Speed limit of 20mph 'reduced crashes and deaths', TfL says
Last year, the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association branded the widening of 20mph zones "devastating" to black cab drivers.In London, 5% of roads are operated by TfL with the rest managed by London's 32 boroughs and the City of London.The 20mph speed limit was introduced across the central London Congestion Charging zone in March 2020 although more than half of boroughs now implement the same policy, TfL said.
'Clog up roads'
The authors of the report recognised the implementation of 20mph schemes "was not the sole cause of improved road safety in this time".The analysis also showed a 35% reduction of all collisions - from 2,560 to 1,715 - although the control group showed a drop of 12% would have occurred anyway.Deaths fell from 15 to nine and the number of children killed dropped from four to one.No change was observed in motorcycle-related fatalities,.
Mr McGoldrick added: "Slowing down traffic across entire areas can clog up roads, delay journeys and hit productivity, especially for tradespeople and small businesses."Rather than heavy-handed restrictions, councils and TfL should focus on targeted measures at accident blackspots, not treating every motorist like a menace."Mr Norman added: "Every death or serious injury on our roads is one too many. Slower speeds not only protect the most vulnerable, they also help create safer, more welcoming streets, and are a vital part of building a safer London for everyone."The Mayor and I are proud that London is leading the way with bold, evidence-led action to reduce danger on our roads, and we will continue working to eliminate death and serious injury on the transport network as part of our vision zero goal."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Hire car companies fine drivers for tiny scuff marks found by AI
Holidaymakers renting out cars this summer could face steep fines following the launch of AI-powered car scanners across the UK and Europe, it has been warned. Car rental firms have been accused of punishing drivers through a new fleet of robotic scanners that are picking up tiny scuffs and marks. The scanners, which capture and analyse thousands of images of a car as it is returned, are now being used at Heathrow Airport by the rental company Sixt. Uveye, a tech company which already supplies AI car scanners to Hertz in the US, is also expanding its operations across the UK and Europe. Car rental firms say the scanners make their businesses more efficient and prevent bottlenecks and traffic at their lots. However, they have already triggered a barrage of complaints from drivers who claim they have been forced to pay vast fines owing to minor scuffs. Others have also argued that they have been billed erroneously for damage already on their cars at the time of rental. One motorist told US car publication The Drive that he was charged $440 (£330) after returning a car to a Hertz rental lot in Atlanta because of an inch-long scuff on the driver's side rear wheel. Kelly Rogers, another driver, told The New York Times that she was charged $195 for a mark so small it 'could have been a shadow'. A Hertz spokesman said the digital inspections were 'introducing much-needed precision, objectivity and transparency to the process', claiming that it had scanned more than 500,000 rentals with 97pc showing no billable damage. Hertz said it does not currently use digital scanners in the UK. Meanwhile, Sixt has been accused of targeting drivers with erroneous charges for scuffs and marks that were already on vehicles when they were rented. The company said: 'We sincerely apologise for any inconvenience to the customer. This experience does not reflect our high service standards. 'In the rare event a discrepancy occurs, our team is committed to reviewing it thoroughly and resolving it promptly – as was done here in response to the customer's feedback.' 'Purely evil' The technology has sparked intense controversy on social media, with one Reddit user branding it a 'purely evil way of boosting profits by charging for wear and tear'. Sixt uses AI scanners made by the tech company ProovStation at its Heathrow airport base. Gabriel Tissandier, the chief executive of ProovStation, said in a LinkedIn post that the technology was 'redefining transparency and trust in the car rental process'. The company says its CarStation scanner 'meticulously scans every millimetre of a passing car to identify any damages or alterations, with 100pc accuracy and precision'. However, one person commenting on Mr Tissandier's LinkedIn post flagged an issue: 'I used it recently and thought it was very slick, however, it didn't pick up the damage I took photos of that wasn't logged whilst driving out. Luckily, I'd logged the damage before driving away.'
BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Driver dies in collision with lorry at Leeming Bar
A man has died after a car and a lorry collided on the A1(M) in North said the crash involved a blue Suzuki hatchback and blue Scania lorry, both travelling in the same happened at junction 51 near Leeming Bar on the northbound carriageway at 22:43 BST on said the driver of the Suzuki was pronounced dead at the scene. A North Yorkshire Police spokesperson said the road was closed for several hours to allow investigation work and enable the vehicles to be who witnessed either vehicle prior to the collision, or who has any relevant dashcam footage, has been asked to contact the force. Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Charging ahead: will the UK's new electric vehicle grant work for you?
