logo
Select Committee on Education condemns infrastructure failures after Eastern Cape School tragedy, pledges accountability

Select Committee on Education condemns infrastructure failures after Eastern Cape School tragedy, pledges accountability

IOL News23-06-2025
Makhi Feni urges accountability in school infrastructure after a tragic minibus accident, vowing oversight and support for affected families while addressing national failures in safety and disaster preparedness.
Chairperson of the Select Committee on Education, Sciences, and Creative Industries, Makhi Feni, has addressed a range of urgent national issues affecting the basic education sector.
Speaking at the Social Services Cluster Briefing on Monday, he highlighted challenges ranging from infrastructure damage caused by recent floods to the implementation of progressive education legislation, including the BELA Act and the Early Childhood Development Amendment Act.
Feni expressed his deepest condolences following a tragic incident where 13 schoolchildren died after a minibus fell into a river while crossing a bridge in the Eastern Cape. He described it as a national tragedy that reflects broader infrastructure and safety failures.
"We lost the future. As the committee, we are with the families. We are feeling what they are feeling," Feni said.
He emphasised the committee's commitment to investigating the incident and supporting the affected families.
He confirmed that oversight visits and a full disaster management report would be pursued to investigate possible negligence or poor workmanship in infrastructure projects.
Feni stressed the importance of accountability in infrastructure spending, especially after floods have severely damaged school properties across the country.
"We do not want to find ourselves rebuilding because someone ticked a box without providing quality."
Moreover, Feni said the committee would work with the Auditor General to monitor the use of public funds and submit quarterly broadcast reports to ensure transparency.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Battle for SA's education future: BELA Act divides stakeholders as deadline approaches
Battle for SA's education future: BELA Act divides stakeholders as deadline approaches

IOL News

timea day ago

  • IOL News

Battle for SA's education future: BELA Act divides stakeholders as deadline approaches

Basic Education Minister Siviwe Gwarube Image: GCIS As the closing date for public comments on the controversial Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Act approaches, reactions from education stakeholders remain mixed, with some raising concerns about implementation and equity, while others welcome the legislation as a step toward accountability and fairness in South Africa's public schools. The Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Basic Education, Joy Maimela, warned that some of the regulations 'might undermine the legislation's intention.' 'Firstly, the committee has previously called for all the regulations to be gazetted in one go and not in a piecemeal fashion. We want the public to engage on a comprehensive document that will give expression to the intentions of the Act. 'While we understand the intent may be to avoid technical delays, this fragmented rollout undermines the coherence, urgency and integrity of the BELA implementation process. South Africa's children cannot afford to wait for bureaucratic caution or political compromise,' said Maimela. She added: 'Furthermore, it is noted that some of the terms used in the regulations seem to deviate from the Act. It gives the impression that the regulations aim to undermine the intention of the Act.' Maimela warned that this could contradict Parliament's goal of transforming South Africa's education system and might instead perpetuate the exclusion of vulnerable learners. 'The regulations on admissions, for example, refer to taking into account the demographics and education needs of the 'surrounding community'. In the Bela Act the responsibility for admission policy lies with the head of department (HOD) and is based on the 'broader Education Districts'. This potentially reinforce local demographic homogeneity, contrary to the type of inclusivity the Act intended.' She further noted: 'This, once again, points to keeping previously disadvantaged learners out via location. Historically it has been linked to exclusion. It seems these regulations are attempting to re-write the Bela Act and re-introduce matters that were unsuccessfully contested in the Bela Act legislative drafting process.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Andre De Bruyn from EUSA Image: Supplied 'The committee will continue to closely monitor this process and engage robustly with the Minister on the gazetted regulations, which seem to deviate from the national objective,' emphasised Maimela. Gwarube said the regulations provide 'an important opportunity for education stakeholders and the broader South African public to actively shape the future of basic education in our country.' 'These regulations are instruments that will affect how schools are governed and managed, how children are admitted, and how our values as a society are reflected in our education system. I call on all South Africans, including parents, teachers, school governing bodies, civil society, education experts and community members to participate meaningfully in this public comment process. Your voice matters. Let it be heard in shaping the policies and regulations that govern the education of your children,' said Gwarube. The Educators and Allied Workers Union, Western Cape (EUSA) has raised concerns about proposed learner–teacher ratios, warning they will remain 'a pipe dream' unless consistently enforced across all schools. André De Bruyn, Chairperson of EUSA, said: 'Post level 1 educators are bearing the brunt, often with very little or no administrative time, together with overcrowded classes. Poorer schools face relentless pressure to admit more learners, resulting in severe overcrowding, while affluent schools seldom face the same demands. Wealthier schools have the resources to challenge the department in court over forced admissions.' He added: 'If budget constraints are blamed, who will be appointing the teachers and building the classrooms to make a 1:40 ratio possible? The Department of Basic Education ultimately pursues its predetermined agenda regardless of community engagement. More and more demands are being put on teachers, especially in poorer schools, while the vision of 1:40 and 1:30, if not enforced in all schools, will remain an illusion.' The South African Democratic Teachers' Union (SADTU) expressed strong criticism of the regulations and the Minister's approach. SADTU highlighted that the Minister issued implementation guidelines earlier this year, which the union rejected as unlawful, arguing that only formal regulations have legal standing. Vanessa Le Roux from PEESA Image: Supplied 'The issuing of guidelines appears to be an attempt to sow confusion, delay the implementation of the Act and advance the DA's political agenda against the full implementation of Sections 4 and 5,' said SADTU in a statement. The union emphasised its commitment to safeguarding learners' constitutional right to quality education, warning that any provisions undermining these rights would be opposed. SADTU confirmed it is studying the draft regulations and will submit formal comments by the 5 September 2025 deadline. Vanessa Le Roux of Parents for Equal Education South Africa (PEESA) welcomed the BELA Bill, seeing it as a mechanism to enforce equity and accountability in public schools. 'As an organisation there is mixed feelings, especially because we reside in the Western Cape, over the years we saw the inequalities growing to the point where we feared that education will only be for those who can afford it. 'On the other hand we don't want to take away the power from the SGB/community, who is the real authority when it comes to schools, however what we saw over the years is that governing bodies, in especially township schools are not equipped with enough knowledge to govern the school, and ultimately the principal runs that school to the point where they are involved with finances of the school.' Le Roux said out of all the 9 Provinces in public participation, the Western Cape was the only province who took real issue with the Bela Bill and said it came down to a case of accountability. 'For far too long these former model C schools have gotten away with the violation of the rights to basic education for all learners, and they were protected by the education department. 'So whether they call it centralisation of power, we from poor communities, call it a step in the right direction. The same rules, policies, and laws should be applied. It is a matter of addressing inequalities, discrimination, and racism in public schools. We welcome the implementation of the Bela Bill with much hope, and open arms.' Weekend Argus

