&w=3840&q=100)
ED flags ₹131 crore sand mining scam to Bihar govt, seeks fresh FIR
The federal probe agency's communication was sent a few weeks back and it came in the backdrop of a 2023 'Lok Adalat' (alternate dispute redressal platform) proceeding during which the alleged criminal offence was "compounded" and the accused were let off with a monetary penalty, the sources told PTI.
The case began with the Banka police filing as many as seven criminal FIRs between 2017 and 2018 against a company named Mahadev Enclave and its promoters to probe the alleged illegal sand mining in the district.
The police had pressed multiple IPC sections related to cheating, forgery and theft apart from sections of the Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation Act, Bihar Minerals (Concession, Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules and Environment Protection Act in its complaint.
The company was the sole licence holder in the said district to excavate sand from 28 river banks between 2015 and 2021, according to mining department officials.
The police investigated the case, recorded statements of various persons and filed chargesheets in all the seven cases before a local court naming the company and its director Manoj Kumar Pachisia as accused, they said.
However, the sources said, as there was a delay in the court proceedings, the case was taken before the 'Lok Adalat' for compounding and the accused were let off after they were slapped with a penalty amount in February 2023, the sources said.
The company or its promoters could not be contacted for a comment on these charges made against them.
The ED had filed a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) on the basis of these police chargesheets and had collected some "evidence" and recorded statements of various persons under the PMLA, including that of the Banka mining development officer.
However, the compounding of the original criminal case tied the hands of the ED as under the anti-money laundering law, the agency requires a predicate offence to prosecute the accused.
Sources privy to the development said the ED recently wrote to the Mines and Geology department of the Bihar government under section 66(2) of the PMLA that allows it to share information and evidence with a law enforcement agency regarding violation of a criminal law.
The agency, in the communication, is understood to have furnished a geospatial report prepared by the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Patna (undertaken on ED's request) to the Bihar government which found that 11.99 crore cubic metres of the sand was "illegally" excavated from the district by the accused company between 2016 and 2021.
Experts of the IIT used remote sensing and similar techniques to prepare the report in about two months time and it was also reported that alleged illegal sand mining was done beyond the lease areas, according to the sources.
The ED has said in its letter that as per mining department's rates, this alleged illegal excavation of sand led to the loss of about Rs 131,43,20,058 in revenue to the state government, the sources said.
The agency has sought filing of a fresh FIR by the state police under various sections of the IPC/BNS related to cheating, forgery, criminal conspiracy and relevant mining and environment laws so that the accused could be prosecuted under the relevant criminal laws.
Sources said a money trail analysis of the accused and others linked to them indicate potential involvement of certain politicians.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Mithi River desilting fraud: ED searches properties of five contractors
MUMBAI: The Mumbai unit of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Thursday conducted searches in Mumbai at eight properties of civic contractors as part of its money laundering investigation into the alleged irregularities in contracts to desilt the Mithi River, according to officials aware of the developments. Mumbai, India. June 30, 2025: View of the polluted Mithi River at the Powai area of Mumbai. The Mithi River flows through Salsette Island, which is part of the city of Mumbai. Mumbai, India. June 3, 2025. (Photo by Raju Shinde/HT Photo) (Raju Shinde) The searches were conducted at the properties of five contractors who had allegedly submitted bogus documents to the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) related to silt dumping work, officials said. The investigation is based on an FIR registered by the Mumbai police's Economic Offences Wing (EOW) in May, in which 13 people and entities were booked for allegedly causing the BMC a wrongful loss of ₹65.54 crore. Earlier, on June 6, the ED had carried out searches at 18 locations across Mumbai, Kochi and Thrissur in connection with the investigation. The locations searched included the residential and/or office premises of actor Dino Morea and his businessman brother Santino Morea, BMC engineer Prashant Ramgude, civic contractor Bhupendra Purohit, alleged intermediaries Jay Joshi and Ketan Kadam, and Matprop Technical Services Pvt Ltd, a Kochi-based company that rented machinery and equipment for the desilting work. The ED had also questioned the Morea brothers in June, claiming they were associates of alleged intermediary Kadam. The brothers have denied all the allegations of their involvement in the case. On June 7, the ED said that its investigation and search operations had, prima facie, indicated that the accused people and others allegedly colluded to form a cartel intending to manipulate BMC's tenders related to desilting the Mithi River. 'This action effectively conferred a monopoly in [the] award of desilting contracts of Mithi River and caused payments at inflated rates for desilting works, resulting in undue gains to the contractors and associated parties, thereby causing financial loss to the public exchequer,' the agency had said in a statement. These undue financial gains were concealed by layering them through certain shell companies by the accused persons and others, the agency added. So far, during its searches, the ED has seized ₹7 lakh in cash and frozen 22 bank accounts/fixed deposits and a demat account. The total amount seized or frozen is more than ₹1.25 crore. Certain digital devices and incriminating documents were also seized that appeared to be relevant for further proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, according to the ED.
