logo
Canada's Conservatives court Jewish voters in bid to break Liberal grip on key cities

Canada's Conservatives court Jewish voters in bid to break Liberal grip on key cities

Yahoo26-04-2025

TORONTO — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is making a strategic push to court Jewish Canadian votes, hoping to capitalize on growing dissatisfaction with the Liberal government's handling of antisemitism and the Israel-Hamas war.
The Conservative Party has done extensive outreach within the Jewish community in an effort to crack Toronto and Montreal in particular — voter-rich areas that typically play a key role in who becomes Canada's next prime minister.
With the Liberals entrenched in many of these seats, even small shifts in voter allegiance could tip the scales in what's shaping up to be a high-stakes battle for Canada's political future. It's a dynamic that has already led to some political swings in other elections, such as those last year in the U.S. and U.K.
'We've always had debates and disagreements about foreign issues in Canada, but those disagreements did not spill into violence on our streets. People left the violence abroad,' Poilievre said on the campaign trail regarding pro-Palestinian protests.
'The Jewish community feels understandably under siege, as these hate marches and antisemitic outbursts have become an unfortunate part of Canadian life, and Liberals have encouraged these divisions.'
Last year, an unknown person or persons fired gunshots at a Jewish elementary school in north Toronto three separate times, attacked synagogues and Jewish community centers, firebombed a Montreal synagogue, and vandalized Jewish businesses.
In a suburb of Montreal, Liberal incumbent Anthony Housefather, a Jewish candidate who has had his own campaign signs vandalized, has had to distance himself from former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's handling of the war.
While Trudeau denounced some pro-Palestinian protests on campuses, devoted new funding to fight hate crimes and enlisted Housefather to serve as a special adviser on Jewish community relations and antisemitism, many viewed the measures as insufficient.
'There was an ambiguity in certain senses where he felt there was a need to constantly mention Islamophobia and antisemitism in the same breath all the time. The constant balance of wording was frustrating for both sides,' Housefather told POLITICO.
He even considered leaving his party last year, after the Liberal caucus made a symbolic vote in the House of Commons to recognize Palestinian statehood. Many in Mount Royal, an electoral district with the second-highest percentage of Jewish voters in Canada, are displeased with a 'lack of action' to combat the rise of antisemitism in their communities, Housefather said. Meanwhile, Poilievre is vowing to bring in tougher laws around vandalism, 'hate marches that break laws' and violent attacks based on ethnicity and religion.
He's also promised to defund the United Nations agency that works with Palestinian refugees, and defund 'wokeism and fight antisemitism' in federally funded universities and museums.
Housefather said those promises have led Jewish voters who voted Liberal in the past to switch their support to the Conservative candidate, and that he has spent 'much more time' this election attempting to court them.
The Liberals continue to hold most seats in Toronto — except for a midtown district that Conservative Don Stewart won by about 600 votes in a special election last summer, in the party's first victory there for over 30 years.
With several key battlegrounds in play, Conservative candidates in the area are trying to replicate the success of Stewart's campaign.
'He showed us we can accomplish this,' Conservative candidate Roman Baber, who is running in north Toronto, said at a campaign event. Stewart declined an interview with POLITICO.
Liberals are putting in a lot of effort to win back the district under their candidate Leslie Church, but one neighborhood with a large Jewish population has been tough to break through. The Liberal campaign has been targeting the area with campaign literature regarding its stance on Israel, and volunteers doorknock regularly. But some Jewish Canadians feel Liberals haven't been doing enough to combat the rise of antisemitism in their communities following Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack into southern Israel and the Israeli response in Gaza.
'I hear those concerns every day from families and members of the Jewish community in the riding,' Church told POLITICO. 'We've had a tremendous rise in hate crimes in midtown and it's making people scared, and rightfully so.'
With antisemitism becoming an electoral issue, new Liberal Leader Mark Carney has promised to create safe bubble zones around places of worship, and to criminalize the intimidation of people attending places of worship, schools or community centers.
'In Montreal, in Toronto, across this country, [there are people] who fear going to their synagogue, fear going to their community center, fear taking their children [and] leaving their children in school, and this has to stop,' said Carney during the federal leaders debate last week in Montreal. 'It's totally unacceptable.'
A recent report from the Toronto Police Service, Canada's largest metropolitan force, says it has spent nearly C$20 million tackling rising hate crimes since the Israel-Hamas war began. Police say about half of the hate crimes reported in Toronto were against the Jewish community.
Some voters in the region say they are extremely dissatisfied with the Liberal government's handling of pro-Palestinian protests, and consider it hypocritical they're not shut down in the same fashion the federal government brought down the 'Freedom Convoy' — a series of protests supported by Conservatives that gridlocked downtown Ottawa for three weeks and temporarily blocked Canada-U.S. trade in protest of Covid-19 measures.
'I didn't necessarily agree with them — there was a global pandemic, I got vaccinated. But when I look back at how they treated those people for speaking up for Canadian values: The government froze their bank accounts and arrested them,' said Ian Jacobs, a Conservative voter based in Toronto. 'Whereas you see on a weekly basis, pro-hate rallies that justify Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, the Islamic regime in Iran, and the police let them do it. It's all backwards.'
He gestured toward the Canadian flag, a symbol he says was proudly waved during the "Freedom Convoy" protests but set ablaze at an anti-Israel demonstration — proof, in his eyes, that the country's core values are being eroded under a Liberal government.
'It's hypocritical,' he said.
Jason Daniel Baker, a writer from Toronto, is also fed up with the weekly protests in his neighborhood. After witnessing a bookstore vandalized by pro-Palestinian protesters, he decided to rejoin the Conservative Party, despite ripping up his membership 10 years ago.
'Pierre Poilievre is a lifelong supporter of Israel,' said Daniel Baker, who will be voting Conservative. 'They believe Israel belongs to the Jewish people, and so do I.'
In Jewish support groups online, people echo that message, trying to convince their relatives and neighbours to vote Conservative on Monday. Some even say they will move to Israel if the Liberals form their fourth mandate.
Conservatives hope their staunch support of Jewish Canadians can be a winning issue.
'We're going to set a different tone, and we're going to end the ugliness that we're seeing on Canadian streets,' said Baber. 'We're going to make Canada safe for the Jewish community.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters to the Editor: Why pro-Palestinian protests can actually help protect Jewish students
Letters to the Editor: Why pro-Palestinian protests can actually help protect Jewish students