Parliament slams Operation Dudula's ‘vigilante tactics'
Parliament slams Operation Dudula's ‘vigilante tactics'

The Citizen

time2 days ago

  • The Citizen

Parliament slams Operation Dudula's ‘vigilante tactics'

Parliament emphasised that it must operate within established legal frameworks rather than extrajudicial means. The chairperson of parliament's Select Committee on Education, Science and the Creative Industries has condemned Operation Dudula's campaign to disrupt services at healthcare centres and schools. Makhi Feni expressed his disapproval of the organisation's actions, which have prevented foreign nationals from accessing healthcare facilities in recent months. Three arrested members of Operation Dudula were released on Monday on a warning after appearing in the Orlando Magistrate's Court. They were arrested for denying foreign nationals access to healthcare at the Lilian Ngoyi Clinic in Diepkloof. Police allege the women stormed the maternity ward at the clinic and tried to remove a pregnant woman. ALSO READ: 'We've not broken any laws': Operation Dudula to press on with ID checks after members freed on warning The arrests did not deter them. Shortly after their release, they marched straight back to the clinic to remove undocumented migrants. Operation Dudula announced last week that it plans to carry out similar disruptions at schools when they reopen in 2026. Operation Dudula's vigilante approach condemned The organisation's tactics have drawn sharp criticism from some in parliament. 'Operation Dudula's actions have the potential to misrepresent our country and our democracy. South Africa is a country of law and order, and these should be strictly adhered to,' said Feni on Tuesday. The parliamentary chairperson described the organisation's actions as problematic and counterproductive to government efforts addressing immigration challenges. 'The actions of Operation Dudula are objectionable and are an unnecessary distraction to the work the government is doing around immigration challenges. People do not just come to South Africa out of free will but for refuge and from hunger,' he added. ALSO READ: Gauteng health MEC warns against denying foreign nationals health care access Feni emphasised that the government must operate within established legal frameworks rather than extrajudicial means. 'We cannot all adopt vigilante tactics when dealing with a challenge everyone accepts as massive and worthy of resolution. Legislative amendments and means are being proposed to resolve this challenge,' he said. Government initiatives underway The chairperson highlighted several government initiatives already in motion to address immigration concerns. In 2024, authorities established the Border Management Agency to manage border-related issues more effectively. 'On the labour front, something is being done with the Labour Migration Policy. Home Affairs is deporting those it can, who have been found to have been in the country illegally,' Feni explained. He called on Operation Dudula to collaborate constructively with the government rather than targeting vulnerable populations. Operation Dudula leader defiant Operation Dudula leader Zandile Dabula remained defiant when speaking to the media, criticising the legal process her organisation faces. 'There's no way that you will keep people in jail for five days and give them free bail and take them out on a warning. We have been treated like this is a Schedule 6 offence,' she said. Dabula drew comparisons between current government actions and historical oppression. 'The government of the ANC and the GNU together. They're taking us back to the apartheid days. They're using the system. It's just coming in a different colour now. They're using the police to work against us,' she stated. Escalation threats and continued operations Dabula indicated her organisation would intensify its activities despite government opposition. 'Now we're going to do what the ANC did to the apartheid government. Now we're going to do it to the ANC government, together with the GNU, whatever they call themselves. We're not going to stop,' Dabula declared. She stopped short of explicitly calling for violence but suggested confrontation is possible. 'I'm not inciting violence, but if we have to fight. If this country has to be ungovernable, then let it be. We're going to operate,' she said. Dabula maintained that her organisation operates within legal boundaries while the government fails to enforce existing laws. 'There is nothing wrong that we have done. We have not broken any laws. Instead, we are implementing and enforcing the laws that the government is failing to enforce,' she claimed. READ NEXT: Operation Dudula wants to know why organisations prioritise foreign nationals

