Christchurch man becomes first New Zealander in space
Rocket made history on board the 12th crewed flight for Blue Origin's New Shepard programme in West Texas.
Rocket told The Press the flight exceeded his expectations.
"It was incredibly intense," he told The Press.
"Just a really amazing space flight."
With a New Zealand flag in hand, Rocket and five others levelled off 105km above the Earth, where they experienced zero gravity for 11 minutes.
Blue Origin's New Shepard programme is run by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos' space tourism company.
Mark Rocket out of his seat during the sub-orbital flight on Blue Origin's NS-32 mission. Photo: Blue Origin
Rocket told The Press he experienced "fairly steady acceleration" after lift-off. But once they reached "3400km/h, the acceleration is just absolutely incredible".
When the main engine cut off and the booster separated from the rocket, the crew experienced zero gravity.
He said a highlight was doing flips in mid-air in the true darkness of space.
"It was just a totally immersive, full-on, thrilling experience," Rocket told The Press.
"So I did another backflip and jumped into the seat and within a minute you're doing quite a few Gs and it goes up to about 5Gs."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
17 hours ago
- Scoop
Law Change Could Save Farmers And Taxpayers Millions
Federated Farmers is throwing its support behind a new Member's Bill that could bring much-needed clarity to New Zealand's climate change laws - and save millions in legal costs. National MP Joseph Mooney's Climate Change Response (Restriction on Civil Proceedings) Amendment Bill aims to confirm a common-sense principle: if a person or business is complying with national climate change laws, they can't be sued for causing climate-related damage. "It sounds very obvious, but that's not how the law appears to be working right now," Federated Farmers climate change spokesperson Wayne Langford says. "It's crazy that companies like Fonterra and Dairy Holdings, who are fully meeting their legal climate obligations right now, can still be dragged into court and sued for allegedly causing harm through emissions. "We fully support Joseph Mooney's Bill, which will restore some much-needed common sense and save farmers, food processors and taxpayers millions of dollars in court costs." Climate activist Mike Smith is taking seven major New Zealand companies, including Fonterra and Dairy Holdings, to court over their greenhouse gas emissions. He says the emissions are harming Māori land and culture, and is claiming public nuisance, negligence, and breach of a duty to stop contributing to climate change. The High Court threw out two of the claims but allowed the third to proceed. After appeals from both sides, the Supreme Court has now reinstated all three claims, allowing the case to go to trial, and the matter is now back in front of the High Court. Federated Farmers says the case sets a dangerous precedent. "Every New Zealander contributes to climate change in some way," Langford says. "When you turn on a light switch, cook dinner, drive your car - even an EV - you're using energy and consuming goods. All of that has emissions behind it." In most cases, those emissions come from companies operating within New Zealand's legal framework - following rules set out under the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), reporting requirements, and other regulatory obligations. "So, it's silly stuff to then try and sue those law-abiding companies," Langford says. He points out that long-lived carbon dioxide emissions are already captured under the ETS, and the Government is actively investing in research and tools to help farmers reduce their short-lived methane emissions. "If these companies are following the rules, there has to be some certainty and protection in that, or the legal risk becomes unmanageable." Mooney's Bill would provide that certainty by spelling out in law that private legal action cannot be taken against individuals or companies for their greenhouse gas emissions, provided they're complying with climate laws already set by Parliament. "Rather than force the courts to debate and decide what the law in New Zealand is, this Bill would allow Parliament to exert its authority and define the law," Langford says. He says it's no different from how things work in other areas of law. "If a property developer gets resource consent to build a high-rise apartment, the neighbours can't turn around and sue them for the shade or noise. "That's because we recognise the developer has done everything required under the law to get permission. "Why should climate law be treated any differently?" Smith's lawsuit covers major electricity generators, petrol retailers, dairy farming and dairy processing. Langford warns that if Smith's case is successful, it would see a host of vital industries face major cost and risk. The case could open the floodgates to further lawsuits against other industries that also produce emissions, even if they're fully compliant with New Zealand's climate regulations. "In practice, the only way for those industries to avoid legal risk would be to stop emitting entirely - meaning they'd effectively have to shut down overnight." He says that would be economically disastrous and would leave the Government scrambling to urgently rewrite the law to protect the economy. "If the case is successful, Parliament will simply be forced to urgently change the law. Let's not wait for that crisis. Parliament should clarify the law now, before this goes any further." Federated Farmers is urging the Government to adopt Mooney's Bill as a Government Bill, which would significantly speed up its passage through Parliament. "Rather than wait for Fonterra and Dairy Holdings to go through a lengthy and expensive High Court process - something that will also cost taxpayers dearly - the Government should step in now and provide certainty. "We need to focus our time, energy and taxpayer dollars on solutions that actually reduce emissions, not on endless litigation against companies doing everything the law requires."
