Liquidators appointed to marketing company Frank&Bear amid alleged misappropriation of funds
Joint provisional liquidators have been appointed by the High Court to Dublin company Frank&Bear Limited, stated to be involved in a number of significant digital marketing campaigns in Ireland, the UK, Europe and the United States.
Barrister Eoin Coffey told Mr Justice David Holland that the company, which employs 12 people, was unable to meet its debts and that two of its three directors were engaged in promoting a petition through the courts for the winding up of the firm.
Mr Coffey, who appeared with Grace Armstrong of
McCann Fitzgerald Solicitors
, said the petition was being sought by directors Niamh Haughey and fellow director Michael Corcoran, a key member of the company's senior management team responsible for running a consultancy arm by the name of 'Frankly.'
Counsel told the court that Ms Haughey, of Hollywood Grove, Newry, Co Down, had indicated in sworn written evidence opened to the court that director and financial controller David Connor of Ontario Terrace,
Ranelagh
, Dublin, had misappropriated approximately €1.75 million of company funds.
READ MORE
Ms Haughey said a forensic investigation had revealed that Connor had taken out company funds for renovations to his family home and also for the acquisition of a number of vehicles that had been applied to his personal use and for members of his family. She also stated that Connor owned a season ticket to a UK Premier League Club and had used company funds to finance family holidays.
Mr Coffey told Judge Holland that Connor had also formed the opinion that the company should be wound up but was not co-operating with the appointment of joint provisional liquidators Dessie Morrow and Diarmaid Guthrie of Azets Ireland.
Ms Haughey said Frank&Bear had been involved in a number of significant digital marketing campaigns throughout Ireland, the UK, Europe and the US and had provided consulting services to a number of well-known brands in the area of social media strategy and operations.
She had met Mr Connor when she had commenced working for an unrelated digital marketing company in May 2016 when he was CEO and majority shareholder of that company which had also employed Mr Corcoran.
In January 2020 she had been offered a role in a leading international agency and on Mr Connor having become aware of the offer he had suggested she turn it down, which she did, and go into business with him instead which she had done.
Frank&Bear was a social media and digital marketing agency specialising in creating and managing online marketing campaigns to help businesses reach and engage their target audiences and increase revenue. The company operated fully remotely and did not own or lease any real property.
To her knowledge the company had traded profitably for the period ending December 2022 but in April 2025 Mr Corcoran had been informed by a building contractor that they had carried out renovations to Mr Connor's personal property but had received payment for the works by Frank&Bear.
This had led to the forensic investigation into the financial matters of the company and she stated there had been a complete breakdown in trust and confidence between Mr Connor and herself and Mr Corcoran. Mr Connor, who had refused to co-operate with the investigation, had been suspended on full pay.
Both she and Mr Corcoran now believed the company should be wound up in the interest of employees and creditor.
Judge Holland directed that Mr Morrow and Mr Guthrie be appointed joint provisional liquidators of Frand&Bear with power to take control of all property to which the company appeared to be entitled, including books and records and power to institute legal proceedings.
The application was brought ex parte in the absence of any representation on behalf of the company and returned to July 7th.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Gardaí arrest man in his 20s in Finglas after seizing drugs worth an estimated €119,000
A man in his 20s was arrested after gardaí seized drugs with an estimated value of €119,000 in west Dublin on Friday. Gardaí from the Dublin Crime Response Team carried out a search in Finglas as part of a continuing operation targeting the sale and supply of controlled drugs. During the course of the search gardaí seized cannabis herb valued at €114,940, cocaine with an estimated value of €3,010, and ketamine valued at €1,500. Gardaí also seized €9,500 in cash, believed to be the proceeds of crime, along with drugs paraphernalia. READ MORE A man, aged in his 20s, was arrested and is currently being detained under section two of the Criminal Justice (Drug Trafficking) Act 1996 at a Garda station in Dublin. The seized drugs will be sent to Forensic Science Ireland for examination and analysis. Investigations are continuing.


Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘I 100% didn't do this', Dublin firefighter accused of rape tells Boston court
The Dublin firefighter on trial for rape over St Patrick's Day weekend last year told a Boston jury on Friday, 'I 100 per cent didn't do this. I've done nothing wrong.' Terence Crosbie (38) took the stand as the concluding witness on the fifth day of trial. The complainant, a 29-year-old attorney, claims she was raped by Mr Crosbie while his Dublin Fire Brigade colleague Liam O'Brien slept in a separate bed in a shared hotel room. She says she had consensual relations with Mr O'Brien after meeting him at the Black Rose bar in Boston. She later fell asleep in a separate bed but then says she awoke to Mr Crosbie raping her. READ MORE Mr Crosbie denied this allegation on Friday. 'There was nobody in my bed, my bed was empty,' he told the court. 'I had no physical or sexual contact with her at all.' Mr Crosbie said that he 'said hello' to the complainant at The Black Rose and was in the hotel room when she and Mr O'Brien first entered. He stated that Mr O'Brien gave him a 'look' and that he 'read between the lines and left the room'. Approximately two hours later he returned. 'I knocked on the door and got no answer and I knocked a second time and still no answer,' he said. He claimed that he 'shouted' and called for Mr O'Brien two more times and 'heard no reply.' He said that the room was dark and 'even darker' after he shut the door and that he did not see Mr O'Brien or the complainant. Shortly after he got into bed he heard someone 'rummaging around the room'. The complainant previously stated that the bathroom light was on when Mr Crosbie returned. When she broke free from underneath Mr Crosbie and escaped to the bathroom to dress, he 'was jiggling the handle' after she locked the door. Under cross examination, defense attorney Daniel C Reilly had asked the complainant if she noticed if the assailant 'had body marks or tattoos.' 'I was trying not to look,' the complainant replied. On Friday, the defense submitted photos of tattoos on Mr Crosbie's upper arms and legs. Jurors previously heard that Mr Crosbie was arrested while boarding an early flight back to Dublin after being questioned by police. On Friday Mr Crosbie said that his 'head was spinning' and that he was 'scared like a rabbit in the headlights.' He stated that he reported the police interview to his superiors at the fire brigade and that when he returned to his hotel room, he found that the door was left open and packed his suitcase. 'I didn't like the fact that someone had been in my room and the nature of the allegations being made,' he stated. Mr Crosbie also denied insulting Mr O'Brien, claiming that he would not have used the word 'friend' as the complainant alleged. 'I would say mate or buddy,' he stated. Under direct questioning, Mr Crosbie stated he would not have used the word 'loser' either, as the complainant alleged he called Mr O'Brien. 'That's not an Irish term or anything I would use,' he said. 'Does the word 'stop' mean the same thing in Ireland as it does in the United States,' Suffolk County district attorney Erin Murphy asked Mr Crosbie under cross examination. 'Yes,' Mr Crosbie said. Dublin Fire Brigade member Terence Crosbie (right) with his defence lawyer Daniel C Reilly during his trial in a Boston court. Photograph: Susan Zalkind/The Irish Times Jurors previously saw video of Mr Crosbie with his head close to an unidentified blonde woman at The Black Rose bar, prior to the alleged assault. The state used this image to identify Mr Crosbie and a Dublin Fire Brigade emblem on his jumper. Mr Crosbie had previously stated he was married and has two daughters. 'What were you doing at the precise moment the [prosecution] decided to zoom in,' Mr Reilly asked Mr Crosbie in direct examination. 'I was kissing another woman,' he said. 'Is that what you're charged with in this case?' Mr Reilly asked. 'It's not, no,' said Mr Crosbie. Jurors previously saw video of the complainant leaving room 610 of the Omni Parker hotel 20 minutes after Mr Crosbie returned in the early hours of March 15th, 2024. Two minutes later she texted a friend: 'I woke up and a guy was inside of me.' In the text she alleged the perpetrator told her she 'wanted it' and that his 'friend' was 'pathetic.' The complainant reiterated this allegation on the stand, stating that she woke up to a man raping her and that Mr Crosbie called Mr O'Brien 'a loser'. Hours later she went to the hospital to report an assault. Jurors previously heard that in her initial reports the woman did not recall Mr O'Brien's name and did not recall meeting Mr Crosbie previously. Jurors also heard from an analyst who testified two male DNA profiles were collected from the complainant. Mr O'Brien was identified as one of the males. Jurors heard that it was unclear if the second set of male DNA was that of Mr Crosbie. The defense previously called Dr Chris Rosenbaum, the director of medical toxicology for Newton-Wellesley Hospital, as an expert witness. Dr Rosenbaum testified that the complainant reported a 'prior history of binge drinking' in her medical documents and that her blood alcohol level at the time she reported the assault the next morning can 'correlate with memory loss and impairment.' Mr Crosbie has been detained in the Nashua Street Jail since his arrest. Jurors will hear closing arguments on Monday.


Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
BBC will not appeal against Gerry Adams's defamation case victory
The BBC will not appeal over Gerry Adams's defamation victory against the organisation. Mr Adams, a former president of Sinn Féin , said there needs to be 'substantial reform' of the broadcaster. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, that he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. READ MORE The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Féin leader's legal costs. After the decision, the broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it took time to consider an appeal. However, on Friday, the BBC confirmed it would not pursue an appeal. A spokesperson said: 'We have given careful consideration to the jury's decision.' 'We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences,' the spokesperson said. In a statement issued through the Sinn Féin press office on Friday, Mr Adams said the decision not to appeal by the 'British Broadcasting Corporation' has to be followed by a 'substantial reform of its internal journalistic processes and a recognition that it cannot continue to be a voice for the British state in Ireland'. He said the broadcaster must become 'more accountable to the public'. 'The Dublin court found the BBC guilty of libel and rejected its claim that its journalism was fair and reasonable and in the public interest,' he said. 'The British Broadcasting Corporation is a public service provider. There is an onus on the BBC to ensure that in the future its ethics and journalism reflect the principles and values of a public broadcast service. 'As I have already said, the damages will be donated to good causes,' he said. —Press Association