BELA battle far from over, Sadtu warns
BELA battle far from over, Sadtu warns

IOL News

time2 days ago

  • IOL News

BELA battle far from over, Sadtu warns

Basic Education Minister Siviwe Gwarube has been accused of using the gazetting of the Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Act regulations to sow confusion, delay the implementation of the Act and advance the DA's political agenda. Image: GCIS THE South African Democratic Teachers' Union (SADTU) has accused Basic Education Minister Siviwe Gwarube of using the gazetting of the Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Act regulations to sow confusion, delay the implementation of the Act and advance the DA's political agenda. Gwarube recently gazetted the first two sets of regulations under the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act, 2024 (BELA Act) for public comment, saying two regulations, which deal with language and school capacity were designed to ensure that the amendments in the BELA Act were implemented in a manner that upheld learners' rights, enhanced school functionality, and maintained a careful balance of powers and functions between school governing bodies and the government in the management and governance of schools. Further regulations would be released for public comment as soon as they were finalised, vetted, and approved, she said. However, the move has been met with mixed reactions, with the Portfolio Committee on Basic Education among the first to raise concerns that Gwarube may be undermining the intent of the Act through a fragmented rollout of draft regulations and the use of terminology that appears to deviate from the language and purpose of the Act. 'The regulations on admissions, for example, refer to taking into account the demographics and education needs of the 'surrounding community'. In the Bela Act the responsibility for admission policy lies with the head of department (HOD) and is based on the 'broader Education Districts'. This potentially reinforces local demographic homogeneity, contrary to the type of inclusivity the Act intended,' said Maimela. While the BELA Act refers to the broader community in the education district in which the public school is situated, the gazetted regulations instead use the term 'feeder zones' to manage learner numbers and coordinate parental preferences. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The introduction of 'feeder zones' in the regulations deviates from the BELA Act, which references 'education districts', said Maimela. 'This, points to keeping previously disadvantaged learners out via location. Historically it has been linked to exclusion. It seems these regulations are attempting to re-write the Bela Act and re-introduce matters that were unsuccessfully contested in the Bela Act legislative drafting process,' Maimela added. Sadtu said they were still studying the regulations and intended to make their submissions on or before the deadline. 'In June this year, the Minister released guidelines for the implementation of the BELA Act, a move that SADTU strongly rejected as the Act does not empower the Minister to issue implementation guidelines. The Minister is only allowed to make regulations. SADTU viewed the issuing of guidelines as an attempt to sow confusion, delay the implementation of the Act and advance the DA's political agenda against the full implementation of Sections 4 and 5. SADTU will exercise extreme vigilance to ensure that the regulations align strictly with the letter and spirit of the BELA Act,' the union said. GOOD Party secretary-general Brett Herron said Gwarube cannot use the regulations to introduce concepts that undermine or "limit the rights created by Parliament through legislation". Herron added that school language policies remain among the most contested and politically weaponised tools used to preserve historical privilege. 'Regulations must not be allowed to reinforce this. BELA was meant to reform outdated admissions and language policy frameworks and dismantle the spatial, linguistic, and racial barriers that persist in South Africa's public education system. However, the wording of the regulations does not reflect that intention. Instead, the Minister has selectively chosen language that risks entrenching exclusion,' said Herron. Parents for Equal Education South Africa (PEESA) said the organisation had mixed feelings, while they did not seek to strip School Governing Bodies (SGBs) of their power entirely, they believed that reform was necessary to enforce accountability where it had long been lacking. 'The Western Cape was the only province that took real issue with the Bella Bill, they call it centralisation of power, (but it's) because they didn't want to be held accountable for the exclusion, discrimination that they have embraced for far too long. The Bella Bill forces them to account, now we will address real issues such as inequalities, they can't hide behind an SGB anymore. Because for far too long former model C schools have gotten away with the violation of the rights to basic education for all learners,' said PEESA founder Vanessa Le Roux. While Gwarube's office did not respond to requests for comment by deadline, the draft regulations are available on the Department of Basic Education's website and in the Government Gazette No. 53119 and 53120 of 6 August 2025. Comments on the draft regulations must be made by September 30 via AdmissionRegz@ Cape Times

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store