Lewis Hamilton joins Lululemon as brand ambassador
: Ferrari's Lewis Hamilton during the Formula One 75 Live Season Launch at the O2, London, Britain on February 18. PHOTO: REUTERS
Lululemon has named seven-time Formula 1 World Champion Lewis Hamilton as its newest brand ambassador, the company announced. The collaboration will provide Hamilton with high-performance activewear for training, recovery, and lifestyle needs while integrating his insights into future product development and innovation.
Hamilton is not only one of the most decorated drivers in Formula 1 history but also a recognized figure in fashion and advocacy. With a record number of Grand Prix victories, podium finishes, and pole positions, his impact on motorsport is unparalleled. Beyond the track, Hamilton has used his platform to champion diversity, equity, and social justice, aligning with Lululemon's broader commitment to wellness and inclusivity.
As part of the partnership, Hamilton will work closely with Lululemon's research, innovation, and design teams, contributing to the development of athletic and lifestyle collections. Additionally, the brand's Centre for Social Impact will collaborate with Hamilton's global foundation, Mission 44, to incorporate movement and mental health initiatives into their efforts to create more equitable opportunities for young people.
Hamilton will also be a key figure in Lululemon's upcoming global campaign, No Holding Back, which highlights the dedication required to succeed in high-performance sports and daily training. The campaign showcases Lululemon's latest men's training apparel, including the Metal Vent Tech franchise, reinforcing the brand's emphasis on performance and well-being.
By joining Lululemon, Hamilton expands the brand's presence in professional sports, alongside ambassadors such as PGA golfers Min Woo Lee and Max Homa, ATP tennis player Frances Tiafoe, WTA's Leylah Fernandez, NFL's DK Metcalf, NBA's Jordan Clarkson, and NHL's Connor Bedard. His involvement signals a broader push toward integrating athletic performance, advocacy, and innovation in the brand's global outreach.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Australia fight back after Rabada's fifer in WTC final
South Africa's Kagiso Rabada celebrates with teammates after taking the wicket of Australia's Cameron Green, caught out by Aiden Markram. Photo: Reuters Listen to article South Africa were reeling on 43-4 at stumps on the first day of the World Test Championship final at Lord's on Wednesday after dismissing defending champions Australia for 212. Seamer Kagiso Rabada took 5-51 as South Africa's bowling unit made a strong start to the match but their inexperienced batting line-up came under fire as soon as they began their reply. Australia's fast bowling attack proved as fearsome as anything South Africa had to offer and by the close of play they were firmly in command. "I think we're in a good spot. We've probably had a few missed opportunities with the bat to try and get a bigger total, but I think the wicket's offered something all day," said Australia's Steve Smith. South Africa trail Australia by 169 runs after a day on which 14 wickets fell and captain Temba Bavuma (3) and David Bedingham (8) will resume on Thursday with a daunting task ahead. "We feel there is a lot of opportunity still left in the contest," Rabada said. A see-saw contest started with South Africa's decision to put Australia in to bat in a calculated gamble on a good pitch but with cloudy conditions that Bavuma sought to capitalise on.. It was vindicated when Rabada and Marco Jansen took two wickets each to leave Australia struggling on 67-4 at lunch, with Marnus Labuschagne's first innings as an opener ending after 17 runs and the returning Cameron Green lasting only three balls. When the sun came out at the start of the second session, however, Smith and Beau Webster added 79 runs for the fifth wicket before Smith was dismissed by part-time spinner Aiden Markram for 66. It was the only wicket to fall in the afternoon session as Australia advanced to 190-5 at tea, only for fortunes to swing back South Africa's way after tea as they took Australia's last five wickets for 22 runs in 6.4 overs. Keshav Maharaj bowled Alex Carey (23) attempting an injudicious stroke, followed by two wickets for Rabada who removed Pat Cummins for one and induced Webster into a thick edge with extra bounce. Webster top scored with a test-best 72 in his fourth appearance for Australia. Jansen bowled Nathan Lyon to end with figures of 3-49 and Rabada completed his five-wicket haul by castling Mitchell Starc. South Africa came in to bat with 90 minutes left in the day's play and lost Markram in their first over as he chopped the ball onto his boot and then the stumps to give Starc a first wicket. The left-armer also snagged Ryan Rickelton for 16, encouraged into a drive and well caught by Usman Khawaja at first slip, as South Africa fell to 19-2. Wiaan Mulder, dropped on one, lasted 44 balls but made only six runs as he looked thoroughly uncomfortable after being promoted to number three in the order and Tristan Stubbs was clean bowled by Josh Hazlewood for two shortly before the close.
