administration will use this as another avenue to strip schools of their funding. The president has collectively paused billions of dollars to universities for alleged antisemitism, diversity, equity and inclusion practices, and transgender athletes in women's sports. While the focus of the Trump administration is returning to 'merit-based' admissions — a concept the federal government made Columbia and Brown agree to in their deals to release federal funding — some say the administration's moves WILL? have the opposite effect. Timothy Welbeck, director of the Center of Anti-Racism at Temple University, said this memorandum doesn't address 'legacy. They don't do anything about whether your family has the ability to donate large amounts of money to your desired institution. But they go after some of these other measures that they say are discriminatory and ignore these, which is why I believe that merit isn't really the intended outcome of these conversations to begin with.' 'This particular fight around the numbers is seeking to give another line of argument to people who are arguing that post-secondary institutions are discriminating against white people. That's ultimately a claim that's implicit in some of these arguments, and what I would say to that is that the facts typically do not bear out,' he added.
