
Ottawa tabling bill to skirt impact assessment law for ‘national interest' projects
OTTAWA – The federal government is developing a 'national interest' bill to fast-track nation-building projects with a streamlined regulatory approval process as a substitute for reviews under the Impact Assessment Act.
A briefing document obtained by The Canadian Press indicates the legislation would lay out the criteria to decide if a project is in the national interest. Once that's decided, a single federal minister would be named to oversee a review process laying out how the project can be built.
The document, dated May 23, was prepared for consultations between the Privy Council Office, or PCO, and provinces, territories, and Indigenous partners on the government's major projects strategy.
PCO officials met with those partners as recently as Wednesday night to go over the proposal. It's expected to be a topic of conversation at the upcoming first ministers meeting in Saskatoon on June 2.
Prime Minister Mark Carney campaigned on a promise to push big projects forward swiftly as Canada seeks to decouple its economy from an increasingly unpredictable and unreliable United States and turn itself into an energy superpower.
He announced the plan after meeting with Canada's premiers two days before the election was called before making it the keystone of his election platform.
'We are going to build, baby, build,' Carney said in his victory speech after Canadians elected his Liberal party to a fourth consecutive mandate on April 28.
The document, identified as a 'background' paper on 'National Interest Legislation,' says U.S. tariffs and 'other trade-distorting policies have put Canada's economic future at risk.'
It then outlines the steps the government is planning to hasten the approval process for a 'small number' of major projects.
Part of the plan involves drafting criteria to decide whether a project is in the national interest.
Those criteria could include 'whether a project will make an exceptional contribution to Canada's prosperity, advances economic security, defence security and national autonomy through improved movement of goods, services and people,' the document says.
'Projects should strengthen access of Canadian resource, goods and services to a diverse group of reliable trade partners,' it says.
Projects would also be assessed against Indigenous and provincial and territorial interests and on their 'clean growth potential,' according to the document.
'Once a project is determined to be in the national interest, federal reviews will shift from 'whether' to build these projects to 'how' to best advance them,' the document reads.
'It will streamline multiple decision points for federal approval and minimize the risk of not securing project approval following extensive project work.'
The aim, according to the document, is to build more flexibility into the regulatory process and allow the government to decide that all federal regulatory requirements have been satisfied through a regulatory order. A designated minister would also have the power to impose conditions on those projects.
'The order would effectively substitute the determination for 'downstream' decisions about whether the project can proceed, including decisions under the Impact Assessment Act,' the document says.
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
That would effectively circumvent C-69, the Impact Assessment Act. Conservative critics have claimed it has prevented projects from being built.
The document says the intent is to 'send a clear signal early that will build investor confidence' and get projects built faster.
The proposed legislation would not cover decisions made by arm's length authorities or regulators, federal-provincial entities or treaty-based processes in the North, the document says. It also commits to upholding Canada's obligations under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
The document also indicates the government may have further plans for speeding up major projects — it refers to 'broader reform' required to get all projects down to a two-year decision timeline.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 29, 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Calgary Herald
40 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Bell: Danielle Smith and Alberta give Mark Carney an offer he shouldn't refuse
It is a letter. A five-page letter. Article content Article content You could call it THE letter. Whatever happens with this letter will play a big, big part in Alberta's place in Canada going forward. Article content It is dated May 16, signed by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and addressed to Prime Minister Mark Carney. Article content On Monday, June 2, this letter will be on the table when Carney sits down with the premiers in Saskatoon. Article content Article content Before Smith gets around to making her offer, she begins her letter to Carney talking about how what Alberta wants will 'address serious issues plaguing Canada's economic well-being and the very real sense of alienation felt across the West.' Article content Article content This is serious stuff. Alberta has had more than enough. Article content She says Asian customers in Japan and South Korea have told her they believe Canada needs to 'accelerate market access of our oil, LNG, ammonia and critical minerals faster.' Article content Article content Alberta's pitch is to build out the B.C. port of Prince Rupert. Article content 'We must build on what TMX delivered by creating another pipeline that delivers similar economic uplift, jobs, opportunities for reconciliation and Canadian security.' Article content Article content The premier says an oil pipeline has to be on Carney's list of nation-building projects to be fast-tracked. Article content It will also … and read between these lines … 'send an unwelcome signal to Albertans concerned about Ottawa's commitment to national unity.' Article content Smith adds there must be 'a clear path to increasing oil and gas production so that Canada can achieve its full economic potential by avoiding the stranding of trillions of dollars of energy assets in Alberta.'


