logo
Utterly terrifying final moments of woman knocked out of canoe and killed by alligator in front of her husband

Utterly terrifying final moments of woman knocked out of canoe and killed by alligator in front of her husband

Daily Mail​08-05-2025
The terrifying final moments of a Florida grandmother who was knocked out of a canoe and mauled to death by an 11-foot-long alligator as her husband watched in horror have been revealed.
Cynthia Diekema, of Davenport, Florida, was enjoying a day on Lake Kissimmee with her husband Dave Diekema on Tuesday when the couple paddled over an alligator in shallow water.
Wildlife officials revealed the couple's 14-foot canoe was in just two feet of water when the alligator suddenly thrashed beneath them.
The alligator caused the couple's canoe to flip, pulling them both into the water as the grandmother fell directly on top of the beast.
This triggered the reptile to fatally attack the woman, while her horrified husband desperately attempted to save his wife.
Emergency services were called to the scene at around 4pm and spotted the victim floating in the water.
She was recovered from the lake and pronounced dead at the scene, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission said.
A radio call obtained by WKMG detailed her husband's desperate struggle to save his wife.
A woman has been killed by an alligator while canoeing with her husband on a Florida lake
'Gator grabbed her out of the canoe,' the officer said. '[Her husband] tried to fight the gator off. We're at the last place he saw her. He left the paddle here where he last saw her.'
Although a fatal alligator attack is a highly rare occurrence, this was the second alligator attack at the same lake within two months - raising concerns among locals.
Now, multiple alligators linked to the attack have been captured by trappers, but authorities must determine which reptile was responsible for the woman's death.
Officials revealed they will examine the stomach contents of the captured alligators as part of their investigation, according to WFTV.
Dikema's latest Instagram post - a collage of recent happy photos alongside her husband - has been filled with emotional tributes and condolences in the comments.
Beneath images of the couple's recent vacation, showing them smiling and enjoying life together, mourners have left messages expressing their shock and grief.
'You seemed like a genuine, beautiful soul. How lucky you were to live such a fun and rich life for decades, but how terrible it is to lose it in such a way,' wrote one follower.
'Even more terrible that you were so loved, so cherish that your death will affect so many of those around you. May God watch over your family, may you find the peace that you deserve, and may the memory of your light never dim.'
Another commented: 'So sad. Thoughts and prayers for your girls and granddaughter. I was always terrified of them when we lived down there.'
Nearby camper Taylor Stokes, who has lived in the area for over 40 years, expressed his condolences while acknowledging the risk of the gators, saying he even 'looks twice' before stepping into his bathtub.
'I've been living here 40-something years, and everyone knows you don't get in no pond, no lake, no nothing. I look twice before stepping in the bathtub,' Stokes said to WESH 2.
'My heart goes out to the family. Tragic accident.'
A nuisance alligator trapper was dispatched to the area in accordance with the Statewide Nuisance Alligator Program (SNAP) which deals with alligators which are deemed a danger to people, animals or property.
It comes just months after another alligator attacked another woman in the same area near Lake Kissmimee.
On March 3 a woman was left with injuries after she was bitten on the elbow.
The FWC has advice for alligator safety which recommends keeping a safe distance if one is spotted.
Swimmers should keep to designated areas and avoid swimming at night or with pets, which should also be kept on a leash and away from the water's edge.
Feeding alligators is illegal and strongly advised against by the FWC which warns the practice can lead to gators losing their natural reticence and becoming a nuisance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kilmar Abrego Garcia wants criminal case thrown out over Trump administration's ‘vindictive' prosecution
Kilmar Abrego Garcia wants criminal case thrown out over Trump administration's ‘vindictive' prosecution

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Kilmar Abrego Garcia wants criminal case thrown out over Trump administration's ‘vindictive' prosecution

