Have your say: Is Nigel Farage stirring up tensions over asylum seekers?
The Government has promised to stop using asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament, but in the meantime it still needs places to house people.
Epping Forest District Council has been granted a temporary High Court injunction to block migrants from being accommodated at the town's Bell Hotel.
And of course Nigel Farage sees an opportunity here, saying Reform-led councils would do 'everything in their power to follow Epping's lead.'
And a number of councils have already signalled they plan to do just that. In Hertfordshire, the Conservative-run Broxbourne Council said it was urgently seeking legal advice.
So we want to know if you think Farage is using this opportunity to stir up tensions. Let us know by taking our poll below.
The Bell Hotel in Epping has been the scene of violent clashes in recent weeks after a man staying there was charged with assaulting a 14-year-old girl - which he denies.
It means every asylum seeker at The Bell has to be moved, and to make matters worse for the Home Office, other councils are expected to follow suit, with around 30,000 people being housed in hotels. Nigel Farage has said 12 local authorities where Reform are the largest party will be weighing up legal challenges.
The Reform leader is being accused of inflaming tensions after he wrote: 'Now the good people of Epping must inspire similar protests around Britain. Wherever people are concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels and who are free to walk their streets, they should follow the example of the town in Essex.
'Let's hold peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels, and put pressure on local councils to go to court to try and get the illegal immigrants out; we now know that together we can win.'
A Home Office source told the i newspaper that Farage is urging people to protest outside these hotels, saying: 'The police have a legal responsibility to keep people safe and maintain public order. This will be at the expense of them going out fighting crime.'
On Thursday night, eight officers were injured during altercations between protesters and police, with those hurt sustaining injuries to their hands as well as cuts and grazes. A video circulating on social media on the same evening showed a police vehicle driving towards a number of protesters and appearing to collide with at least one person.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: The STAGGERING amount of money Aussie taxpayers will have to fork out to pay for the Brisbane Olympics
Many Aussie taxpayers can't wait for the Brisbane Olympics to begin in 2032 - but they won't be happy to hear they'll be forking out more than $7billion to host the Games. Under a deal struck with the Queensland government, the Commonwealth has agreed to contribute just under half the cost of building when it comes to Games venues and other infrastructure. The federal government will provide $3.43billion for 17 new and upgraded venues for the Games - with the whole bill forecast to cost $7.1billion. Given the long track history of Olympics being subject to huge cost overruns, the eventual total could be far in excess of that. A large proportion of federal government's contribution will be spent on the new 63,000-seat stadium at Victoria Park as well as a 25,000-seat National Aquatic Centre in Spring Hill. In total, 37 venues across 11 Queensland cities will be used to host the 28 Olympic and 22 Paralympic sports. But given some sports won't be determined until an International Olympic Committee (IOC) meeting is staged next year, Games organisers will be forced to create a venue plan while not knowing what sports they are hosting. At the LA Olympics in 2028, there will be six additional sports: cricket, baseball, flag football, lacrosse, squash and softball. In March, Premier David Crisafulli apologised to Queenslanders for breaking a major election promise after announcing the construction of a new stadium as part of Brisbane's $7billion plan for the 2032 Olympics. Crisafulli repeatedly pledged not to build any new stadiums on the campaign trail in the lead-up to last year's state elections. 'It became a choice between the embarrassment of hosting the games at [the run-down Queensland Sport and Athletics Centre] or a new stadium at Victoria Park,' he said earlier this year. 'In the end, the choice was clear. The Games must be held at a new stadium at Victoria Park.' Crisafulli was asked how he planned to respond to claims he had back-flipped on his earlier promises. 'By being honest and copping that on the chin,' he conceded. 'I have to own that, and I will, and I am sorry. (But) it is my decision.' Following the Olympic and Paralympic Games, the new stadium will host home games for the Brisbane Lions and Cricket Australia matches. Brisbane won the rights to host the 2032 Games four years ago when the International Olympic Committee stated the city was its 'preferred candidate' based on its previous successes in hosting international sporting events.
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Majority of public back housing and developments in their area
A majority of people back the idea of new housing or developments where they live, new data has indicated. The poll of 2,005 people conducted by Public First in July found that 55% of respondents would 'generally support new buildings or developments or buildings being built in my local area'. The research found that Labour backers (72%) and young people aged 25-34 (67%) were most likely to be 'Yimby' (yes in my backyard). Reform backers (44%) and people in the East of England (44%) were the most likely groups to say that they generally oppose development in their locality, the poll found. Overall, 33% of people said that they would generally oppose development. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to put 'builders not blockers first' and 'overhaul the broken planning system'. In December, the Prime Minister announced new mandatory targets for councils when it comes to housebuilding. He said at the time: 'Our plan for change will put builders not blockers first, overhaul the broken planning system and put roofs over the heads of working families and drive the growth that will put more money in people's pockets.' In its report, The Quiet Yes, released on Thursday, Public First argued that a 'more representative planning system' is needed. The policy research organisation recommended that councils bring in changes to surveys and research on public opinion on building plans and questions about how residents would want councils to spend certain money earmarked for development. Jack Airey, director of housing and infrastructure at Public First, said: 'Most people instinctively support new development, yet their voices go unheard. 'Our research finds the public understand the housing shortage and back new homes, but the planning system doesn't reflect that reality. 'Councils and Government should build on this majority view, creating a representative planning system that unlocks support for new homes and the infrastructure communities need.' Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner has said that Labour are 'overhauling the broken planning system'. She said: 'With investment and reform, Labour is delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, unleashing a social rent revolution, and embarking on a decade of renewal for social and affordable housing in this country.'
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Lucy Connolly set to be released from prison following jail term for hate tweet
Connolly, the wife of Conservative councillor Raymond Connolly, will be released on Thursday after being sentenced last year to 31 months in custody, the Telegraph reported. She had posted on X on the day of the murder of three children by Axel Rudakubana in Southport: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it.' She pleaded guilty to inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X and was jailed at Birmingham Crown Court in October last year. Her sentence has been criticised as being too harsh, but Sir Keir Starmer defended it earlier this year. The Prime Minister was asked in May about Connolly's case after her Court of Appeal application against her jail term was dismissed. Asked during Prime Minister's Questions whether her imprisonment was an 'efficient or fair use' of prison, Sir Keir said: 'Sentencing is a matter for our courts, and I celebrate the fact that we have independent courts in this country. 'I am strongly in favour of free speech, we've had free speech in this country for a very long time and we protect it fiercely. 'But I am equally against incitement to violence against other people. I will always support the action taken by our police and courts to keep our streets and people safe.' Connolly's post was viewed 310,000 times in three-and-a-half hours before she deleted it. Lord Young of Acton, founder and director of the Free Speech Union, said: 'The fact that Lucy Connolly has spent more than a year in prison for a single tweet that she quickly deleted and apologised for is a national scandal, particularly when Labour MPs, councillors and anti-racism campaigners who've said and done much worse have avoided jail. 'The same latitude they enjoyed should have been granted to Lucy.'
