Injury concern for Jasprit Bumrah already? Shubman Gill explains why India pacer didn't bowl in final stages of 1st Test
Team India's pace spearhead Jasprit Bumrah was missing from action in the dying moments of the Headingley Test on Tuesday, raising eyebrows as England raced to a five-wicket win. Despite the new ball being taken immediately after the 80th over, a moment tailor-made for Bumrah's return, captain Shubman Gill chose to hand it to Mohammed Siraj instead, while persisting with Ravindra Jadeja from the other end. India's Jasprit Bumrah during Day 5 of the Leeds Test(Action Images via Reuters)
The decision didn't yield the desired results. With only 21 runs needed for victory, England's wicketkeeper Jamie Smith showed no hesitation, going after Jadeja with ruthless intent. He plundered 18 runs in a single over, sealing a memorable 371-run chase for the hosts, their second-highest in Test history.
Bumrah's absence from the attack during the decisive final phase left fans significantly concerned. Moments before India took the second new ball, Bumrah was seen receiving a shoulder massage on the field, a sight that reignited hopes of a last-ditch effort from India to script a miracle finish. But as England edged closer to the target, Bumrah remained on the field without taking the ball, fuelling speculation over a potential fitness concern.
Gill, however, dismissed concerns over Bumrah's fitness, insisting the pacer was fully fit. He explained that the decision was tactical, aimed at giving other bowlers a shot with England needing only a handful of runs. Still, the omission of Bumrah at a crunch moment raised serious questions about India's intent and game awareness in the final stretch.
'No, he's completely fit. Nothing like that. They were 15 or 20 runs left, so we just wanted to give it to some other bowlers, but he is definitely fit,' Gill told the BBC after the match.
Bumrah went wicketless in the second innings after a five-for in the first. After a frustrating 188-run opening stand through which Ben Duckett and Zak Crawley pounced on India's inconsistent line and lengths, Prasidh Krishna struck twice to ignite hopes. Shardul Thakur, then, took two wickets in a single over before Jadeja removed captain Ben Stokes. However, Joe Root and Jamie Smith ensured the hosts comfortably cruised over the line to take a 1-0 lead in the series. Will Bumrah play next Test?
Gill was also asked whether the team has decided on India's premier fast bowler's availability for the next Test at Edgbaston. However, the Indian captain remained tight-lipped on that front.
'It's definitely match-by-match. We've got a good break after this match. Once we go to Birmingham and see the wicket, we will see if he's going to play that one or not,' said Gill.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
21 minutes ago
- News18
Dobermann Analogy Sparks Debate IND vs ENG Team India Jasprit Bumrah Twitter Memes
Indian tailenders—Shardul Thakur, Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Siraj, and Prasidh Krishna—could only manage to add 5 runs to India's total in the first innings of the first Test against England currently underway at Headingley in Leeds, and the pacer quartet added four runs in the second innings on Monday (June 23). After India's tailenders failed to put up a fight with the bat for the second time in the first Test, fans on X slammed Indian the full news with @7NikitaSingh Like and subscribe to our channel and never miss a to CricketNext YouTube channel to never miss a video: CricketNext on Facebook: CricketNext on Twitter: CricketNext on Instagram: :
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
23 minutes ago
- First Post
Ravindra Jadeja lacked 'tactical awareness' at Headingley, says Sanjay Manjrekar while backing Kuldeep Yadav
Sanjay Manjrekar did not mince his words as he said that experienced Ravindra Jadeja put in a 'disappointing' performance in India's defeat against England at Headingley. He also made case for Kuldeep Yadav's inclusion. read more Sanjay Manjrekar felt Ravindra Jadeja as an experienced bowler needed to do more for India in the Headingley Test. Images: JioHotstar/Reuters Former Indian batter Sanjay Manjrekar has questioned Ravindra Jadeja's performance in the first Test against England, which India lost by five wickets despite setting a target of 371. However, Manjrekar doesn't want India to drop Jadeja; rather, he wants him to play along with Kuldeep Yadav in the second Test at Edgbaston in Birmingham. Jadeja took just one wicket in two innings, giving away 172 runs in 47 overs and also failed to maximise the rough patches around the stumps on the final day of the match as England scored 353 runs on just Day 5. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Manjrekar: 'I am going to be critical of Ravindra Jadeja' Speaking on JioHotstar's 'Match Centre Live' after England took a 1-0 lead in the five-match series, Manjrekar refused to blame the pacers, but said that Jadeja lacked tactical awareness in the Headingley Test at Leeds. 