Kilmar Abrego Garcia is asking a federal judge to throw out a criminal case against him, claiming he was 'singled out' by President Donald Trump's administration for 'having the audacity to fight back, rather than accept a brutal injustice' after he was wrongfully deported to a brutal prison in his home country. Despite admitting in court that he was wrongfully deported to El Salvador in March, government lawyers and top administration officials spent weeks insisting Abrego Garcia would never be allowed back into the country following a high-profile lawsuit challenging his arrest and removal. He was abruptly flown back to the United States in June to face a criminal indictment in Tennessee, where a grand jury indicted him on federal smuggling charges. Prosecutors cannot abuse the law to 'punish someone for exercising his constitutional rights,' lawyers for Abrego Garcia wrote on Tuesday. 'Yet that is exactly what has happened here.' 'Kilmar Abrego Garcia has been singled out by the United States government,' they added. 'It is obvious why. And it is not because of the seriousness of his alleged conduct.' Last month, the federal judge overseeing his criminal case ordered his release from jail before trial, finding that prosecutors failed to show 'any evidence' that his history or arguments against him warrant his ongoing detention. That order arrived moments after another federal judge overseeing his wrongful deportation case blocked the Trump administration from immediately arresting and deporting him after he is set to be released from jail. The court agreed to pause his release from pretrial detention so attorneys can 'evaluate options' as they brace for immigration officers to arrest and remove him a second time. That pause is set to expire this Friday August 22. Abrego Garcia's attorneys argue he was only charged because 'he refused to acquiesce in the government's violation of his due process rights.' 'Rather than fix its mistake and return [him] to the United States, the government fought back at every level of the federal court system,' attorneys wrote. 'And at every level, [he] won. This case results from the government's concerted effort to punish him for having the audacity to fight back, rather than accept a brutal injustice.' The Independent has requested comment from Homeland Security. In court filings, Abrego Garcia's attorneys detailed the 'severe mistreatment' and 'torture' he experienced during his month-long detention inside El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT. His attorneys say the 29-year-old father was subject to 'severe beatings, severe sleep deprivation, inadequate nutrition, and psychological torture' at the facility. 'A group of the most senior officials in the United States sought vengeance: they began a public campaign to punish Mr. Abrego for daring to fight back, culminating in the criminal investigation that led to the charges in this case,' his attorneys wrote. His lawyers admitted that motions to dismiss on grounds of selective or vindictive prosecution are rarely granted but 'if there has ever been a case for dismissal on those grounds, this is that case,' they said. 'The government is attempting to use this case — and this Court — to punish Mr. Abrego for successfully fighting his unlawful removal. That is a constitutional violation of the most basic sort,' his attorneys wrote. Abrego Garcia — who entered the country illegally as a teenager after fleeing gang violence in El Salvador — was deported on March 15 despite an immigration judge's order that blocked his removal from the country for humanitarian reasons. Government lawyers admitted in court documents that he was removed from the country due to a procedural error and several federal judges and a unanimous Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to 'facilitate' his return. Still, the government spent weeks battling court orders while officials publicly said he would never step foot in the United States, characterizing him as a serial abuser and criminal gang member. Emails and text messages provided to members of Congress appear to show that administration officials and government lawyers were sympathetic to his wrongful removal and made efforts to get him out of El Salvador before the case made headlines, which caused major headaches for the White House. A two-count indictment in Tennessee accuses Abrego Garcia of participating in a years-long conspiracy to illegally move undocumented immigrants from Texas to other parts of the country. He faces one count of conspiracy to transport aliens and one count of unlawful transportation of undocumented aliens. But in their request to keep him in jail before trial, federal prosecutors also claimed he is a member of transnational gang MS-13, and 'personally participated in violent crime, including murder.' Prosecutors also claim he 'abused' women and trafficked children, firearms and narcotics, and there is also an ongoing investigation into 'solicitation of child pornography.' Abrego Garcia is not facing any charges on those allegations and a federal judge determined that the government failed to link those allegations to evidence that implicates him.

