Louisiana to execute prisoner using nitrogen gas banned for animal euthanasia
The US state of Louisiana is set to carry out its first execution in 15 years using nitrogen gas, a method that is banned under the state's own laws for euthanizing cats and dogs.
Unless the US Supreme Court intervenes, Jessie Hoffman, a 46-year-old prisoner, is scheduled to be executed in Louisiana State Penitentiary, also known as Angola Prison.
Hoffman was sentenced to death for the 1996 rape and murder of advertising executive Mary Elliott.
If the execution proceeds, Louisiana will become only the second US state to use nitrogen gas for capital punishment.
Photo: Jessie Hoffman/ Jessie Hoffman legal team
Why Is nitrogen gas controversial?
Nitrogen gas causes death by suffocation, depriving the body of oxygen in a process called hypoxia. The method has been widely criticized as inhumane, even for animals.
The American Veterinary Medical Association states that nitrogen should not be used to euthanize conscious animals because they experience extreme distress before death.
Louisiana law explicitly bans nitrogen gas for euthanizing cats and dogs due to its inhumane nature.
A veterinarian in Louisiana, Dr. Lee Capone, recalled witnessing dogs being gassed in the 1980s and described it as horrific, with the animals showing fear, distress, and signs of suffering before they died.
Concerns over past executions using nitrogen gas
Louisiana's decision follows four recent executions in Alabama using the same method. Witnesses described disturbing scenes:
Kenneth Smith was seen shaking violently, writhing, and convulsing as he was forced to inhale nitrogen.
Alan Miller, another prisoner, shook and trembled for about two minutes before dying.
Critics argue that nitrogen gas causes immense suffering, making it a cruel and unusual punishment under international human rights standards.
Legal challenges and secret preparations
Hoffman was granted a temporary reprieve last week by a federal judge. However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, one of the most conservative courts in the US, overturned the stay on Friday, clearing the way for the execution.
Legal documents have revealed photographs from inside Louisiana's execution chamber, showing:
A blue industrial-style mask placed on the execution gurney alongside leather straps and handcuffs.
Pipes leading to nitrogen gas canisters, indicating how the lethal gas will be delivered
Did Louisiana obtain execution gas illegally?
Last year, three major US suppliers of medical-grade nitrogen—Airgas, Air Products, and Matheson Gas—banned the use of their products for executions.
Despite this, court documents show that Louisiana has acquired nitrogen gas produced by Airgas, a company owned by the French multinational Air Liquide. This appears to violate Airgas' own policy, which explicitly forbids supplying gas for executions.
The Guardian contacted Airgas for comment, but the company has yet to respond.
Growing international concern over US execution methods
The use of nitrogen gas for executions is drawing global criticism, with human rights groups and medical professionals warning against the suffering it causes. Many see Louisiana's decision as a step backward in human rights, especially considering that its use is banned for animals in the same state.
The fate of Jessie Hoffman now depends on last-minute legal appeals or intervention from the US Supreme Court before the execution scheduled for Tuesday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
5 days ago
- Business Recorder
Publicis sues India antitrust body for denying case files in ad agencies probe
NEW DELHI: Publicis has sued India's antitrust watchdog for denying access to case files in a high-profile price-fixing investigation of ad agencies, after the French group failed to get the probe stalled until it could review the documents, court filings show. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) shook India's near-$30 billion media and entertainment sector in March with dawn raids at WPP's GroupM, Dentsu, Publicis, Omnicom and many other agencies over suspected collusion over publicity rates and discounts. Details of cartel cases are kept confidential in India, but Reuters has reported that the CCI's initial assessment found the firms used a WhatsApp group to coordinate and agree on pricing, entered into secret pacts, and colluded with broadcasters to deny business to agencies that didn't comply. Concerned the CCI has not responded to its requests in recent months to provide access to case files, Publicis approached the Delhi High Court on August 11 asking judges to order the watchdog to accede to its requests, according to its non-public filing reviewed by Reuters on Thursday. Publicis and its employees in India are 'unable to understand the allegations against them and prepare a defence in the absence of the case records', it said in the filing. India raids ad giants GroupM, Dentsu and broadcasters' body over price collusion, sources say The CCI did not respond to Reuters queries, and the court is likely to hear Publicis' case next week. The filing was made by TLG India, which its court papers said 'is the legal entity that houses majority of the advertising business of the Publicis group in India'. The antitrust investigation was triggered by Dentsu disclosing alleged industry malpractices to the CCI in February 2024 under the regulator's leniency program, which allows lesser penalties for firms that share evidence of malpractice. Publicis is the first company to file a lawsuit related to the high-profile CCI investigation in court. Filings showed the company urged the CCI in July that 'further investigation remain in abeyance till' it is granted inspection of case records. CCI investigations typically take several months. The regulator has powers to impose financial penalties on the media agencies of up to three times their profit or 10% of an Indian entity's global turnover, whichever is higher, for each year of wrongdoing. Publicis' court filing also showed the CCI in July asked for a brief note from the company about its business model, and how operations are coordinated with the parent entity. On August 4, the CCI issued summons to Publicis' South Asia chief Anupriya Acharya to appear before investigators, and provide documents such as copies of key contracts involving Publicis and its Indian entities, including on revenue sharing. Acharya did not respond to Reuters queries, and Publicis has asked the court to quash the summon.