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Letters to the Editor: Why pro-Palestinian protests can actually help protect Jewish students

To the editor: Although I have no qualms calling out President Trump's exploitation of antisemitism charges to silence dissent and defund education, I object to this article's premise that the college protests make Jews unsafe and would argue the opposite is true ('Being Jewish on campus amid Trump's campaign against antisemitism: 'tremendous heartache,'' June 9). Pro-Palestinian protests on campus increase Jewish people's safety because they challenge the normalization of Israel's bombardment and blockage of food, water, medicine and fuel on a starving and caged population in Gaza. Once we normalize and arm the slaughter and imposition of starvation on Gaza, we normalize crimes against humanity everywhere, leaving us all unsafe. Moreover, Israel's proclamation that it is the state of the Jewish people unfairly associates Jews worldwide with its policies of apartheid and ethnic cleansing. I live in Santa Barbara, where I supported the UCSB encampment in the spring of last year and continue to applaud students of all denominations who say, 'Never again means never again for anyone.' Equating such protests and encampments with antisemitism does us all a disservice. I do not want to be associated with Israel's war crimes, as alleged by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the International Court of Justice and International Criminal Court, and appreciate the opportunity to participate in the anti-Zionist group Jewish Voice for Peace. Not in our name! Marcy Winograd, Santa BarbaraThis writer is a member of the California legislative team for Jewish Voice for Peace.

Arizona Gov. Hobbs vetoes antisemitism bill, citing 'attack' on public schools
Arizona Gov. Hobbs vetoes antisemitism bill, citing 'attack' on public schools

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Arizona Gov. Hobbs vetoes antisemitism bill, citing 'attack' on public schools

Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed a bill that would have allowed students and their parents to sue K-12 and university teachers and potentially make them pay damages for teaching or promoting antisemitism. Hobbs announced the veto of House Bill 2867 in a letter June 10. In it, she said the bill was "not about antisemitism" but rather, "it's about attacking our teachers. It puts an unacceptable level of personal liability in place for our public school, community college, and university educators and staff, opening them up to threats of personally costly lawsuits." She rebuked the Legislature, writing, "It is disappointing to yet again see this Legislature single out and attack our public education system." The governor said despite the veto, she continues to stand with the Jewish community against hate and remains "committed to fighting antisemitism in all its forms." Students who experience antisemitism in the classroom already can report unprofessional conduct to the State Board of Education, Hobbs said. She said she was "confident that by using those tools, we can fulfill our moral and legal responsibility to eradicate hate and discrimination in our public school system." Hobbs also pointed to several Jewish groups that opposed the bill, including the National Council of Jewish Women Arizona, the Tucson Jewish Museum & Holocaust Center and the Rabbi Joseph H. Gumbiner Community Action Project. HB 2867 would have prohibited teachers, administrators, contractors and volunteers at K-12 public schools and public or private universities from: teaching or promoting antisemitism; requiring students to advocate for anti-Semitic points of view; and receiving professional development "in any antisemitism" that creates a "discriminatory" or "hostile" environment. The proposal provoked concern from public-school advocates about exacerbating the teacher shortage and had raised red flags about First Amendment violations due to what the proposed law considered "antisemitism." The Arizona Education Association, the main teachers' union in the state, and the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona had urged Hobbs, a Democrat, to veto the bill. The teacher's union said the bill "weaponizes legitimate concerns about antisemitism to attack public education" by stripping teachers of professional liability protections. The ACLU said it would "chill the First Amendment rights of students, teachers, speakers and administrators" and target those who criticized Israel. The bill included specific examples of speech the state would have prohibited, which a Federal District Court in Texas said amounted to "viewpoint discrimination that chills speech in violation of the First Amendment" when used to punish university students. Arizona's bill mostly applied to teachers, but one provision targeted university student groups — a fact First Amendment expert Eugene Volokh said was "pretty clearly unconstitutional." Supporters of the bill, such as sponsor Rep. Michael Way, R-Queen Creek, said it was needed because existing anti-discrimination laws "either weren't clear enough or didn't contain the necessary enforcement mechanism to address this problem." Rep. Alma Hernandez, a Democrat from Tucson and co-sponsor of the bill, was another vocal proponent of the legislation. Neither she nor Way immediately responded to requests for comment regarding Hobbs' veto. Could teachers be sued? Under a bill on Hobbs' desk, Ariz. teachers could be sued for what they say in classroom Taylor Seely is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at The Arizona Republic / Do you have a story about the government infringing on your First Amendment rights? Reach her at tseely@ or by phone at 480-476-6116. Seely's role is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Arizona Gov. Hobbs says antisemitism bill an 'attack' on schools

British citizens among 9,000 immigrants to be sent to Guantanamo
British citizens among 9,000 immigrants to be sent to Guantanamo

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

British citizens among 9,000 immigrants to be sent to Guantanamo

At least 9,000 undocumented immigrants, including British citizens, are to be sent to Guantanamo Bay detention camp, according to reports in the US. The first transfers are due to start within days, as the Trump administration ramps up its campaign to deport illegal immigrants. In January, Donald Trump announced plans to house 30,000 migrants in the notorious camp on Cuba, which was previously used as a military prison to house combatants captured during George W Bush's 'war on terror' following the September 11 attacks on the US. According to documents seen by Politico, the plan is to hold the migrants at the camp for a short period before deporting them back to their home country. Guantanamo currently holds roughly 500 people. This move represents a further toughening of the administration's immigration policy, which has seen masked snatch squads lifting suspected illegal immigrants off the streets. The official reason for detaining migrants at Guantanamo is to free up space in migrant detention centres in the US itself, especially with the White House setting a target of 3,000 arrests a day. However, critics say the administration believes using Guantanamo will serve as a deterrent for new illegal immigrants and encourage those already in the country to self-deport. An estimated 800 Europeans are on the list of potential Guantanamo detainees, with the Washington Post saying they include British and French citizens. It is a move which has reportedly alarmed European diplomats, given that they have previously co-operated in the repatriation of their own citizens. 'The message is to shock and horrify people, to upset people,' one State Department official told Politico. In Washington, a court is considering a plea to outlaw the use of Guantanamo to house migrants, with the American Civil Liberties Union claiming they are being held in dire conditions in a rodent-infested camp, where detainees are denied a weekly change of clothing and adequate food. In its writ, the ACLU accused the administration of using Guantanamo 'to frighten immigrants, deter future migration, induce self-deportation, and coerce people in detention to give up claims against removal and accept deportation elsewhere'. This was denied by the US Justice Department, which told the court that Guantanamo is being used as a temporary staging post. Previously, nine British citizens were held at Guantanamo, of which five were repatriated in March 2004. A further nine who had residency status in the UK, but not citizenship, were also held at the camp. The State Department confirmed that 'illegal aliens' were being sent to Guantanamo as a temporary measure, but declined to comment on discussions with individual foreign governments regarding their citizens. The Telegraph also approached the Department of Homeland Security for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store