Gabbard revokes security clearances of 37 current, former US intelligence professionals
Gabbard revokes security clearances of 37 current, former US intelligence professionals

Reuters

time22 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Gabbard revokes security clearances of 37 current, former US intelligence professionals

WASHINGTON, Aug 19 (Reuters) - U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Tuesday, opens new tab that she had revoked security clearances of 37 current and former intelligence professionals whom she accused of "politicizing and manipulating intelligence." Gabbard said in a social media statement that the action was taken at President Donald Trump's direction. Gabbard has repeatedly alleged weaponization of the U.S. intelligence community, and last month the U.S. Department of Justice said it was forming a strike force to assess her claims. Trump has leaped on recent comments from Gabbard in which she threatened to refer officials from the administration of Democratic former President Barack Obama to the Justice Department for prosecution over an intelligence assessment of Russian interference in U.S. elections. Republican Trump has accused Obama, without providing evidence, of leading an effort to falsely tie him to Russia and undermine his 2016 presidential campaign. A spokesperson for Obama had denounced Trump's claims, saying, "These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction." It was not clear if all of those on the list released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence - including a former spokesperson for Obama's National Security Council and Biden's coordinator for global COVID response - had indeed served as intelligence professionals. An ODNI spokesperson did not immediately respond to questions about the backgrounds of those whose security clearances had been revoked. Gabbard says there was a "treasonous conspiracy" in 2016 by top Obama officials to undermine Trump, claims that Democrats called false and politically motivated. Trump won the 2016 election. An assessment by the U.S. intelligence community published in January 2017 concluded that Russia, using social media disinformation, hacking, and Russian bot farms, sought to damage Democrat Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and bolster Trump. The assessment determined the actual impact was likely limited and showed no evidence that Moscow's efforts changed voting outcomes. Russia has denied it attempted to interfere in U.S. elections.

‘Alligator Alcatraz' civil rights case sees split ruling from Miami judge
‘Alligator Alcatraz' civil rights case sees split ruling from Miami judge

The Guardian

time26 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘Alligator Alcatraz' civil rights case sees split ruling from Miami judge

A federal judge in Miami issued a split decision in a lawsuit over the legal rights of detainees at the immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades known as 'Alligator Alcatraz', dismissing part of the suit and also moving the case to a different jurisdiction. US district judge Rodolfo Ruiz issued the decision late on Monday, writing in a 47-page ruling that claims the detainees at the facility do not have confidential access to their lawyers or to hearings in immigration court were rendered moot when the Trump administration recently designated the Krome North processing center near Miami as a site for their cases to be heard. The judge heard arguments from both sides in a hearing earlier on Monday in Miami. Civil rights attorneys were seeking a preliminary injunction to ensure detainees at the facility have access to their lawyers and can get a hearing. The state and federal government had argued that even though the isolated airstrip where the facility is located is owned by Miami-Dade county, Florida's southern district was the wrong venue since the detention center is located in neighboring Collier county, which is in the state's middle district. Judge Ruiz had hinted during a hearing last week that he had some concerns over which jurisdiction was appropriate. 'Much has changed since the complaint's filing,' Ruiz wrote. Six of the plaintiffs have met with lawyers through videoconference, though they claimed the conferences are not confidential since they are not in an enclosed room and staff is close by and in listening proximity to the detainees. A subset of detainees alleged they are eligible for bond hearings and their lawyers have been 'unable to access – yet alone identify – the proper court for those hearings'. But Ruiz noted the facts in the case changed on Saturday, when the Trump administration designated the Krome facility as the immigration court with jurisdiction over all detainees at the detention center. Ruiz wrote that the case had 'a tortured procedural history' since it was filed on 16 July, weeks after the first group of detainees arrived at the facility. 'Nearly every aspect of the Plaintiffs' civil action – their causes of action, their facts in support, their theories of venue, their arguments on the merits and their requests for relief – have changed with each filing,' the judge wrote. The judge granted the state defendants' change of venue motion to the middle district of Florida, where the remaining claims of first amendment violations will be addressed. The state and federal government defendants made an identical argument last week about jurisdiction for a second lawsuit in which environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe sued to stop further construction and operations at the Everglades detention center until it is in compliance with federal environmental laws. US district judge Kathleen Williams in Miami on 7 August ordered a 14-day halt on additional construction at the site while witnesses testified at a hearing that wrapped up last week. She has said she plans to issue a ruling before the order expires later this week. She had yet to rule on the venue question.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store