Justice Kagan stresses the need for government officials to obey court orders
The comments from Kagan, one of three liberal members on the high court, come as the Trump administration has been accused of flouting orders from lower courts.
'This idea that litigants, and most especially here I'm talking about government officials, needn't obey the dictates of courts. Needn't obey court orders. And you know that just is not the way our system works, not the way rule of law in this country works,' Kagan said during a wide-ranging conversation before an audience of judges and lawyers at the 9th US Circuit Judicial Conference as she discussed several things she thought presented a challenge to the nation's federal court system.
She continued: 'And that's true for the Supreme Court, and it's also true for every district court, unless and until an appellate court or the Supreme Court says otherwise — that judicial orders are judicial orders and need to be respected.'
Among the other issues Kagan said are facing her colleagues in the judiciary are threats to their personal safety and the way people talk about judges in the US. She pointed to a rare statement Chief Justice John Roberts issued earlier this year after President Donald Trump called for judges who ruled against him to be impeached.
'Judges are fair game for all kinds of criticism: strong criticism, pointed criticism. But vilifying judges in that way is a step beyond and ought to be understood as such,' Kagan said at the event in Monterey, California.
The administration has been accused of skirting court orders in a range of cases, but judges have largely avoided pursuing contempt proceedings against officials.
The issue reached new heights last month after a fired Justice Department lawyer who worked on immigration cases filed a whistleblower complaint that claimed a top DOJ official crudely told others in the department to ignore court orders before a controversial immigration enforcement situation in March.
Emil Bove, the official accused of making the comments, has denied the allegations. The US Senate is currently considering whether to confirm him to a lifetime appointment on a Philadelphia-based federal appeals court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: Trump's (new) new tariff rates are here (again)
The first time U.S. President Donald Trump unveiled his "reciprocal" tariffs on the rest of the world, the April 2 event had a cinematic, even grand, quality. It took place at the White House Rose Garden. There was a live band playing, according to The Wall Street Journal. Trump hoisted huge physical charts of his tariff rates, which were helpfully color-coded for visual clarity. This time, Trump's updated "reciprocal" tariffs, released the night before they come into effect on Aug. 1, seemed in comparison stripped of pomp and glamor. The White House's executive order popped up around 7 p.m. ET, just as people in the U.S. were getting off work. There was no live event, no big chart and certainly no entertainment — just a stern website with a black-and-white table. That austerity — and, one might even say, stealth — surrounding the recent announcement suggests two things. First, the White House could be aware that the dramatic shock of tariffs has less power to sway trade deals when staged a second time. The "90 deals in 90 days" that trade advisor Peter Navarro had promised in April are, after all, nowhere in sight. Second, the U.S. might actually be fine not making trade deals with some countries, leaving them with higher-than-hoped-for tariffs. In June, the U.S. Treasury Department reported an unexpected surplus thanks to tariff revenue, which were more than four times higher from a year ago. And economists aren't as alarmed by tariff-driven inflation as they once were. All that's speculation, of course. Little else is known about the latest tariffs except the numbers — it's been barely two hours since they were out and there have been no other official communication thus far. The order could have been released in this low-key fashion simply because the Rose Garden is now more like a Concrete Path. Or perhaps Trump doesn't want the penguins on the Heard and McDonald islands to hear about his levies this time. The U.S. rejigs tariff rates ahead of Aug. 1 deadline. Trump's executive order imposed tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on dozens of countries, and subjected all goods considered to have been transhipped to an additional 40% duty. The S&P 500 falls, retreating from an intraday high. Microsoft shares, however, rose around 4% to push the company's market cap above $4 trillion. The Stoxx Europe 600 fell 0.75% amid a flurry of earnings from companies such as Rolls-Royce and AB InBev. Apple beats expectations for profit and revenue. The Cupertino-based company's iPhone sales grew 13% year over year, while overall revenue rose 10% in its fiscal third quarter, the fastest growth since December 2021. Amazon's gloomy guidance overshadows its earnings. Even though the company surpassed Wall Street's estimates for its second-quarter results, its expected operating income for the current quarter wasn't as high as analysts had hoped for. [PRO] Novo Nordisk's stock plunge isn't that surprising. On Tuesday, the firm's shares fell as much as 26% after it slashed its full-year guidance — and appointed a new CEO. Here's why companies tend to make both announcements simultaneously. Tariff turmoil: How global CEOs are shifting gears In interviews with CNBC this earnings season, CEOs across industries sent a clear message: tariffs are no longer just a political tactic. As trade rules grow more uncertain and tariffs resurface in policy discussions, business leaders say they're rethinking everything from where factories are located to how products are priced. The old "just in time" model is giving way to something more cautious: make goods closer to the buyer, ask for exemptions where possible, and stay alert to shifting consumer habits. —
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Virginia Giuffre's Brother Asks Why Epstein Files Haven't Been Released
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Virginia Giuffre's brother, Sky Roberts, said he wants to know why the documents related to the investigation into sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have not been released, saying in part that "it's time for these monsters to be exposed." Newsweek reached out to the Department of Justice (DOJ) via online form Thursday night for comment. Why It Matters Backlash regarding the investigation into the disgraced financier reached fever pitch this month after the DOJ and the FBI released a joint statement confirming that Epstein died by suicide in 2019 and that there was no "client list." Attorney General Pam Bondi has faced the brunt of the backlash from MAGA and Democrats alike as lawmakers plead for transparency and access to documents. What To Know Earlier this week, Trump was asked aboard Air Force One whether one of the workers "stolen" from his Mar-a-Lago Club by Epstein was Giuffre. Trump responded, "I don't know. I think she worked at the spa. I think so, I think that was one of the people, yep. He stole her, and by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know, none whatsoever." Trump's comments prompted Giuffre's family to release a statement, saying in part, "It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been 'stolen' from Mar-a-Lago," the family said. "We would like to clarify that it was convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell who targeted and preyed upon our then 16-year-old sister, Virginia, from Mar-a-Lago, where she was working in 2000, several years before Epstein and President Trump had their falling out," Giuffre's family added. Giuffre died by suicide in April 2025 in Australia. The family members of Virginia Giuffre can be seen talking with CNN's Kaitlan Collins on July 31. (Photo from CNN) The family members of Virginia Giuffre can be seen talking with CNN's Kaitlan Collins on July 31. (Photo from CNN) If you or someone you know is considering suicide, contact the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline by dialing 988, text "988" to the Crisis Text Line at 741741 or visit This is a developing story that will be updated with additional information.
E&E News
2 hours ago
- E&E News
Trump regulatory czar Jeffrey Clark should be disbarred for role in 2020 election plot, disciplinary board rules
The D.C. Bar's disciplinary arm has recommended that longtime Donald Trump ally Jeffrey Clark lose his law license for assisting Trump's failed bid to overturn the 2020 election. The recommendation now heads to the D.C. Court of Appeals for a final determination. It also triggers an automatic suspension for Clark from practicing law, unless he convinces the court within 30 days to intervene and block that immediate punishment. Clark, who was a top Justice Department official during Trump's first term, is currently leading the Trump administration's regulatory review in the Office of Management and Budget. Lawyers for Clark did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Advertisement 'The fight continues,' Clark said in a series of posts on X, shortly after the decision.