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
The Great New Zealand Road Trip - Nine Questions with rugby referee and doctor Ben O'Keeffe
How quiet and beautiful the North Shore is, especially early morning walks along Takapuna Beach. Then the quick access over the bridge into the vibrant bars, cafes and restaurants in the city makes it a great spot. Ben O'Keefe and fiancee Wilhelmina Shrimpton at their engagement party earlier this year. Photo / supplied What are your passions? I love the challenge of refereeing a test match in front of thousands of people, and I am really passionate about helping people with my medicine. I work in a pretty high-defeat role refereeing games of rugby, so it's really special when I can see a patient in clinic and they come in and thank me for helping them with an issue that they had a few weeks before. I get a buzz from that. Which New Zealander (alive or dead) do you most admire – and why? Fred Hollows. He gave the gift of sight to so many people in and outside of New Zealand. He pioneered so much in the field of ophthalmology, and his legacy lives on with his foundation and the reason for a lot of altruistic work that many ophthalmologists do around Australasia. What is your idea of perfect happiness? Time off when I am at home and relaxing with my fiancee, listening to music, cooking and making sure close family are safe and comfortable. What is your greatest fear? It used to be failing at what I am trying to achieve, but now it's more around not wanting to miss out on important experiences by being too busy. What is it that you most dislike? I'm normally pretty relaxed and not much flusters me, but I do dislike it when people are rude to one another, especially online when people choose to be negative towards one another. I have copped my fair share of it and I see a lot of it still happening to younger people. I hope we can get past this in the future. What is on your bucket list? Hot air balloon ride in Turkey at sunrise. That will be amazing. What do you hope/think NZ will look like in 10 years? I hope people are happy, interest rates are low, the cost of living comes down and the All Blacks would have won two more World Cups. Editor-at-Large Shayne Currie is one of New Zealand's most experienced senior journalists and media leaders. He has held executive and senior editorial roles at NZME including Managing Editor, NZ Herald Editor and Herald on Sunday Editor.
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Almighty debt fight in Parliament, as Nicola Willis accuses Chris Hipkins and Chlöe Swarbrick of fiscal vandalism
'That is Fitch telling us that borrowing a lot more, as Opposition parties are proposing, would lead to a credit downgrade. 'That would increase the cost of government debt and also have a flow-on effect to the cost of household and business borrowing, as New Zealand would be seen as a more risky country to lend to,' Willis said. Labour has not released a fiscal plan, which would detail how much taxing, spending, and borrowing the party plans if it wins the next election. Hipkins has previously spoken about the need to borrow to invest in infrastructure. On Tuesday, he said, when asked by the Herald, that his party's fiscal plan would chart a path back to surplus. The Green Party has released a fiscal plan that includes $99.1 billion in additional revenue made up of about $89b in new taxation and the rest in climate taxes. The plan also includes additional borrowing for capital investment and a higher deficit in the last year of the forecast period. Finance Minister Nicola Willis during her standup at the Prime Minister's usual spot, hit out at Labour and the Greens. Photo / Mark Mitchell Under their plan, net debt would be about $44b higher at the end of the forecast period, a sum equivalent to just under 10% of GDP. Fitch's commentary, calling for a return to surplus and a reduction in debt levels to keep the current credit rating, is inconsistent with the Greens' plan, which ends up with more debt and a larger deficit. However, Swarbrick said Fitch's broader social and growth analysis might be more aligned with the Greens'. In general, Fitch noted that both National and Labour Governments had brought the books back into balance after an economic shock. The agency, warned, however, that recent experience had seen surpluses delayed and this could be a problem. 'Evidence of a weakening in the culture of fiscal responsibility would affect creditworthiness,' the commentary said. Willis said Hipkins had laid his 'stake in the ground' and that Labour was 'prepared to walk away' from a 'culture of fiscal responsibility'. 'Every New Zealander will pay the price if a Labour-Greens Government puts our fiscal reputation at risk,' Willis said. 'Team of vandals' - Willis Willis said Hipkins had departed from the 'orthodoxy' of previous Labour finance ministers like Michael Cullen. 'This is an altogether different path in which he seems to be walking a lot closer to Chlöe Swarbrick and her team of vandals, who want to gaslight New Zealanders into believing that if we just spent more and borrow more, everything would be better,' Willis said. 'Michael Cullen would never allow for the fiscally reckless approach that Chris Hipkins has been signalling,' Willis said. Hipkins, heading into his own caucus meeting, said Willis's attack had more to do with the Government wanting to divert attention from a sluggish economy. He said it was 'important that the Government balances its budget'. 'I notice that Nicola Willis has yet to do that. She'll be on to her third budget next year and there's not a surplus in sight,' Hipkins said. Hipkins promised that Labour would set its own fiscal rules in its pre-election fiscal plan, but he confirmed that these would include a return to surplus. 