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC to first test maintainability for reopening 2022 PMLA verdict
New Delhi The Supreme Court on Thursday said it will first examine whether the review petitions filed against its 2022 judgment in the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case, which upheld the Enforcement Directorate's sweeping powers under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), are legally maintainable before proceeding to consider the substantive issues raised by the petitioners. The bench posted the matter for hearing on August 6, making it clear that the preliminary objections raised by ED must be addressed first. (ANI PHOTO) A three-judge bench led by Justice Surya Kant emphasised that the scope of a review jurisdiction hinges on certain fixed parameters and therefore, the petitioners demanding a reconsideration of the 2022 judgment must cross the first hurdle of maintainability. 'Since the proposed issues are arising in the review proceedings, we propose to first hear the parties on the issue of maintainability of the review petitions followed by a hearing on the questions proposed to be raised on behalf of the review petitioners. Eventually, the questions that would finally arise for consideration will also be determined by us if we hold that the review petitions are maintainable,' noted the bench, also comprising justices Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh, hearing a bunch of petitions seeking a complete review of the impugned judgment. The bench posted the matter for hearing on August 6, making it clear that the preliminary objections raised by ED must be addressed first. 'Review has limitations…You will (petitioners) proceed on the premise as if the entire matter has been reopened... but they (ED) are justified in raising preliminary issues… first what we will suggest is you address preliminary issues,' the bench told senior advocates Kapil Sibal, Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Vikram Chaudhri, leading counsel for the petitioners in the matter. The court's observation came during a brief hearing on the clutch of review petitions filed against the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary ruling, a decision that has since become a constitutional flashpoint for its endorsement of the ED's broad powers related to arrest, search, seizure and the attachment of property. ED, represented by Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, argued that the review jurisdiction of the court is narrow and cannot be used as a backdoor to file an appeal. Raising three preliminary objections, the ASG contended that the review petitions must be dismissed unless they clearly demonstrate an 'error apparent on the face of the record' in the 2022 verdict. He read out the three objections framed by the agency -- Whether the review petitions meet the threshold of an 'error apparent on the face of the record; whether the petitions amount to an appeal in disguise and whether the review can be confined only to two issues, as mandated by the court's August 25, 2022 order. By the August 2022 order, the top court had agreed to take a re-look at only two issues -- the supply of the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) to the accused and the constitutionality of the reverse burden of proof under Section 24 of the PMLA. The 2022 order issuing notice in the review petition, filed by Congress lawmaker Karti Chidambaram, had noted that these two issues required reconsideration. During the hearing, Sibal contested the ED's claim that the review was limited to two issues, pointing out that no such restriction was recorded in the August 2022 order. He also urged the bench to tag a separate but related batch of cases, where the correctness of the Vijay Madanlal verdict had been raised, with the current review proceedings. That batch had remained dormant following the retirement of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul in December 2023. In this batch of petitions, sections 50 and 63 of the PMLA have been assailed, besides a reconsideration of the entire 2022 judgment. These sections relate to the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) powers to summon witnesses, extract confessions and prosecute for providing false information. Responding, Justice Kant advised Sibal to mention the matter before the Chief Justice of India to seek listing of that batch. The petitioners, in their list of 13 issues submitted to the court, have sought reconsideration of key aspects of its 2022 ruling, arguing that the judgment diluted the offence of money laundering by misreading a pertinent provision, retrospectively applied the law in violation of fundamental rights, and wrongly upheld the ED's powers to compel statements under Section 50, undermining protections against self-incrimination. They have also challenged the court's classification of ED officers as non-police personnel, non-supply of the ECIR to the accused, constitutional validity of the reverse burden of proof for securing bail, which, they claim, strips accused persons of basic due process safeguards.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Anil Ambani summoned by ED in ₹17,000 crore loan fraud investigation
