Britain named work from home capital of Europe
Britain has been named Europe's work from home capital, with employees spending more days away from the office than in any other nation on the Continent.
Workers in the UK spend an average of 1.8 days working from home each week, according to a new report from King's College London, which was more time than all nations bar Canada – at 1.9 days – among the 40 nations studied.
Britain's work from home average was the highest in Europe and well above the global average of 1.3 days working from home each week.
Workers in South Korea average half a day at home per week, with those in Greece and China typically putting in 0.6 days remotely, the King's study found. This rises to one day in France, 1.2 in Australia and 1.6 in Germany and the US.
The persistence of home working since the Covid lockdowns is 'becoming a defining feature of the UK labour market,' said Cevat Aksoy, the lead researcher on the report.
'This isn't just a post-pandemic hangover – British workers have clearly decided they're not going back to the old ways.'
The findings may raises fresh fears for productivity in the economy, amid growing concern among bosses about the detrimental impact of working remotely.
Lord Rose, the former boss of Asda, has said productivity is 'less good if you work from home' and 'your personal development suffers'.
He said earlier this year: 'We are creating a whole generation and probably a generation beyond that of people who are used to actually not doing what I call proper work.'
Jamie Dimon, the boss of America's biggest bank JP Morgan, also railed against remote work in a leaked recording in February. He told staff: 'Don't give me this s--- that work-from-home Friday works. I call a lot of people on Fridays, and there's not a goddamn person you can get a hold of. I've had it with this kind of stuff.'
Other corporate leaders, including Bob Iger, chief executive of Disney, have also expressed concerns about the impact of remote work on creativity.
Adrian Pabst at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) said working from home can undermine coordination between colleagues, and is particularly tough for younger workers who struggle to learn the ropes when away from the office.
He said: 'There are certain benefits [from WFH], including in productivity terms for certain tasks, but one can see, especially in the public sector, that the absence from the office creates problems in the levels of coordination and the levels of teamwork. It is not clear the benefits outweigh the costs.
'There is collective memory, the institutional culture and ethos of a place, which has to be transmitted in a collaborative manner between colleagues.'
The UK has long had a productivity problem relative to nations such as the US. Productivity is so far behind that American workers typically produce as much output in four days as their counterparts in the UK can manage in five.
The problem ia getting worse. Output per hour worked in the first quarter of the year was 0.2pc lower than in the opening three months of 2024, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
However, Mr Aksoy said: 'Research to date shows that hybrid work arrangements have no negative effects on productivity – and can offer substantial upsides in terms of employee retention and satisfaction.
'Given that hybrid models – where most people work from home on Mondays and Fridays, and from the office mid-week – have become the dominant form in the UK, we see no compelling evidence that this arrangement hampers organisational productivity.'
Home working also saves employees time and money, as they spend less on petrol or bus and train tickets, which can be spent elsewhere instead, often to the benefit of the local economy where they live, rather than town and city centres.
Mr Pabst said there may be personal, rather than professional, tolls from working remotely. He said: 'We have also got the other side of the work-life balance, which is mental health .... Is working in isolation, especially for younger people who may not yet be in long-term relationships, may not yet have families or children – is isolating at home good for their mental health, let alone their work performance?'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Seneca Foods Full Year 2025 Earnings: EPS: US$5.96 (vs US$8.64 in FY 2024)
Revenue: US$1.58b (up 8.2% from FY 2024). Net income: US$41.2m (down 35% from FY 2024). Profit margin: 2.6% (down from 4.3% in FY 2024). The decrease in margin was driven by higher expenses. EPS: US$5.96 (down from US$8.64 in FY 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Seneca Foods shares are down 4.5% from a week ago. It's necessary to consider the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Seneca Foods (at least 2 which are significant), and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Britain's biggest pub company to slash jobs amid debt crunch
Britain's biggest pub company is set to cut a raft of jobs as bosses seek to slim down the debt-laden firm following Rachel Reeves's tax raid. Stonegate Group, which runs more than 4,000 pubs across the UK including the Slug & Lettuce and Craft Union brands, has been working with restructuring specialists at AlixPartners over recent months, The Telegraph has learnt. Up to 150 jobs are expected to be cut across the company's head office and central functions. It is understood no decision has yet been made on the exact number of roles under threat. Jobs in its pubs and bars will not be affected and no pubs will close as a result of the restructuring. It comes after a difficult period for Stonegate, which is owned by TDR Capital, the private equity house which also controls Asda. It has lost hundreds of millions of pounds while straining under the weight of a near-£3bn debt pile while higher taxes levied on employers by the Chancellor this year have added to pressures. Despite a rise in revenues in recent years, it reported pre-tax losses of £257m and £214m in 2023 and 2024 respectively as interest payments on its debts pushed it into the red. A Stonegate spokesman said the planned cuts were partly due to a shift away from managed pubs – which it owns and operates itself – towards leased and tenanted pubs, which are rented out to and operated by publicans. The latter have proved more profitable for Stonegate in recent years. Managed pubs also require more resources and head office staff to oversee, making them less appealing to run at a time when the company is trying to return to profit. The spokesman said: 'This, combined with rising costs, particularly after the recent Budget, means we must reorganise our support functions to reflect the shape of our business today. 