Is it time to go electric? The UK car industry certainly thinks so and is readying for a surge in demand as a new subsidy scheme cuts the price of some electric cars by up to £3,750. With purchase prices – not to mention range anxiety – contributing to weak consumer uptake, the government grants are designed to bring the upfront cost closer to a petrol car. Making them cheaper will also give 'thousands more drivers access to savings of up to £1,500 a year in fuel and running costs compared to a petrol car', officials say. Robert Forrester, the chief executive of the car dealership group Vertu Motors, says: 'With the average new electric vehicle now costing close to £49,000, the market has drifted away from the everyday motorist. 'This grant helps correct that, opening access to a wider range of customers by making sub-£40,000 EVs more appealing and financially viable.' The £650m electric car grant (ECG) is a reboot of a previous state-backed money-off scheme to incentivise drivers to switch, before a ban on the sale of new fully petrol or diesel cars and vans from 2030. There are two tiers pegged to how green the manufacturing process is. The greenest vehicles in 'band one' qualify for a £3,750 discount while for 'band two' vehicles the figure is £1,500. All eligible vehicles must have an RRP below £37,000. The grant only applies to new cars. The good news is that consumers don't have to fill in any extra paperwork when they make a purchase. It is the manufacturer that applies for the grant, with the allocated funds deducted from the car's list price. Tom Jervis, the consumer editor at Auto Express, says that while the grant is aimed at EVs costing under £37,000 'price alone isn't enough'. 'Eligibility also depends on manufacturer commitment to emissions targets, the environmental impact of the battery and production process, and where the car and battery are built,' he says. 'It is based on lifecycle carbon costs, meaning the country of assembly and battery production play a major role.' The price and environmental conditions attached to securing a grant mean that some well-known brands, including Tesla, are not part of the scheme. To qualify the manufacturer must have a science-based target for cutting greenhouse gas emissions. These are verified by the Science Based Targets initiative, an independent body that assesses corporate sustainability plans. Vehicles made in countries where the electricity grid is more reliant on fossil fuels will get a higher score than those made in one powered by renewables or nuclear. This focus on emissions essentially excludes vehicles made in China with its reliance on coal-fired power stations. Although the scheme was launched formally in the middle of July, the full list of qualifying cars is still some way off. That's because manufacturers need to apply to be considered for funding. This week, the government announced the first. On the list are 19 models from four carmakers: Citroën, Renault, Nissan and Vauxhall. They include the Citroën ë-C3 – Auto Express's 2024 car of the year – Renault Megane, Nissan Micra and Vauxhall Grandland Electric. They are now available at the band two discount of £1,500 each. The Department for Transport (DfT) has a dedicated page on the website which it is updating on a rolling basis with the list of approved vehicles. It says it expects to approve more models over the coming weeks. The £37,000 cut-off point narrows the choice significantly in a market where about 70% of new EVs cost over £40,000. It rules out upmarket models, including the UK's bestselling EV, the Tesla Model Y, and every other Tesla on sale. No Audi, BMW or Mercedes EV would now be eligible either. The scheme's design also favours European over Chinese-built cars. 'Countries with high-carbon electricity, like China, are penalised in the grant calculations, meaning Chinese-built EVs like the MG4, BYD Dolphin, and Leapmotor models are expected to only qualify for the £1,500 tier – if they qualify at all,' says Jervis. 'South Korean brands like Hyundai and Kia are in a grey area – reliant on fossil-fuel-heavy grids but potentially meeting other sustainability metrics. Their eligibility will likely vary by model.' He adds: 'The scheme is unapologetically tilted in favour of European production with cleaner assembly and battery footprints, and this has given many manufacturers confidence that they will qualify.' The latest Nissan Leaf, which is being produced at the Japanese manufacturer's Sunderland plant, is thought to be a shoo-in for scheme qualification when it arrives in showrooms later this year. Auto Express has compiled a list of the 52 cars its writers think could qualify if they meet the sustainability criteria. A recent poll by online marketplace Carwow found that four in 10 drivers thought the scheme excluded too many of the EVs now on sale. The objective is to make budget EVs more attractive to the public as opposed to executives who lease them, or acquire them as company cars, or through salary sacrifice schemes. Carwow's Iain Reid says: 'Crucially, the grant applies to both outright purchases and leasing deals, making electric vehicles more accessible to a wider range of private drivers.' If you have your heart set on a car marque unlikely to make the cut the good news is that the scheme has triggered a wave of price cuts by manufacturers who don't want to be left behind. The Chinese brand Leapmotor has, for example, launched what it calls a leap-grant, with adverts that pose the question: 'Why wait for the government?' It has cut the price of its cheapest model, the To3, by £1,500 to £14,495 and is billing it as the 'UK's most affordable 5-door electric city car'. It has also cut the price of its C10 SUV by £3,750, bringing it down to £32,750. Other manufacturers have taken action to make sure models come under the price threshold for the scheme. Jervis says: 'Both the Vauxhall Grandland and Renault Scenic were slightly above the cut-off when the grant was first announced, but the entry point for the Scenic range has dropped by £200 and the Grandland by £400 to put both electric SUVs at £36,995. 'Getting the entry models under £37,000 is crucial for brands, as that brings the entire lineup using the same battery into eligibility.' He says Chinese carmakers GWM Ora and MG have also cut prices by up to £3,750, 'likely because they fear they won't qualify – in order to stay competitive. Volvo, Hyundai and Kia all launched offers too, and we are likely to see more brands follow suit over the next few weeks.' With the scheme scheduled to run until 2027–28 – or until the funding is exhausted – early signs point to strong demand. Carwow's Reid says: 'Traffic to our EV grant information pages surged 160% immediately after the announcement. The government's previous plug-in car grant, which ended in June 2022, helped increase electric car sales by 70% within a year. Our advice is to start researching and test-driving now. On average, the car-buying journey takes around 190 days, so being prepared means you can act fast once the grant applies to your chosen model. There's a definite first-mover advantage and today's mix of official and brand incentives may not stick around for long.' Now is a 'very good time to go and buy an electric vehicle', says Vertu Motors' Forrester. 'It's coming at a time when we are, for the first time, seeing cheaper electric vehicles on the market.' He adds: 'I think there'll be a limited number [of cars approved for grants] because a lot of manufacturers don't think they will comply and are discounting to overcome the competitive disadvantage. Whether you get a grant or not, doesn't really matter, does it? The price has come down.'