The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has summoned Anil Ambani, chairman and managing director of Reliance Group, for questioning in connection with its ongoing investigation into an alleged `17,000-crore loan fraud case. He's been asked to appear on August 5 at ED headquarters in the Capital, people in the know told ET. ED last week carried out searches at multiple entities and individuals linked to Anil Ambani's Reliance Group across 35 locations in Mumbai, covering 50 companies and 25 individuals under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). In a related development, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) shared with ED and two other agencies the findings of a separate probe, launched by it into alleged diversion of `10,000 crore by Reliance Infrastructure (R Infra). Sebi's report, accessed by ET, alleged R Infra diverted a large amount of money disguised as intercorporate deposits (ICDs) to Reliance Group units through CLE Pvt Ltd, an undisclosed related party company. CLE is said to be the 'C' company that had cropped up during investigation and was the subject of much speculation. The engineering, procurement and construction firm has its office at Nehru Road, Vakola, Santacruz (East), Mumbai.A person close to Reliance Group questioned the findings. 'Reliance Infrastructure publicly disclosed this matter on February 9, and Sebi did not make any independent discovery. Reliance Infra had an exposure of Rs 6,500 crore. The allegation that the diverted amount is Rs 10,000 crore only serves to sensationalise the magnitude and is not based on facts,' the person told ET. 'When the exposure was Rs 6,500 crore, how can the diversion be Rs 10,000 crore? Reliance Infra diligently pursued recovery of its dues in this matter. Reliance Infra arrived at a settlement to recover its entire exposure of Rs 6,500 crore through mandatory mediation proceedings conducted by a retired Supreme Court Judge and filed before the Bombay High Court, the person said.'Odisha distribution companies contemplated in the settlement are operational, and their recovery is pending before the courts,' he added. 'This amount is fully recoverable, contrary to the allegations.' The person also denied receipt of any notice from Sebi on the matter. In the second week of May, Sebi sent a formal communication to ED, the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) to look into the matter independently. The market regulator's investigation found alleged non-compliance with approval and disclosure norms on related party transactions. 'This camouflaged the material diversion of funds to the undisclosed related part as genuine business transactions,' according to the Sebi regulator said non-compliance with statutory provisions resulted in R Infra 'withholding crucial information in its financial statements with respect to diversion of funds for the ultimate benefit of its promoter and related entities.' It added that 'by considering CLE as a third party company, R Infra avoided accurate and meaningful disclosures of specific fair value adjustments… and thereby misstated the financial statements… the misstatement continues till date.'Company dealings According to the Sebi report, R Infra had various financial dealings with CLE in the form of ICDs, investments in equity and corporate guarantees. As of March 31, 2022, this amounted to Rs 8,302 crore. Sebi's investigations are for the period between FY16 and FY23. The report said that from FY17 to FY21, R Infra had written off Rs 10,110 crore on account of fair value adjustment, provisions, impairment added that R Infra 'continued to provide advances to CLE despite recognising incapacity of CLE to repay the loans, that is, even after creating provision of doubtful debts in one year, they continued to extend loans in the same or subsequent years.' The Sebi report said that from FY13 to FY23, total outstanding annual expenditure on CLE by R Infra was 25-90% of the latter's total assets. The markets regulator said R Infra allegedly did not disclose CLE as its related party in order to avoid having to obtain approval from the shareholder and audit committees, and the checks and balances imposed on related-party transactions as per law. Sebi found CLE to be a related party of R Infra on the basis of documentation. These included submissions made by CLE to Yes Bank in order to avail of loans acknowledging Reliance Infra is one of its promoters. Reliance Infra audit committee meeting minutes mention CLE as a group company. Signatories of CLE's bank accounts were all having email IDs from the Reliance ADA group domain, that is, @ Other supporting data include statements of key management personnel (KMPs) recorded during the Sebi investigation. Also, directors and KMPs appointed in CLE were directors and executives of Reliance Group. Sebi's report alleged that Anil Ambani, by virtue of his position as chairman of Reliance Group (formerly Reliance ADAG), held over 40% shareholding in Reliance Infrastructure entities in which he had significant control and influence till March 2019. He was also nonexecutive chairman and director in R Infra till March 25, 2022.