Express Tribune
04-08-2025
- Express Tribune
Giorgio Armani fined for labour violations
Italy's antitrust regulator has fined fashion group Giorgio Armani and one of its units 3.5 million euros (USD4 million) for alleged unfair commercial practices, it said on Friday. The Giorgio Armani group rejected the accusation and said it would appeal. The regulator said in a statement that the two companies "issued misleading ethical and social responsibility statements in contrast with the actual working conditions found at suppliers and subcontractors". It added that Armani outsourced most of its bag and leather accessory production to these third parties. The authority said that although the group emphasised its attention to sustainability — using it as a marketing instrument — the external suppliers, in turn, subcontracted to other producers, which in some cases employed workers illegally and in poor health and safety conditions. The issue already came up last year with Italian prosecutors, who placed one of Armani's units under judicial administration, a measure which was then lifted in February. In a statement the Giorgio Armani group expressed "disappointment and bitterness" at the regulator's decision, adding it would appeal it before an Italian regional administrative court. "(The group) always operated with the utmost fairness and transparency towards consumers, the market, and stakeholders, as demonstrated by the Group's history," it added. Last year the competition authority opened a similar investigation into LVMH-owned Dior to assess whether it had misled consumers. The French brand agreed on a number of remedies in May to settle the probe, considered by the regulator as appropriate and enough to avoid any sanctions. Earlier this year also cashmere king Loro Piana and a unit of luxury brand Valentino were put under judicial administration in Italy over worker abuses in supply chains.
Business Recorder
26-07-2025
- Business Recorder
Georges Ibrahim released after 40 years in French jail
LANNEMEZAN, (France): One of France's longest-held inmates, the pro-Palestinian Lebanese militant Georges Ibrahim Abdallah, 74, was released from prison and deported on Friday, after more than 40 years behind bars for the killings of two diplomats. At around 3:40 am (01:40 GMT), a convoy of six vehicles left the Lannemezan penitentiary with lights flashing, AFP journalists saw. Hours later, he was placed on a plane bound for Lebanon. As he disembarked in Beirut, he was welcomed by family members at the airport's VIP lounge. Dozens of supporters, some waving Palestinian or Lebanese Communist Party flags gathered near the arrivals hall to give him a hero's reception, an AFP correspondent said. Abdallah's family had said previously they would take him to their hometown of Kobayat, in northern Lebanon, where a reception is planned. Abdallah was detained in 1984 and sentenced to life in prison in 1987 for his involvement in the murders of US military attache Charles Robert Ray and Israeli diplomat Yacov Barsimantov in Paris. 'Past symbol' The Paris Court of Appeal had ordered his release 'effective July 25' on the condition that he leave French territory and never return. While he had been eligible for release since 1999, his previous requests were denied with the United States — a civil party to the case — consistently opposing him leaving prison. Inmates serving life sentences in France are typically freed after fewer than 30 years. Abdallah's lawyer, Jean-Louis Chalanset, visited for a final time on Thursday. 'He seemed very happy about his upcoming release, even though he knows he is returning to the Middle East in an extremely tough context for Lebanese and Palestinian populations,' Chalanset told AFP. AFP visited Abdallah last week after the court's release decision, accompanying a lawmaker to the detention centre. The founder of the Lebanese Revolutionary Armed Factions (FARL) — a long-disbanded Marxist anti-Israel group — said for more than four decades he had continued to be a 'militant with a struggle'. After his arrest in 1984, French police discovered submachine guns and transceiver stations in one of his Paris apartments. The appeals court in February noted that the FARL 'had not committed a violent action since 1984' and that Abdallah 'today represented a past symbol of the Palestinian struggle'. The appeals judges also found the length of his detention 'disproportionate' to the crimes and given his age.
