Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene scooped up stocks as the market crumbled last week
Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene made several stock purchases as the market tanked last week over President Donald Trump's tariffs.
Lululemon, Dell Computer, Amazon, the parent of Restoration Hardware, and a few others hit hard by Trump's tariff threats were down 40% on average late last week, and according to the Associated Press, Greene pounced on all of them.
Data from a required three-page financial holdings document doesn't disclose exactly how much she paid for the stocks, only ranges and dates.
Some are working out so far, at least as of Wednesday's close.
RH, formerly called Restoration Hardware, is Greene's clear winner. It jumped more than a third since Friday's close when she bought it after a stunning collapse in price that shook even the head of the furniture retailer.
'Oh, sh…!,' said RH CEO Gary Friedman in a conference call last week as the stock plunged.
TRENDING STORIES:
LIVE UPDATES: Severe Thunderstorm Warnings issued for several metro counties
6 charged after shooting at Marietta apartment complex leads to chase, crash
Pregnant woman, 19, killed in apparent murder-suicide in Austell, police say
Dell went up 9% since Greene bought the stock last week after it had lost more than half its value.
Lawmakers from both major parties have proposed bills banning members from stock trading because of the apparent conflict of interest in owning shares of companies they can heavily influence with positions they can take in office.
But none of the bills - The Transparent Representation Upholding Service and Trust in Congress Act, for instance - have been passed. A new bill, The End Congressional Stock Trading Act, was proposed last month.
Asked whether she made the stock purchases herself and about possible conflicts of interest, Greene said in a statement: 'I have signed a fiduciary agreement to allow my financial advisor to control my investments. All of my investments are reported with full transparency.'
The MAGA supporter has been outspoken in her support of Trump's tariffs.
'Tariffs are a powerful proven source of leverage to protect our national interests,' she posted on X earlier this year, adding, 'We will win this trade war.'
Investors are not completely convinced.
After surging on Wednesday when Trump called a partial halt to the import taxes, stocks were heading down again on Thursday.
The Associated Press contributed to this article.Sign in to access your portfolio
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Least Favorite Words, in One Terrifying Song
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Last year, a lot of indie-music fans—including myself—got someone else's packing list stuck in their head. I'd walk around muttering 'Milk thistle, calcium, high-rise, boot cut / Advil, black jeans, blue jeans'—lyrics hissed out by the art-punk legend Kim Gordon on a song called 'Bye Bye.' The track led off her album The Collective, one of the most acclaimed releases of 2024. Over hard hip-hop beats and snarling guitar distortion, Gordon stammered about daily banalities, reframing modern life as a psychological war zone. Now the 72-year-old co-founder of Sonic Youth has released a new version of the song, called 'Bye Bye 25.' The music is largely the same, but the lyrics are new, and they start like this: mental health electric vehicle Gulf of Mexico energy conversion gay bird flu These are among the terms that the Trump administration has tried to minimize from public life. PEN America has assembled a list of at least 350 phrases that federal authorities have, this year, scrubbed from government websites and materials (including school curricula), flagged as necessitating extra review in official documents and proposals, or discouraged the use of among staffers. The attention paid to these words reflects Trump's crusade against diversity, equity, and inclusion, as well as his team's stances on policy issues such as energy and vaccines. Gordon picked some of these words to rework 'Bye Bye'—making her, somewhat curiously, one of the few established musicians to release music directly inspired by Trump's second term. For all the chaos and consternation caused by the president this year, the entertainment world's response has been relatively muted. Bruce Springsteen, that liberal stalwart, kicked off his tour with an anti-Trump sermon; stars such as Doechii and Lady Gaga have made awards-show speeches in support of immigrants, trans people, and protesters. But outright protest music responding to recent events has been rare. 'I think people are kind of mostly just still stunned and don't know what to do,' Gordon told me in a video chat earlier this week. The memory of what happened the last time around might be contributing to the hesitation. Trump's rise to power in 2016 spurred a quick response from popular culture, resulting in diss tracks (Nipsey Hussle and YG's 'FDT') and provocations from luminaries (remember Madonna wanting to explode the White House?). The indie-rock world united for a compilation called Our First 100 Days: one track released for each of Trump's first 100 days in office. But today, many of those efforts feel like either artifacts of a bygone movement—the pink-hatted #Resistance—or simply inconsequential. When I spoke with Gordon, she said, with a laugh, that she had no memory of contributing to the Our First 100 Days project. The new version of 'Bye Bye' caught my attention because it's deadpan funny, and because it avoids some of the pitfalls that await many anti-Trump protest efforts. The president and many of his supporters seem to use liberal outrage as fuel, which means strident criticism has a way of backfiring. Steve Bannon's stated strategy to 'flood the zone with shit'—to stoke multiple incendiary media narratives every day—can make knowing what to protest first difficult. The firing of human-rights workers? The extrajudicial deportations? The dehumanization of trans people? The bid to turn Gaza into a resort? How do you pick? Gordon's song cuts across topic areas by highlighting the dark absurdity of an ascendant political tactic: controlling policy by controlling language. It also doesn't sloganeer; instead, it presents a patently ridiculous jumble of terms for listeners to reflect on. (Theoretically, a MAGA loyalist might even enjoy the sound of diversity-related jargon becoming a heavy-metal hit list). 