'It's not fair to be overly critical of younger players like Prasidh Krishna — there are obvious areas for improvement. But I am going to be critical of Ravindra Jadeja. This was a final-day pitch with rough patches for him to exploit. And while there were a couple of chances, we have to expect more from someone of his experience. These weren't typical English conditions where the pitch offers nothing. I felt he didn't use the rough nearly enough — especially against Ben Duckett. Also Read | Hussain criticises Gill's captaincy; Broad calls out India's inability to close match 'Against Ben Stokes, yes, he did make an effort. But it was only much later in Duckett's innings that Jadeja started using the rough properly. When you're dealing with experienced bowlers and seasoned batters, you expect a higher level of tactical awareness. Somewhere, I felt Jadeja was disappointing. The seamers had no help from the surface — but Jadeja at least had something in the pitch working in his favour.' 'Kuldeep Yadav has to come back' Manjrekar also asked India to make immediate changes to their combination for the next Test in England. He felt Kuldeep Yadav needs to be back in any case and Shardul Thakur must be dropped. 'I think Kuldeep Yadav has to come back. I'm sorry to say, but Shardul Thakur has to go out. That is one change India will have to make,' he said. 'As for Nitish Kumar Reddy — I backed him for the first Test purely based on what he did in Australia. It's an unpopular choice, because when he comes in, the balance does get affected a bit. He won't quite bowl like a fourth seamer, so India needs to take a hard call: even in English conditions, they must go with quality bowlers. If that means playing two spinners, so be it. Pick your best bowlers, irrespective of the conditions. Also Read | Where Team India went wrong in 1st Test at Headingley and why they lost 'You don't have the luxury of someone like Mohammed Shami available, or the full-strength pace battery, so I'd go one seamer short and bring Kuldeep Yadav into the XI. He has to play. Let's also acknowledge that English summers these days are largely dry — thanks to global warming, perhaps — and that does open the door for spin. In a way, it's time to reintroduce the idea of India playing spin in England. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Ben Stokes has already changed the narrative with common-sense, aggressive cricket. India needs to embrace the same clarity. There was a time when India would play three spinners no matter what — whether in New Zealand or England. If Kuldeep is in your squad, play him. Don't go with seamers just because you're playing in England. I'd drop one seamer and bring in Kuldeep Yadav.' Catch the second Test of India's tour of England, starting 2nd July at 3:30 PM, live on JioHotstar
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Jasprit Bumrah dragged into awkward Prasidh Krishna comparison after India quick's costly figures vs England
Former India bowler Irfan Pathan wasn't too pleased with Prasidh Krishna's outing in the first Test against England in Leeds. Prasidh gave India the opening breakthrough after a long wait in the second innings when he dismissed Zak Crawley after an 188-run stand, and also ignited hopes by dismissing Ollie Pope cheaply. However, the tall pacer leaked runs, conceding at 6.10 runs/over throughout his 15 overs. Prasidh was expensive in the first over too, conceding over 6 rpo in 20 overs, albeit with three wickets to his name. India's Jasprit Bumrah celebrates with teammates after taking the wicket of England's Zak Crawley, catch taken by Karun Nair(Action Images via Reuters) Talking about his performance in the game, Pathan pointed out that Jasprit Bumrah has a better economy rate in T20s than Prasidh had in the Headingley Test. "Just look at his economy combining both the innings. He is at No. 2 in terms of the worst economy for a fast bowler in history. Bumrah has this economy in T20s, nearly 6.50. So he will have to concentrate on his economy. He has good height and pace. He will have to learn as soon as possible how to bowl a consistent area according to the batter," Pathan said on Sony Sports Network. Prasidh was unsurprisingly the most expensive pacer in the match, although Gautam Gambhir, the Indian head coach, had words of encouragement for him in the post-match press conference. He felt that Prasidh, who got five wickets in the match, has 'all the ingredients of becoming a very good Test match bowler.' Bumrah, meanwhile, was India's lone warrior for much of England's first innings with the bat, as he picked up a five-wicket haul. To make matters worse, India endured sloppy fielding efforts all through the Test, with Bumrah alone missing out on three chances to get early wickets in the first innings. Next Test from July 2 Shubman Gill's India will regroup on July 2 for the second Test at Edgbaston, but major concerns loom over the bowling unit, particularly Jasprit Bumrah's availability. Gambhir reaffirmed after the Headingley defeat that Bumrah would not feature in more than three Tests this series, casting immediate doubt on his inclusion for the next match. If Bumrah is rested, India's pace attack will look severely undercooked. Mohammed Siraj, who was erratic in the first Test, would likely be asked to spearhead a unit lacking both experience and consistency, a worrying prospect for a side already battling cracks in its bowling discipline.