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Twilight of the Empire
US President Donald Trump gestures, as he departs for Pennsylvania, on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC, U.S., May 30, 2025. Photo: Reuters Listen to article As a series of trends and shocks cumulatively strain the old order, US President Donald Trump, even his critics must admit, possesses the fatal gift of locating the aching pulse of the nation, only to inflame it further with self-destructive measures while eroding Washington's global credibility. He sees the symptoms of American decline clearly: deindustrialisation, a brittle middle class, bloated trade deficits, and the political cost of endless wars. But he metabolises crisis into spectacle, grievance into doctrine, and interdependence into betrayal. For decades, the US has functioned as the imperial core of a global capital-recycling apparatus. The system has depended on the continuous inflow of surplus capital from export-heavy economies, including China and Germany, to America's debt-saturated financial architecture. The US trade deficit reached an eye-watering $1.1 trillion in 2023, a figure that dwarfs those of other peripheral or semi-peripheral economies like India. In this light, Trump's populist howl against the 'indignity' of the American people, dispossessed in the very belly of global wealth, is not entirely misplaced. His instinct that endless wars serve as spectacles to obscure the real mechanism of American hegemony – the global dollar-debt regime – is accurate in a crude, pre-theoretical sense. Since the late 1960s, when America ceased being a surplus nation, its geopolitical muscle has rested not on production but on its control of the dollar as the global reserve currency. The military-industrial complex is merely the theatrical wing of a deeper financial imperialism. However, Trump is radically mistaken in his belief that punitive tariffs and protectionist swagger will resurrect 'Middle America.' Tariffs, in the late neoliberal stage, cannot revive industrial capacity gutted by decades of offshoring and rentier capitalism. Instead, they risk destabilising the very mechanism whereby America's status as a debtor empire is transformed into an asset: the recycling of dollar-denominated debt into US capital markets. If that circuit is broken, the paper wealth of Wall Street and the speculative empires of Trump's own class will collapse. To materially uplift the working and lower-middle classes that fuelled his electoral resurgence, Trump would have to declare war not on China or Brussels, but on Manhattan and Malibu, hedge funds, private equity, and speculative real estate. 'Asymmetric interdependence' For much of the post-World War II period, what was marketed as 'globalisation' was, in fact, an imperial project cloaked in liberal universals. It was the projection of American state-capitalist hegemony through a scaffold of multilateral institutions – the IMF, World Bank, WTO, NATO – and the sacrosanct status of the dollar as the planetary currency-signifier. These were not neutral frameworks but instruments of asymmetric interdependence: the United States exported capital, debt, and ideology, while importing dependence, discipline, and surplus labour from the periphery and semi-periphery. The so-called "Washington Consensus" was never a consensus but a diktat. The system also functioned through a deeper ideological fantasy that free markets and global rule-based order were apolitical, universal, and benign. However, even most liberal-internationalist critiques warn the fantasy is fraying. The very interdependence that sustained US primacy is in retreat. Firms and governments worldwide need American consumers, capital markets, and alliances, giving Washington soft coercive power. Trump's tactics have upended that balance. By 'assailing interdependence,' the administration is chipping away at the very basis of American advantage. Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye argue that order depends on stable power balances, shared norms, and sustaining institutions. Trump has shaken all three. What follows is a deeper drift into disorder, one that won't resolve until Washington either reorients itself or is overtaken by a new dispensation. The plunge may already be underway. 'In his erratic and misguided effort to make the United States even more powerful, Trump may bring its period of dominance—what the American publisher Henry Luce first called 'the American century'—to an unceremonious end,' they write in a Foreign Affairs essay. The weaponisation of the global economy hollows out the very symbolic order the US once used to legitimate its rule. By shrinking its adversaries' strategic space, Washington also corrodes the interconnected lattice that once lent credibility and allure to its empire. A tariff here, a blacklist there, and the freezing of foreign bank reserves – each may win tactical advantage, but at the cost of eroding the trust that underpinned the liberal international order. After all, what merchant or government would dare anchor long-term plans to a system where every node can be severed by a presidential signature? Trump's disruption is risky for the US precisely because new economic blocs are emerging from the wreckage of Western hegemony. Many leaders of the Global South remember colonialism and feel the 21st century liberates them from Western diktats. Where the US once posed as the sole path to progress, China's tech power and Russia's security reach now appear less like threats and more like counterweights. On soft power's front, when natural disasters strike or epidemics spread, Western-style NGOs and media have lost