'We do need to get the books back into surplus. No government should be aiming to indefinitely run deficits,' Hipkins said. When asked whether one of the rules would be returning to surplus at some time, he said: 'Get the books back into surplus – yes.' Fiscal plans, which function like a draft budget for a political party, are not typically released until much closer to an election. Labour says its tax policy is coming later this year. Labour's last Budget included a primary fiscal rule 'returning the operating balance before gains and losses (OBEGAL) to a surplus and aiming for small surpluses thereafter'. 'This is vintage National Party, when they're in a hole, and they're in a very big hole at the moment, start throwing mud at the Labour Party, but the reality is their hole is getting deeper, they need to work out how to get themselves out of a hole without worrying about other political parties.' New Zealand's AA+ rating with Fitch dates back to 2022. Photo / Mark Mitchell Swarbrick hit back at Willis saying that 'when these made-up economic metrics, the likes of GDP, are superseding our focus on the wellbeing of people and planet, we've kind of lost the plot'. Swarbrick said that ratings agencies actually took a 'more sophisticated approach' in assessing the Government's finances than the Treasury. Swarbrick said, 'Luxon and Willis' decisions have seen productivity growth flatline, skilled workers deserting the country and deteriorating infrastructure placed under ever more pressure. 'Ironically, financial markets have a clearer grasp of fiscal responsibility than the Minister of Finance. They reward countries that successfully build economic resilience and punish those weakened by the chronic underinvestment favoured by Willis,' she said. Pointing to Fitch's concerns about the housing market and unemployment, Swarbrick said, 'The Government's decisions to withdraw public investment, in turn generating higher household debt and simultaneously increasing unemployment, is very bad for financial stability and debt-servicing.' New Zealand is one of just 12 countries to have a AA+ or AAA rating from Fitch. The current rating was obtained in 2022, under the last Labour Government and Finance Minister Grant Robertson. New Zealand had been downgraded to AA after the financial crisis and the Christchurch Earthquake In its commentary on that decision, and subsequent reviews, Fitch has stressed that forecasts show a 'fiscal consolidation', in which the Government runs a surplus and debt declines as a percentage of the GDP. National misses election surplus promise, Labour won't say it would have cut spending had it won election At the 2023 election, both National and Labour ran on fiscal plans that showed a surplus in 2027. National promised to reduce the amount of new spending each year by a cumulative $3.3b, meaning its 2027 surplus and subsequent surpluses were slightly larger than Labour's. Beginning in 2022, the Treasury began slashing its economic growth and tax revenue forecasts. This continued in the months after the election, when new forecasts showed the surplus shrinking, and has persisted to 2025. The result of this has been lower revenue than expected, pushing the forecast surplus out into the future. This has meant that despite Willis reducing spending growth, on balance, by far more than her fiscal plan promised in 2023, the deficit and overall borrowing levels are far higher. The Treasury reckons this year's deficit will be $15.6 billion, more than 10 times larger than the $1b deficit National promised on the campaign trial. Labour promised an even larger deficit of $1.5b. Given changes to GDP and revenue projections, that deficit would have increased too. On current forecasts, a surplus, by the traditional measure, is not forecast until the early 2030s. National and Labour are scrapping over how to fix the mess. Willis, noting the Government's large deficit, refuses to spend even more on stimulus, which some hope would speed an economic recovery, ultimately restoring the books in the process. Hipkins, on the other hand, refused to say he would have cut spending to keep to his fiscal promises, had he won the election. Willis rebuffed calls for more spending to stimulate the economy, saying that this spending would be 'the end of interest rate reductions'. 'Treasury has affirmed the best way to stimulate an economy in a downturn is through monetary policy ... I am concerned that without dropping interest rates we won't see the revival we all wish to see in the construction sector, our business sector, all of the private industries that rely on being able to borrow to generate the growth that New Zealanders want to see,' Willis said. Meanwhile Hipkins, would not say whether he would have dropped his spending and borrowing commitments had he won the election. Labour's 2023 plan included just over $3b more borrowing than National's. Hipkins did not definitively say he would have made cuts in light of the deteriorating finances. 'What I indicated before the election would have been our priorities, which was looking at how you get more effective spending. 'Take health, more money on preventative healthcare, like free prescriptions and making doctors' visits more accessible has the potential to save money, because you end up with fewer people in emergency departments,' he said. Asked whether Labour would have cut its cloth had it won in 2023, Hipkins said, 'We need to accept Nicola Willis has made this worse. Increasing unemployment is at least in part because of the decisions that this Government has taken. 'If I look at areas where I wouldn't have wanted to spend extra money, I wouldn't have wanted to spend extra money on Jobseeker benefits. I would have rather kept Kiwis in work.'