Edmonton Journal
41 minutes ago
- Edmonton Journal
Lorne Gunter: PM Carney set to worsen Trudeau's fiscal failures
Article content The first conclusion is no surprise. Trudeau's policies led to a decade of decline in the economy, industrial productivity, investment, per capita GDP, affordability and government finances. But Carney!? The man the Liberals touted as a financial genius who would correct all the failures of the Trudeau decade seems determined to repeat them. Or even magnify them. Thanks to the investigative work of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF), we now know how obscenely the Liberals inflated the federal civil service. Call it 98,000 additional bureaucrats in just 10 years — a 38 per cent increase.


Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Poilievre could face leadership review as early as March
The Conservative party's national council is expected to meet mid-June to determine when leader Pierre Poilievre will face a leadership review, but there's still no sign of an overarching review of the party's failure to defeat the Liberals on April 28. The election returned a Liberal minority government, and while some Conservatives privately say Prime Minister Mark Carney could govern for as long as four years, others say work on fixing their failure to defeat him must start now. Two Conservative sources told The Globe and Mail the party's executive director is proposing national council sign off on a March leadership review, which would give party members the chance to vote on whether Mr. Poilievre should remain as leader. The Globe is not identifying the sources as they were not authorized to speak publicly about internal party matters. But, Calgary MP Greg McLean, recently appointed to lead an economic growth council advising Mr. Poilievre, told the Globe he's been instructed to be ready to present his findings at a January convention. The party did not return a request for comment. Since the formation of the modern Conservative Party, one other leader has faced a leadership review: Stephen Harper. He lost the 2004 election, held shortly after he became leader. In the review, members voted overwhelmingly to let him stay, and he went on to win three elections. Opinion: In Poilievre's defeat, a familiar call for patience – and a new appreciation for second chances Neither of Mr. Harper's successors – Andrew Scheer and Erin O'Toole – made it to a leadership review. Mr. Scheer stepped down, and Mr. O'Toole was forced out by MPs. When asked by reporters Friday if he was worried about a challenge to his leadership, Mr. Poilievre said 'no.' 'We had the biggest vote count in our party's history, the biggest increase in our party's history, the biggest vote share since 1988 and we're going to continue to work to get over the finish line,' he said. Mr. Harper, Mr. Scheer and Mr. O'Toole all commissioned reviews of their election defeats. MPs and grassroots party members insist one needs to be done now too. One effort by MPs to get a former colleague to do a probe fell flat. Some rank-and-file party members are considering organizing to force a public discussion of what they see as the campaign's failings if public steps to address and correct them aren't taken soon. Specific frustrations include the target seat program, bottlenecks around decision making, outdated campaign literature and top-down control over what local candidates could do. But the biggest anger is around nominations, and people blocked from running at the last minute in favour of hand-picked candidates. Riding and campaign managers in Ontario and British Columbia told the Globe that national campaign manager Jenni Byrne must address those shortcomings, and step back from future campaigns, or they will try to band together to oust her. Opinion: The good and unnecessarily bad of Pierre Poilievre The Globe is not naming the sources so they could speak candidly about internal party affairs. The last Conservative convention was in 2023, so one was expected soon anyway. National council can call a convention with 90 days notice, which could also neutralize grassroots efforts to force changes as there wouldn't be enough time to engage formal policy or constitutional processes. Though Conservatives did win more seats, Mr. Poilievre lost his own. He's planning to run in a by-election for an Alberta riding. Those close to him say few major changes will be made to anything the party does until that election ends. Still, there are smaller steps being taken. Long-time Conservative communications professional Katy Merrifield will soon join the staff. Jeff Ballingall, a conservative strategist, is also being brought on to help with Mr. Poilievre's image and message. Mr. McLean, the MP leading Mr. Poilievre's economic council, said his group is working to keeping policy going in the right direction. 'What Canadians saw at the end of the day was the Liberals embracing Conservative policy positions,' he said. 'Part of what we're doing with this exercise is [ensuring] we do have the ability to continue that kind of process: 'Here are the Conservative policies, Mark Carney et al, can you please follow these policies? They're better for the country than what you've been putting forward so far.''