'We recognise that this is a difficult time and we are committed to supporting our colleagues with care and fairness as we consult with the business on the proposed changes.' Hospitality firms have been lumbered with extra costs after Ms Reeves raised employers' National Insurance contributions and lowered the threshold at which they are paid this year. Bosses have argued the latter has disproportionately hurt hospitality firms because of the number of lower-paid and part-time workers they employ. It will be the second round of job cuts at Stonegate in two years following more than 250 redundancies in 2023. Stonegate has also been reviewing rents and agreements with suppliers as part of restructuring efforts. Last summer, TDR pumped £250m into the company to avoid defaulting on its debts, after the cost of servicing its borrowings rose from £301m to £450m in 2024. This included refinancing. The refinancing gave Stonegate breathing room, allowing it to push the repayment date for much of its debts to 2029. At the time, Stonegate said the deal would allow it to invest more in its pubs. The agreement saw one of its lenders, AlbaCore Capital Group, take a stake in the firm. Domiciled in the Cayman Islands, Stonegate traces its history back to 2010, when TDR bought 333 pubs from Toby Carvery owner Mitchells & Butlers. Its debts ballooned when it bought rival pub firm Ei Group – formerly Enterprise Inns – in a £3bn deal in 2019. The deal completed just before the pandemic forced the nation's pubs shut for months on end. After the pandemic, soaring interest rates heaped pressure on firms with large debts. Stonegate's troubles echo those of TDR-owned Asda, which too has been battling to bring down costs in the wake of its debt-fuelled buyout by the firm and the billionaire Issa brothers in 2021. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Sign in to access your portfolio


San Francisco Chronicle
8 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
First direct flight from US to Greenland since 2008 lands on Trump's birthday
NUUK, Greenland (AP) — The first direct flight from the U.S. to Greenland by an American airline landed in the capital city of Nuuk on Saturday. The United Airlines-operated Boeing 737 Max 8 departed from Newark International Airport in New Jersey at 11:31 a.m. EDT (1531 GMT) and arrived a little over 4 hours later, at 6:39 p.m. local time (1939 GMT), according to the flight-tracking website FlightAware. A seat cost roughly $1,200. Saturday's flight marks the first direct passage between the U.S. and the Arctic Island for nearly 20 years. In 2007, Air Greenland launched a route between Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport and Kangerlussuaq Airport, some 315 kilometers (196 miles) north of Nuuk. It was scrapped the following year due to cost. The United Airlines flight took place on U.S. President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, which was being celebrated in Washington with a controversial military parade that's part of the Army's long-planned 250th anniversary celebration. Trump has repeatedly said he seeks control of Greenland, a strategic Arctic island that's a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, and has not ruled out military force. The governments of Denmark, a NATO ally, and Greenland have said it is not for sale and condemned reports of the U.S. stepping up intelligence gathering on the mineral-rich island. United announced the flight in October, before Trump was re-elected. It was scheduled for 2025 to take advantage of the new Nuuk airport, which opened in late November and features a larger runway for bigger jets. 'United will be the only carrier to connect the U.S. directly to Nuuk — the northernmost capital in the world, providing a gateway to world-class hiking and fascinating wildlife under the summer's midnight sun,' the company said in a statement at the time. Saturday's flight kicked off the airline's twice weekly seasonal service, from June to September, between Newark and Nuuk. The plane has around 165 seats. Previously, travelers had to take a layover in Iceland or Copenhagen, Denmark, before flying to Greenland. The new flight is beneficial for the island's business and residents, according to Greenland government minister Naaja Nathanielsen. Tourists will spend money at local businesses, and Greenlanders themselves will now be able to travel to the U.S. more easily, Nathanielsen, the minister for business, mineral resources, energy, justice and gender equality, told Danish broadcaster DR. The route is also an important part of diversifying the island's economy, she said. Fishing produces about 90% of Greenland's exports. Tourism is increasingly important. More than 96,000 international passengers traveled through the country's airports in 2023, up 28% from 2015. Visit Greenland echoed Nathanielsen's comments. The government's tourism agency did not have projections on how much money the new flights would bring to the island. 'We do know that flights can bring in much more than just dollars, and we expect it to have a positive impact -- both for the society and travellers,' Tanny Por, Visit Greenland's head of international relations, told The Associated Press in an email. __