logo
Pope Leo's Childhood Home Faces Eminent Domain as He Relocates to a More Eminent Domain

Pope Leo's Childhood Home Faces Eminent Domain as He Relocates to a More Eminent Domain

Yahoo21-05-2025
"Every man has by nature the right to possess property as his own," wrote Pope Leo XIII, in his famous 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum, laying down the basics of Catholic social teaching.
The plans of contemporary socialists to seize private property, Leo XIII denounced as "emphatically unjust, for they would rob the lawful possessor, distort the functions of the State, and create utter confusion in the community."
The last Pope Leo's defense of private property adds no small amount of irony to the small Chicago suburb of Dolton, Illinois' plan to honor the new American-born Pope Leo XIV by seizing his childhood home from its private owners.
Yesterday, Chicago-area media reported that Dolton officials plan to use eminent domain to take the home where Leo XIV, formerly Robert Francis Prevost, was raised from its current private owners to create a publicly accessible historic site.
At present, the owners are auctioning off the small, 1949-built home for a reserve price of $250,000.
In a Tuesday letter to the auction house running the sale, Dolton attorney Burton Odelson cautioned buyers against purchasing the house.
"Please inform any prospective buyers that their 'purchase' may only be temporary since the Village intends to begin the eminent domain process very shortly," reads Odelson's letter, per NBC Chicago.
Odelson told Chicago's ABC7 that the village had initially tried to voluntarily purchase the home but had snagged on the sale price.
"We've tried to negotiate with the owner. [He] wants too much money, so we will either negotiate with the auction house or, as the letter stated that I sent to the auction house, we will take it through eminent domain, which is our right as a village," Odelson said.
One wonders how outrageous the owners' offered sale price was given its current auction price of $250,000.
The fact that the home was once lived in by the current pope surely doesn't enable the owners to command that much of a sale premium on what is undeniably a quite modest dwelling.
While a papal museum is certainly a lovely idea for the property, there's no reason the village can't pursue a voluntary sale.
That would seem to be more in line with Leo XIII's defense of private property. It would also seem to be more in line with the current Leo XIV's view of the Church as an institution characterized by voluntarism and love.
"The Church of Rome presides in charity and its true authority is the charity of Christ. It is never a question of capturing others by force, by religious propaganda, or by means of power. Instead, it is always and only a question of loving as Jesus did," said Leo XIV in his first Sunday homily as pope.
"[Saint] Peter must shepherd the flock without ever yielding to the temptation to be an autocrat," he added.
Autocracy is certainly a powerful temptation. It's one that not even the Village of Dolton seems able to resist.
The post Pope Leo's Childhood Home Faces Eminent Domain as He Relocates to a More Eminent Domain appeared first on Reason.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump, Zelensky talk Ukraine security, avoiding repeat of February Oval Office blowup
Trump, Zelensky talk Ukraine security, avoiding repeat of February Oval Office blowup

New York Post

time28 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump, Zelensky talk Ukraine security, avoiding repeat of February Oval Office blowup

WASHINGTON — President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky put on friendly faces in front of the world's media in the Oval Office Monday — avoiding a replay of their ugly spat from February — as the American leader attempts to hammer out a peace deal in eastern Europe. Trump, 79, reflected approvingly on the fact that Zelensky, 47, chose to wear a military-style suit in a sign of respect — ditching his usual camoflauge wardrobe, and both leaders handled occasionally hostile press questions without clashing. Zelensky said there were 'two parts' that Kyiv needs as part of any peace deal, including a 'strong Ukrainian army' featuring Western weaponry, training and intelligence sharing, and also persistent backing of 'big countries.' Advertisement Trump met Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, and hastily gathered Zelensky and seven European leaders Monday to discuss the final elements of a potential peace agreement. Putin has requested that Ukraine surrender its hold on the eastern Donetsk province as a condition to end the war, while Zelensky has expressed fear that doing so would set the stage for a renewed onslaught. Visiting European leaders, including President Emmanuel Macron of France and Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the UK, have agreed to commit troops to a peacekeeping operation following the signing of any deal, which the allies assess would grant NATO-like protection to Kyiv without formal admission to the alliance.