'I wanted to have some really mundane, weird words in there like allergy or measles or tile drainage,' she told me. 'It's unrealistic to think they could actually ban these words, because everyone uses them every day. But I think if they had their ultimate fantasy, maybe.' Gordon and her former band, Sonic Youth, emanate the kind of inscrutable hauteur that might seem at odds with outright protest. But this is not her first such effort in this vein. Sonic Youth arose out of the punk-rock underground of the 1980s that was boiling with outrage against Ronald Reagan. In 1992, their song 'Youth Against Fascism' featured Thurston Moore—the band's other singer, and Gordon's now-ex-husband—sneering, 'Yeah, the president sucks / He's a war pig fuck.' That same year, the Gordon-led 'Swimsuit Issue' skewered male chauvinism, a topic she returned to with the hilarious 'I'm a Man' on The Collective. Talking with her, I remembered that though Gordon is often associated with Gen X disaffection, she's really a Baby Boomer who came of age attending Vietnam War protests and listening to folk music. The video for 'Bye Bye 25' splices images from the recent anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles with shots of her holding cue cards in the style of Bob Dylan's 'Subterranean Homesick Blues' video. She told me her favorite protest song is Neil Young's 'Ohio,' which decried the state violence at Kent State University in 1970. Young, she suspected, didn't intend to write an out-and-out rallying cry. 'Those lyrics were describing a time,' she said. 'That's what I hope I'm doing with my music and my lyrics—really describing what's going on.' Article originally published at The Atlantic
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tucker Carlson splits from Trump, advocates ‘dropping Israel'
Talk show host Tucker Carlson broke with President Donald Trump on Iran on Friday, writing in a scathing commentary in his daily newsletter that the United States should 'drop Israel' and 'let them fight their own wars.' 'If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so. It is a sovereign country, and it can do as it pleases,' Carlson wrote of Israel's preemptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. 'But not with America's backing.' Trump, for his part, has endorsed Israel's attacks, which he called 'very successful,' and underscored in an interview with Fox News on Thursday night that the U.S. would defend Israel if Iran retaliates. He also warned that the situation 'will only get worse' if Iran does not agree to a nuclear deal 'before there is nothing left.' TRUMPS TAKE Trump to Fox News: U.S. will defend Israel if Iran retaliates Read more In recent days, Carlson has argued that fears of Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon in the near future are unfounded and said that a war with the Islamic Republic would not only result in 'thousands' of American casualties in the Middle East but 'amount to a profound betrayal of' Trump's base and effectively 'end his presidency.' Carlson reiterated that claim in his newsletter, accusing Trump of 'being complicit in the act of war' through 'years of funding and sending weapons to Israel.' Direct U.S. involvement in a war with Iran, he said, 'would be a middle finger in the faces of the millions of voters who cast their ballots in hopes of creating a government that would finally put the United States first.' 'What happens next will define Donald Trump's presidency,' he concluded.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump loses bid for appeals court to reconsider $5m loss to E Jean Carroll
A federal appeals court on Friday declined to rehear President Donald Trump's challenge to a $5m (£3.6m) sexual abuse and defamation suit he lost to writer E Jean Carroll two years ago. In May 2023, a New York jury awarded Ms Carroll damages over her civil claim that Mr Trump sexually assaulted her in the 1990s, and then branded the incident a hoax on social media. He denied the allegations. Mr Trump, 78, had asked for a hearing before the full US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, after a three-judge panel rejected his appeal. The appellate court did not offer an explanation, though two of the 13 judges, both appointed by Mr Trump, dissented. Ms Carroll, a former magazine columnist who is now 81, accused Mr Trump of attacking her in the mid-1990s in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan, and later defaming her on Truth Social in a 2022 post denying her claim. Mr Trump has called her accusations a lie on several occasions, claiming she was "not my type". The US Supreme Court is the last place Mr Trump can appeal the $5m decision. He has also appealed a separate jury's decision in 2024 finding him liable of defaming Ms Carroll and awarding her nearly $84m. In a statement to US media, Ms Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, said her client was "very pleased" with the news. "Although President Trump continues to try every possible manoeuvre to challenge the findings of two separate juries, those efforts have failed. He remains liable for sexual assault and defamation," she said. The BBC has contacted Mr Trump's legal team for comment. In their written two dissent, the two Trump-appointed judges, Steven Menashi and Michael Park, said the decision not to rehear the case "sanctioned striking departures" from legal precedent. Trump files appeal after $5m verdict in abuse trial Trump claims E Jean Carroll 'fabricated' sex assault
