
More and more adults are wondering if they have autism. These signs could help with a diagnosis
Natasha Nelson, a 35-year-old entrepreneur in the United States, didn't know why people meeting for the first time would choose to engage in small talk instead of deep conversations, or why people like to make their beds.
Then, a few years ago, she was diagnosed with autism, just after her youngest daughter received the same.
In the US, a study published last year in JAMA Network Open showed a 452 per cent increase in autism diagnoses among US adults aged 26 to 34 from 2011 to 2022.
A 2021 study in the United Kingdom, meanwhile, found that between 1998 and 2018, there had been a 787 per cent increase in autism diagnoses.
The researchers of that study, which was published in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, said this could be due to increased prevalence or "more likely, increased reporting and application of diagnosis".
"Rising diagnosis among adults, females, and higher functioning individuals suggest augmented recognition underpins these changes," the authors added.
Here's more information on what you should know about adult autism diagnoses.
What is autism and when is it usually diagnosed?
Autism spectrum disorder is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by a range of intellectual, language, and social difficulties, like rigidly following routines, having fixed or obsessive interests, and struggling to hold eye contact or understand nonverbal communication.
Autism typically manifests during early childhood before the age of 3, according to France's Pasteur Institute.
The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends all children be screened as early as 18 months.
Why are more adults being diagnosed with autism?
More adults have sought insight into their own neurodiversity in the last decade, often after their children are diagnosed or after seeing social media posts.
Some traits of autism can go unnoticed until adulthood when there are new social demands. Others may have learned how to hide certain behaviours, known as masking.
"Adults have learned to compensate over time," said Whitney Ence, a psychologist at the University of California San Francisco who works with autistic adults.
"They may have learned like 'I can't display that in public, and so I do that in private'".
There's also an overlap of symptoms between various disorders like ADHD and OCD that can complicate an autism diagnosis due to difficulties with nonverbal social cues or executive functions like attention span, working memory, and problem-solving.
What are the symptoms of autism in adults?
Symptoms present differently for everyone, and many of the traits are common for people without autism, like enjoying routines or enjoying going down rabbit holes of information.
But to meet the diagnostic definition of autism, the symptoms must cause significant impairment, said Dr Arthur Westover, a psychiatrist who specialises in autism at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
"We're human beings in general. We like routines... just having a bit of pleasure and feeling better with routines does not mean you're autistic," Westover said.
"It goes a little bit deeper than that".
Russell Lehmann, 34, has lived with his autism diagnosis for more than 20 years. The motivational speaker has routines that he describes as both comfortable and stressful.
Eating the same food and buying the same groceries, he said, brings him comfort. But if he skips going to the gym for an hour and a half every day, he becomes overwhelmed with feelings of depression and failure.
"It's like no gym, no day," he said, calling the routine "an incredibly existential burden".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


AFP
4 days ago
- AFP
'Make America Healthy Again' report cites nonexistent studies: authors
The highly anticipated "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) report was released on May 22 by the presidential commission tasked with assessing drivers of childhood chronic disease. But it included broken citation links and credits authors with papers they say they did not write. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt downplayed the errors as "formatting issues" during a press briefing on May 29 (archived here). "It does not negate the substance of the report," said Leavitt, who expressed confidence in Kennedy and his team, and insisted their work was "backed on good science." Image White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt takes questions during the daily briefing at the White House in Washington, DC, on May 29, 2025 (AFP / Jim WATSON) The issues were first reported May 29 by NOTUS (archived here), a US digital news website affiliated with the nonprofit Allbritton Journalism Institute. Noah Kreski (archived here), a Columbia University researcher listed as an author of a paper on adolescent anxiety and depression during the Covid-19 pandemic, told AFP the citation is "not one of our studies" and "doesn't appear to be a study that exists at all." The citation included a link (archived here) that purported to send users to an article in the peer-reviewed medical journal JAMA Pediatrics, but it was broken. Jim Michalski, a