some of their framing power, as Chinese and Russian aid convoys now appear on television alongside those from the Red Cross. The velvet-glove diplomacy of the Cold War years – teddy bears over bombers – has been largely replaced by quarantine diplomacy, vaccine pledges, and once-dominant American development agencies playing second fiddle to Belt-and-Road contracts. In May, a major Democracy Perception Index reported that majorities of people worldwide now see the US negatively. The pollster noted that after Trump's return to the White House, America's reputation 'took a particularly massive hit in EU countries' and fell sharply everywhere. Even NATO founder Anders Fogh Rasmussen sighed that the US' standing was 'unloved' across most of the world. By contrast, China's image is improving globally, even overtaking the US in overall favourability in most regions. At home, the US is cannibalising its future. Budget cuts to core research agencies like the NSF and NIH are hollowing out the very ecosystem that once drove American innovation. Labs shrink, fellowships vanish, and global talent turns to Beijing, Singapore, or the UAE – where funding flows and visas follow. Meanwhile, China invests aggressively in semiconductors, AI, and green tech, eroding the US edge. As Oxford's Carl Benedikt Frey puts it, Trump's agenda risks dismantling the pillars of US innovation. Technological leadership is not a birthright but is built. And Washington is letting it rot. Trump's move to turn tariff-penalties and export bans into blunt instruments has worried many that he was abandoning existing rules and undermining the soft power that Washington has spent decades building. Analysts argue that American power rests on a blend of hard force and attraction, even though this very soft power has enabled hard power interventions. Interdependence with trading partners and multilateral institutions generates US leverage, while global admiration for 'American culture and ideals' makes allies pliant, they argue. Trump's assault on trade pacts and international agencies undercuts the foundation of American power and accelerates the erosion of the postwar order. In principle, if American power were absolute, it could force partners into line indefinitely. In practice, aggressive trade measures are sowing resentments. Many countries have been party to US-led trade deals expecting mutual benefit – now they wonder if Washington will simply upend their exports to punish political stances. The WTO and other legal venues, for a long time arenas where small states could begrudge larger ones, are being largely sidelined. Without clear enforcement, the most vulnerable economies will look for alternative blocs or simply bribe each other to stay out of the US orbit. The cruellest irony is that by inflicting pain on others – or threatening to – the US is undermining the very goodwill and partnerships that underpinned its postwar hegemony. The writer is a Lahore-based senior journalist
Express Tribune
14 hours ago
- Express Tribune
US China trade deal: Chinese stocks surge as Hang Seng Index rises after US-China trade deal announced
Chinese stocks rose on June 11, bolstered by signs of easing trade tensions between the United States and China after a two-day meeting in London. The meeting saw both countries agree on a preliminary framework to de-escalate trade conflicts, which helped restore investor confidence. As reported by Bloomberg, the onshore CSI 300 Index, which tracks the largest companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges, gained 1%, marking its most significant rise in nearly a month. Meanwhile, a measure of Chinese stocks listed in Hong Kong advanced by 0.9%, reaching its highest point since March. The market rally followed the announcement of an agreement between the US and China, which focused on the implementation of consensus reached earlier in Geneva. Progress made in the trade talks, coupled with positive rhetoric from both sides, has raised hopes that the dispute between the two largest economies in the world could be heading towards resolution. The agreement also addresses China's export restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets, which have been a point of contention between the two nations. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed the framework at the conclusion of the London talks, highlighting its potential to put the trade truce back on track. US and Chinese officials agreed on a framework to put their trade truce back on track and resolve China's export restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said — Reuters (@Reuters) June 11, 2025 However, market reactions were largely muted, with S&P 500 futures showing little movement, and only modest fluctuations in the offshore yuan. Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone, noted that the lack of significant market reaction suggested that the outcome of the talks had already been priced in. The Daily Fix – Big trading levels in full view US-China talks continue to progress well – superficially, at least – with talks set to spill over for a third day - a factor that keeps the bid in risk and the sellers feeling they may be able to execute orders at higher/better… — Chris Weston (@ChrisWeston_PS) June 10, 2025 'The devil will be in the details,' Weston said, emphasising the importance of how rare earths exports to the US are handled and the subsequent access for US-produced chips to China. Despite the limited immediate impact on market movements, the outlook for a resolution in the trade conflict has provided Chinese and Hong Kong stocks with a positive boost ahead of further details from the ongoing trade talks.