How your county is affected by "big beautiful bill" tax cuts
How your county is affected by "big beautiful bill" tax cuts

Axios

time28 minutes ago

  • Axios

How your county is affected by "big beautiful bill" tax cuts

Americans dodged a big tax hike when Congress passed the "big, beautiful bill," making permanent the tax cuts of President Trump 's first term — and adding on a bunch more. Why it matters: Tax cuts free up money for folks to spend on other things — which could be dearly needed next year as wages still haven't caught up with inflation and tariffs threaten to push costs up further. The big picture: The average American will receive a federal tax cut of $3,752 in 2026 thanks to the bill, per an analysis from the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan research group that mostly supports lower taxes. The intrigue: They may not feel much of a change. The map above compares the tax rate in 2026 with what it would've been had the big bill not passed and the 2017 tax cuts expired. By the numbers: The largest average tax cuts will be in Wyoming ($5,375), Washington ($5,372) and Massachusetts ($5,139). Taxpayers in West Virginia ($2,503) and Mississippi ($2,401) will see the smallest average cuts. How it works: The big bill not only made the 2017 tax cuts permanent, it added on new breaks: deductions for tips and overtime income, a cut for seniors and an expanded child-care tax cut. These are temporary provisions. Zoom in: Business owners will get some of the biggest cuts — thanks, in part, to tax breaks being made permanent for research and development expenses and other provisions. Those in high-tax coastal regions will also get big breaks, thanks to the increased cap on state and local tax deductions (known as SALT — also temporary). For example, the average tax cut in 2026 for Westchester County, N.Y. — a high-income New York City suburb poised for a big SALT payoff — is $6,644. But just to the south, in the Bronx, the average tax cut is $1,761. The largest average tax cuts are happening in mountain resort towns where high-earners and business owners live. In Teton County, Wy., residents will see an average tax cut of $37,373, the highest in the U.S. The smallest tax cuts are in rural counties — like Loup County, in Nebraska, where the average tax cut in 2026 is $824.

How the United States Can Enhance Critical Minerals Supply
How the United States Can Enhance Critical Minerals Supply

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

How the United States Can Enhance Critical Minerals Supply

As the U.S. government considers how to strengthen America's economic and national security, many industry stakeholders are calling for a more cohesive and coordinated approach to the development of critical minerals, including rare earth minerals, to accelerate results. Why it matters: Progress in the past decade toward achieving resource security has been slow.1 More than 15 federal agencies are currently engaged in activities and programs aimed at increasing the United States' mineral security,2 but these initiatives have at times overlapped or lacked effective coordination. If U.S. industries from advanced manufacturing to energy, semiconductors, and defense applications continue to rely on foreign mineral supply chains, the United States will become increasingly vulnerable to potential disruptions of those same supply chains and industries. By the numbers: Of the 50 elements deemed critical to the American economy and national security by the U.S. Geological Survey,3 the United States is 100% dependent on foreign suppliers for 12 of them and is more than 50% reliant on non-domestic sources for another 29.4 What's next: Through an executive order, President Trump created and empowered the National Energy Dominance Council (NEDC) comprising at least 19 senior U.S. government officials to advise the White House on strengthening the U.S. energy sector, improving permitting and regulation, enhancing private sector investments, and facilitating cooperation among government agencies and industry, including for critical minerals.5 The Trump administration has made critical minerals security a key component of its energy-focused strategy, evident by several recent executive orders.6 The NEDC could coordinate, manage, and work closely with relevant U.S. government agencies and key private-sector stakeholders to implement the critical minerals action plan and help identify additional policy and investment measures that could increase the supply of key minerals and enhance supply chain security. Such a critical minerals action plan could focus on three priorities: Go deeper: The priorities of this critical minerals action plan could inform multiple actions to help advance three key outcomes: The bottom line: By designing a time-sequenced, prioritized plan that can be implemented with an effective accountability framework, the United States could significantly enhance the attractiveness of its domestic mining industry for new investments. It could also promote supply chain access, creating flexibility to respond to market movements and developing resilience against future supply chain shocks. By following a targeted strategy and working with industry toward the achievement of a set of common objectives, the U.S. government can make tangible and measurable progress toward its goal to promote U.S. critical mineral security and move from being a primary consumer and price-taker in a nontransparent market to being a supply maker in a transparent and resilient market. —Richard Longstaff, managing director; Cole Johnson, senior manager; Joe Figueiredo, senior manager; and Matt Austin, specialist leader, all in Infrastructure & Resilience with Deloitte's Government and Public Services Practice, Deloitte Consulting LLP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store