spokesman for the JAMA Network (archived here), said it "was not published in JAMA Pediatrics or in any JAMA Network journal." Columbia University epidemiologist Katherine Keyes (archived here), who was also listed as an author of the supposed JAMA study, told AFP she does research on the topic but does not know where the statistics credited to her came from, and that she "did not write that paper." She expressed concern about the error saying: "Citation practices are an important part of conducting and reporting rigorous science." She said she would be happy to send her actual research on depressive symptoms in adolescents and young adults "to the MAHA committee to correct the report, although I have not yet received information on where to reach them." Guohua Li, another Columbia University professor named in the citation (archived here), said the reference is "totally fabricated" and that he does not even know Kreski. AFP also spoke with Harold Farber, a pediatrics professor at Baylor College of Medicine (archived here), who said the paper attributed to him "does not exist" nor had he ever collaborated with the co-authors credited in the MAHA report. Similarly, Brian McNeill, spokesperson for Virginia Commonwealth University, confirmed that professor Robert Findling (archived here) did not author a paper the report says he wrote about advertising of psychotropic medications for youth. A fourth paper on ADHD medication was also not published in the journal Pediatrics in 2008 as claimed in the MAHA report, according to the journal's publisher, the American Academy of Pediatrics. A keyword search reveals a blog post with the same title as the purported paper, "Direct-to-consumer advertising and the rise in ADHD medication use among children" but it has a different author and is not a peer-reviewed publication (archived here). The Democratic National Committee blasted the report as "rife with misinformation" in a May 29 press release, saying Kennedy's agency "is justifying its policy priorities with studies and sources that do not exist" (archived here). Citations edited The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) declined to comment, referring AFP's questions to the White House. At her briefing, Leavitt declined to answer how the report was produced and whether artificial intelligence tools may have been used to craft it, directing those questions back to HHS. t reported its analysis of the citations showed "oaicite" was attached to the URLs, the presence of which indicates the use of artificial intelligence products from OpenAI (archived here). Within hours of the briefing, an edited version of the report replaced the original paper on the White House website (archived here). Changes are not flagged or marked as corrections, but the four citations investigated by AFP were replaced with working links. The modifications are as follows: The paper said to come from the team at Columbia University was swapped out for a reference to a briefing on the Teen National Health Interview Survey published by KFF (archived here). The nonexistent paper credited to Farber was replaced with a paper on oral corticosteroid medication prescribed for asthma he published in Pediatrics in 2017 (archived here). An article published in the journal Psychiatric Services in 2006 replaced the paper initially credited to Findling (archived here). The reference to a paper on ADHD medication advertising was supplanted by a 2013 article from The New York Times (archived here) Concerns about Kennedy The revelations about the MAHA study came just a day after Kennedy attacked major medical journals, accusing them of collaborating with the pharmaceutical industry and threatening to bar government scientists from publishing in them. Kennedy was approved as health secretary earlier this year despite widespread alarm from the medical community over his history of promoting vaccine misinformation and denying scientific facts. Since taking office, he has ordered the National Institutes of Health to probe the causes of autism -- a condition he has long falsely tied to the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. The report's chronic disease references appear to nod to that same disproven theory, discredited by numerous studies since the idea first aired in a late 1990s paper based on falsified data. It also criticizes the "over-medicalization" of children, citing surging prescriptions of psychiatric drugs and antibiotics, and blaming "corporate capture" for skewing scientific research. Image US Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) (L) look on as Director of the National Institutes of Health Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharya holds up a copy of a MAHA health report during a MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) Commission Event in the White House in Washington, DC, on May 22, 2025. A White House report detailing Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s priorities devotes sizable space to stoking fear about vaccines -- even as it tackles more grounded worries over chemicals and diet. (AFP / Jim WATSON) Read more of AFP's reporting on health misinformation here. Gwen Roley and Manon Jacob contributed reporting to this article.


France 24
5 days ago
- France 24
'Make America Healthy Again' report cites nonexistent studies: authors
The highly anticipated "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) report was released May 22 by the presidential commission tasked with assessing drivers of childhood chronic disease. But it includes broken citation links and credits authors with papers they say they did not write. The errors were first reported Thursday by NOTUS, a US digital news website affiliated with the nonprofit Allbritton Journalism Institute. Noah Kreski, a Columbia University researcher listed as an author of a paper on adolescent anxiety and depression during the Covid-19 pandemic, told AFP the citation is "not one of our studies" and "doesn't appear to be a study that exists at all." The citation includes a link that purports to send users to an article in peer-reviewed medical journal JAMA, but which is broken. Jim Michalski of JAMA Network Media Relations said it "was not published in JAMA Pediatrics or in any JAMA Network journal." AFP also spoke with Harold Farber, pediatrics professor at Baylor College of Medicine, who said the paper attributed to him "does not exist" nor had he ever collaborated with the co-authors credited in the MAHA report. Similarly, Brian McNeill, spokesperson for Virginia Commonwealth University, confirmed that professor Robert Findling did not author a paper the report says he wrote about advertising of psychotropic medications for youth. A fourth paper on ADHD medication, was also not published in the journal Pediatrics in 2008 as claimed in the MAHA report. "I can confirm that we didn't find that title in a site search," said Alex Hulvalchick, media relations specialist for the journal's publisher the American Academy of Pediatrics. The Department of Health and Human Services declined to comment, referring questions on the apparent errors to the White House. Kennedy was approved as health secretary earlier this year despite widespread alarm from the medical community over his history of promoting vaccine misinformation and denying scientific facts. Since taking office, he has ordered the National Institutes of Health to probe the causes of autism -- a condition he has long falsely tied to the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. The report's chronic disease references appear to nod to that same disproven theory, discredited by numerous studies since the idea first aired in a late 1990s paper based on falsified data. It also rails against the "over-medicalization" of children, citing surging prescriptions of psychiatric drugs and antibiotics, and blaming "corporate capture" for skewing scientific research.


Euronews
07-05-2025
- Euronews
Scientists think genetics could explain how old babies are when they start walking
ADVERTISEMENT Whether babies take their first steps at nine or 15 months depends on a lot of factors – including their genes, a new study has found. New parents wait with bated breath for their babies to begin walking independently, which is an important early sign of child development. But the exact age that they start hinges on their size, whether they were born early, if they've had the chance to practice walking, and their nutrition, among other conditions. Now, the study indicates 11 genetic markers can explain about a quarter of the variation in when babies start walking on their own. Related No link between COVID vaccines and infection during pregnancy and developmental delays in toddlers 'Parents can provide a constructive environment and support their children, but they're not 100 per cent in control,' Angelica Ronald, the study's senior author and a professor of psychology and genetics at the University of Surrey in the UK, told Euronews Health. 'Genes also influence this timing'. The study was published in the journal Nature Human Behaviour and included nearly 71,000 children in Norway, the Netherlands, and the UK. The genes that influence the age at which children learn to walk overlap closely with genes that affect both brain size and how many folds are on the outer layer of the brain, which is associated with cognitive function, the analysis found. Related Why experts are warning parents not to give their kids dietary supplements like vitamins Notably, the genes tied to early walking also overlap with those linked to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The researchers hypothesised that more active babies with shorter attention spans could move around more, giving them more practice walking earlier. Meanwhile other research has shown that learning how to walk late – beyond around 18 months – can be an early sign of intellectual disabilities. The new findings 'suggest that the genes influencing the age of onset of walking are quite central to development across a range of areas,' Ronald said. Related Young people's eating disorders could be linked to lagging brain development, study finds Going forward, Roland's team plans to study how genes interact with the environment to shape young children's development, with the goal of identifying the most ideal settings for infants to grow up. But for now, she said the results should help assuage parents' worries that they aren't doing enough to help their babies walk unassisted. 'We put a lot of emphasis on kids who do things quicker than others,' Ronald said, but 'there are probably advantages to walking later and walking earlier'.